Assessment of Weed Competition Critical Period in Sugar Beet

Year 2018, Volume: 24 Issue: 1, 82 - 89, 31.03.2018

Doğan Işık , Adem Akça

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.446394

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Weed control constitutes the most essential issue in cropping systems. The critical periods should especially be determined for each crop. Field experiments were conducted during the seasonal growing periods of sugar beet in 2012 and 2013 in Kayseri, Turkey to assess the critical weed control period (CPWC). A log-logistic model having four parameters was used to assist in monitoring and analyzing two sets of related, relative crop yield. Data was obtained during the periods of increased weed interference and as to compare, during the weed-free periods. In both years, the relative root yield of sugar beet decreased with a longer period of weed-interference and increased where there was a longer weed-free period. In 2012, the CPWC varied between 122-595 GDD (growing degree days) corresponding to 12 to 46 days after crop emergence (DAE). The following year, CPWC were found to be between 82-735 GDD, (8-54 DAE) based on 5% acceptable yield loss. Weed-free conditions are needed to be arranged as early as the first week after crop emergence and maintained up to and including nine weeks thereafter to avoid more than a 5% loss in sugar beet root yield. Those results could assist sugar beet producers through reducing the expenses significantly, as well as improving the efficacy of their weed management programs. 

Keywords

Critical period; Nonlinear regression; Weeds; Competition; Sugar beet

References

• Akça A & Isik D (2013). Determination of weed species in sugar beet field (Beta vulgaris L.) in Kayseri Province in Turkey. In: Proceedings of the 16th EWRS, European Weed Research Society Symposium. 24-27 June, Samsun, Turkey, pp. 132-141
• Bakhshkandi H, Mirshekari B, Pedram A & Alizadeh E (2013). Planting pattern could increase competitive power in sugar beet (Beta vulgaris) cultivars at interference with redroot pigweed (Amaranthus retroflexus). Life Science Journal 10: 185-188
• Bukun B (2004). Critical periods for weed control in cotton in Turkey. Weed Research 44: 404-412 Dawson J H (1977). Competition of late emerging weeds with sugar beets. Weed Science 25: 168-170
• Evans S P, Knezevic S Z, Lindquist J L, Shapiro C A & Blankenship E E (2003). Nitrogen application influences the critical period for weed control in corn. Weed Science 51: 408-417
• FAO (2015). FAOSTAT Online Database, Available from: http://faostat.fao.org/ (Accessed September, 2015) Gilmore E C & Rogers R S (1958). Heat units as a method of measuring maturity in corn. Agronomy Journal 50: 611-615
• Güncan A (2000). Şeker pancarlarında ekim öncesi yabancı ot mücadelesi. Pancar Ekicileri Eğitim ve Sağlık Vakfı Yayınları No: 5, Ankara, s. 143-148
• Hall M R, Swanton C J & Anderson G W (1992). The critical period of weed control in grain corn (Zea mays). Weed Science 40: 441-447 Isik D, Mennan H, Bukun B, Oz A & Ngouajio M (2006). The critical period for weed control in corn in Turkey. Weed Technology 20: 867-872
• Jalali A H & Salehi F (2013). Sugar beet yield as affected by seed priming and weed control. Archives of Agronomy and Soil Science 59: 281-288
• Jursik M, Holec J, Soukup J & Venclova V (2008). Competitive relationships between sugar beet and weeds in dependence on time of weed control. Plant, Soil and Environment 54: 108-116
• Kiymaz S & Ertek A (2015). Water use and yield of sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) under drip irrigation at different water regimes. Agricultural Water Management 158: 225-234
• Knezevic S Z & Datta A (2015). The critical period for weed control: Revisiting data analysis. Weed Science 63(Special Issue): 188-202
• Knezevic S Z, Evans S P, Blankenship E E, Van Acker R C & Lindquist J L (2002). Critical period for weed control: The concept and data analysis. Weed Science 50: 773-786
• Knezevic S Z, Streibig J C & Ritz C (2007). Utilizing R software package for dose-response studies: The concept and data analysis. Weed Technology 21: 840848
• Kropff M J, Spitters C J T, Schneiders B J, Joenije W & Groot W D E (1992). An ecophysiological model for interspecific competition, applied to the influence of Chenopodium album L. on sugar beet. Weed Research 32: 451-463
• Malaslı Z M (2010). Şeker pancarı üretim alanlarında yabancı otla mücadele yöntemleri ve uygulama etkinliklerinin belirlenmesi. Yüksek lisans tezi, Harran Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü (Basılmamış), Şanlıurfa
• Marwitz A, Ladewig E & Marlander B (2014). Response of soil biological activity to common herbicide strategies in sugar beet cultivation. European Journal of Agronomy 54: 97-106
• Mobarak O M M A (2013). Determination of critical period of weed competition with sugar beet (Beta vulgaris L.) and weed control. PhD Thesis. Assiut University (Unpublished), Egypt
• Norris R F (1996). Sugar beet integrated weed management. Publication UC IPM Pest Management Guidelines: Sugar beet, Veg Crops/Weed Science, UC Davis UC DANR Publication 3339
• Parthasarathi T, Velu G & Jeyakumar P (2013). Impact of crop heat units on growth and developmental physiology of future crop production. Research & Reviews: A Journal of Crop Science and Technology 2(1): 1-11
• Salehi F, Esfandiari H & Mashhadi H R (2006). Critical period of weed control in sugar beet in Shahrekord Region. Iranian Journal of Weed Science 2: 1-12
• Swanton C J & Weise S F (1991). Integrated weed management: The rationale and approach. Weed Technology 5: 657-663
• Tursun N, Akinci I E, Uludag A, Pamukoglu Z & Gozcu D (2012). Critical period for weed control in direct seeded red pepper (Capsicum annum L.). Weed Biology and Management 12: 109-115
• Young S L (2012). True integrated weed management. Weed Research 52: 107-111