Effect of opening layout and sheathing on lateral load bearing capacity in wooden shear walls

Year 2021, Volume: 6 Issue: 2, 70 - 80, 30.06.2021

Erdem Kazım Demirkıran , Nabi Volkan Gür Mehmet Selim Ökten

https://doi.org/10.29187/jscmt.2021.62

Cited By: 1

Abstract

Wood is preferred as building material in earthquake zones thanks to its light-weight. In countries with high seismic activity, wooden construction systems are required to be resistant to lateral and vertical loads. In traditional architecture, lateral load resistance is ensured with filled and unfilled walls which are strengthened with braces. In present day lateral load resistance is ensured with wooden shear walls formed by sheathings covered on the wall frame. Wooden shear walls may contain openings such as windows, doors and service channels. These types of openings reduce rigidity in wooden shear walls. The opening ratio, opening location, sheathing thickness and connection types have an impact on the lateral load bearing capacity of shear walls. This study investigates the use of two types of wooden shear walls with different-layout openings which were modelled with plywood sheathing material. For the purposes of this study, lateral load bearing capacities were calculated for both types of sheathing material of different thicknesses. The results are presented in tables by comparing the calculated capacity increase to the increase in weight.

Keywords

Earthquake resistant building design, opening arrangement in shear wall, wooden shear wall, wooden structures

References

• 1. Swetha, K. S., & Akhil, P. A. (2017). Effect of Openings in Shear Wall. International Research Journal of Engineering and Technology (IRJET) Volume, 4.
• 2. Kankuntla, A. Sangave, P., & Chavan, R. (2016). Effects of Openings in Shear Wall on Seismic Response of Structures, Int. J. Comput. Appl., vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 10–15, 2016, doi: 10.9790/1684-13120106
• 3. Trimble Tekla Tedds. (2013). Timber Frame Racking Panel Design.
• 4. Güngör, İ. H. (1961). Ahşap Yapı Bilgisi, İTÜ Teknik Okulu.
• 5. Aktaş, Y. D., Akyüz, U., Türer, A., Erdil, B., & Güçhan, N. A. (2014). Seismic Resistance Evaluation of Traditional Ottoman Timber-Frame Hımış Houses: Frame Loadings and Material Tests. Earthquake Spectra, 30(4), 1711–1732. https://doi.org/10.1193/011412eqs011m
• 6. Aksoy, D., & Z. Ahunbay, Z. (2005). Geleneksel ahşap iskeletli Türk Konutu’ nun deprem davranışları, No. 1999, pp. 47–58.
• 7. National Institute of Standards and Technology (1996). The January 17, 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) Earthquake.
• 8. Bertero, V. V., Borcherdt, R. D., Clark, P. W., Dreger, D. S., Filippou, F. C., Foutch, D. A., ... & Xiao, Y. (1995). Seismological and engineering aspects of the 1995 Hyogoken-Nanbu (Kobe) earthquake. Report UCB/EERC-95/10, Earthquake Engineering Research Center, University of California, Berkeley.
• 9. Esper, P., & Tachibana, E. (1998). Lessons from the Kobe earthquake. Geological Society, London, Engineering Geology Special Publications, 15(1), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1144/gsl.eng.1998.015.01.11
• 10. TBDY. (2018). Türkiye Bina Deprem Yönetmeliği.
• 11. Li, M., Lam, F., & Foschi, R. O. (2009). Seismic Reliability Analysis of Diagonal-Braced and Structural-Panel-Sheathed Wood Shear Walls. Journal of Structural Engineering, 135(5), 587–596. https://doi.org/10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0000008
• 12. Breyer, D. E., Fridley, K. J., Pollock, D. G., & Cobeen, K. (2007). Design of Wood Structures-ASD/LRFD. McGraw-Hill Education.
• 13. AWC’s Wind & Seismic Task Committee. (2015). Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic 2015 Edition.
• 14. Hansly, J.S. (2018). Confidently Design Wood-Framed Shear Walls to Resist Lateral Loads, RCE Interface, pp. 20–26.
• 15. Sputo, T. (2015). Segmented And Perforated Shear Walls, pp.1-15.
• 16. European Committee For Standardization. (2004). Eurocode 5: Design of timber structures, Vol. 1, No. 2005.
• 17. Stojić, D., Cvetković, R., Conić, S., & Marković, N. (2016). Design Of Wall Diaphragms According To EC 5, Contemporary Achievements In Civil Engineering, pp. 51-58, 2016, doi: 10.14415/konferencijaGFS 2016.107
• 18. Jack, P. & Abdy, K. (1991). Structural timber, Vol. 15, No. 4. 1991.
• 19. Computers & Structures Inc. (2019). SAP2000 Structural Analysis and Design.
• 20. American Society of Civil Engineers. (2010). Minimum Design Loads For Buildings and Other Structures.