Türkçe’de hece başında ünsüz kümelenmesinde ses türemesi ve İngiliz dili eğitimine etkisi

Year 2021, Volume: 3 Issue: 1, 28 - 37, 21.02.2021

Bilal Genç , Namık Ülkersoy , Volkan Darmaz

https://doi.org/10.47806/ijesacademic.773329

Abstract

Supporting Institution

Yok

Project Number

Yok

Thanks

Yok

Initial consonant cluster epenthesis in Turkish and its implications to EFL

Abstract

Abstract
The phonological structure of Turkish does not allow word-initial consonant clusters. That is, the syllable onset position of borrowed vocabulary requires the insertion of an epenthetic high vowel. This changes the syllable structure by the addition of an extra syllable to the word. In Turkish schools, all grammar teachers teach those borrowed words as if they were one syllable words. However, the situation is different phonologically since these are not one syllable but two syllable words. Borrowed words such as tren (English train), plan (English plan) are pronounced with the insertion of the high vowel [i] and therefore become two syllable words. Our goal in this paper was to analyse such borrowed words drawing syllable diagrams in order to prove that these loan words actually consist of two syllables in Turkish. The diagrams were illustrated in phonetic transcription. We also concluded that Turkish initial consonant cluster epenthesis might affect Turkish EFL learners’ pronunciation of English words in their foreign language classes.

Key words: epenthesis, consonant clusters, onset, Turkish.

Keywords

epenthesis, consonant clusters, onset, Turkish

Project Number

Yok

References

• Abrahamsson, N. (1999). Vowel epenthesis of /sC(C)/ onsets in Spanish/Swedish interphonology: A longitudinal case study. Language Learning 49 (3), 473-508.
• Benzer, A. (2010). Türk Hece Yapısındaki Değişmeler. Turkish Studies: International Periodical For The Languages, Literature and History of Turkish or Turkic 5 (1), 830-842.
• Carlisle, R. S. (1998). The acquisition of onsets in a markedness relationship: A longitudinal study. Studies in Second Language Acquisition 20, 245 – 260.
• Delatorre, F. (2006). Brazilian EFL Learners’ Production of Vowel Epenthesis in Words Ending in –ed. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Universidade Federal de Santa Catarina, Florianópolis, Brazil.
• Dupoux, E., Kakehi, K., Hirose, Y., Pallier, C., & Mehler, J. (1999). Epenthetic vowels in Japanese: A perceptual illusion? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance 25 (6), 1568-1578.
• Harrison, K. D. (1999). Tuvan reduplication and harmony. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000), (pp.75–86).
• Hooper, J. B. (1976) An introduction to natural generative phonology. New York: Academic Press.
• Kabak, B. & Idsardi, W. (2003). Syllabically Conditioned Perceptual Epenthesis. Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: General Session and Parasession on Phonetic Sources of Phonological Patterns: Synchronic and Diachronic Explanations (2003), (pp. 233-244).
• Kaun, A. (1999). Epenthesis-Driven Harmony in Turkish. Proceedings of the 25th Annual Meeting of the Berkeley Linguistics Society: Special Session on Caucasian, Dravidian, and Turkic Linguistics (2000), (pp.95–106).
• Prince, A. & Smolensky, P. (2004). Optimality Theory: Constraint Interaction in Generative Grammar. MA, USA: Blackwell Publishing.
• Rose, Y. & Demuth, K. (2006). Vowel epenthesis in loanword adaptation: Representational and phonetic considerations. Lingua 116 (2006), 1112-1139.
• Saussure, F. de (2011). Course in General Linguistics (Edited by Charles Bally and Albert Sechehaye, Translated by Wade Baskin). New York: Columbia University Press.
• Ulkersoy, N. (2007). Markedness Differential Hypothesis and The Phonological Errors of Turkish EFL Learners. (Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation). Cukurova University, Adana, Turkey.
• Vaux, B. (2001). Consonant Epenthesis and Hypercorrection. Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/097a/f212f739cdc3091888f57a9ece94fe447c79.pdf
• Yavas, M. (1979). Vowel harmony, natural phonology and the problems of borrowing. Kansas Working Papers in Linguistics 4 (2), 41-53.
• Zimmer, K. & Orgun, O. (1999). Turkish. In IPA (ed.), Handbook of the International Phonetic Association: A guide to the use of the International Phonetic Alphabet, (pp.154–158). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.