In recent years, the degradation of the natural environment and the misused of resources
have led to the conclusion that the environment must be protected. In this context, consumers have
started to attach more importance to organic farming practices and organic foods than ever before.
However, although organic farming practices have increased significantly, the rate of purchasing
organic foods by consumers is still low. In this study, the hypothesis that environmental image
creates environmental trust and satisfaction and this positively affects the environmental word-ofmouth intention is discussed based on organic foods. The first study of this hypothesis based on
organic foods constitutes the original value of this study. A field study was conducted on
households living in Antakya-Hatay to test the relationships in the conceptual model adapted by
Mehriban and Russell. By using a field sampling method, research data were collected with a faceto-face survey. Confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) and structural equation modeling were applied
in the analysis of the data. The findings show that the environmental image of organic foods
(stimuli) leads to positive effect on the environmental word-of-mouth intention for organic foods
(response), if it creates environmental trust on organic foods and environmental
satisfaction with organic foods (organism).
Environmental image Environmental trust Environmental satisfaction Environmental word-of-mouth intention Organic foods
The author acknowledges and is grateful to the students of master program in 2017-2018 term for their efforts in collecting data process.
Son yıllarda doğal çevrenin bozulması ve kaynakların kötüye kullanımı çevrenin
korunması gerektiği sonucunu doğurmuştur. Bu bağlamda tüketiciler, organik tarım uygulamalarına
ve organik gıdalara her zamankinden daha fazla önem vermeye başlamışlardır. Ancak organik
tarım uygulamaları önemli ölçüde artmış olsa da tüketicilerin organik gıda satın alma oranı halen
düşüktür. Bu çalışmada, çevreci imajın çevresel güven ve memnuniyet yarattığı ve bunun da
ağızdan ağıza iletişimi olumlu yönde etkilediği hipotezi organik gıdalar temel alınarak tartışılmıştır.
Bu hipotezin ilk kez organik gıdalara dayalı olarak incelenmesi, bu çalışmanın orijinal değerini
oluşturmaktadır. Mehriban ve Russell tarafından uyarlanan kavramsal modeldeki ilişkileri test
etmek için Antakya-Hatay'da yaşayan hane halkları üzerinde bir saha çalışması yapılmıştır. Veriler
anket yöntemi ile toplanmış ve alan örneklemesi yöntemi uygulanmıştır. Verilerin analizinde
doğrulayıcı faktör analizi (DFA) ve yapısal eşitlik modeli uygulanmıştır. Bulgular, organik gıdaların
çevresel imajının (uyarıcılar), tüketici (organizma) için organik gıdalara karşı çevresel güven ve
çevresel memnuniyet yaratması halinde organik gıdalar için çevresel ağızdan ağza iletişim niyetini
(tepkiyi) olumlu yönde etkilediğini göstermektedir
Çevreci İmaj Çevresel Güven Çevresel Tatmin Çevresel Ağızdan Ağza İletişim Niyeti Çevresel Ağızdan Ağza İletişim Niyeti, Organik Gıdalar.
Primary Language | English |
---|---|
Journal Section | Makaleler |
Authors | |
Publication Date | April 30, 2021 |
Acceptance Date | January 28, 2021 |
Published in Issue | Year 2021 Issue: 58 |
Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).
Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.
No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.
Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.
Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.
Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.