Denetim Raporu Gecikmesi Üzerinde Denetçi Görüşünün, Denetçi ve Denetim Şirketi Değişiminin Etkisi: BIST’te Bir Uygulama

Year 2025, Issue: 105, 75 - 96, 26.01.2025

Erol Geçici

https://doi.org/10.25095/mufad.1553042

Abstract

Bu çalışmada, 2015-2023 yılları arasında Borsa İstanbul'da (BIST) sürekli işlem gören 190 finansal olmayan şirketin denetçi görüşünün, erken/geç denetçi değişiminin ve denetim şirketi değişiminin denetim raporu gecikmesine etkisinin panel veriyle analiz edilmesini amaçlamaktadır.
Araştırma sonucuna göre şartlı veya görüş bildirmekten kaçınma denetim görüşü ile denetim raporu gecikmesi arasında anlamlı pozitif bir ilişki tespit edilmiştir. Ancak erken/geç denetçi değişiminin ve denetim şirketi değişiminin denetim raporu gecikmesi üzerinde anlamlı bir etkisi tespit edilememiştir. Aktif kârlılık oranı, şirket büyüklüğü ve dört büyük denetim şirketi tarafından denetlenme ile denetim raporu gecikmesi arasında negatif ilişki tespit edilirken, zarar ile denetim raporu gecikmesi arasında pozitif bir ilişki bulunmuştur. Bulguların, denetim sürecindeki faktörlerin denetim raporu gecikmesi üzerindeki etkilerini anlamaya yönelik literatüre katkı sağlaması beklenmektedir.

Keywords

Denetim Raporu Gecikmesi, Denetçi Görüşü, Denetçi Değişimi, Panel Veri Analizi, BIST

The Impact of Auditor Opinion, Auditor Change, and Audit Firm Change on Audit Report Delay: An Application in BIST

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the effect of auditor's opinion, early/late change of auditor and change of audit firm on audit report delay for 190 non-financial companies continuously traded on Borsa Istanbul (BIST) between 2015 and 2023 using panel data.
The results of the research reveal a significant positive relationship between a qualified opinion or a disclaimer of opinion and audit report delay. However, there is no significant effect of early/late change of auditor and change of audit firm on audit report delay. While a negative relationship was identified between return on assets, company size, and auditing by one of the Big Four firms with audit report delay, a positive relationship was found between firm losses and audit report delay. The findings are expected to contribute to the literature on the effects of factors in the audit process on audit report delay.

Keywords

Audit Report Delay, Auditor Opinion, Auditor Change, Panel Data Analysis, BIST

References

• Abbott, Lawrance J. - Parker, Susan - Peters, Gary F. (2012). “Internal audit assistance and external audit timeliness”, Auditing, 31(4), 3–20.
• Alkhatib, Khalid - Marji, Qais (2012). “Audit reports timeliness: empirical evidence from Jordan”, Procedia- Social and Behavioral Sciences, 62, 1342–1349.
• Ashton, Robert H. - Willingham, John J. - Elliott, Robert K. (1987). “An empirical analysis of audit delay”, Journal of Accounting Research, 275–292.
• Astami, Emita - Pramono, Agus Joko - Rusmin, Rusmin - Cahaya, Fitra Roman - Soobaroyen, Teerooven (2024). “Do family ownership and supervisory board characteristics influence audit report lag? A view from a two-tier board context”, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 56, 1–17.
• Bağımsız Denetim Yönetmeliği, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi:11/08/2024).
• Bamber, Michael E. - Bamber, Linda Smith - Schoderbek, Michael P. (1993). “Audit structure and other determinants of audit report lag: An empirical analysis”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 12(1), 1–23.
• Bağımsız Denetim Standardı 700, https://www.kgk.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 04/05/2024).
• Bonson-Ponte, Enrique - Escobar-Rodrguez, Tomas - Borrero-Domnguez, Cinta (2008). “Empirical analysis of delays in the signing of audit reports in Spain”, International Journal of Auditing, 12(2), 129–140.
• Borgi, Hela - Ghardallou, Wafa - Alzeer, Maha (2021). “The effect of CEO characteristics on financial reporting timeliness in Saudi Arabia”, Accounting, 7(6), 1265–1274.
• Borsa İstanbul. (2023). Entegre faaliyet raporu, https://www.borsaistanbul.com/ (Erişim tarihi: 20/06/2024).
• Cengiz, Selim (2017). “Denetim komitesi etkinliğinin denetim raporlarının yayınlanma süresi üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi: Borsa İstanbul’da bir uygulama”. Mali Çözüm, 31–60.
• Chen, Clement - Liu, Zhenfeng - Tang, Wenye - Tuo, Ling (2024). “Accounting reporting complexity, audit engagement partner mandatory rotation, and audit quality”, Journal of Corporate Accounting and Finance, 35(2), 157–170.
• DeAngelo, Linda Elizabeth (1981). “Auditor size and audit quality”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(3), 183–199.
• Durand, Giselle (2019). “The determinants of audit report lag: a meta-analysis”, Managerial Auditing Journal, 34(1), 44–75.
• Dyer, James C. - Mchugh, Arthur J. (1975). “The timeliness of the Australian annual report”, Journal of Accounting Research, 13(2), 204–219.
• Ettredge, Michael L. - Li, Chan - Sun, Lili (2006). “The impact of SOX Section 404 internal control quality assessment on audit delay in the SOX era”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 25(2), 1–23.
• Fakhfakh Sakka, Imen - Jarboui, Anis (2016). “Audit reports timeliness: Empirical evidence from Tunisia”, Cogent Business and Management, 3(1), 1–13.
• Güleç, Ömer Faruk - Aktaş Mozeikçi, Aysun (2020). “Denetim raporlarının yayınlanma süresinin incelenmesi: BİST şirketleri için bir uygulama”, Mali Çözüm Dergisi, 30(157), 125–144.
• Gümrah, Abdurrahman - Tanç, Ahmet (2022). “Denetim raporu gecikmesini etkileyen faktörler: Türkiye’deki finans kuruluşları üzerine bir araştırma”, Nişantaşı Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 10(1), 78–94.
• Habib, Ahsan - Bhuiyan, Md Borhan Uddin. - Huang, Hedy Jiaying - Miah, Muhammad Shahin (2019). “Determinants of audit report lag: A meta-analysis”, International Journal of Auditing, 23(1), 20–44.
• Hair, Joseph F.- Black, William C. - Babin, Barry J. - Anderson, Rolph E. (2009). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th ed.). Pearson Prentice Hall.
• Handoko, Bambang Leo - Deniswara, Kevin - Nathania, Christy (2019). “Effect of profitability, leverage, audit opinion and firm reputation toward audit report lag”, International Journal of Innovative Technology and Exploring Engineering, 9(1), 2214–2219.
• Harindahyani, Senny (2018). “The effect of corporate governance on audit report timeliness in Indonesia”, Jurnal Akuntansi Bisnis, 16(1), 80–94.
• Knechel, W. Robert - Payne, Jeff L. (2001). “Additional evidence on audit report lag”, Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(1), 137–146.
• Lee, Ho-Young - Jahng, Geum-Joo (2008). “Determinants of audit report lag: Evidence from Korea - An examination of auditor-related factors”, Journal of Applied Business Research, 24(2), 27–44.
• Merter, Abdullah Kürşat - Özer, Gökhan (2024). “Audit committee and timely reporting: evidence from Turkey”, SAGE Open, 14(1), 1–21.
• Ng, Patrick. PH - Tai, Benjamin YK (1994). “An empirical examination of the determinants of audit delay in Hong Kong”, The British Accounting Review, 26(1), 43–59.
• O’sullivan, Noel (2000). “The impact of board composition and ownership on audit quality: Evidence from large UK companies”, The British Accounting Review, 32(4), 397–414.
• Oussii, Ahmed Atef - Boulila Taktak, Neila (2018). “Audit committee effectiveness and financial reporting timeliness: The case of Tunisian listed companies”, African Journal of Economic and Management Studies, 9(1), 34–55.
• Öztürkçü Akçay, Aysel (2022). “Denetim raporu gecikmesi ve denetim firması rotasyonu: Borsa İstanbul üzerine bir inceleme”. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Araştırmaları Dergisi, 20(3), 18–34.
• Raweh, Nahla Abdulrahman Mohammed - Abdullah, Abdulwahid Ahmed Hashed - Kamardin, Hasnah - Malek, Mazrah (2021). “Industry expertise on audit committee and audit report timeliness”, Cogent Business and Management, 8(1), 1–20.
• Schwartz, Kenneth B. - Soo, Billy S. (1996). “The association between auditor changes and reporting lags”, Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1), 353–370.
• Shuraki, Mojtaba Golmohammad - Pourheidari, Omid - Azizkhani, Masoud (2021). “Accounting comparability, financial reporting quality and audit opinions: Evidence from Iran”, Asian Review of Accounting, 29(1), 42–60.
• Soltani, Bahram (2002). “Timeliness of corporate and audit reports: Some empirical evidence in the French context”, The International Journal of Accounting, 37(2), 215–246.
• SPK. (2013). Sermaye Piyasasında Finansal Raporlamaya İlişkin Esaslar Tebliği (II-14.1), https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ (Erişim tarihi: 05/06/2024).
• Sultana, Nigar - Singh, Harjinder - Van der Zahn, J-L. W. Mitchel (2015). “Audit committee characteristics and audit report lag”, International Journal of Auditing, 19(2), 72–87.
• Tanyi, Paul - Raghunandan, Kannan - Barua, Abhijit (2010). “Audit report lags after voluntary and involuntary auditor changes”, Accounting Horizons, 24(4), 671–688.
• Tuan, Koray - Memiş, Mehmet Ünsal - Kaygusuz, Faruk - Chegini, Zeinab (2020). “Audit Report Delay and Audit Firm Rotation in Turkey”, Çukurova Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 29(1), 29-41.
• Türk Ticaret Kanunu, https://www.mevzuat.gov.tr/ (Erişim Tarihi: 15/09/2024).
• Whittred, Greg P. (1980). “Audit qualification and the timeliness of corporate annual reports”. Accounting Review, 55(4), 563–577.