Are University Students Willing to Participate in Environmental Protection Activities (EPAs)? – Sub-dimensions of Ecological Intelligence as Predictors

Year 2021, Volume: 7 Issue: 3, 269 - 282, 01.07.2021

Nalan Akkuzu Güven , Melis Arzu Uyulgan

https://doi.org/10.21891/jeseh.960912

Abstract

Ecological intelligence is a comprehensive understanding that aims to create an awareness regarding how human activities affect ecosystems and to promote preventing unconscious consumption behaviors that would lead to a sustainable life. It enables us to take social, economic and environmental responsibility, also to act cooperatively and sensitively against ecological problems. All this would pave the way for maintaining strong global sustainability in our ecological objectives. This study explores the levels of ecological intelligence (LoEI) of university students; it also investigates the role of the sub-dimensions of ecological intelligence in predicting future participation in environmental protection activities (EPAs). The data were collected via ecological intelligence scale (EIS) and written open-response assessment (WORA) form by using a sample of 179 students. According to the results, the model to predict participation in EPAs indicated that a good discriminative ability with a prediction accuracy of 79.3%. We found that the most significant variables for the prediction of willingness to participate were ecologically conscious purchasing behavior (ECPB), ecological sensitivity (ES), ecological knowledge sharing (EKS) among the sub-dimensions of the EIS. This study is an important contribution to solve environmental problems by developing an ecological intelligence responding to the individual, social and economic needs of the next generation.

Keywords

Ecological intelligence, Environmental protection activities, Logistic regression, Sustainability

References

• Akenji, L., & Bengtsson, M. (2014). Making sustainable consumption and production the core of sustainable development goals. Sustainability, 6(2), 513-529.
• Akkuzu, N. (2016). Towards a profound ecological understanding: Statistical attempts to measure our ecological intelligence. International Journal of Social Sciences and Education, 6(2), 198-216.
• Azapagic, A. (2003). Systems approach to corporate sustainability a general management framework. Process Safety and Environmental Protection, 81(5), 303-316.
• Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind: Collected essays in anthropology, psychiatry, evolution, and epistemology. San Francisco: Chandler.
• Bayazıt Hayta, A. (2009). The role of consumer education in achieving sustainable consumption behavior. Kırsehir Faculty of Education Journal, 10(3), 143-151.
• Bowers, C. A. (2010). Educational reforms that foster ecological intelligence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), 9-31. Campbell Bradley, J., Waliczek, T. M., & Zajicek, J. M. (1999). Relationship between environmental knowledge and environmental attitude of high school students. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(3), 17-21.
• Chen, T. B., & Chai, L. T. (2010). Attitude towards the environment and green products: Consumers perspective. Management Science and Engineering, 4(2), 27-39.
• Chili, N. S. (2014). The ecology of teaching: Efficiency, efficacy, and effectiveness of teaching and learning of tourism in township high schools. Journal of Human Ecology, 48(2), 299-312.
• Collins, A., Flynn, A., Wiedmann, T., & Barrett, J. (2006). The environmental impacts of consumption at a sub-national level: The ecological footprint of Cardiff. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10(3), 9-24.
• Connolly, J., & Prothero, A. (2003). Sustainable consumption: Consumption, consumers and the commodity discourse. Consumption Markets and Culture, 6(4), 275–291.
• Crutzen, P. J. (2002). Geology of mankind: The Anthropocene. Nature, 415, 23.
• Dobson, A. (2007). Environmental citizenship: Towards sustainable development. Sustainable Development, 15(5), 276–285.
• Dyment, J. E., Davis, J. M., Nailon, D., Emery, S., Getenet, S., McCrea, N., & Hill, A. (2014). The impact of professional development on early childhood educators’ confidence, understanding and knowledge of education for sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 20(5), 660-679.
• Emanuel, R., & Adams, J. N. (2011). College students’ perceptions of campus sustainability. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 12(1), 79-92.
• Estrada-Vidal, L. I., & Tójar-Hurtado, J. C. (2017). College student knowledge and attitudes related to Sustainability education and environmental health. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 237, 386–392.
• Field, A. (2009). Discovering statistics using SPSS (3rd ed.). London: Sage.
• Fischer, D., Brettel, M., & Mauer, R. (2020). The three dimensions of sustainability: A delicate balancing act for entrepreneurs made more complex by stakeholder expectations. Journal of Business Ethics, 163, 87-106.
• Flower, L. (2006). Environmental challenges in the 21st century. Assumption University Journal of Technology, 9(4), 248-252.
• Foster, J. B., Clark, B., & York, R. (2008). Ecology: The moment of truth-an introduction. Monthly Review, 60(3), 1-11.
• Gheith, E. (2013). Environmental value orientations and its relation to pro-environmental behavior among Petra University students in Jordan. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(22), 61-72.
• Goleman, D. (2009). Ecological intelligence: How knowing the hidden impacts of what we buy can change everything. New York: Broadway Books.
• Goleman, D., Barlow, Z., & Bennet, L. (2010). Forging new norms in New Orleans: From emotional to ecological intelligence. Teacher Education Quarterly, 37(4), 87-98.
• Goleman, D., Bennett, L., & Barlow, Z. (2012). Ecoliterate: How educators are cultivating emotional, social, and ecological intelligence. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
• Greene, J. C. (2005). The generative potential of mixed methods inquiry. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(2), 207-211.
• Hart, P. (2003). Teachers' thinking in environmental education. New York: Peter Lang.
• He, X. E., Hong, T., Liu, L., & Tiefenbacher, J. (2011). A comparative study of environmental knowledge, attitudes and behaviors among university students in China. International Research in Geographical and Environmental Education, 20(2), 91–104.
• Hornbuckle, C. A. (2008). Ecological intelligence: British women writers and the environmental tradition (Unpublished PhD thesis). University of South Carolina, Columbia.
• Hosmer, D. W., & Lemeshow, S. (2000). Applied logistic regression. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
• Johnson, B. (2004). Simply identity work? The voluntary simplicity movement. Qualitative Sociology, 27(4), 527-530.
• Kilbourne, W., & Pickett, G. (2008). How materialism affects environmental beliefs, concern, and environmentally responsible behavior. Journal of Business Research, 61(9), 885-893.
• Kirchain, R. E. Jr., Gregory, J. R., & Olivetti, E. A. (2017). Environmental life-cycle assessment. Nature Materials, 16(7), 693–697.
• Knowles, V., Henningsson, S., Youngman, R., & Faulkner, A. (2012). Coming clean: The global cleantech innovation index 2012. http://info.cleantech.com/2012InnovationIndex.html
• Kreis, I., & Rauch, F. (1999). Joint learning and research of educational organisations and local communities. A report of international workshop of innovations in teacher education through environmental education. https://docplayer.net/11309557-International-workshop-11nnovations-in-teacher-education-through-environmental-education.html.
• Lummis, G. (2002). Globalisation: Building a partnership ethic for an ecopedagogy in Western Australia. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 27(1), 9-18.
• Mansaray, A., & Abijoye, J. O. (1998). Environmental knowledge, attitudes and behavior in Dutch secondary school. The Journal of Environmental Education, 30(2), 4-11.
• McCallum, I. (2008). Ecological intelligence: Rediscovering ourselves in nature. United States: Fulcrum.
• Miéville, C. (2015, August 1). The limits of Utopia. Salvage. https://salvage.zone/in-print/the-limits-of-utopia/
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: A sourcebook of new methods. London: Sage.
• Murphy, E. R., Illes, J., & Reiner, P. B. (2008). Neuroethics of neuromarketing. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 7, 293– 302.
• OECD (2014). OECD work on biodiversity and ecosystems. OECD Publishing. http://www.oecd.org/env/resources/OECD-work-on-biodiversity-and-ecosystems.pdf
• Orr, D. W. (2004). Earth in mind: On education, environment, and the human prospect (2nd ed.). Earth Island Press.
• Othman, M. N., & Umar, S. M. (2000). Kesedaran terhadap alam sekitar: Kajian perbandingan di antara pengguna Melayu dan Cina di Bandar. Malaysian Journal of Consumer and Family Economics, 3(1), 42-50.
• Pereira Heath, M. T., & Chatzidakis, A. (2012). ‘Blame it on marketing’: Consumers' views on unsustainable consumption. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 36(6), 656-667.
• Purvis, B., Mao, Y., & Robinson, D. (2019). Three pillars of sustainability: In search of conceptual origins. Sustainability Science, 14, 681–695.
• Said, A. M., Ahmadun, F., Paim, L. H., & Masud, J. (2003). Environmental concerns, knowledge and practices gap among Malaysian teachers. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 4(4), 305-313.
• Schwepker, C. H., & Cornwell, T. B. (1991). An examination of ecologically concerned consumers and their intention to purchase ecologically packaged products. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 10(2), 77-101.
• Shumba, O. (2011). Commons thinking, ecological intelligence and the ethical and moral framework of Ubuntu: An imperative for sustainable development. Journal of Media and Communication Studies,3 (3), 84-96.
• Steffen, W., Crutzen, P. J., & McNeill, J. R. (2007). The Anthropocene: Are humans now overwhelming the great forces of nature? Ambio, 36(8), 614-621. https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447(2007)36[614:TAAHNO]2.0.CO;2.
• Sterling, S. (2009). Ecological intelligence: Viewing the world relationally. In A. Stibbe (Ed.), The handbook of sustainability literacy: Skills for a changing world (pp. 76-83). Totnes, UK: Green Books.
• Suwandi, S., Yunus, A., & Rahmawati, L. E. (2017). The effectiveness of ecological intelligence-based Indonesian language textbooks on the environmentally friendly behaviors of state junior high school students in Surakarta. In Proceedings of the 1st International Seminar on Language, Literature and Education Conference (ISLLE 2017) (pp. 261-267).Jakarta, Indonesia: KnE.
• Tukker, A., & Jansen, B. (2006). Environmental impacts of products: A detailed review of studies. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 10 (3), 159-182. UNEP (2006). Annual evaluation report 2005. https://wedocs.unep.org/bitstream/handle/20.500.11822/183/UNEP_Anual_Evaluation_Report_2005.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y%2C%20https
• UNESCO (2012). Shaping the education of tomorrow: 2012 report on the UN decade of education for sustainable development, abridged. UNESCO. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/content/documents/919unesco1.pdf
• Wang, J., Zhu, M., Tang, X., He, M., Xu, S., Gao, Y., & Gu, J. (2010). Opportunities and challenges for environmental education at Yunnan’s institutions of higher learning. Chinese Education & Society, 43(2), 82–93.
• Ward, M. D., & Ahlquist, J. S. (2018). Maximum likelihood for social science: Strategies for analysis. New York: Cambridge University Press.
• Waters, C. N., Zalasiewicz, J., Summerhayes, C., Barnosky, A. D., Poirier, C., Galuszka, A.,… Wolfe, A. P. (2016). The Anthropocene is functionally and stratigraphically distinct from the Holocene. Science, 351(6269), 138-147.
• Wiek, A., Withycombe, L., & Redman, C. L. (2011). Key competencies in sustainability: A reference framework for academic program development. Sustainability Science, 6, 203-218.
• Yılmaz, V., Çelik, H. E., & Yağızer, C. (2009). Investigating the effects of environmental sensitivity and environmental behavior on ecological product buying behavior through structural equation modeling. Anadolu University Journal of Social Sciences, 9(2), 1-14.
• Zalasiewicz, J., Williams, M., Haywood, A., & Ellis, M. (2011). The Anthropocene: A new epoch of geological time? Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society A, 369(1938), 835-841.