Abstract
This study examines the court reportages in the books of Cemal Refik's Courtroom Reportages and Sait Faik Abasıyanık's Law Court written in the 1930s and 1940s. The main goal of the study is to identify the characteristics of the reportages of the two authors and to highlight the similarities and differences between them based on their comparisons. The basic thesis is that there are both similarities and differences between the reportages. In fact, at the conclusion of analysis, it was shown that both authors remained faithful to the basic characteristics of the reportages. In this sense, there are many similarities between them. There were, of course, differences. It is possible to say that the study fulfils a function in the context of giving the necessary importance to the reportage in Turkey.