Teknoparkların Özümseme Kapasitesine Etkisive Bu Süreçte Gatekeeperların ( Kapı görevlilerinin) Rolü

Year 2016, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 92 - 102, 01.12.2016

Murat Gülmez , Saadet Sağtaş , Diler Yaman Kahyaoğlu

Abstract

Bilgi teknolojilerine ve ileri teknolojilere dayalı firma ve kuruluşların Teknopark bünyesindeki varlığı artış göstermektedir. Teknoparklar Üniversite ve sanayi işbirliğini sağlar ve firmalar ile diğer bilim kuruluşları arasında bilgi transferinin gelişmesine yardımcı olur. Bu çalışmanın amacı; teknoparkların özümseme kapasitesine etkisini ve kapı görevlilerinin bu süreçteki rolünü incelemek ve ortaya koymaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Çukurova Teknopark ve Mersin Tecnoscope’ ta yer alan firmalara anket uygulaması yapılmıştır. Yapılan anket değerlendirmeleri ve belirlenen firmalarda yer alan kapı görevlileri ile gerçekleştirilen mülakat görüşmeleri sonucunda bulgular, teknoparkların firmaların özümseme kapasitesi üzerinde olumlu yönde etkiye sahip olduğunu göstermiştir. Ayrıca Ar-ge yöneticilerinin ve firma kurucularının bilgi transferi sürecinde kapı görevlileri gibi önemli rol üstlendikleri tespit edilmiştir

Keywords

: Teknopark, Özümseme Kapasitesi, Kapı Görevlisi

THE EFFECTS OF TECHNOPARKS ON ABSORPTIVE CAPACITY AND THE ROLE OF GATEKEEPERS IN THIS PROCESS

Abstract

The existence of the companies and organizations depending on information technologies and advanced technologies in the technoparks are in increase. Technoparks allows the cooperation between the University and the Industries and helps to improve the information transfer among the companies and other scientific institutions. The purpose of this study is to investigate and reveal the effects of technoparks on the absorptive capacity and the role of gatekeepers in this process. In accordance with the purpose, a survey has been conducted to reach the firms that are located at Cukurova Tecnopark, and Mersin Technoscope. After an evaluation of the surveys and face to face interviews with the gatekeepers from selected firms, the findings show that the technoparks has positive effects on assimilative capacity. More over the managers of R&D departments or the founder partners of the companies as the gatekeepers plays a crucial role on information transfer process

Keywords

Technopark, Absorptive capacity, Gatekeeper

References

• Andrewina, L. Govindaraju, R. Samadh, A. Sudirman (2008). I. The Effect of Interorganizational Relationship on Knowledge Sharing Capability and Absorptive Capacity, Proceedings of the 9th Asia Pasific Industrial Engineering& Management Systems Conference, Indonesia, 837-848.
• Armbruster, H. Bikfalvi, A. Kinkel, S. Lay, G. (2008). “Organizational Innovation: The Challenge of Measuring NonTechnical Innovation in Large-Scale Surveys”, Technovation, 28, 644-657.
• Ashekele, H.M., Matengu, K. (2008). Success factor in technology transfer to SME's: Rundu Woodwork Common Facility Center, Proceedings of PICMET 2008, 27-31 July, Cape Town, South Africa.
• Autant-Bernard, C. Chalaye, S. Manca, F. Moreno, R. Suriñach, J. (2010). Measuring the adoption of innovation. A typology of EU countries based on the Innovation Survey. Innovation, The European Journal of Social Science Research. 23(3), 199-222.
• Bellavista, J., & Sanz, L. (2009). Science and technology parks: habitats of innovation: introduction to special section. Science and Public Policy, 36(7), 499-510.
• Chesbrough, H. W., & Garman, A. R. (2009). How open innovation can help you cope in lean times. Harvard business review, 87(12), 68-76.
• Chesbrough, H. (2004). Managing open innovation. Research-Technology Management, 47(1), 23-26.
• Chesbrough, H. W. (2006). The era of open innovation. Managing innovation and change, 127(3), 34-41.
• Flatten, T. C., Engelen, A., Zahra, S. A., & Brettel, M. (2011). A measure of absorptive capacity: Scale development and validation. European Management Journal, 29(2), 98-116.
• Ivarsson, M., & Gorschek, T. (2009). Technology transfer decision support in requirements engineering research: a systematic review of REj. Requirements engineering, 14(3), 155-175.
• Löfsten, H., & Lindelöf, P. (2002). Science Parks and the growth of new technology-based firms—academic-industry links, innovation and markets. Research policy, 31(6), 859-876.
• Lundquist, G. (2003). A rich vision of technology transfer technology value management. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 28(3-4), 265-284.
• Monck. C. S. P., Porter, R. B., Quintas, P. Storey, D. Wynarczyk, P.(1988). Science Parks and the Growth of High Technology Firms. London: Routledge.
• Norman, DA. Verganti, R. (2014). Incremental and Radical Innovation: Design Research vs. Technology and Meaning Change. Design Issues, 30(1), 78-96.
• Ramirez, M. Dickenson, P. (2010). Gatekeepers, Knowledge Brokers and Inter-Firm Knowledge Transfer in Beijing’s Zhongguancun Science Park, International Journal of Innovation Management, 14(01), 93- 122.
• Shane, SA. (2004). Academic Entrepreneurship: University Spinoffs and Wealth Creation, Edward Elgar Publishing, 352.
• Simonin, B. (2004). An Empirical Investigation of the Process of Knowledge Transfer in International Strategic Alliance, Journal of International Business Studies, 35(5), 407-427.
• Van Burg, E., Romme, A.G.L., Gilsing, V.A. and Reymen, I.M.M.J. (2008), Creating University Spinoffs: A Science-Based Design Perspective. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(2), 114-128.
• Vrande, V. Jong, J. Vanhaverbeke, W. Rochemony, M. (2009). “Open Innovation in SMEs: Trends, Motives and Management Challenges”. Technovation, 29(6), 423-437.
• Zhang, Y. (2005). The Science Park Phenomenon: Development, Evolution and Typology. International Journal Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management, 5(1-2), 138-154.