ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE AND SCHOOLS

Year 2016, Issue: 4, 236 - 260, 01.06.2016

Kıvanç Bozkuş

Abstract

Structures that are formed by people who come together to accomplish some goals are called organizations. Every organization has different structures according to its establishment goals. Basic concepts, models and formations of these structures were examined and these were associated with schools which are educational organizations. Since the organizational structure of an individual school may vary according to its particular conditions, it may be more logical to understand it using theoretical models rather than generalizing the organizational structure of schools. From this point of view, contextual and structural dimensions of the organizational structure of schools, bureaucratic models of Weber and Hall, school structure models of Hoy, Miskel and Sweetland, the organizational structure model of Mintzberg, the mechanical and organic organization models, the loose structure model, the compliance theory of Etzioni were elaborated and the formation of the organizational structure was examined.

Keywords

organization, school, organization structure

ÖRGÜT YAPISI VE OKULLAR

Abstract

İnsanların bazı amaçları gerçekleştirmek amacıyla bir araya gelerek oluşturdukları yapılara örgüt denmektedir. Her örgüt kuruluş amacına göre farklı yapılara sahiptir. Bu yapılar ile ilgili temel kavramlar, modeller ve yapıların oluşumları incelenmiş ve bunlar eğitim örgütleri olan okullarla ilişkilendirilmiştir. Her okulun örgüt yapısı bulunduğu şartlara göre farklılık gösterebileceğinden bu yapıyı genellemektense kuramsal modellerle anlamaya çalışmak daha mantıklı olabilir. Bu doğrultuda okul yapısının bağlamsal ve yapısal boyutları, Weber’in ve Hall’un bürokratik modelleri, Hoy, Miskel ve Sweetland’ın okul yapısı modelleri, Mintzberg’in örgütsel yapı modeli, mekanik ve organik örgüt modelleri, gevşek yapı modeli, Etzioni’nin uyum teorisi ele alınmış ve örgüt yapısının oluşturulması incelenmiştir.

Keywords

örgüt, okul, örgüt yapısı

References

• Bolman, L. G., & Deal, T. E. (2008). Reframing organizations : Artistry, choice, and leadership (4. b.). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Boone, L. E., & Kurtz, D. L. (2011). Contemporary business (14 b.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Daft, R. L. (2007). The leadership experience (4. b.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
• Daft, R. L. (2008). Management (8. b.). Mason, OH: Thomson South-Western.
• Daft, R. L. (2010). Organization Theory and Design (10 b.). Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning.
• David, F. R. (2011). Strategic Management Concepts And Cases (13 b.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Dellar, G. B. (1994). Schools as open social systems: A study of site specific restructuring. The Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association. New Orleans, LA: AERA.
• George, J. M., & Jones, G. R. (2012). Understanding and managing organizational behavior (6. b.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Glassman, R. B. (1973). Persistence and loose coupling in living systems. Behavioral Science, 18, 83- 98.
• Griffin, R. W., & Moorhead, G. (2014). Organizational behavior: Managing people and organizations (11. b.). Mason, OH: South Western Cengage Learning.
• Hellriegel, D., & Slocum, J. W. (2011). Organizational behavior (13. b.). Mason, OH: South-Western, Cengage Learning.
• Hoy, W. K., & Miskel, C. G. (2013). Educational administration: Theory, research, and practice (9. b.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational Administration Quarterly, 37(3), 296-321.
• Jones, G. R. (2004). Organizational theory, design, and change (4. b.). Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Kowalski, T. J. (2010). The school principal : Visionary leadership and competent management. New York, NY: Routledge.
• Lunenburg, F. C., & Ornstein, A. C. (2008). Educational administration: Concepts and practices (5. b.). Belmont, CA: Thomson.
• Luthans, F. (2011). Organizational behavior : An evidence-based approach (12. b.). New York: McGraw- Hill.
• McShane, S. L., & Glinow, M. A. (2010). Organizational behavior : Emerging knowledge and practice for the real world (5. b.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
• Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in fives: Designing effective organizations. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Owens, R. G. (2004). Organizational behavior in education: Adaptive leadership and school reform (8. b.). Boston: Pearson.
• Robbins, S. P., & Judge, T. A. (2011). Organizational behavior (14. b.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Schermerhorn, J. R., Hunt, J. G., Osborn, R. N., & Uhl-Bien, M. (2010). Organizational Behavior (11. b.). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.
• Simon, H. A. (1996). The sciences of the artificial (3. b.). Cambridge: MIT Press.
• Süngü, H. (2012). Türkiye, Almanya, Fransa ve İngiltere’de okul müdürlerinin atanması ve yetiştirilmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 2(1), 33-48.
• Şişman, M. (2012). Türk eğitim sistemi ve okul yönetimi (6. b.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Wagner, J. A., & Hollenbeck, J. R. (2010). Organizational behavior : Securing competitive advantage. New York: Routledge.
• Weick, K. E. (1976). Educational organizations as loosely coupled systems. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(1), 1-19.
• Yukl, G. (2010). Leadership in organizations (7. b.). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.