Informatıon for revıewers

·         “Acta Medica Alanya” is based on independent, unbiased, double-blinded peer-review reports in the evaluation of the articles. The submitted articles, their originality, methodologies, and the importance of the topic discussed are evaluated by members of the Editorial Board. This is followed by an unbiased double-blind peer-review by two or more independent experts in the field. For all submissions, the Editorial Board is the final authority in the decision-making process.

·         It is advisable to read the " Information for Reviewers " and "Instruction to authors" sections of the journal before evaluating the reviewers.

·         Reviewers should evaluate all articles in terms of authenticity, validity, importance and ethics. “Acta Medica Alanya”  uses DergiPark evaluation system. The reviewer can enter the system by entering the user name and password through the link address sent to the e-mail address.

·         When reviewers receive an invitation through our article evaluation system; It is expected that he will decide quickly and decide whether to accept the evaluation. Reviewers accepting the evaluation must submit the evaluation result within the specified time. In case of delay, reminders are made with warning e-mails. Reviewers must fill in the evaluation form in the system after evaluating the article in accordance with the above criteria. They can also convey their views on the article to authors and editors separately. Reviewers are informed about the process of the article through the system.

·         Reviewers are expected to comment on ethical violations such as gift writing, duplicate publication, and plagiarism.  If the reviewers are involved in a possible conflict of interest, the editor must provide information before accepting the evaluation.

·         Before completing the evaluation of the reviewers; it is expected to make final checks on conflicts of interest, publication misconduct, suitability to the journal's standards, title and abstract quality, scientific structure, novelty and significance of information, suitability of terminology, adequacy of the references, sufficiency of the figures and tables, English and Turkish summary suitability and priority of publication.

Advantages of Reviewing for Acta Medica Alanya:

·         Journal referees who decide whether a manuscript publishable or not, are important stakeholders of publication process.

·         Acta Medica Alanya  publishes the reviewer list every year in the last issue along with its special thanks to reviewers.

·         Thanks certificates are given to the Reviewers  in order to use  In their academic record

·         The articles of the authors who Reviewers for  our journal  are evaluated first.