Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

Examination of patient opinions about whiteboard use

Year 2024, , 64 - 72, 31.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.56723/dyad.1272295

Abstract

This study was conducted to examine patients' opinions about whiteboard use. It was carried out in the Obstetrics and Gynecology Service of a private hospital. The population of the study consisted of patients who were hospitalized between 10.09.2021 and 10.11.2021 and accepted to participate in the study. The whole universe was included in the sample without choosing a sample from the population. In the collection of data, the Introductory Information Form which was prepared by the researcher by scanning the literature, and 16 questions developed by the researchers to examine the patient's opinions about the use of whiteboards was used. In the study, it was determined that 64.5% of 107 participants did not use the whiteboard before, 73% contributed to their care in assessing their pain, and 85% contributed to their taking an active role in their care. As a result, the average of the answers of all participants was found to be 4.20. This value shows that the opinions of the patients about the use of whiteboards are generally positive. This study may help direct patients and their families to their goals, encourage daily use of the environment and nurse-patient participation around the whiteboard, and facilitate communication and information sharing.

References

  • [1] Goyal AA, Tur K, Mann J, Townsend W, Flanders SA, Chopra V. “Do bedside visual tools improve patient and caregiver satisfaction? A systematic review of the literature”. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 12(11), 930-936, 2017.
  • [2] Bost N, Crilly J, Wallis M, Patterson E, Chaboyer W. “Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department–a literature review”. International Emergency Nursing, 18(4), 210-220, 2010.
  • [3] Wong HJ, Caesar M, Bandali S, Agnew J, Abrams H. “Electronic inpatient whiteboards: improving multidisciplinary communication and coordination of care”. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(4), 239-247, 2009.
  • [4] Karn C. “The use of personalized whiteboards in the inpatient acute care setting and their effect on patient and nurses perception of communication”. The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library, San Francisco, USA, 5-19, 2016.
  • [5] Xiao Y, Schenkel S, Faraj S, Mackenzie CF, Moss J. “What whiteboards in a trauma center operating suite can teach us about emergency department communication”. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 50(4), 387-395, 2007.
  • [6] Pimentel VM, Sun M, Bernstein PS, Ferzli M, Kim M, Goffman D. “Whiteboard use in labor and delivery: a tool to improve patient knowledge of the name of the delivery provider and satisfaction with care”. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 565-570, 2018.
  • [7] Sehgal NL, Green A, Vidyarthi AR, Blegen MA, Wachter RM. “Patient whiteboards as a communication tool in the hospital setting: a survey of practices and recommendations”. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5(4), 234-239, 2010.
  • [8] Singh S, Fletcher KE, Pandl GJ, Schapira MM, Nattinger AB, Biblo LA, Whittle J. “It’s the writing on the wall: whiteboards improve inpatient satisfaction with provider communication”. American Journal of Medical Quality, 26(2), 127-131, 2011.
  • [9] Makaryus AN, Friedman EA. “Brief Report: Does Your Patient Know Your Name? An Approach to Enhancing Patients' Awareness of Their Caretaker's Name”. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 27(4), 53-56, 2005.
  • [10] Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. “A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans”. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23, 1-21, 2012.
  • [11] Dingley C, Daugherty K, Derieg MK, Persing R. Improving Patient Safety Through Provider Communication Strategy Enhancements. Editörler: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US, Rockville (MD), 2008.
  • [12] Erdoğan Y, Bayram S, Deniz L. “Web tabanlı öğretim tutum ölçeği: Açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi çalışması”. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 1-14, 2007.
  • [13] Hursh A, Salsbury S, Lenhart B, Doran S, Zadvinskis IM. “Using personalized care boards for communicating safe patient handling and mobility status in acute care: Lessons learned using the donabedian model”. American Journal of Safe Patient Handling and Mobility, 3(4), 124-131, 2013.
  • [14] Cholli P, Meyer EC, David M, Moonan M, Mahoney J, Hession-Laband E, et al. “Family perspectives on Whiteboard use and recommendations for improved practices”. Hospital Pediatrics, 6(7), 426-430, 2016.
  • [15] Tan M, Hooper Evans K, Braddock III CH, Shieh L. “Patient whiteboards to improve patient-centred care in the hospital”. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 89(1056), 604-609, 2013.

Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi

Year 2024, , 64 - 72, 31.01.2024
https://doi.org/10.56723/dyad.1272295

Abstract

Bu çalışma, beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hastaların görüşlerini incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Özel bir hastanede Kadın Hastalıkları ve Doğum Servisi’nde gerçekleştirilmiştir. Araştırmanın evrenini 10.09.2021-10.11.2021 tarihleri arasında hastanede yatan ve araştırmaya katılmayı kabul eden hastalar oluşturmuştur. Evrenden örneklem seçimine gidilmeden tüm evren örnekleme dahil edilmiştir. Verilerin toplanmasında araştırmacı tarafından literatür bilgiler taranarak hazırlanan 4 sorudan oluşan Tanıtıcı Bilgi Formu ve beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi amacı ile literatür doğrultusunda araştırmacılar tarafından geliştirilen 16 soruluk anket formu kullanılmıştır. Çalışmada yüz yedi katılımcıdan %64.5’inin daha önce beyaz tahtayı kullanmadığı, %73’ünün ağrısını değerlendirmede bakımına katkı sağladığı, %85’inin bakımında aktif rol almasına katkı sağladığı tespit edilmiştir. Sonuç olarak tüm katılımcıların yanıtlarının ortalaması 4.20 bulunmuştur. Bu değer, hastaların beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili görüşlerin genel olarak olumlu olduğunu göstermektedir. Bu çalışma, hastaları ve ailelerini amaçlarına yönlendirmeye, ortamın günlük kullanımını ve beyaz tahta etrafında hemşire-hasta katılımını teşvik etmeye, iletişim ve bilgi paylaşımını kolaylaştırmaya yardımcı olabilecektir.

References

  • [1] Goyal AA, Tur K, Mann J, Townsend W, Flanders SA, Chopra V. “Do bedside visual tools improve patient and caregiver satisfaction? A systematic review of the literature”. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 12(11), 930-936, 2017.
  • [2] Bost N, Crilly J, Wallis M, Patterson E, Chaboyer W. “Clinical handover of patients arriving by ambulance to the emergency department–a literature review”. International Emergency Nursing, 18(4), 210-220, 2010.
  • [3] Wong HJ, Caesar M, Bandali S, Agnew J, Abrams H. “Electronic inpatient whiteboards: improving multidisciplinary communication and coordination of care”. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 78(4), 239-247, 2009.
  • [4] Karn C. “The use of personalized whiteboards in the inpatient acute care setting and their effect on patient and nurses perception of communication”. The University of San Francisco USF Scholarship: a digital repository @ Gleeson Library, San Francisco, USA, 5-19, 2016.
  • [5] Xiao Y, Schenkel S, Faraj S, Mackenzie CF, Moss J. “What whiteboards in a trauma center operating suite can teach us about emergency department communication”. Annals of Emergency Medicine, 50(4), 387-395, 2007.
  • [6] Pimentel VM, Sun M, Bernstein PS, Ferzli M, Kim M, Goffman D. “Whiteboard use in labor and delivery: a tool to improve patient knowledge of the name of the delivery provider and satisfaction with care”. Maternal and Child Health Journal, 22, 565-570, 2018.
  • [7] Sehgal NL, Green A, Vidyarthi AR, Blegen MA, Wachter RM. “Patient whiteboards as a communication tool in the hospital setting: a survey of practices and recommendations”. Journal of Hospital Medicine, 5(4), 234-239, 2010.
  • [8] Singh S, Fletcher KE, Pandl GJ, Schapira MM, Nattinger AB, Biblo LA, Whittle J. “It’s the writing on the wall: whiteboards improve inpatient satisfaction with provider communication”. American Journal of Medical Quality, 26(2), 127-131, 2011.
  • [9] Makaryus AN, Friedman EA. “Brief Report: Does Your Patient Know Your Name? An Approach to Enhancing Patients' Awareness of Their Caretaker's Name”. Journal for Healthcare Quality, 27(4), 53-56, 2005.
  • [10] Tan WL, Wong TL, Wong MC, Lang NP. “A systematic review of post‐extractional alveolar hard and soft tissue dimensional changes in humans”. Clinical Oral Implants Research, 23, 1-21, 2012.
  • [11] Dingley C, Daugherty K, Derieg MK, Persing R. Improving Patient Safety Through Provider Communication Strategy Enhancements. Editörler: Henriksen K, Battles JB, Keyes MA, Grady ML. Advances in Patient Safety: New Directions and Alternative Approaches (Vol. 3: Performance and Tools). Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality US, Rockville (MD), 2008.
  • [12] Erdoğan Y, Bayram S, Deniz L. “Web tabanlı öğretim tutum ölçeği: Açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizi çalışması”. Uluslararası İnsan Bilimleri Dergisi, 4(2), 1-14, 2007.
  • [13] Hursh A, Salsbury S, Lenhart B, Doran S, Zadvinskis IM. “Using personalized care boards for communicating safe patient handling and mobility status in acute care: Lessons learned using the donabedian model”. American Journal of Safe Patient Handling and Mobility, 3(4), 124-131, 2013.
  • [14] Cholli P, Meyer EC, David M, Moonan M, Mahoney J, Hession-Laband E, et al. “Family perspectives on Whiteboard use and recommendations for improved practices”. Hospital Pediatrics, 6(7), 426-430, 2016.
  • [15] Tan M, Hooper Evans K, Braddock III CH, Shieh L. “Patient whiteboards to improve patient-centred care in the hospital”. Postgraduate Medical Journal, 89(1056), 604-609, 2013.
There are 15 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Health Care Administration
Journal Section Research Articles
Authors

Feyza Kalay Tan 0000-0002-0921-6479

Nurten Cansu Özşaşılar This is me 0000-0002-3951-2551

Publication Date January 31, 2024
Submission Date March 28, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2024

Cite

APA Kalay Tan, F., & Özşaşılar, N. C. (2024). Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.56723/dyad.1272295
AMA Kalay Tan F, Özşaşılar NC. Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi. January 2024;4(1):64-72. doi:10.56723/dyad.1272295
Chicago Kalay Tan, Feyza, and Nurten Cansu Özşaşılar. “Beyaz Tahta kullanımı Ile Ilgili Hasta görüşlerinin Incelenmesi”. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi 4, no. 1 (January 2024): 64-72. https://doi.org/10.56723/dyad.1272295.
EndNote Kalay Tan F, Özşaşılar NC (January 1, 2024) Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi 4 1 64–72.
IEEE F. Kalay Tan and N. C. Özşaşılar, “Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi”, Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 64–72, 2024, doi: 10.56723/dyad.1272295.
ISNAD Kalay Tan, Feyza - Özşaşılar, Nurten Cansu. “Beyaz Tahta kullanımı Ile Ilgili Hasta görüşlerinin Incelenmesi”. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi 4/1 (January 2024), 64-72. https://doi.org/10.56723/dyad.1272295.
JAMA Kalay Tan F, Özşaşılar NC. Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;4:64–72.
MLA Kalay Tan, Feyza and Nurten Cansu Özşaşılar. “Beyaz Tahta kullanımı Ile Ilgili Hasta görüşlerinin Incelenmesi”. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 4, no. 1, 2024, pp. 64-72, doi:10.56723/dyad.1272295.
Vancouver Kalay Tan F, Özşaşılar NC. Beyaz tahta kullanımı ile ilgili hasta görüşlerinin incelenmesi. Disiplinlerarası Yenilik Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2024;4(1):64-72.