KÜMELENME VE KÜMEYE ÖZGÜ KAYNAKLARIN BELİRLENMESİ

Year 2013, Volume: 1 Issue: 1, 35 - 55, 01.08.2013

Sema Yiğit , Kadir Ardıç

Abstract

Belirli bir alanda birbiri ile ilişkili firmalar ve kurumların coğrafik konsantrasyonu olarak tanımlanabilecek kümeler, içindeki işletmelerin rekabet gücünü artırırken bir bölgesel kalkınma aracı olarak da ülke politikalarında git gide daha çok yer bulmaktadır. Oldukça önem atfedilen kümelerin kendine has kaynakları olup olmadığını ve bu kaynakların neler olduğunu belirlemek araştırmanın amacını oluşturmaktadır. Çalışma, Kayseri Mobilya İş Kümesinde yapılmış olup, 250 işletmenin katılımı sağlanmıştır. Veriler anket yöntemi kullanılarak toplanmıştır. Elde edilen veriler AMOS ve SPSS paket programları kullanılarak analiz edilmiştir. Yapılan açıklayıcı ve doğrulayıcı faktör analizleri neticesinde küme kaynaklarının 28 madde içeren ve kurumsal kaynaklar, özelleşmiş kaynaklar, ilişkisel kaynaklar ve finansal kaynaklar olarak isimlendirilen dört gruptan oluştukları görülmüştür.

 

Anahtar Kelimeler: Küme kaynakları, kümelenme

Keywords

-

References

• Andersson, T., Serger, S. S., Sörvik, J., & Hansson, E. W. (2004). The cluster policies whitebook. http://www.clusterplattform.at/fileadmin/user_upload/clusterbibliothek/916_TheClusterPoliciesWhitebook.pdf (Erişim:10.12.2011)
• Becattini, G. (1990). The Marshallian ındustrial district as a socio-economic notion. F. Pyke, G. Becattin, & W. S. (eds) içinde, Industrial Districts and Inter-firm Cooperation in Italy (s. 37-51). Geneva: International Institute for Labour Studies.
• Bekar, C., & Lipsey, R. G. (2001). Clusters and economic policy. Canadian Journal of Policy Research, 3(1):62-70.
• Brusco, S. (1982). The Emilian Model: Productive Decentralisation and Social Integration. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 6 (2): 167-184
• Deloitte Business Consulting. (2010). Cluster Benchmarking in Poland . WARSAW: Deloitte Business Consulting S.A.
• http://www.proinno-europe.eu/sites/default/files/page/11/02/Clusters_benchmarking_in_Poland_-_2010_-_English_summary.pdf (Erişim:25.03.2011).
• DTM. (2009, Şubat). KOBİ İşbirliği ve Kümelenme Projesi. http://www.smenetworking.gov.tr/detay.cfm?MID=45 (Erişim:30.06.2012).
• Fenstersefier, J. E. & Rastoin J-L. (2010). Wine cluster resources, firm value creation and competitive advantage. 5th International Academy of Wine Business Research Conference, (s.1-9).Auckland.
• Forsman, M., & Solitander, N. (2003). Knowledge Transfer in Clusters And Networks-An interdisciplinary conceptual analysis. JIBS Literature Review, 1-23.
• Hervás-Oliver, J. L., & Albors-Garrigós, J. (2007). Do clusters capabilities matter? An empirical application of the resource-based view in clusters. Entrepreneurship & Regional Development, 19(2):113-136.
• Krugman, P. (1991). Geography and Trade. Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Kuchiki, A. (2007). A Flowchart Approach to Malaysia's Automobile Industry Cluster Policy. IDE-JETRO Discussion Paper No.120, 1-30.
• Marshall, A. (1890). Principles of Economics. London: Macmillan.
• Maskell, P. & Malmberg, A. (1999), Localised learning and industrial competitiveness Cambridge Journal of Economics, Vol. 23, pp. 167‐185.
• Menzel, M. P., & Fornahl, D. (2007). Cluster Life Cycles - Dimensions and Rationales of Cluster Development. Jena Economic Research Papers 2007-076, 1-45.
• OECD (1999). Boosting Innovation: The Cluster Approach. http://www.clusterbg.net/content/library/EN/Boosting_Inovations_Cluster_Approach.pdf, (Erişim:15.12.2011).
• Owen-Smith, J., & Powell, W. W. (2004). Knowledge Networks as Channels and Conduits: The Effects of Formal Structure in the Boston Biotechnology Community. Organization Science, 15(1): 5–21.
• Perry, M. (2005). Clustering Small Enterprise: Lessons From Policy Experience in New Zealand. Environment and Planning , 23(6):833-850.
• Piore, M., & Sabel, C. (1984). The Second Industrial Divide:Possibilities for Prosperity. New York: Basic Books.
• Porter, M. E. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
• Porter, M. E. (1998a). Clusters and New Economics of Competition. Harvard Business Review, 77-90.
• Porter, M. E. (1998b). On Competition. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
• Porter, M. E. (2000). Location, Competition and Economic Development: Local Clusters in a Global Economy. Economic Development Quarterly , 15-34.
• Porter, M. E., & Ketels, C. (2009). Clusters and Industrial Districts Common Roots Different Perspectives. G. Becattini, M. Bellandi, & L. D. Propris içinde, A Handbook of Industrial Districts (s. 172-186). Massachusetts: Edward Elgar Publishing.
• Rosenfeld, S. A. (1997). Bringing Business Clusters into the Mainstream of Economic Development. European Planning Studies, 5(1): 3-23.
• Rosenfeld, S. A. (2002). Creating Smart Systems: A guide to Cluster Strategies in Less Favoured Regions. European Union-Regional Innovation Strategies., 1-35.
• Sölvell, Ö. (2008). Clusters Balancing Evolutionary and Constructive Forces. Stockholm: Ivory Tower Publishing.
• Swann, P., & Prevezer, M. (1996). A Comparison of the Dynamics of Industrial Clustering in Computing and Biotechnology. Research Policy, 25: 139-157.
• Terstriep J . (2008, Haziran 17). Cluster Mapping. Ocak 05, 2012 tarihinde http://www.iat.eu/files/wp6-cluster_mapping_v1_5.pdf adresinden alındı
• Viedma, J. M. (2003). SCBS Social Capital Benchmarking System Profiting From Social Capital When Building. Journal of Universal Computer Science, 9(6):501-509.
• Wilk, E. O. (2003). Resource-Based View, Industrial Clusters and Collective Competitive Capabilities: A Case Study in South Brazilian Wineries. http://www.Ifama.org/conference/2003conference/papers/wilkb resource. pdf, (Erişim:20.10.2011).
• Wolfe, D. A., & Gertler, M. S. (2004). Clusters from the Inside and Out:Local Dynamics and Global Linkages. Urban Studies, (41):1071-1093.
• Zen, A. C., Fensterseifer, J. E., & Prévot, F. (2011). Internationalization of Clustered Companies and the Influence of Resources: A Case Study on Wine Clusters in Brazil and France. Latin American Business Review, 12(2):123-141.