WHAT MAKES A STREET WALKABLE? A DATA ANALYTIC APPROACH TO INVESTIGATING WALKABILITY FACTORS

Year 2022, - Vol.23 - 16th DDAS (MSTAS) Special Issue -2022, 86 - 93, 23.12.2022

Nur Sipahioğlu

https://doi.org/10.18038/estubtda.1170105

Abstract

Walkability is a hot topic for variety of disciplines, as well as everyday walker. It affects the health, the environment and the liveliness of our neighbourhoods. Walkable streets are necessary for a better lifestyle and sustainable planet. The problem with walkability is that we still don’t have a general understanding of the concept. Every study differs in the way they define walkability, thus making walkability a subjective topic. However, the subjectivity causes contradiction in science. In this study, the aim to answer the question of what makes a street walkable by using a data analytic approach. The features used in other studies, as well as new attributes specific to this study, were investigated. Street images were used to extract data. The data was divided into nine categories: Street, Sidewalk, Obstacles, Urban Blocks, Amenities, Transportation, Attractiveness, People, and Vehicles. Data collection was carried out by measuring physical attributes through Remote Sensing images in QGIS, visually analyzing qualitative attributes with Google Street Maps/View and double checking data in Open Street Map Overpass Turbo API. Attributes were translated into scores and normalized where possible. Mutual Information Matrix and Correlation processes were conducted in Rapidminer. The attributes were processed in relation to overall assessment of walkability which was defined with personal rating. As a result, Mutual Information and Correlation matrices are useful in figuring out the relationship and dependencies between different attributes. Applying data analytics to a more comprehensive dataset will help identify the global factors of walkability.

Keywords

Walkability, Data Mining, Correlation, Mutual Information

References

• [1] Speck J. Walkable City. 1st ed. New York, NY, USA: North Point Press, 2012.
• [2] Forsyth A. What is a walkable place? The walkability debate in urban design. Urban Des Int 2015; 20(4): 274–292
• [3] Krambeck H V. The Global Walkability Index. MCP, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Massachusetts, USA, 2006.
• [4] Lo R. H. Walkability: What is it? J. Urban 2009; 2(2): 145–166.
• [5] Tiemann T K, Scott, A C, Atkins K N. Sidewalks, Streets and Walkability. Spaces Flows Int J Urban Extra Urban Stud 2012; 2(3). [6] Campoli J. Made for Walking: Density and Neighborhood Form. 1st ed. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, 2012.
• [7] Quercia D, Aiello LM, Schifanella R, Davies A. The Digital Life of Walkable Streets. Proceedings of the 24th International Conference on World Wide Web, 2015.
• [8] Ewing R, Handy S. Measuring the unmeasurable: Urban design qualities related to walkability. J Urban Des 2009; 14(1): 65–84.
• [9] Ewing R, Handy S, Brownson R C, Clemente O, Winston E. Identifying and Measuring Urban Design Qualities Related to Walkability. J Phys Act Heal 2016; 3(1): 223–240.
• [10] Moura F, Cambra P, Gonçalves A B. Measuring walkability for distinct pedestrian groups with a participatory assessment method: A case study in Lisbon. Landsc Urban Plan 2017; 157: 282–296.
• [11] Knapskog M, Hagen O H, Tennøy A, Rynning M K. Exploring ways of measuring walkability. Transp Res Procedia 2019; 41: 264–282.
• [12] Majic I, Pafka E. AwaP-IC—An Open-Source GIS Tool for Measuring Walkable Access. Urban Sci 2019; 3(2): 48.
• [13] D’Orso G, Migliore M. A GIS-based method for evaluating the walkability of a pedestrian environment and prioritised investments. J Transp Geogr 2020; 82: 102555.