HOW THE OWNER-MANAGER'S EVALUATE THEIR OWN IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ?: THE OWNER-MANAGER’S OF A SMALL ORGANIZATIONS IDENTIFICATION OF CORE-PERSONALITY ON SOME CONCLUSION

Year 2016, Issue: 48, 117 - 127, 28.04.2016

Hakan Kara

Abstract

In this study, the owner-manager of small organization aimed to
determine how they evaluate their identification of core-personality. Data were
obtained from 100 small owner-manager organization. To determine identification
of core-personality, Adjective Check List and Five Factor Personality Model is
used. 15 point average of Adjective
Check List
to the scan list and the total of the average is taken. Using the sum of the
mean, Five Factor Model of Personality personality that was founded on the
front of the cross-correlations. The highest score in double identification of core-personality of
small owner-manager, Responsibility (12,59) has the personality trait. This
personality trait, respectively Agreeableness (11,11), Neuroticism (10,78),
Extraversion (10,48) and Autonomy (8,06) personality properties has by
followed. As for the traits that have been made in the some conclusions.

Keywords

Identification of Core-Personality, Owner-Managers, Big Five Factor Personality Model, Adjective Check List, Personality Traits

SAHİP-YÖNETİCİLER ÖZ-KİŞİLİK KİMLİKLERİNİ NASIL DEĞERLENDİRİYORLAR?: KÜÇÜK ÖRGÜT SAHİP-YÖNETİCİLERİNİN ÖZ-KİŞİLİK KİMLİKLERİ ÜZERİNE BAZI ÇIKARIMLAR

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, küçük örgüt sahip-yöneticilerinin öz-kişilik kimliklerini
nasıl değerlendirdiklerinin belirlenmesi amaçlanmıştır. Veriler 100 adet küçük
örgüt sahip-yöneticilerinden elde edilmiştir. Öz-kişilik kimliklerinin
belirlenmesi için Sıfat Tarama Listesi ve Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Modeli
kullanılmıştır. 15 maddelik Sıfat Tarama Listesi’ne verilen yanıtların
ortalamaları alınmıştır. Ortalamaların toplamları kullanılarak, Beş Faktörlü
Kişilik Modeli’nin ön gördüğü kişilikler ile çapraz bağıntılar kurulmuştur.
Küçük örgüt sahip-yöneticilerin öz-kişilik kimlikleri içerisinde en yüksek
puanı Sorumluluk (12,59) kişilik özelliği almıştır. Bu kişilik özelliğini
sırasıyla Uyumluluk (11,11), Duygusal Denge (10,78) Dışa Dönüklülük (10,48) ve
Otonomi (8,06) kişilik özellikleri almıştır. Ortaya konulan kişilik
özelliklerini yönelik olarak da çıkarımlarda bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Öz-Kişilik Kimliği, Sahip-Yöneticiler, Beş Faktörlü Kişilik Modeli, Sıfat Tarama Listesi, Kişilik Özellikleri

References

• Ashton, M. C. (1998). Personality and Job Performance: The Importance of Narrow Traits, Journal of Organizational Behavior, 19:289-303.
• Block, J. (1995). A Contrarian View of The Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description, Psychol Bulletein, 117(2):187-215.
• Block, J. (2001). Millennial Contrarianism: The Five-Factor Approach to Personality Description 5 Years Later, Journal of Research in Personality, 35:98-107.
• Costa, P. T. JR. ve Mc Crae, R. R. (1992). The Five-Factor Model of Personality and Its Relevance to Personality Disorders, Journal of Personality Disorders, 6:343-359.
• Craig, R. J., Loheidi, R. A., Rudolph, B., Leifer, M. ve Rubin, N. (1998). Relationship Between Psychological Needs and The Five-Factor Model of Personality Classification, Journal of Research in Personality, 32:519-527.
• Digman, J. M. (1990). Personality Structure: Emergence of The Five-Factor Model, Annual Review of Psychology, 41:417-440.
• Domino, G. (1970). Identification of Potentially Creative Persons From The Adjective Check List, Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 35(1):48-51.
• Duval, D. L., Williams, J. E., Patterson, D. J. ve Fogle, E. E. (1995). A ‘Big Five’ Scoring System For The Item Pool of The Adjective Check List, Journal of Personality Assessment, 65(1):59-76.
• Goldberg, L. R. (1993). The Structure of Phenotypic Personality Traits, American Psychologist, 48(1):26-34.
• Gough, H. G. (1979). A Creative Personality Scale for The Adjective Check List, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37(8): 1398-1405.
• Gough, H. G. (1960). The Adjective Check List As a Personality Assessment Research Technique, Psychological Reports, 6(1):107-122.
• Hough, L. (1992). The ‘Big Five’ Personality Variables-Construct Confusion: Description Versus Prediction, Human Performance, 5(1-2):139-155.
• https://tr.wikipedia.org/wiki/, Erişim Tarihi, 10.12.2015.
• Kara, H. (2009). Yönetim Bilimin Düşünce İzleri, Kütahya:Üç Mart Basım.
• Ledesma, R. D., Sanchez R. ve M. Diaz-Lazaro, C. (2011). Adjective Checklist To Assess The Big Five Personality Factors in The Argentine Population, Journal of Personality Assessment, 93(1):46-55.
• Marcus, D. K. ve Lehman, S. J. (2002). Are There Sex Differences In Interpersonal Perception At Zero Acquaintance? A Social Relations Analysis, Journal of Research in Personality, 36(3):190-207.
• Mc Crae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. JR. (1985). Comparison of EPI and Psychoticism Scales With Measures of The Five-Factor Model of Personality, Personality and Individual Differences, 6(5):587-597.
• Mc Crae, R. R. (1991). The Five-Factor Model and Its Assessment in Clinical Settings, Journal of Personality Assessment,57(3):399-14.
• Nautal, M. M. (2004). Self-efficacy As a Mediator of The Relationships Between Personality Factors and Career Interests, Journal of Career Assessment, 12(4):381-394.
• Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C. ve Schmidt, F. L. (1993). Meta-analysis of Integrity Test Validities, Journal of Applied Psychology, 78:679-703.
• Parker, W. D. ve Stumpf, H. (1998). A Validation of The Five-Factor Model of Personality in Academically Talented Youth Across Observers and Instruments, Personality and Individual Differences, 25(6):1005-1025.
• John, Oliver P. (1990). The “Big Five” Factor Taxonomy: Dimensions of Personality in The Nutural Language and in Questionnaires, 66-100, Pervin, L. A., (ed.), Handbook of Personality Theory and Research, New York: Guilford Press.
• Piedmont, R. L., Mc Crae, R. R. ve Costa, P. T. JR. (1991). Adjective Check List Scales and The Five-Factor Model, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(4):630-637.
• Raad, B. D. (1998). Five Big, Big Five Issues Rationale, Content, Structure, Status, and Crosscultural Assessment, European Psychologist, 3:113-124.
• Robbins, S. P. (2009). Self-Assessment Library 3.4 Insights Into Your Skills Interests And Abilities, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Robbins, S. P., Decenzo, D. A. ve Coulter, M. (2013). Yönetimin Esasları, (Çev.; Adem Öğüt), Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Smith, J. M. ve Schaefer, C. E. (1969). Development of A Creativity Scale for The Adjective Check List, Psychological Reports, 25:87-92.
• Judge, T. A., Higgins, C.A., Thoresen, C. J. ve Barrick, M. R. (1999). The Big Five Personality Traits, General Mental Ability, and Career Success Across The Life Span, Personnel Psychology, 52(3):621-652.
• Wells, W. D., Andriuli, F. J., Goi, F. J. ve Seader, S. (1957). An Adjective Check List for The Study of Product Personality, Journal of Applied Psychology, 41(5):317-319.
• Williams, J. E. ve Bennett, S. M. (1975). The Definition of Sex Stereotypes Via The Adjective Check List, Sex Roles, 1(4):327-337.
• Williams, J. E. ve Best, D. L. (1977). Sex Stereotypes and Trait Favorability on The Adjective Check List, Educational and Psychological Measurement, 37(1):101-110.
• Williams, J. E., Giles, H., Edwards, J. R., Best,, D. L. ve Daws, J. T. (1977). Sex-trait Stereotypes in England, Ireland and The United States, The British Psychological Society, 16(4):303-309.
• Zuckerman, M. (1960). The Development of An Affect Adjective Check List for The Measurement of Anxiety, Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24(5):457-462.