Bankacılık Sektöründe Çevre Bağlılığı ve Yeşil Bilgi Paylaşımının Çevre Performansı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir Araştırma

Year 2024, Volume: 13 Issue: 4, 1379 - 1394, 15.10.2024

Edip Örücü , Itır Hasırcı

https://doi.org/10.33206/mjss.1412369

Abstract

Bu araştırmanın amacı yeşil bilgi paylaşımı ve çevre bağlılığın çevre performansı üzerindeki etkilerini belirlemektir. Araştırmanın evrenini Balıkesir ilinde ve ilçelerinde çalışan 1800 banka personeli oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın örneklemini Bandırma ilçesinde ve Balıkesir il merkezinde bulunan bankalardan seçilen 361 personel oluşturmaktadır. Araştırmanın verileri anket yolu ile toplanmıştır. Toplanan veriler, frekans analizi, keşfedici faktör analizi, güvenilirlik analizi, normallik testi, korelasyon analizi ve çoklu regresyon analizine tabi tutulmuştur. Yapılan korelasyon analizinin sonucuna göre çevre bağlılığı ile çevre performansı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir ilişki, çevre bağlılığı ile yeşil bilgi paylaşımı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu bir ilişki, yeşil bilgi paylaşımı ile çevre performansı arasında anlamlı ve olumlu ilişkilerin olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Araştırma kapsamında yapılan çoklu regresyon analizinin neticesinde çevre bağlılığının ve yeşil bilgi paylaşımının bankaların çevre performansları üzerinde anlamlı ve olumlu etkilerinin olduğu sonucuna ulaşılmıştır.

Keywords

Çevre Bağlılığı, Yeşil Bilgi Paylaşımı, Çevre Performansı, Banka

Ethical Statement

“Bankacılık Sektöründe Çevre Bağlılığı ve Yeşil Bilgi Paylaşımının Çevre Performansı Üzerindeki Etkileri: Bir Araştırma” başlıklı çalışmanın yazım sürecinde bilimsel kurallara, etik ve alıntı kurallarına uyulmuş; toplanan veriler üzerinde herhangi bir tahrifat yapılmamış ve bu çalışma herhangi başka bir akademik yayın ortamına değerlendirme için gönderilmemiştir. Gerekli olan etik kurul izinleri Bandırma Onyedi Eylül Üniversitesi Sosyal ve Beşeri Bilimler Etik Kurulu’nun 12/12/2023 tarih ve 2023-10 sayılı toplantısında alınmıştır.

The Effects of Environmental Commitment and Green Knowledge Sharing on Environmental Performance in the Banking Sector: A Research

Abstract

The aim of this research is to determine the effects of green knowledge sharing and environmental commitment on environmental performance. The population of the research consists of 1800 bank personnel working in Balıkesir province and its districts. The sample of the research consists of 361 personnel selected from banks in Bandırma district and Balıkesir city center. The data of the research was collected through a survey. The collected data were subjected to frequency analysis, exploratory factor analysis, reliability analysis, normality test, correlation analysis and multiple regression analysis. According to the results of the correlation analysis, it was determined that there was a significant and positive relationship between environmental commitment and environmental performance, a significant and positive relationship between environmental commitment and green knowledge sharing, and a significant and positive relationship between green knowledge sharing and environmental performance. As a result of the multiple regression analysis conducted within the scope of the research, it was concluded that environmental commitment and green knowledge sharing have significant and positive effects on the environmental performance of banks.

Keywords

Environmental Commitment, Green Knowledge Sharing, Environmental Performance, Bank

References

• Acar, A. Z., & Zehir, C. (2007). Kaynak tabanlı işletme yetenekleri ölçeği geliştirilmesi ve doğrulanması. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi İşletme Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(1), 103-131.
• Afshar Jahanshahi, A., & Brem, A. (2018). Antecedents of corporate environmental commitments: The role of customers. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 15(6), 1191-1211.
• Afsar, B. &Umrani, W.A. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and pro-environmental behavior at workplace: the role of moral reflectiveness, coworker advocacy, and environmental commitment. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 27(1), 109-125.
• Ahmad, F., Hossain, M. B., Mustafa, K., Ejaz, F., Khawaja, K. F., & Dunay, A. (2023). Green HRM Practices and Knowledge Sharing Improve Environmental Performance by Raising Employee Commitment to the Environment. Sustainability, 15(6), 5040-5060.
• Alavi, M., & Leidner, D. E. (2001). Knowledge management and knowledge management systems: Conceptual foundations and research issues. MIS quarterly, 1, 107-136.
• Al Amri, F. H., Das, A., & Ben‐Ayed, O. (2019). The impact of perceived corporate social responsibility on employee engagement: The case of Qatar. Business Strategy & Development, 2(3), 180-191.
• Appiah, B. K., Zhang, D., Majumder, S. C., & Monaheng, M. P. (2020). Effects of environmental strategy, uncertainty and top management commitment on the environmental performance: Role of environmental management accounting and environmental management control system. International Journal of Energy Economics and Policy, 10(1), 360-372.
• Aragón-Correa, J. A., & Sharma, S. (2003). A contingent resource-based view of proactive corporate environmental strategy. Academy of management review, 28(1), 71-88.
• Asiaei, K., O'Connor, N. G., Barani, O., & Joshi, M. (2023). Green intellectual capital and ambidextrous green innovation: The impact on environmental performance. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(1), 369-386.
• Awan, F. H., Dunnan, L., Jamil, K., & Gul, R. F. (2023). Stimulating environmental performance via green human resource management, green transformational leadership, and green innovation: a mediation-moderation model. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 30(2), 2958-2976.
• Bangwal, D., Tiwari, P. & Chamola, P. (2017). Green HRM, work-life and environment performance. International Journal of Environment, Workplace and Employment, 4(3), 244-268.
• Bektaş, F., Kural, B. ve Orçan, F. (2017). Doğaya bağlılık ölçeğinin Türkçe uyarlaması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Niğde Üniversitesi Beden Eğitimi ve Spor Bilimleri Dergisi, 11(1), 77-86.
• Bresciani, S., Rehman, S. U., Giovando, G., & Alam, G. M. (2023). The role of environmental management accounting and environmental knowledge management practices influence on environmental performance: mediated-moderated model. Journal of Knowledge Management, 27(4), 896-918.
• Celep, C. ve Çetin, B. (2003). Bilgi Yönetimi. Anı Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Chang, T. W., & Hung, C. Z. (2021). How to shape the employees’ organization sustainable green knowledge sharing: Cross-level effect of green organizational identity effect on green management behavior and performance of members. Sustainability, 13(2), 626.
• Chen, M. H., Wang, H. Y., & Wang, M. C. (2018). Knowledge sharing, social capital, and financial performance: The perspectives of innovation strategy in technological clusters. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 16(1), 89-104.
• Chen, J., Siddik, A. B., Zheng, G. W., Masukujjaman, M., & Bekhzod, S. (2022). The effect of green banking practices on banks’ environmental performance and green financing: An empirical study. Energies, 15(4), 1292-1312.
• Cohen, W.M. ve Levinthal, D.A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: A new perspective on learning and innovation. Adm. Sci. Q., 35, 128–152.
• Connelly, C. E., & Kelloway, E. K. (2003). Predictors of employees’ perceptions of knowledge sharing cultures. Leadership & Organization Development Journal, 24(5), 294-301.
• Cop, S., Alola, U. V., & Alola, A. A. (2020). Perceived behavioral control as a mediator of hotels' green training, environmental commitment, and organizational citizenship behavior: A sustainable environmental practice. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(8), 3495-3508.
• Cormican, K., Meng, C., Sampaio, S., & Wu, Q. (2021). Towards sustainable knowledge sharing practices: an analysis of organizational level enablers. Sustainability, 13(23), 129-139.
• Crossan, M.M. ve Apaydin, M. A. (2010). multi-dimensional framework of organizational innovation: A systematic review of the literature. J. Manag. Stud., 47, 1154–1191.
• Doğan, M., & Sökmen, S. (2021). Turizm araştırmalarında sosyal değişim teorisi’nin çeyrek yüzyılı. Türk Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 5(2), 1220-1237.
• Dubey, R., Gunasekaran, A., & Ali, S. S. (2015). Exploring the relationship between leadership, operational practices, institutional pressures and environmental performance: A framework for green supply chain. International Journal of Production Economics, 160, 120-132.
• Epstein, M., & Roy, M. J. (1998). Managing corporate environmental performance:: A multinational perspective. European management journal, 16(3), 284-296.
• Figge, F., & Hahn, T. (2012). Is green and profitable sustainable? Assessing the trade-off between economic and environmental aspects. International Journal of Production Economics, 140(1), 92-102.
• George, D., & Mallery, M. (2010). SPSS for Windows step by step: A simple guide and reference, 17.0 update (10nd ed.) Boston: Pearson.
• Gürbüz, S. ve Şahin, F. (2017). Sosyal bilimlerde araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Haldorai, K., Kim, W. G., & Garcia, R. F. (2022). Top management green commitment and green intellectual capital as enablers of hotel environmental performance: The mediating role of green human resource management. Tourism Management, 88, 104-117.
• Hart, S. L., & Dowell, G. (2011). Invited editorial: A natural-resource-based view of the firm: Fifteen years after. Journal of management, 37(5), 1464-1479.
• Haşıloğlu, S. B., Baran, T., & Aydın, O. (2015). Pazarlama araştırmalarındaki potansiyel problemlere yönelik bir araştırma: Kolayda örnekleme ve sıklık ifadeli ölçek maddeleri. Pamukkale İşletme ve Bilişim Yönetimi Dergisi, (1), 19-28.
• Henriques, I., & Sadorsky, P. (1999). The relationship between environmental commitment and managerial perceptions of stakeholder importance. Academy of management Journal, 42(1), 87-99.
• Jilani, M. M. A. K., Fan, L., Islam, M. T., & Uddin, M. A. (2020). The influence of knowledge sharing on sustainable performance: A moderated mediation study. Sustainability, 12(3), 908-921.
• Karaaslan, A., Özler, D. E., & Kulaklıoğlu, A. S. (2009). Örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ve Bilgi Paylaşimi Arasindaki İlişkiye Yönelik Bir Araştirma. Afyon Kocatepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 135-160.
• Karabey, C. N., & Öztürk, F. D. (2022). Örgütsel sosyalleşme, bilgi paylaşma davranışı ve bilgi paylaşmaya yönelik duygular arasındaki illişkiler. Uluslararası Ekonomi İşletme ve Politika Dergisi, 6(2), 352-370.
• Kellner, A., Cafferkey, K., & Townsend, K. (2019). 21. Ability, motivation and opportunity theory: A formula for employee performance?. Elgar introduction to theories of human resources and employment relations, 1, 311- 331.
• Keogh, P. D., & Polonsky, M. J. (1998). Environmental commitment: a basis for environmental entrepreneurship?. Journal of organizational change management, 11(1), 38-49.
• Klassen, R. D., & Whybark, D. C. (1999). Environmental management in operations: the selection of environmental technologies. Decision Sciences, 30(3), 601-631.
• Kwahk, K. Y., & Park, D. H. (2016). The effects of network sharing on knowledge-sharing activities and job performance in enterprise social media environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 55, 826-839.
• Laguir, I., Marais, M., El Baz, J., & Stekelorum, R. (2018). Reversing the business rationale for environmental commitment in banking: does financial performance lead to higher environmental performance?. Management Decision, 56(2), 358-375.
• Latan, H., Jabbour, C. J. C., de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L., Wamba, S. F., & Shahbaz, M. (2018). Effects of environmental strategy, environmental uncertainty and top management's commitment on corporate environmental performance: The role of environmental management accounting. Journal of cleaner production, 180, 297-306.
• Lin, Y. H., & Chen, Y. S. (2017). Determinants of green competitive advantage: the roles of green knowledge sharing, green dynamic capabilities, and green service innovation. Quality & Quantity, 51, 1663-1685.
• Marouf, L. (2005). The Role of Social Networks in Organizational Knowledge Sharing. In Knowledge Management: Nurturing Culture, Innovation, and Technology, 1, 65-77.
• Memon, S. B., Rasli, A., Dahri, A. S., & Hermilinda Abas, I. (2022). Importance of top management commitment to organizational citizenship behaviour towards the environment, green training and environmental performance in Pakistani industries. Sustainability, 14(17), 110-129.
• Meyer, J. P. & Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1, 61-89.
• Moore, S. A. (2010). The effect of knowledge sharing on the environmental performance of proactive environmental organisations (Doktora Tezi). Southern Cross University, Avustralya.
• Naz, S., Jamshed, S., Nisar, Q. A., & Nasir, N. (2023). Green HRM, psychological green climate and pro- environmental behaviors: An efficacious drive towards environmental performance in China. Current Psychology, 42(2), 1346-1361.
• Nie, L., Gong, H., & Lai, X. (2022). Green research intensity and diversified performance: the moderating role of environmental regulation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 1, 1-12.
• Ojo, A. O., & Fauzi, M. A. (2020). Environmental awareness and leadership commitment as determinants of IT professionals engagement in Green IT practices for environmental performance. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 24, 298-307.
• Özen, Z. O. & Terzioğlu, M. K. (2023). Makroekonomik göstergelerin çevresel bozulma üzerindeki rolü: Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve yeşil ekonomi. Sosyal, Beşeri ve İdari Bilimler Alanında Gelişmeler, Platanus Publishing.
• Porter, M. E. (1991). Towards a dynamic theory of strategy. Strategic management journal, 12(S2), 95-117.
• Ur Rehman, Z., Shafique, I., Khawaja, K. F., Saeed, M., & Kalyar, M. N. (2023). Linking responsible leadership with financial and environmental performance: determining mediation and moderation. International Journal of Productivity and Performance Management, 72(1), 24-46.
• Rae, K., Sand, J., & Gadenne, D. (2015). The Association between Organisational Commitment And Corporate Social Responsibility-Environmental Performance Within an Integrated Sustainability Balanced Scorecard Framework. Issues in Social & Environmental Accounting, 9(1), 1-32.
• Robertson, J. L., & Barling, J. (2013). Greening organizations through leaders' influence on employees' pro‐ environmental behaviors. Journal of organizational behavior, 34(2), 176-194.
• Roscoe, S., Subramanian, N., Jabbour, C. J., & Chong, T. (2019). Green human resource management and the enablers of green organisational culture: Enhancing a firm's environmental performance for sustainable development. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(5), 737-749.
• Rubel, M.R.B., Kee, D.M.H. & Rimi, N.N. (2021c). High commitment human resource management practices and hotel employees’ work outcomes in Bangladesh. Global Business and Organizational Excellence, 40(5), 37-52.
• Rubel, M. R. B., Kee, D. M. H., Yusliza, M. Y., & Rimi, N. N. (2023). Socially responsible HRM and hotel employees’ environmental performance: the mediating roles of green knowledge sharing and environmental commitment. International Journal of Contemporary Hospitality Management, 35(7), 2645-2664.
• Seonghee, K., & Boryung, J. (2008). An analysis of faculty perceptions: Attitudes toward knowledge sharing and collaboration in an academic institution. Library & Information Science Research, 30(4), 282-290.
• Sharif-Askari, H., & Abu-Hijleh, B. (2018). Review of museums' indoor environment conditions studies and guidelines and their impact on the museums' artifacts and energy consumption. Building and Environment, 143, 186-195.
• Sharma, S. (1996). Applied Multivariate Techniques. Newyork: John Wiley& Sons Inc.
• Song, M., Yang, M. X., Zeng, K. J., & Feng, W. (2020). Green knowledge sharing, stakeholder pressure, absorptive capacity, and green innovation: Evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms. Business Strategy and the Environment, 29(3), 1517-1531.
• Studlar, D., & McAllister, I. (1999). Green versus Brown: Explaining Environmental Commitment in Australia. 80(4), 775-792.
• Sun, X., Tian, Z., Wang, J., & Su, W. (2022). The impact of environmental commitment on green purchase behavior in China. International Journal of Environmental Research and public health, 19(14), 8644.
• Terrier, L., & Marfaing, B. (2015). Using social norms and commitment to promote pro-environmental behavior among hotel guests. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 44, 10-15.
• Terzioğlu, M. K., Temelli, S., Yaşar, A., Özdemir, Ö. (2023). Bankacılık sektöründe finansal ve çevresel performansların çok kriterli karar verme yöntemleri ile karşılaştırılması. Karadeniz Teknik Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 13(25), 21-45.
• Tung, A., Baird, K., & Schoch, H. (2014). The association between the adoption of an environmental management system with organisational environmental performance. Australasian journal of environmental management, 21(3), 281-296.
• Wang, Q., Watson, J. P., & Guan, Y. (2013). Two-stage robust optimization for Nk contingency-constrained unit commitment. IEEE Transactions on Power Systems, 28(3), 2366-2375.
• Wei, F., Abbas, J., Alarifi, G., Zhang, Z., Adam, N. A., & de Queiroz, M. J. (2023). Role of green intellectual capital and top management commitment in organizational environmental performance and reputation: Moderating role of pro-environmental behavior. Journal of Cleaner Production, 405, 136847.
• Weng, H. H., Chen, J. S., & Chen, P. C. (2015). Effects of green innovation on environmental and corporate performance: A stakeholder perspective. Sustainability, 7(5), 4997-5026.
• Xing, X., Liu, T., Wang, J., Shen, L., & Zhu, Y. (2019). Environmental regulation, environmental commitment, sustainability exploration/exploitation innovation, and firm sustainable development. Sustainability, 11(21), 6001-6021.
• Yeniçeri, O. ve İnce, M. (2005). Bilgi yönetim stratejileri ve girişimcilik. İstanbul: IQ Kultur-Sanat Yayıncılık.
• Yücel, M. A., & Terzioğlu, M. K. (2022). Türkiye ve Avrupa bölgesinde eko-verimlilik: Dinamik mekansal panel veri yaklaşımı. Verimlilik Dergisi, (4), 569-584.
• Yücel, M. A., & Terzioğlu, M. K. (2023). Sürdürülebilir kalkınma ve eko-inovasyon: dinamik mekânsal etkileşim. Verimlilik Dergisi, Özel Sayı, 171-186.
• Zaim, H., Muhammed, S., & Tarim, M. (2019). Relationship between knowledge management processes and performance: critical role of knowledge utilization in organizations. Knowledge Management Research & Practice, 17(1), 24-38.
• Zelezny, L. C., & Schultz, P. W. (2000). Psychology of promoting environmentalism: Promoting environmentalism. Journal of social issues, 56(3), 365-371.
• Zhang, M., Shui, X., Smart, P., Wang, X., & Chen, J. (2023). Environmental performance feedback and timing of reshoring: perspectives from the behavioural theory of the firm. British journal of management, 34(3), 1238- 1258.