Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

TAMİRDE DIŞKAYNAĞIN VE ÖDEMEDE GECİKMENİN KUSURLU ÜRÜNLER ÜRETEN BİR ÜRETİM SİSTEMİNİN PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Year 2023, Issue: 65, 57 - 66, 31.08.2023

Harun Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1262528

Abstract

Ödemede belirli bir süre gecikmeye izin verilmesi varsayımının toplam maliyet üzerindeki etkisi birçok üretim stok kontrol modelinde ele alınmıştır. Bu modellerde, ödemede izin verilen gecikme süresinin alıcının satın alma kararını etkilediği bu durumun da stok maliyetlerini önemli ölçüde azalttığı sonucuna varılmıştır. Stok maliyetlerini azaltmanın bir diğer yolu da üretim sırasında üretilen kusurlu ürünlerin tamir edilmesidir. Bu çalışmada, kusurlu ürünlerin dışkaynak kullanılarak tamiri ve ödemede gecikmeye izin verilmesi varsayımları altında bir ekonomik üretim miktarı modeli geliştirilmiştir. Birim zamandaki toplam maliyeti enküçükleyecek optimum üretim miktarı önerilen bir algoritma yardımıyla elde edilmiştir. Sonuçları göstermek amacıyla duyarlılık analizine sahip iki sayısal örnek verilmiştir. Sayısal analizler, kusurlu ürünlerin dışkaynak tamirinin aynı üretim sisteminde tamirine göre kısmen daha avantajlı olduğunu göstermiştir.

Keywords

stok ekonomik üretim miktarı kusurlu ürün tamir dışkaynak ödemede gecikmeye izin verilmesi

References

  • Axsäter, S. (2006). Inventory control. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2009). Economic production quantity with rework process at a single-stage manufacturing system with planned backorders. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1105-1113.
  • Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., Chung, K. J., ve Treviño-Garza, G. (2014). Celebrating a century of the economic order quantity model in honor of Ford Whitman Harris. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 1-7.
  • Chang, C. T. (2004). An EOQ model with deteriorating items under inflation when supplier credits linked to order quantity. International Journal of Production Economics, 88(3), 307-316.
  • Cheng, T. C. E. (1991). An economic order quantity model with demand-dependent unit production cost and imperfect production processes. IIE Transactions, 23(1), 23-28.
  • Chung, K. J. ve Liao, J. J. (2004). Lot-sizing decisions under trade credit depending on the ordering quantity. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), 909-928.
  • Goyal, S. K. (1985). Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(4), 335-338.
  • Hayek, P. A. ve Salameh, M. K. (2001). Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Production Planning & Control, 12(6), 584-590.
  • Huang, Y. F. (2003). Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), 1011-1015.
  • Huang, Y. F. (2007). Economic order quantity under conditionally permissible delay in payments. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 911-924.
  • Jamal, A. M. M., Sarker, B. R., ve Mondal, S. (2004). Optimal manufacturing batch size with rework process at a single-stage production system, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47(1), 77-89.
  • Jamal, A. M. M., Sarker, B. R., ve Wang, S. (1997). An ordering policy for deteriorating items with allowable shortage and permissible delay in payment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(8), 826-833.
  • Jaber, M. Y., Zanoni, S., ve Zavanella, L. E. (2014), “Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options”, International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 126-131.
  • Mokhtari, H. (2019). Optimal lot size in a manufacturing system with imperfect raw materials and defective finished products. Scientia Iranica (Transactions E: Industrial Engineering), 26(4), 2561-2578.
  • Ouyang, L. Y. (2015). An integrated inventory model with capacity constraint and order-size dependent trade credit. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 84, 133-143.
  • Ouyang, L. Y. ve Chang, C. T. (2013). Optimal production lot with imperfect production process under permissible delay in payments and complete backlogging. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 610-617.
  • Ouyang, L. Y., Wu, K. S., ve Yang, C. T. (2006). A study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(4), 637-651.
  • Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34, 137-144.
  • Salameh, M. K. ve Jaber, M. Y. (2000). Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 64 (1-3), 59-64.
  • Sarkar, B. (2012). An EOQ model with delay in payments and stock dependent demand in the presence of imperfect production. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(17), 8295-8308.
  • Sarkar, B., Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., Sarkar, M. ve Singgih, M. L. (2014). An economic production quantity model with random defective rate, rework process and backorders for a single stage production system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(3), 423-435.
  • Taft, E. W. (1918). The most economical production lot. Iran Age, 1410-1412.
  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Sari-Khanbaglo, M. P., ve Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2019). Outsourcing rework of imperfect items in the economic production quantity (EPQ) inventory model with backordered demand”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49(12), 2688-2699.
  • Tiwari, S., Ahmed, W., ve Sarkar, B. (2018). Multi-item sustainable green production system under trade-credit and partial backordering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 82-95.
  • Tsao, Y. C., Chen, T. H., ve Huang, S. M. (2011). A production policy considering reworking of imperfect items and trade credit. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 23(1), 48-63.
  • Tsao, Y. C., Zhang, Q., Chang, F. C., ve Vu-Thuy, L. (2017). An imperfect production model under Radio Frequency Identification adoption and trade credit. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 42, 493-508.

THE JOINT EFFECT OF OUTSOURCED REPAIR AND PERMISSIBLE DELAY IN PAYMENT ON THE PERFORMANCE OF AN IMPERFECT PRODUCTION INVENTORY SYSTEM

Year 2023, Issue: 65, 57 - 66, 31.08.2023

Harun Öztürk

https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1262528

Abstract

There have been many production inventory control problems addressing the effect of permissible delay in payment on total cost. These models concluded that permissible delay in payment affects buyers' purchasing decisions, leading to a significant reduction in inventory costs. Another way to reduce inventory costs is to repair sub-standard items produced during production. This study develops a mathematical model for the economic production quantity, assuming outsourcing of repairs to sub-standard items and permissible delay in payment. An algorithm is proposed to obtain the optimum production quantity, designed to minimise the total cost per unit time. The results are illustrated through two numerical examples, accompanied by severity analyses. These numerical analysis show that outsourcing of repairs to sub-standard items is partially more cost-effective than repairing them in the original production system.

Keywords

inventory economic production quantity sub-standard items repair outsourcing permissible delay in payment

References

  • Axsäter, S. (2006). Inventory control. New York: Springer Science + Business Media.
  • Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2009). Economic production quantity with rework process at a single-stage manufacturing system with planned backorders. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 57, 1105-1113.
  • Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., Chung, K. J., ve Treviño-Garza, G. (2014). Celebrating a century of the economic order quantity model in honor of Ford Whitman Harris. International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 1-7.
  • Chang, C. T. (2004). An EOQ model with deteriorating items under inflation when supplier credits linked to order quantity. International Journal of Production Economics, 88(3), 307-316.
  • Cheng, T. C. E. (1991). An economic order quantity model with demand-dependent unit production cost and imperfect production processes. IIE Transactions, 23(1), 23-28.
  • Chung, K. J. ve Liao, J. J. (2004). Lot-sizing decisions under trade credit depending on the ordering quantity. Computers & Operations Research, 31(6), 909-928.
  • Goyal, S. K. (1985). Economic order quantity under conditions of permissible delay in payments. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 36(4), 335-338.
  • Hayek, P. A. ve Salameh, M. K. (2001). Production lot sizing with the reworking of imperfect quality items produced. Production Planning & Control, 12(6), 584-590.
  • Huang, Y. F. (2003). Optimal retailer’s ordering policies in the EOQ model under trade credit financing. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 54(9), 1011-1015.
  • Huang, Y. F. (2007). Economic order quantity under conditionally permissible delay in payments. European Journal of Operational Research, 176(2), 911-924.
  • Jamal, A. M. M., Sarker, B. R., ve Mondal, S. (2004). Optimal manufacturing batch size with rework process at a single-stage production system, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 47(1), 77-89.
  • Jamal, A. M. M., Sarker, B. R., ve Wang, S. (1997). An ordering policy for deteriorating items with allowable shortage and permissible delay in payment. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 48(8), 826-833.
  • Jaber, M. Y., Zanoni, S., ve Zavanella, L. E. (2014), “Economic order quantity models for imperfect items with buy and repair options”, International Journal of Production Economics, 155, 126-131.
  • Mokhtari, H. (2019). Optimal lot size in a manufacturing system with imperfect raw materials and defective finished products. Scientia Iranica (Transactions E: Industrial Engineering), 26(4), 2561-2578.
  • Ouyang, L. Y. (2015). An integrated inventory model with capacity constraint and order-size dependent trade credit. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 84, 133-143.
  • Ouyang, L. Y. ve Chang, C. T. (2013). Optimal production lot with imperfect production process under permissible delay in payments and complete backlogging. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(2), 610-617.
  • Ouyang, L. Y., Wu, K. S., ve Yang, C. T. (2006). A study on an inventory model for non-instantaneous deteriorating items with permissible delay in payments. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 51(4), 637-651.
  • Porteus, E. L. (1986). Optimal lot sizing, process quality improvement and setup cost reduction. Operations Research, 34, 137-144.
  • Salameh, M. K. ve Jaber, M. Y. (2000). Economic production quantity model for items with imperfect quality. International Journal of Production Economics, 64 (1-3), 59-64.
  • Sarkar, B. (2012). An EOQ model with delay in payments and stock dependent demand in the presence of imperfect production. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 218(17), 8295-8308.
  • Sarkar, B., Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E., Sarkar, M. ve Singgih, M. L. (2014). An economic production quantity model with random defective rate, rework process and backorders for a single stage production system. Journal of Manufacturing Systems, 33(3), 423-435.
  • Taft, E. W. (1918). The most economical production lot. Iran Age, 1410-1412.
  • Taleizadeh, A. A., Sari-Khanbaglo, M. P., ve Cárdenas-Barrón, L. E. (2019). Outsourcing rework of imperfect items in the economic production quantity (EPQ) inventory model with backordered demand”, IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics: Systems, 49(12), 2688-2699.
  • Tiwari, S., Ahmed, W., ve Sarkar, B. (2018). Multi-item sustainable green production system under trade-credit and partial backordering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 204, 82-95.
  • Tsao, Y. C., Chen, T. H., ve Huang, S. M. (2011). A production policy considering reworking of imperfect items and trade credit. Flexible Services and Manufacturing Journal, 23(1), 48-63.
  • Tsao, Y. C., Zhang, Q., Chang, F. C., ve Vu-Thuy, L. (2017). An imperfect production model under Radio Frequency Identification adoption and trade credit. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 42, 493-508.
There are 26 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language Turkish
Subjects Business Administration
Journal Section Makaleler
Authors

Harun Öztürk 0000-0003-0193-6663

Early Pub Date August 18, 2023
Publication Date August 31, 2023
Acceptance Date May 12, 2023
Published in Issue Year 2023 Issue: 65

Cite

APA Öztürk, H. (2023). TAMİRDE DIŞKAYNAĞIN VE ÖDEMEDE GECİKMENİN KUSURLU ÜRÜNLER ÜRETEN BİR ÜRETİM SİSTEMİNİN PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ. Erciyes Üniversitesi İktisadi Ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi(65), 57-66. https://doi.org/10.18070/erciyesiibd.1262528
 Download Cover Image

Ethical Principles and Ethical Guidelines

The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences places great emphasis on publication ethics, which serve as a foundation for the impartial and reputable advancement of scientific knowledge. In this context, the journal adopts a publishing approach aligned with the ethical standards set by the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and is committed to preventing potential malpractice. The following ethical responsibilities, established based on COPE’s principles, are expected to be upheld by all stakeholders involved in the publication process (authors, readers and researchers, publishers, reviewers, and editors).

Ethical Responsibilities of Editors
Make decisions on submissions based on the quality and originality of the work, its alignment with the journal's aims and scope, and the reviewers’ evaluations, regardless of the authors' religion, language, race, ethnicity, political views, or gender.
Respond to information requests from readers, authors, and reviewers regarding the publication and evaluation processes.
Conduct all processes without compromising ethical standards and intellectual property rights.
Support freedom of thought and protect human and animal rights.
Ensure the peer review process adheres to the principle of double-blind peer review.
Take full responsibility for accepting, rejecting, or requesting changes to a manuscript and ensure that conflicts of interest among stakeholders do not influence these decisions.
Ethical Responsibilities of Authors
Submitted works must be original. When utilizing other works, proper and complete citations and/or references must be provided.
A manuscript must not be under review by another journal simultaneously.
Individuals who have not contributed to the experimental design, implementation, data analysis, or interpretation should not be listed as authors.
If requested during the review process, datasets used in the manuscript must be provided to the editorial board.
If a significant error or mistake is discovered in the manuscript, the journal’s editorial office must be notified.
For studies requiring ethical committee approval, the relevant document must be submitted to the journal. Details regarding the ethical approval (name of the ethics committee, approval document number, and date) must be included in the manuscript.
Changes to authorship (e.g., adding or removing authors, altering the order of authors) cannot be proposed after the review process has commenced.
Ethical Responsibilities of Reviewers
Accept review assignments only in areas where they have sufficient expertise.
Agree to review manuscripts in a timely and unbiased manner.
Ensure confidentiality of the reviewed manuscript and not disclose any information about it, during or after the review process, beyond what is already published.
Refrain from using information obtained during the review process for personal or third-party benefit.
Notify the journal editor if plagiarism or other ethical violations are suspected in the manuscript.
Conduct reviews objectively and avoid conflicts of interest. If a conflict exists, the reviewer should decline the review.
Use polite and constructive language during the review process and avoid personal comments.
Publication Policy
The Journal of Erciyes University Faculty of Economics and Administrative Sciences is a free, open-access, peer-reviewed academic journal that has been in publication since 1981. The journal welcomes submissions in Turkish and English within the fields of economics, business administration, public finance, political science, public administration, and international relations.

No submission or publication fees are charged by the journal.
Every submitted manuscript undergoes a double-blind peer review process and similarity/plagiarism checks via iThenticate.
Submissions must be original and not previously published, accepted for publication, or under review elsewhere.
Articles published in the journal can be cited under the Open Access Policy and Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is given.
The journal is published three times a year, in April, August, and December. It includes original, high-quality, and scientifically supported research articles and reviews in its listed fields. Academic studies unrelated to these disciplines or their theoretical and empirical foundations are not accepted. The journal's languages are Turkish and English.

Submissions are first subject to a preliminary review for format and content. Manuscripts not meeting the journal's standards are rejected by the editorial board. Manuscripts deemed suitable proceed to the peer review stage.

Each submission is sent to at least two expert reviewers. If both reviews are favorable, the article is approved for publication. In cases where one review is positive and the other negative, the editorial board decides based on the reviews or may send the manuscript to a third reviewer.

Articles published in the journal are open access and can be cited under the Creative Commons license, provided proper attribution is made.