Ethical Principles
We expect all authors to read and understand our ethical policy before submitting any manuscripts to the JOBDA.
Under the decisions taken by Ulakbim TR Directory, the Ethics Committee Permit is required for the works to be published as of 2020. The studies requiring the Ethics Committee Permission are listed below. While uploading your work to our journal, you should upload your Ethics Committee document along with your article file. If your study is not in the working group that requires ethics committee permission, you must sign the declaration form stating this situation and indicate the relevant situation in your article. TR INDEX Evaluation Criteria (ethics committee name, date, and number) included in Article 8 within the scope of the Assessment Criteria, the process in the method section of the article, as well as the first/last article of the article. It is mandatory to be on the page.
In the case of reports, it should be stated that the "Informed consent form" was taken.
For more, please contact us via jobda.info@gmail.com
Publication Policy
Open Access Policy:
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
------------------------------------------------------------
Copyright Policy:
Copyrights for articles are retained by the authors, with first publication rights granted to the journal. Authors have the right to reuse, republish, archive, and distribute their own articles after publication. The journal/publisher is not responsible for subsequent uses of the work.
------------------------------------------------------------
Paper Selection and Publishing Process:
a) Submission Acknowledgement
When you submit a manuscript online, you will receive a submission acknowledgment letter sent by the online system automatically. For email submission, the editor or editorial assistant sends an e-mail confirmation to the submission’s author within one to three working days. If you fail to receive this confirmation, please check your bulk email box or contact the editorial assistant.
b) Primarily Evaluation
The editor or editorial assistant determines whether the manuscript fits the journal’s focus and scope. Next, a check for the similarity rate is done using CrossCheck, powered by iThenticate. Any manuscripts out of the journal’s scope or containing plagiarism, including self-plagiarism, are rejected.
c) Peer Review
We use a double-blind system for peer-review; both reviewers' and authors’ identities remain anonymous. The submitted manuscript will be reviewed by at least two experts: one editorial staff member as well as one to three external reviewers. The review process may take two to four weeks.
d) Decision Is Made
The decision to accept or reject an article is based on the suggestions of reviewers. If differences of opinion occur between reviewers, the editor-in-chief will weigh all comments and arrive at a balanced decision based on all comments, or the second round of peer review may be initiated.
e) Notification of the Result of Review
The result of the review will be sent to the corresponding author and forwarded to other authors.
f) E-journal Is Available
The typesettings of the accepted manuscripts will be done by the journal team. After, the latest version of the paper will be sent to the corresponding author for the final check. E-journal in PDF is available on the journal’s webpage, free of charge for download.
g) Publication Notice
The authors and readers will be notified and invited via e-mail and social media to visit our website for the newly published articles.
-----------------------------------------------------------
Double-Blind Peer-Review Process:
Papers deemed suitable are then typically sent to a minimum of two independent expert reviewers to assess the scientific quality of the paper. Each manuscript is reviewed by at least four people: the editor, the associate editor, and two reviewers. The final recommendation is sent to the author(s). Reviewers’ comments provide information and suggestions to authors that may be helpful in completing revisions. Authors are given a deadline for returning manuscripts at every stage in the publication process. The Editor is responsible for the final decision regarding the acceptance or rejection of articles. The Editor's decision is final. Following manuscript acceptance and prior to publication, authors will receive galleys to check for errors.
This journal uses a double-blind review, which means the identities of the authors are concealed from the reviewers.
The review process considered the evaluation of content and styling. The research problem, quality of the literature review, method, and findings are evaluated separately by the reviews. The contribution of the paper, originality, and novelty are considered. At last, reviewers evaluate the styling f the paper which includes scientific writing, use of language, and table and figures.
All reviewers are chosen from the internal database of the journal according to their expertise. The reviewer database is updated constantly. Reviewers are asked to evaluate the paper.