Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

İşyerinde Hatalardan Öğrenme Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması

Year 2021, Volume: 19 Issue: 40, 299 - 322, 19.04.2021

Elif Bilginoğlu , Uğur Yozgat

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.716676
Cited By: 4

Abstract

Mesleki/profesyonel öğrenme ve gelişim alanında, insanların yanılabilirlikleri ve hatalardan öğrenme konularına olan ilgi giderek artmaktadır. Araştırmacılar ve uygulayıcılar hatalardan öğrenmenin önemini fark etmiş olmakla birlikte konu üzerinde çok fazla araştırma yapılmamıştır ve işyerindeki hatalardan öğrenme süreçlerine dair eksiksiz bir kavrayış henüz mevcut değildir. Örgütlerin hataların olumlu sonuçlarından faydalanması için, çalışanları hatadan öğrenmeye teşvik eden koşulları daha iyi anlamak önemlidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, Bauer ve Mulder (2010) tarafından geliştirilmiş olan İşyerinde Hatalardan Öğrenme Ölçeğinin Türkçe’ye kazandırılmasıdır. Ölçek geçerleme çalışması kapsamında, ölçeğin psikometrik özelliklerini değerlendirmek için iki farklı örneklemden, toplamda 455 kişiye ulaşılmıştır. Veriler üzerinde keşfedici, doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri ve test-tekrar test analizleri gerçekleştirilmiştir. Bulgular orijinalde iki faktörlü olarak önerilen ölçeğinin aynı şekilde iki faktörlü (neden analizi ve strateji geliştirme) bir yapıda Türkçe’ye uygunluğunu ifade etmektedir. Bu bulguların teorik önemi ve etkileri geçmiş yazın ışığında tartışılmaktadır.

Keywords

Hata hatalardan öğrenme işyerinde hatalardan öğrenme işyerinde hatalardan öğrenme ölçeği

References

  • Alonso, I.J., Broadrib, M. (2018). “Human Error: A Myth Eclipsing Real Causes”, Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 145-149.
  • Argote, L., Todocara, G. (2007). Organizational Learning. G. P. Hodgkinson ve J. K. Ford (Ed). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 22) içinde (193–234). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Arthur, J.B., Aiman-Smith, L. (2002). “Gainsharing and Organizational Learning: An Analysis of Employee Suggestions over Time”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 737-754.
  • Bauer, J., Gartmeier, M., Harteis, C. (2012). Human Fallibility and Learning from Errors at Work. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (155-169). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Bauer, J., Harteis, C. (2012). The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning: Introduction to the Volume. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (1-14). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Bauer, J., Mulder, R.H. (2010). In Search of a Good Method for Measuring Learning from Errors at Work. M. van Woerkom & R. Poell (Ed.) Workplace Learning: Concepts, Measurement and Application içinde (111-127). NewYork: Routledge.
  • Brodbeck, F.C., Zapf, D., Prümper, J., Frese, M. (1993). “Error Handling in Office Work with Computers: A Field Study”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 303-317.
  • Carroll, P.B, Mui, C. (2008). “Failed Strategies: What CEOs Can Learn From The Billion Dollar Mistakes of Others”, Chief Executive, 236, 44-46.
  • Cannon, M. D., Edmondson, A. C. (2001). “Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs about Failure in Organizational Work Groups”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161–177.
  • Cortini, M., Pivetti, M., Cervai, S. (2016). “Learning Climate and Job Performance among Health Workers. A Pilot Study”, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article1644.
  • Crossan, M., Lane, H.W., White, R.E. (1999). “An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 522–537.
  • Cummings, T.G. ve Worley, C.G. (2015). Organization Development & Change (10th Edition). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
  • Denton, J. (1998). Organisational Learning and Effectiveness. London: Routledge.
  • De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., Wieringa, P.A. (2009). “Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181.
  • Edmondson, A.C. (2011). “Strategies for Learning from Failure”, Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48-55.
  • Edmondson, A., Moingeon, B. (1998). “From Organizational Learning to The Learning Organization”, Management Learning, 29, 5-20.
  • Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., Strahan, E.J. (1999). “Evaluating The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research”, Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
  • Falchuk, B. (2017, September 06). “If You've Made a Huge Mistake at Work, You Can Recover With this 1 Simple Approach”. https://www.inc.com/bryan-falchuk/if-youve-made-a-huge-mistake-at-work-you-can-recov.html [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Fiol, C.M., Lyles, M.A. (1985). “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. Frese, M., Keith, N. (2015). “Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 661–687.
  • Friedman, V.J., Lipshitz, R., Popper, M. (2005). “The Mystification of Organizational Learning”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 19-30.
  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., Heid, H. (2008). “Negative Knowledge: Understanding Professional Learning and Expertise”, Vocations and Learning, 1, 87–103.
  • Gartmeier, M., Lehtinen, E., Gruber, H., Heid, H. (2011). “Negative Expertise: Comparing Differently Tenured Elder Care Nurses’ Negative Knowledge”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 273–300.
  • Gartmeier, M., Ottl, E., Bauer, J., Berberat, P.O. (2017). “Learning from Errors: Critical Incident Reporting in Nursing”, Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(5), 339-352.
  • Gartmeier, M., Schüttelkopf, E.M. (2012). Tracing Outcomes of Learning from Errors on the Level of Knowledge. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (33-51). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Glendon, I., Clarke, S. G., McKenna, E. F. (2006). Human Safety and Risk Management. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor ve Francis. Harteis, C., Bauer, J. (2014). Learning from Errors at Work. S. Billett, C. Harteis, H. Gruber (Ed). International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning içinde (699-732). Amsterdam: Springer.
  • Harteis, C., Bauer, J., Heid, H. (2012). Research on Human Fallibility and Learning from Errors at Work: Challenges for Theory, Research, and Practice. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (256-265). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Hirak, R., Peng, A.C., Carmeli A., Schaubroeck, J.M. (2012). “Linking Leader Inclusiveness to Work Unit Performance: The Importance of Psychological Safety and Learning from Failures”, The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 107–117.
  • Hodgkinson, M. (2000). “Managerial Perceptions of Barriers to Becoming a ‘Learning Organization’”, The Learning Organization, 7(3), 156-166.
  • Hofmann, D.A., Frese, M. (2011). Errors, Error Taxonomies, Error Prevention and Error Management: Laying the Groundwork for Discussing Errors in Organizations. D.A. Hofmann & M. Frese (Ed.). (2011). The Organizational Frontiers Series (SIOP). Errors in Organizations içinde (1-43). Routledge/Taylor ve Francis Group.
  • Homsma, G.J., Van Dyck, C., De Gilder, Koopman, D.P.L., Elfring, T. (2009). “Learning from Error: The Influence of Error Incident Characteristics”, Journal of Business Research, 62, 115–122.
  • Huber, G.P. (1991). “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures”, Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. Keith, N. (2012). Managing Errors During Training. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (173-195). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Kern, T. (2013, May 06). “The War on Error: Human Error as a Strategic Risk Management Concern.” http://www.rmmagazine.com/2013/05/06/the-war-on-error-human-error-as-a-strategic-risk-management-concern/ [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kriegesmann, B., Kley, T., Schwering, M.G. (2005). “Creative Errors and Heroic Failures: Capturing their Innovative Potential”, Journal of Business Strategy, 26, 57–64.
  • Lei, Z., Naveh, E., Novikov, Z. (2016). “Errors in Organizations: An Integrative Review via Level of Analysis, Temporal Dynamism, and Priority Lenses”, Journal of Management, 42(5), 1315-1343.
  • Lim, D., Song, J.H., Yoon, S.W. (2014). Trends and Issues in Integrating Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning for Workplace Performance Improvement. N. E. Chalofsky, T. S. Rocco, & M. L. Morris (Ed.), Handbook of Human Resource Development içinde (369-385). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., Friedman, V.J. (2002). “A Multifacet Model of Organizational Learning”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1),78–98.
  • MacPhail, L.H., Edmondson, A.C. (2011). Learning Domains: The Importance of Work Context in Organizational Learning From Error. D. A. Hofmann & M. Frese (Ed.) Errors in Organizations içinde (177-198). NewYork: Routledge.
  • Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from Errors, Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465-489.
  • Naveh, E., Lei, Z. (2019). “Coping with Errors in Organizations: Challenges, Opportunities, and Frontiers for Operations Management Research”, Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 12(4), 349–433.
  • Oser, F.K., Näpflin, C., Hofer, C., Aerni, P. (2012). Towards a Theory of Negative Knowledge (NK): Almost-Mistakes as Drivers of Episodic Memory Amplification. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (53-70). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Oser, F., Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft. Zur Theorie des Negativen Wissens und zur Praxis der Fehlerkultur [Learning is painful. On the theory of negative knowledge and the practice of error culture]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Peters, G.A. ve Peters, B.J. (2006). Human Error: Causes and Control. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor ve Francis.
  • Popova-Nowak, I.V. ve Cseh, M. (2015). “The Meaning of Organizational Learning: A Meta-Paradigm Perspective”. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 299–331.
  • Putz, D., Schilling, J., Kluge, A. (2012). Measuring Organizational Climate for Learning from Errors at Work. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (107–123). Dordrecht: Springer. Ramanujam, R., Goodman, P. S. (2003). “Latent Errors and Adverse Organizational Consequences: A Conceptualization”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 815–836.
  • Reason, J. T. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., Rose, G. M. (2000). “Information Technology and Organizational Learning: A Review and Assessment of Research”, Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 125-155.
  • Ron, N., Lipshitz, R. ve Popper, M. (2006). “How Organizations Learn: Post-Flight Reviews in an F-16 Fighter Squadron”, Organization Studies, 27(8), 1069–89.
  • Starkey, K. (1998). “What can we Learn from the Learning Organization?” Human Relations, 51(4), 531-546
  • Sugarman, B. (2001). “A Learning Based Approach to Organizational Change: Some Results and Guidelines”, Organizational Dynamics, 30(1), 62-76.
  • Tabachnick, B., ve Fidell, L. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. London: Pearson.
  • Tsang, E.W.K. (1997). “Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research”, Human Relations, 50(1), 73-89.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (2020). Atasözleri ve Deyimler Sözlüğü. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., Batinic, B. (1999). “Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, Validity and Different Language Equivalence”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527–547.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Random House.
  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). “Learning through Failure: The Strategy of Small Losses”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
  • Worthington, R L., Whittaker, T.A. (2006). “Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices”, The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.
  • Zhao, B. (2011). “Learning from Errors: The Role of Context, Emotion, and Personality”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 435–463.
  • Zhao, B., Olivera, F. (2006). “Error Reporting in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012-1030.
  • Zhao, B., Seifried, J., Sieweke, J. (2018). “Trainers’ Responses to Errors Matter in Trainees’ Learning from Errors: Evidence from Two Studies”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(3), 279-296.

Year 2021, Volume: 19 Issue: 40, 299 - 322, 19.04.2021

Elif Bilginoğlu , Uğur Yozgat

https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.716676
Cited By: 4

Abstract

References

  • Alonso, I.J., Broadrib, M. (2018). “Human Error: A Myth Eclipsing Real Causes”, Process Safety Progress, 37(2), 145-149.
  • Argote, L., Todocara, G. (2007). Organizational Learning. G. P. Hodgkinson ve J. K. Ford (Ed). International Review of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (Vol. 22) içinde (193–234). Chichester, UK: Wiley.
  • Argyris, C., Schön, D.A. (1978). Organizational Learning: A Theory of Action Perspective. Reading, Massachusetts: Addison-Wesley Publishing.
  • Arthur, J.B., Aiman-Smith, L. (2002). “Gainsharing and Organizational Learning: An Analysis of Employee Suggestions over Time”, Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 737-754.
  • Bauer, J., Gartmeier, M., Harteis, C. (2012). Human Fallibility and Learning from Errors at Work. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (155-169). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Bauer, J., Harteis, C. (2012). The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning: Introduction to the Volume. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (1-14). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Bauer, J., Mulder, R.H. (2010). In Search of a Good Method for Measuring Learning from Errors at Work. M. van Woerkom & R. Poell (Ed.) Workplace Learning: Concepts, Measurement and Application içinde (111-127). NewYork: Routledge.
  • Brodbeck, F.C., Zapf, D., Prümper, J., Frese, M. (1993). “Error Handling in Office Work with Computers: A Field Study”, Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 66, 303-317.
  • Carroll, P.B, Mui, C. (2008). “Failed Strategies: What CEOs Can Learn From The Billion Dollar Mistakes of Others”, Chief Executive, 236, 44-46.
  • Cannon, M. D., Edmondson, A. C. (2001). “Confronting Failure: Antecedents and Consequences of Shared Beliefs about Failure in Organizational Work Groups”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 22, 161–177.
  • Cortini, M., Pivetti, M., Cervai, S. (2016). “Learning Climate and Job Performance among Health Workers. A Pilot Study”, Frontiers in Psychology, 7, Article1644.
  • Crossan, M., Lane, H.W., White, R.E. (1999). “An Organizational Learning Framework: From Intuition to Institution”, Academy of Management Review, 24 (3), 522–537.
  • Cummings, T.G. ve Worley, C.G. (2015). Organization Development & Change (10th Edition). Stamford, CT: Cengage Learning.
  • Denton, J. (1998). Organisational Learning and Effectiveness. London: Routledge.
  • De Winter, J. C. F., Dodou, D., Wieringa, P.A. (2009). “Exploratory Factor Analysis with Small Sample Sizes”, Multivariate Behavioral Research, 44(2), 147–181.
  • Edmondson, A.C. (2011). “Strategies for Learning from Failure”, Harvard Business Review, 89(4), 48-55.
  • Edmondson, A., Moingeon, B. (1998). “From Organizational Learning to The Learning Organization”, Management Learning, 29, 5-20.
  • Fabrigar, L.R., Wegener, D.T., MacCallum, R.C., Strahan, E.J. (1999). “Evaluating The Use of Exploratory Factor Analysis in Psychological Research”, Psychological Methods, 4(3), 272–299.
  • Falchuk, B. (2017, September 06). “If You've Made a Huge Mistake at Work, You Can Recover With this 1 Simple Approach”. https://www.inc.com/bryan-falchuk/if-youve-made-a-huge-mistake-at-work-you-can-recov.html [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Fiol, C.M., Lyles, M.A. (1985). “Organizational Learning,” Academy of Management Review, 10(4), 803-813. Frese, M., Keith, N. (2015). “Action Errors, Error Management, and Learning in Organizations”, Annual Review of Psychology, 66, 661–687.
  • Friedman, V.J., Lipshitz, R., Popper, M. (2005). “The Mystification of Organizational Learning”, Journal of Management Inquiry, 14(1), 19-30.
  • Gartmeier, M., Bauer, J., Gruber, H., Heid, H. (2008). “Negative Knowledge: Understanding Professional Learning and Expertise”, Vocations and Learning, 1, 87–103.
  • Gartmeier, M., Lehtinen, E., Gruber, H., Heid, H. (2011). “Negative Expertise: Comparing Differently Tenured Elder Care Nurses’ Negative Knowledge”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 26(2), 273–300.
  • Gartmeier, M., Ottl, E., Bauer, J., Berberat, P.O. (2017). “Learning from Errors: Critical Incident Reporting in Nursing”, Journal of Workplace Learning, 29(5), 339-352.
  • Gartmeier, M., Schüttelkopf, E.M. (2012). Tracing Outcomes of Learning from Errors on the Level of Knowledge. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (33-51). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Glendon, I., Clarke, S. G., McKenna, E. F. (2006). Human Safety and Risk Management. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor ve Francis. Harteis, C., Bauer, J. (2014). Learning from Errors at Work. S. Billett, C. Harteis, H. Gruber (Ed). International Handbook of Research in Professional and Practice-Based Learning içinde (699-732). Amsterdam: Springer.
  • Harteis, C., Bauer, J., Heid, H. (2012). Research on Human Fallibility and Learning from Errors at Work: Challenges for Theory, Research, and Practice. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (256-265). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Hirak, R., Peng, A.C., Carmeli A., Schaubroeck, J.M. (2012). “Linking Leader Inclusiveness to Work Unit Performance: The Importance of Psychological Safety and Learning from Failures”, The Leadership Quarterly, 23, 107–117.
  • Hodgkinson, M. (2000). “Managerial Perceptions of Barriers to Becoming a ‘Learning Organization’”, The Learning Organization, 7(3), 156-166.
  • Hofmann, D.A., Frese, M. (2011). Errors, Error Taxonomies, Error Prevention and Error Management: Laying the Groundwork for Discussing Errors in Organizations. D.A. Hofmann & M. Frese (Ed.). (2011). The Organizational Frontiers Series (SIOP). Errors in Organizations içinde (1-43). Routledge/Taylor ve Francis Group.
  • Homsma, G.J., Van Dyck, C., De Gilder, Koopman, D.P.L., Elfring, T. (2009). “Learning from Error: The Influence of Error Incident Characteristics”, Journal of Business Research, 62, 115–122.
  • Huber, G.P. (1991). “Organizational Learning: The Contributing Processes and the Literatures”, Organization Science, 2(1), 88-115. Keith, N. (2012). Managing Errors During Training. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (173-195). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Kern, T. (2013, May 06). “The War on Error: Human Error as a Strategic Risk Management Concern.” http://www.rmmagazine.com/2013/05/06/the-war-on-error-human-error-as-a-strategic-risk-management-concern/ [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Kolb, D. (1984). Experiential Learning. Experience as the Source of Learning and Development. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice-Hall.
  • Kriegesmann, B., Kley, T., Schwering, M.G. (2005). “Creative Errors and Heroic Failures: Capturing their Innovative Potential”, Journal of Business Strategy, 26, 57–64.
  • Lei, Z., Naveh, E., Novikov, Z. (2016). “Errors in Organizations: An Integrative Review via Level of Analysis, Temporal Dynamism, and Priority Lenses”, Journal of Management, 42(5), 1315-1343.
  • Lim, D., Song, J.H., Yoon, S.W. (2014). Trends and Issues in Integrating Knowledge Management and Organizational Learning for Workplace Performance Improvement. N. E. Chalofsky, T. S. Rocco, & M. L. Morris (Ed.), Handbook of Human Resource Development içinde (369-385). Hoboken, NJ: Wiley.
  • Lipshitz, R., Popper, M., Friedman, V.J. (2002). “A Multifacet Model of Organizational Learning”, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 38(1),78–98.
  • MacPhail, L.H., Edmondson, A.C. (2011). Learning Domains: The Importance of Work Context in Organizational Learning From Error. D. A. Hofmann & M. Frese (Ed.) Errors in Organizations içinde (177-198). NewYork: Routledge.
  • Metcalfe, J. (2017). Learning from Errors, Annual Review of Psychology, 68(1), 465-489.
  • Naveh, E., Lei, Z. (2019). “Coping with Errors in Organizations: Challenges, Opportunities, and Frontiers for Operations Management Research”, Foundations and Trends in Technology, Information and Operations Management, 12(4), 349–433.
  • Oser, F.K., Näpflin, C., Hofer, C., Aerni, P. (2012). Towards a Theory of Negative Knowledge (NK): Almost-Mistakes as Drivers of Episodic Memory Amplification. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (53-70). Heidelberg: Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht.
  • Oser, F., Spychiger, M. (2005). Lernen ist schmerzhaft. Zur Theorie des Negativen Wissens und zur Praxis der Fehlerkultur [Learning is painful. On the theory of negative knowledge and the practice of error culture]. Weinheim, Germany: Beltz.
  • Perrow, C. (1984). Normal Accidents: Living with High Risk Technologies. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Peters, G.A. ve Peters, B.J. (2006). Human Error: Causes and Control. Boca Raton, FL: Taylor ve Francis.
  • Popova-Nowak, I.V. ve Cseh, M. (2015). “The Meaning of Organizational Learning: A Meta-Paradigm Perspective”. Human Resource Development Review, 14(3), 299–331.
  • Putz, D., Schilling, J., Kluge, A. (2012). Measuring Organizational Climate for Learning from Errors at Work. J. Bauer & C. Harteis (Ed.) Human Fallibility: The Ambiguity of Errors for Work and Learning içinde (107–123). Dordrecht: Springer. Ramanujam, R., Goodman, P. S. (2003). “Latent Errors and Adverse Organizational Consequences: A Conceptualization”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24, 815–836.
  • Reason, J. T. (1990). Human Error. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
  • Robey, D., Boudreau, M.-C., Rose, G. M. (2000). “Information Technology and Organizational Learning: A Review and Assessment of Research”, Accounting Management and Information Technologies, 10(2), 125-155.
  • Ron, N., Lipshitz, R. ve Popper, M. (2006). “How Organizations Learn: Post-Flight Reviews in an F-16 Fighter Squadron”, Organization Studies, 27(8), 1069–89.
  • Starkey, K. (1998). “What can we Learn from the Learning Organization?” Human Relations, 51(4), 531-546
  • Sugarman, B. (2001). “A Learning Based Approach to Organizational Change: Some Results and Guidelines”, Organizational Dynamics, 30(1), 62-76.
  • Tabachnick, B., ve Fidell, L. (2012). Using Multivariate Statistics. London: Pearson.
  • Tsang, E.W.K. (1997). “Organizational Learning and the Learning Organization: A Dichotomy between Descriptive and Prescriptive Research”, Human Relations, 50(1), 73-89.
  • Türk Dil Kurumu (2020). Atasözleri ve Deyimler Sözlüğü. https://sozluk.gov.tr/ [Erişim Tarihi 15.01.2020]
  • Rybowiak, V., Garst, H., Frese, M., Batinic, B. (1999). “Error Orientation Questionnaire (EOQ): Reliability, Validity and Different Language Equivalence”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 527–547.
  • Senge, P. (1990). The Fifth Discipline: The Art and Practice of the Learning Organization. New York: Random House.
  • Sitkin, S. B. (1992). “Learning through Failure: The Strategy of Small Losses”, Research in Organizational Behavior, 14, 231–266.
  • Worthington, R L., Whittaker, T.A. (2006). “Scale Development Research: A Content Analysis and Recommendations for Best Practices”, The Counseling Psychologist, 34(6), 806–838.
  • Zhao, B. (2011). “Learning from Errors: The Role of Context, Emotion, and Personality”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 32, 435–463.
  • Zhao, B., Olivera, F. (2006). “Error Reporting in Organizations”, Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 1012-1030.
  • Zhao, B., Seifried, J., Sieweke, J. (2018). “Trainers’ Responses to Errors Matter in Trainees’ Learning from Errors: Evidence from Two Studies”, Journal of Managerial Psychology, 33(3), 279-296.
There are 61 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Journal Section Research Article
Authors

Elif Bilginoğlu 0000-0003-1481-0170

Uğur Yozgat 0000-0001-9893-3551

Publication Date April 19, 2021
Submission Date April 8, 2020
Published in Issue Year 2021 Volume: 19 Issue: 40

Cite

APA Bilginoğlu, E., & Yozgat, U. (2021). İşyerinde Hatalardan Öğrenme Ölçeği Türkçe Formunun Geçerlilik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 19(40), 299-322. https://doi.org/10.35408/comuybd.716676

Cited By

Evaluation of Nutrition Knowledge, Sources of Nutrition Information and Digital Healthy Diet Literacy of Schoolteachers: A Cross-Sectional Study
Gümüşhane Üniversitesi Sağlık Bilimleri Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.37989/gumussagbil.1228024
Okullarda Hata Yönetimi Kültürü Ölçeği: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması
İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.17679/inuefd.1076546
PSYCHOLOGICAL CAPITAL LEVEL OF AIRPORT EMPLOYEES AND THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORKPLACE HAPPINESS
Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi
https://doi.org/10.18092/ulikidince.1041484
THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN SELF-EFFICACY AND ATTITUDES OF CHEMISTRY TEACHER CANDIDATES
Problems of Education in the 21st Century
https://doi.org/10.33225/pec/15.63.62
 Download Cover Image

Sayın Araştırmacı;

Dergimize gelen yoğun talep nedeniyle Ekim 2024 sayısı için öngörülen kontenjan dolmuştur, gönderilen makaleler ilerleyen sayılarda değerlendirilebilecektir. Bu hususa dikkat ederek yeni makale gönderimi yapmanızı rica ederiz.

Yönetim Bilimler Dergisi Özel Sayı Çağrısı
Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi 2024 yılının Eylül ayında “Endüstri 4.0 ve Dijitalleşmenin Sosyal Bilimlerde Yansımaları” başlıklı bir özel sayı yayınlayacaktır.
Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi Biga İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi tarafından 5-6 Temmuz 2024 tarihlerinde çevrimiçi olarak düzenlenecek olan 4. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı’nda sunum gerçekleştiren yazarların dergi için ücret yatırmasına gerek olmayıp, dekont yerine Konferans Katılım Belgesini sisteme yüklemeleri yeterli olacaktır.
Gönderilen makalelerin derginin yazım kurallarına uygun olması ve DergiPark sistemi üzerinden sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı ana başlığı ile ilgisiz makaleler değerlendirmeye alınmayacaktır. Özel sayı için gönderilen makalelerin "Makalemi özel sayıya göndermek istiyorum" kutucuğu işaretlenerek sisteme yüklenmesi gerekmektedir. Özel sayı için gönderilmemiş makalelerin bu sayıya eklenmesi mümkün olmayacaktır.
Özel Sayı Çalışma Takvimi
Gönderim Başlangıcı: 15 Nisan 2024
Son Gönderim Tarihi: 15 Temmuz 2024
Özel Sayı Yayınlanma Tarihi: Eylül 2024

Dergimize göndereceğiniz çalışmalar linkte yer alan taslak dikkate alınarak hazırlanmalıdır. Çalışmanızı aktaracağınız taslak dergi yazım kurallarına göre düzenlenmiştir. Bu yüzden biçimlendirmeyi ve ana başlıkları değiştirmeden çalışmanızı bu taslağa aktarmanız gerekmektedir.
İngilizce Makale Şablonu için tıklayınız...

Saygılarımızla,