Meslektaş Dayanışmasının İş Performansı Üzerindeki Aracıları: Eğitim Sektöründe İlişkisel Bir Çalışma

Year 2023, Volume: 13 Issue: 2, 217 - 247, 20.06.2023

İbrahim Hakan Karataş , Bilal Çankır

https://doi.org/10.12658/M0701

Abstract

Eğitim kurumlarının fârik özelliklerinden biri özünde yer alan öğrenme ve öğretme süreçlerinin çoğunlukla uzman eğitimciler tarafından sınıfta bağımsız olarak yürütülmesidir. Bu bağımsızlık ve eşsizlik hali, meslektaş dayanışmasının diğer kurumlara göre eğitim kurumları için daha önemli bir konu olarak ortaya çıkmasına neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışma, eğitimcilerin meslektaş dayanışması ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide kişisel ve kurumsal aracı değişkenlerin etkisini incelemektedir. Bu çalışma, eğitimcilerin arasındaki ilişkide meslektaş dayanışması ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide üç bireysel değişkenin (işte kendini yetiştirme, öz-yeterlilik ve çalışmaya tutkunluk) ve üç kurumsal değişkenin (meslektaş ilişkileri, idari destek ve örgütsel iklim) toplam 766 katılımcıdan toplanan verileri kullanarak aracı rollerini incelemektedir. Eğitimcilerin meslektaş dayanışması ile iş performansı arasındaki ilişkide kurumsal ve bireysel değişkenlerin aracı etkiye sahip olduğu belirlenmiştir. Bu etkide kurumsal değişkenlerin bireysel değişkenlere göre daha zayıf aracılık etkisine sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Elde edilen sonuç, eğitim mesleğinin kendine özgü doğasının araştırmada incelenen değişkenler açısından farklı bir yapı ortaya koyduğunu göstermektedir

Keywords

Meslektaş dayanışması, iş performansı, öz-yeterlik, işte kendini yetiştirme, çalışmaya tutkunluk, meslektaş ilişkileri, idari destek, örgütsel iklim

The Mediators of Collegial Solidarity on Job Performance: A Relational Study in the Education Sector

Abstract

One of the distinguishing features of educational institutions is that the learning and teaching processes that are at their core are mostly carried out by expert educators independently on their own in the classroom. This state of independence and solitude causes collegial solidarity to emerge as a more important issue for educational institutions when compared to other institutions. This study examines the mediators of the relationship between educators’ collegial solidarity and job performance. This study examines the mediating roles of three individual variables (i.e., thriving at work, self-efficacy, and work engagement) and three institutional variables (i.e., collegial relations, administrative support, and organizational climate) have on the relationship between educators’ collegial solidarity and job performance using data collected from a total of 766 participants working at educational institutions. It has been determined that institutional and individual variables have a mediating effect in the relationship between educators’ colleague solidarity and job performance. It was observed that institutional variables had a weaker mediating effect than individual variables in this effect. This result shows that the unique nature of the education profession reveals a different structure in terms of the variables examined in the research.

Keywords

Collegial solidarity, job performance, self-efficacy, thriving at work, work engagement, collegial relations, administrative support, organizational climate

References

• Aarons, G. A. & Sawitzky, A. C. (2006). Organizational climate partially mediates the effect of culture on work attitudes and staff turnover in mental health services. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research, 33(3), 289-301.
• Abbasi, A., Altmann, J., & Hossain, L. (2011). Identifying the effects of co-authorship networks on the performance of scholars: A correlation and regression analysis of performance measures and social network analysis measures. Journal of İnformetrics, 5(4), 594-607.
• Altunel, M. C., Koçak, Ö. E., & Çankır, B. (2015). The Effect of Job Resources on Work Engagement: A Study on Academicians in Turkey. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 409-417.
• Arıcı-Özcan, N., Sahin, S. & Çankır, B. (2021). The validity and reliability of thriving scale in academic context: Mindfulness, GPA, and entrepreneurial intention among university students. Current Psychology, 1-12, https://doi.org/10.1007/s12144-021-01590-1.
• Arseven, A. (2016). Öz yeterlilik: bir kavram analizi. Electronic Turkish Studies, 11(19), 63-80.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-213.
• Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of Social and Clinical Psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
• Bandura, A. (1986b). Social Foundations of Thought and Action: A Social-cognitive View, Prentice-Hall.
• Baron, R. M. & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
• Brown, K. M. & Wynn, S. R. (2007). Teacher retention issues: how some principals are supporting and keeping new teachers. Journal of School Leadership, 17(6), 664-698.
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2005). Anket geliştirme. Türk Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 3(2), 133-151.
• Campbell, J. P., McHenry, J. J. & Wise, L. L. (1990). Modeling job performance in a population of jobs. Personnel Psychology, 43(2), 313-575.
• Çetinkaya Ulusoy, E. (2010). Hemşirelerde meslektaş dayanışması ölçeğinin geliştirilmesi ve meslektaş dayanışmasının iş doyumu ile ilişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış yüksek lisans tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Clark, B. (2001). The entrepreneurial university: new foundations for collegiality, autonomy, and achievement. Higher Education Management, 13(2), 9-24.
• Çoban, A. E. (2005). Psikolojik danışmanlar için meslektaş dayanışması. Mersin Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1(1), 167-174.
• Çöl, G. (2011). Algılanan güçlendirmenin iş gören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(1), 35-46.
• Dan, X., Xu, S., Liu, J., Hou, R., Liu, Y., & Ma, H. (2018). Innovative behaviour and career success: Mediating roles of self-efficacy and CS of nurses. International journal of nursing sciences, 5(3), 275-280.
• Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2008). Self‐determination theory: A macrotheory of human motivation, development, and health. Canadian Psychology/Psychologie Canadienne, 49, 182–185. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0012801
• Deci, E., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self‐determination in human behavior. Plenum Press.
• Dweck, C. S. (1986). Motivational processes affecting learning. American Psychologist, 41(10), 1040.
• Fredrickson, B. L. (2004). The broaden-and–build theory of positive emotions. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences, 359(1449), 1367-1377.
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple suide and reference, 17.0 update (10a ed.) Pearson.
• Groysberg, B. & Lee, L. E. (2008). The effect of colleague quality on top performance: the case of security analysts. Journal of Organizational Behavior: The International Journal of Industrial, Occupational and Organizational Psychology and Behavior, 29(8), 1123-1144.
• Gubanov, N. N. & Gubanov, N. I. (2018, November). Mental bases of social solidarity. In International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2018) (pp. 998-1002). Atlantis Press.
• Hackett, G. & Betz, N. E. (1981). A self-efficacy approach to the career development of women. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 18(3), 326-339.
• Hayes, A. F. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis. New York: The Guilford Press.
• Hoy, W. K. & Tarter, C. J. (1997). The road to open and healthy schools: A handbook for change. Corwin Press, Thousand Oaks, CA.
• Hoy, W. K., & Hannum, J. W. (1997). Middle school climate: An empirical assessment of organizational health and student achievement. Educational Administration Quarterly, 33(3), 290-311.
• Jarzabkowski, L. M. (2002). The social dimensions of teacher collegiality. The Journal of Educational Enquiry, 3(2), 1-20.
• Jarzabkowski, L. M. (2003). Teacher collegiality in a remote Australian school. Journal of Research in Rural Education, 18(3), 139-144.
• Karataş, İ. H., (2020). Okul yöneticileri ve öğretmenler için motivasyon kaynakları. (Eds. Avcı, Ö. & Ayyıldız, E.) Eğitimde Motivasyon içinde (pp. 229-259). Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Karl, K. A., O'Leary‐Kelly, A. M., & Martocchio, J. J. (1993). The impact of feedback and self‐efficacy on performance in training. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 14(4), 379-394.
• Kirkman, B. L. & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 58-74.
• Kleine, A. K., Rudolph, C. W., & Zacher, H. (2019). Thriving at work: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 40(9-10), 973-999.
• Koçak, Ö. E. (2017). How employees thrive at work? importance of relationship quality, person-job fit and recovery experiences after work hours. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora tezi). Marmara University, İstanbul.
• Leithwood, K. & Jantzi, D. (2006). Transformational school leadership for large-scale reform: effects on students, teachers, and their classroom practices. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 17(2), 201-227.
• Lent, R. W., & Brown, S. D. (2006). Integrating person and situation perspectives on work satisfaction: A social-cognitive view. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 69(2), 236–247.
• Lieberman, A. & Miller, L. (1999). Teachers: transforming their world and their work. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Little, J. W. (1982). Norms of collegiality and experimentation: workplace conditions of school success. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 325-340.
• Little, J. W. (1999). Colleagues of choice, colleagues of circumstance: a response to M. Fielding. The Australian Educational Researcher, 26(2), 35-43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF03219693
• Lorig, K., Chastain, R. L., Ung, E., Shoor, S. & Holman, H. R. (1989). Development and evaluation of a scale to measure perceived self‐efficacy in people with arthritis. Arthritis & Rheumatism: Official Journal of the American College of Rheumatology, 32(1), 37-44.
• Magill, A. L. (2002). Studying the needs and experiences of beginning teachers. (Unpublished master’s thesis). University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
• Mamacı, M., Alpar, G. ve Demir, B. (2020). Pandemi İş Yaşamı Değerlendirme Ölçeğinin Geliştirilmesi: Geçerlik ve Güvenirlik Çalışması. İş’te Davranış Dergisi, 5(2), 114-124.
• Maslach, C. & Leiter, M.P. (1997). The truth about burnout. Jossey Bass
• McIntosh, C. & Turnbull, J. (2005). Oxford Advanced Learner’s Dictionary: International Student’s Edition.
• Meydan, C. H. (2011). İş tatmini ve öz yeterliliğin örgüt içi girişimciliğe etkisi: kamu sektöründe bir araştırma. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 20(1), 25-40.
• MoNE (2022). National education statistics: formal education 2021-’22. Ministery of National Education Strategy Development Presidency.
• Neal, A., Griffin, M. A. & Hart, P. M. (2000). The impact of organizational climate on safety climate and individual behavior. Safety Science, 34(1-3), 99-109.
• Oranje, A. (2001). Teacher shortages, teacher job satisfaction, and professionalism: teacher assistants in Dutch secondary schools (Research report). (ERIC Document Reproduction Service No. ED453194).
• Örs Özdil, S. (2107). Tekli ve çoklu aracılık modellerinde aracı değişken etkisinin BK, Sobel, Bootstrap yöntemleriyle karşılaştırılması (PISA 2012 matematik okuryazarlığı). Unpublished PhD Dissertation. Ankara University, Ankara.
• Özgenel, M. (2020). An organizational factor predicting school effectiveness: School climate. International Journal of Psychology and Educational Studies, 7(1), 38-50.
• Özgün, Ö. (2005). The relationship of novice Turkish early childhood education teachers? professional needs, experiences, effıicacy beliefs, school climate for promoting early childhood learning, and job satisfaction (Unpublished PhD Thesis). Syracuse University Syracuse, USA.
• Papay, J. P., Taylor, E. S., Tyler, J. H. & Laski, M. E. (2020). Learning job skills from colleagues at work: evidence from a field experiment using teacher performance data. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(1), 359-88.
• Perera, H. N., Vosicka, L., Granziera, H., & McIlveen, P. (2018). Towards an integrative perspective on the structure of teacher work engagement. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 108, 28-41.
• Porath, C., Spreitzer, G., Gibson, C. & Garnett, F. G. (2012). Thriving at work: toward its measurement, construct validation, and theoretical refinement. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 33(2), 250-275.
• Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2004). SPSS and SAS procedures for estimating indirect effects in simple mediation models. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments, and Computers, 36, 717-731.
• Preacher, K. J., and Hayes, A. F. (2008). Asymptotic and resampling strategies for assessing and comparing indirect effects in multiple mediator models. Behavior Research Methods, 40, 879-891.
• Pritchard, R. D. & Karasick, B. W. (1973). The effects of organizational climate on managerial job performance and job satisfaction. Organizational Behavior & Human Decision Processes, 9(1), 126–146.
• Rathel, J. M., Drasgow, E., Brown, W. H., & Marshall, K. J. (2014). Increasing induction-level teachers’ positive-to-negative communication ratio and use of behavior-specific praise through e-mailed performance feedback and its effect on students’ task engagement. Journal of Positive Behavior Interventions, 16(4), 219-233.
• Raza, S. A. (2010). Relationship between organizational climate and performance of teachers in public and private colleges of Punjab. Doctoral dissertation, University Institute of Education and Research Pir Mehr Ali Shah Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi.
• Rodriguez, M. S., & Cohen, S. (1998). Social support. Encyclopedia of mental health, 3, 535-544.
• Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000a). Self‐determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well‐being. American Psychologist, 55, 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003‐066X.55.1.68
• Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On energy, personality, and health: Subjective vitality as a dynamic reflection of well‐being. Journal of Personality, 65, 529–565. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467‐ 6494.1997.tb00326.x.
• Şahin, S. & Çankır, B. (2019). Sürdürülebilir kalite algısı ve iş performansı: çalışmaya tutkunluğun aracı rolü. Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 28 (3), 196-211.
• Saks, A. M. (2006). Antecedents and consequences of employee engagement. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 21(7), 600-619.
• Schaufeli, W. B., & Bakker, A. B. (2010). Defining and measuring work engagement: Bringing clarity to the concept. Work engagement: a handbook of essential theory and research, 12, 10-24.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Salanova, M., González-Romá, V. & Bakker, A. B. (2002). The measurement of engagement and burnout: a two sample confirmatory factor analytic approach. Journal of Happiness Studies, 3(1), 71-92.
• Schaufeli, W. B., Shimazu, A., Hakanen, J., Salanova, M. & De Witte, H. (2017, October 17). An Ultra-Short Measure for Work Engagement: The UWES-3 Validation Across Five Countries. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 35(4), 577–591.
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Optimistic self-beliefs as a resource factor in coping with stress. In Extreme stress and communities: Impact and intervention (pp. 159-177). Springer.
• Schwarzer, R., Bäßler, J., Kwiatek, P., Schröder, K., & Zhang, J. X. (1997). The assessment of optimistic self‐beliefs: comparison of the German, Spanish, and Chinese versions of the general self‐efficacy scale. Applied Psychology, 46(1), 69-88.
• Selamat, N., Samsu, N. Z., & Kamalu, N. S. M. (2013). The impact of organizational climate on teachers' job performance. Educational Research eJournal, 2(1), 71-82.
• Shah, M. (2011). The dimensionality of teacher collegiality and the development of teacher collegiality scale. International Journal of Education, 3(2), 1-20.
• Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: examining the relationship between organizational culture and perceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27-52.
• Spreitzer, G. M., Lam, C. F., & Fritz, C. (2010). Engagement and human thriving: Complementary perspectives on energy and connections to work. Work engagement: A handbook of essential theory and research, 132-146.
• Spreitzer, G., Sutcliffe, K., Dutton, J., Sonenshein, S. & Grant, A. M. (2005). A socially embedded model of thriving at work. Organization Science, 16(5), 537-549.
• Tickle, B. R., Chang, M. & Kim, S. (2011). Administrative support and its mediating effect on US public school teachers. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(2), 342-349.
• Turkish Language Association (2021). Performans. https://sozluk.gov.tr/
• Yeşilay, A., Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Turkish adaptation of the general perceived self-efficacy scale. http://userpage.fu-berlin.de/∼health/turk.htm
• Yılmaz, K. & Altınkurt, Y. (2013). Örgütsel iklim ölçeğinin Türkçeye uyarlanması: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Trakya Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 3(1), 1-11.
• Yoder, D. M. (2004). Organizational climate and emotional intelligence: An appreciative inquiry into a “leaderful” community college. Community College Journal of Research & Practice, 29(1), 45-62.
• Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Attaining self-regulation. In M. Boekaerts, P. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner (Eds.), Handbook of self-regulation (pp. 13–19). Academic.