Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programında Sosyal-Duygusal Öğrenme Becerilerinin Kapsamının Belirlenmesi

Year 2021, Volume: 54 Issue: 1, 205 - 224, 01.04.2021

Hanife Esen Aygün , Çiğdem Şahin Taşkın

https://doi.org/10.30964/auebfd.797377

Cited By: 2

Abstract

Bireylerin içinde bulunduğu ortama uyum sağlayarak diğer insanlarla iletişim kurma ve kendini ifade etmesinde önemli rolü olan dil becerileri sosyal-duygusal becerileri ile ilişkilidir. Sosyal-duygusal becerileri gelişmiş olan bireylerin sosyal yaşantıları ve duygu dünyasının yanında bilişsel ve dil gelişimlerinin de olumlu etkilendiği bilinmektedir. Bu doğrultuda Türkçe dersi kapsamında sosyal-duygusal becerilere yer verilmesi, bu becerilerin öğrencilere kazandırılmasının yanında dil gelişimini destekleme bakımından da önemlidir. Ancak ülkemizde sosyal-duygusal öğrenme becerileri ile dil becerileri arasındaki ilişkiye odaklanan sınırlı sayıda çalışma bulunmaktadır. Bu araştırmada Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı’nın özel amaçları, temaları ve kazanımları sosyal-duygusal öğrenme becerilerini kapsaması bakımından incelenmiştir. Programın sosyal-duygusal öğrenme ögeleri açısından değerlendirilmesi, Türkçe dersinin sosyal-duygusal ve dil becerilerinin karşılıklı gelişimine ne ölçüde fırsat sağladığının anlaşılması bakımından önemlidir. Bu araştırmada CASEL’in sosyal-duygusal öğrenme tanımı göz önünde bulundurulmuştur. Araştırma durum çalışması deseninde tasarlanmıştır. Araştırma verileri doküman incelemesi yoluyla elde edilmiştir. Veriler tümdengelimsel içerik analizi tekniği ile çözümlenmiştir. Araştırma bulgularına bağlı olarak Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programı’nın sosyal-duygusal öğrenme becerilerine zaman zaman yer verdiği görülmektedir. Bununla beraber, öğrencilerin sosyal-duygusal becerilerini nitelikli bir biçimde geliştirmek amacıyla programın bu becerileri daha kapsamlı içerecek biçimde düzenlenmesine gereksinim olduğu düşünülmektedir.

Keywords

Sosyal-duygusal öğrenme, Türkçe dersi öğretim programı, Türkçe dersi

Identifying Social-Emotional Learning Skills in Turkish Language Curriculum

Abstract

Language skills are essential for individuals to communicate with other people and express themselves orally and in written by adapting themselves to the environment they are in. They are also related to social-emotional skills. Developing individuals’ social-emotional skills positively influences their cognitive and language development as well as their social life and emotional world. Accordingly, involving social-emotional skills within the scope of Turkish course in primary education has an important role in supporting language development as well as social-emotional skills. However, there are a limited number of studies focusing on the relationship between social-emotional learning skills and language skills in our country. In this study, the special aims, themes and acquisitions of the Turkish course curriculum were examined in terms of covering social-emotional learning skills. The evaluation of the Turkish course curriculum in terms of social-emotional learning elements is important in terms of understanding to what extent the Turkish course provides an opportunity for the mutual development of social-emotional and language skills. In this study, CASEL's definition of social-emotional learning was taken into consideration. In this direction, self-awareness, self-management, social awareness, relationship building and decision-making skills were taken into account. In this study, special aims, themes and learning outcomes of the Turkish curriculum were examined in terms of social-emotional learning skills. The sase study design is utilized in this research. Research data were obtained through document analysis. Deductive content analysis was administered in order to analyze the data. Findings of this research revealed that special aims, themes and learning outcomes of the Turkish curriculum can be associated with social-emotional learning skills. However, considering these findings, the researchers suggest that the Turkish course curriculum needs to be restructured in a more comprehensive way to develop students’ language and social-emotional skills effectively.

Keywords

Social-emotional learning, Social-emotional skills, Turkish course curriculum

References

• Ashdown, D. M., & Bernard, M. E. (2012). Can explicit instruction in social and emotional learning skills benefit the social-emotional development, well-being, and academic achievement of young children?. Early Childhood Education Journal, 39(6), 397-405.
• Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. McGraw-Hill Education (UK).
• Bierman, K. L., Domitrovich, C. E., Nix, R. L., Gest, S. D., Welsh, J. A., Greenberg, M. T., Gill, S. (2008). Promoting academic and social–emotional school readiness: The Head Start REDI program. Child Development, 79, 1802–1817.
• Bierman, K. L., Nix, R. L., Greenberg, M. T., Blair, C., & Domitrovich, C. E. (2008). Executive functions and school readiness intervention: Impact, moderation, and mediation in the Head Start REDI program. Development and Psychopathology, 20, 821–843.
• Bowen, G. A. (2009). Document analysis as a qualitative research method. Qualitative research journal, 9(2), 27-40.
• Brackett, M. A., Rivers, S. E., Reyes, M. R., & Salovey, P. (2012). Enhancing academic performance and social and emotional competence with the RULER feeling words curriculum. Learning and Individual Differences, 22(2), 218-224.
• Bryan, T., Burstein, K., & Ergul, C. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities: A science-based presentation of the state of the art. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 45-51.
• Bulut, B. (2013). Etkin dinleme eğitiminin dinlediğini anlama, okuduğunu anlama ve kelime hazinesi üzerine etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi. Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, Aydın.
• Cho, J. Y., & Lee, E. H. (2014). Reducing confusion about grounded theory and qualitative content analysis: Similarities and differences. The qualitative report, 19(32), 1-20.
• Cohen, J. (2006). Social, emotional, ethical, and academic education: Creating a climate for learning, participation in democracy, and well-being. Harvard educational Review, 76(2), 201-237.
• Collaborative for Academic, Social, and Emotional Learning [CASEL] (2013). 2013 CASEL GUIDE: Effective Social And Emotional Programs Preschool And Primary School Edition. http://static.squarespace.com/static/513f79f9e4b05ce7b70e9673/t/526a220de4b00a92c90436ba/1382687245993/2013-casel-guide.pdf adresinden 22.03.2016 tarihinde edinilmiştir.
• Daunic, A., N. Corbett, S. Smith, T. Barnes, L. Santiago-Poventud, P. Chalftant, D. Pitts, & Gleaton, J. (2013). Integrating Social-emotional Learning with Literacy Instruction: An Intervention for Children at Risk for Emotional and Behavioural Disorders. Behavioural Disorders, 39(1), 43–49.
• Denham, S. A., & Brown, C. (2010). “Plays nice with others”: Social–emotional learning and academic success. Early Education and Development, 21(5), 652-680.
• Doğan, Y. (2009). Konuşma becerisinin geliştirilmesine yönelik etkinlik önerileri. Journal of Turkish Educational Sciences, 7(1), 185-204.
• Doyle, B. G., & Bramwell, W. (2006). Promoting emergent literacy and social–emotional learning through dialogic reading. The Reading Teacher, 59(6), 554-564.
• Dresser, R. (2012). Reviving oral reading practices with english learners by integrating social- emotional learning. Promising Practices, 45-50.
• Elias, J. M., Zins, E. J., Weissberg, P. R., Frey, S. K., Greenberg, T. M., Haynes, M. N., Kessler, R., Schwab-Stone,E. M. Ve Shrver, P. T. (1997). Promoting Social And Emotional Learning: Guidelines For Educators. Virginia: association for supeNision and curriculum development.
• Elias, M. J. (2004). The connection between social-emotional learning and learning disabilities: Implications for intervention. Learning Disability Quarterly,27(1), 53-63.
• Elias, M. J. (2006). The connection between academic and social-emotional learning. The educator’s guide to emotional intelligence and academic achievement, 4-14.
• Elias, M. J., & Haynes, N. M. (2008). Social competence, social support, and academic achievement in minority, low-income, urban elementary school children. School Psychology Quarterly, 23, 474–495.
• Elksnin, L. K., & Elksnin, N. (2004). The social-emotional side of learning disabilities. Learning Disability Quarterly, 27(1), 3-8.
• Elo, S., & Kyngäs, H. (2008). The qualitative content analysis process. Journal of advanced nursing, 62(1), 107-115.
• Fantuzzo, J., Bulotsky-Shearer, R., McDermott, P. A., & McWayne, C. (2007). Investigation of dimensions of social-emotional classroom behavior and school readiness for low-income urban preschool children. School Psychology Review,36(1), 44.
• Graneheim U.H. & Lundman B. (2004) Qualitative content analysis in nursing research: concepts, procedures and measures to achieve trustworthiness. Nurse Education Today 24, 105–112.
• Güneş, F. (2015). Eğitim ve zihinsel değişim. Bartın Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 4(1), 1-20.
• Johnson D. W & Johnson R. T. (2004). The three cs of promoting social and emotional learning İçinde Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.
• Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., Hoglund, W. L., & Aber, J. L. (2010). A school-randomized clinical trial of an integrated social–emotional learning and literacy intervention: Impacts after 1 school year. Journal of consulting and clinical psychology, 78(6), 829.
• Jones, S. M., Brown, J. L., & Lawrence Aber, J. (2011). Two‐year impacts of a universal school‐based social‐emotional and literacy intervention: An experiment in translational developmental research. Child development, 82(2), 533-554.
• Karacan, E. (2000). Çocuklarda dil gelişimini etkileyen faktörler. Sürekli Tıp Eğitimi Dergisi, 9(7).
• Kavcar, C., Oğuzkan, F., & Sever, S. (2004). Türkçe öğretimi. Ankara: Engin Yayınları.
• Lane, K. L., Carter, E. W., Pierson, M. R., & Glaeser, B. C. (2006). Academic, social, and behavioral characteristics of high school students with emotional disturbances or learning disabilities. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 14(2), 108-117.
• Leseman, P. P., & Jong, P. F. (1998). Home literacy: Opportunity, instruction, cooperation and social‐emotional quality predicting early reading achievement. Reading Research Quarterly, 33(3), 294-318.
• Lonigan, C. J., Bloomfield, B. G., Anthony, J. L., Bacon, K. D., Phillips, B. M. & Samwel, C. S. (1999). Relations among emergent literacy skills, behavior problems, and social competence in preschool children from low-and middle-income backgrounds. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education, 19(1), 40-53.
• Lopes, P. L. & Salovey, P. (2004). Toward a broader education: social, emotional and practical skilss İçinde Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.
• Lopes, P. N., Salovey, P., & Straus, R. (2003). Emotional intelligence, personality, and the perceived quality of social relationships. Personality and individual Differences, 35(3), 641–658.
• Mayer, J. D., Salovey, P., Caruso, D. R., & Sitarenios, G. (2001). Emotional intelligence as a standard intelligence.
• McCormick, M.P, Cappella, E., O’Connor, E., & McClowry, S. (2015). Social Emotional Learning and Academic Achievement: Using Causal Methods to Explore Classroom-Level Mechanisms. AERA Open, pp.1-26.
• Moretti, F. ve diğerleri (2011). A standardized approach to qualitative content analysis of focus group discussions from different countries. Patient Education and Counseling, 82(3), 420–428.
• Rivers S. E. & Brackett, M. A. (2010) Achieving Standards in the English Language Arts (and More) Using The RULER Approach to Social and Emotional Learning, Reading & Writing Quarterly, 27(1-2), 75-100.
• Senemoğlu, N. (1989). Okulöncesi eğitimde dilin önemi. Milli Eğitim Vakfı Dergisi, 4(14), 21-22.
• Sönmez, V., & Alacapınar, F. G. (2011). Örneklendirilmiş bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Anı Yayıncılık.
• Stake, R. E. (1995). The art of case study research. SAGE publications.
• Şimşek, H., & Yıldırım, A. (2011). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Talim ve Terbiye Kurulu Başkanlığı [TTKB](2015). Türkçe Dersi Öğretim Programları 1-8. Sınıflar.
• Tan, M., & Dobbs-Oates, J. (2013). Relationship between emergent literacy and early social–emotional development in preschool children from low-income backgrounds. Early Child Development and Care, 183(11), 1509-1530.
• Webster-Stratton, C., & Reid, M. J. (2004). Strengthening social and emotional competence in young children—The foundation for early school readiness and success: Incredible years classroom social skills and problem‐solving curriculum. Infants & Young Children, 17(2), 96-113.
• Yangil, M. K. & Kerimoğlu, C. (2014). Bilmecelerin eğitimdeki yeri ve önemi. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(2), 341-354.
• Yin, R. K. (1994). Case study reserach design and methods (second edition), SAGE Publications.
• Zins, J. E., Weissberg, R. P., Wang, M. C., & Walberg, H. J. (Eds.). (2004a). Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say? New York: Teachers College Press.
• Zins, J. E., Bloodworth, M. R., Weissberg, R. P., & Walberg, H. J. (2004). The scientific base linking social and emotional learning to school success. Building academic success on social and emotional learning: What does the research say, 3-22.