The name, institution, ORCID information of the author should be written in accordance with the İSNAD 2.0 Citation System on the first page of the the article sent to the journal.
Academic objectivity and scientific quality are the most important criteria in the evaluation of the articles submitted for publication.
Articles eligible for evaluation are sent to at least two referees in the relevant area. The names of the referees are kept confidential and the reports are kept for five years. If one of the referee reports is positive and the other is negative, the article can be sent to a third referee or Editorial Board can review the referee reports and make the final decision.
The authors rewrite according to the the criticism and suggestions of the referee/s and Editorial Board. If they have any disagreement, they have the right to appeal with their justifications.
Articles that are not accepted for publication are not returned to their authors.
The articles sent to the journal are first examined in terms of compliance with journal principles.
The articles submitted for publication are checked for plagiarism through a special program used in plagiarism detection.
The articles are subject to double-blind peer-review evaluation by at least two referees.
