Pounding Of Adjacent RC Buildings During Seismıc Loads
Year 2009,
Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 129 - 145, 30.06.2009
Mizam Doğan
,
Ayten Günaydın
Abstract
Turkey is in high seismic risk zone. On a possible earthquake, adjacent buildings
which are not separated from each other properly are under pounding risk. Although gap size
requirements are given in Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC), in Turkey, adjacent buildings are still
been constructing with insufficient gap sizes. In this paper; results of pounding and effects of
pounding to structural elements of buildings are studied. Stress analyses are made on frame models
for different impact points and analysis results are discussed. It is concluded that pounding forces
are not completely absorbable because of their high values but their effects on structure can be
reduced by placing elastic materials between adjacent buildings or by reinforcing structural systems
with cast-in-place reinforced concrete (RC) walls.
References
- [1] S. Muthukumar and R. DesRoches, “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for
simulation”, Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, pp. 811-828, 2006.
- [2] S.E. AbdelRaheem, “Seismic pounding between adjacent building structures”, Electronic
Journal of Structural Engineering, Vo. 6, pp. 66-74, 2006.
- [3] B.D.Westermo, “The Dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding”,
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 18, pp. 687-699, 1989.
- [4] B.F. Maison and K.Kasai, “Analysis for type of structural pounding”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, Vol. 116(4), pp. 957-975, 1990.
- [5] S.A. Anagnostopoulos, “Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes”, Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.16, pp. 443-456, 1988.
- [6] S.A. Anagnostopoulos, “An Investigation of earthquake induced pounding between
adjacent buildings”, Earthquake Eng.and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, pp. 289-302, 1992.
- [7] D.L. Garcia, “Discussion on: Critical building separation in reducing pounding risk under
earthquake excitation”, Structural Safety, Vol. 27, pp. 393-396, 2005.
- [8] V.A. Matsagar and R.S. Jangid, “Viscoelastic damper connected to adjacent structures
involving seismic isolation”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 11(4),
pp. 309-322,2005.
- [9] The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Turkish Earthquake Code, 2007.
- [10] C.E.N. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, European Committee
for Standardization, 1998.
- [11] C.S.I. SAP2000 Advanced v10.0.7 (Structural Analysis Program), Computers and
Structures Inc., 2007.
Pounding Of Adjacent RC Buildings During Seismıc Loads
Year 2009,
Volume: 22 Issue: 1, 129 - 145, 30.06.2009
Mizam Doğan
,
Ayten Günaydın
Abstract
Turkey is in high seismic risk zone. On a possible earthquake, adjacent buildings
which are not separated from each other properly are under pounding risk. Although gap size
requirements are given in Turkish Earthquake Code (TEC), in Turkey, adjacent buildings are still
been constructing with insufficient gap sizes. In this paper; results of pounding and effects of
pounding to structural elements of buildings are studied. Stress analyses are made on frame models
for different impact points and analysis results are discussed. It is concluded that pounding forces
are not completely absorbable because of their high values but their effects on structure can be
reduced by placing elastic materials between adjacent buildings or by reinforcing structural systems
with cast-in-place reinforced concrete (RC) walls.
References
- [1] S. Muthukumar and R. DesRoches, “A Hertz contact model with non-linear damping for
simulation”, Earthquake Eng. and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 35, pp. 811-828, 2006.
- [2] S.E. AbdelRaheem, “Seismic pounding between adjacent building structures”, Electronic
Journal of Structural Engineering, Vo. 6, pp. 66-74, 2006.
- [3] B.D.Westermo, “The Dynamics of interstructural connection to prevent pounding”,
Earthquake Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 18, pp. 687-699, 1989.
- [4] B.F. Maison and K.Kasai, “Analysis for type of structural pounding”, Journal of Structural
Engineering, Vol. 116(4), pp. 957-975, 1990.
- [5] S.A. Anagnostopoulos, “Pounding of buildings in series during earthquakes”, Earthquake
Engineering and Structural Dynamics, Vol.16, pp. 443-456, 1988.
- [6] S.A. Anagnostopoulos, “An Investigation of earthquake induced pounding between
adjacent buildings”, Earthquake Eng.and Structural Dynamics, Vol. 21, pp. 289-302, 1992.
- [7] D.L. Garcia, “Discussion on: Critical building separation in reducing pounding risk under
earthquake excitation”, Structural Safety, Vol. 27, pp. 393-396, 2005.
- [8] V.A. Matsagar and R.S. Jangid, “Viscoelastic damper connected to adjacent structures
involving seismic isolation”, Journal of Civil Engineering and Management, Vol. 11(4),
pp. 309-322,2005.
- [9] The Ministry of Public Works and Settlement, Turkish Earthquake Code, 2007.
- [10] C.E.N. Eurocode 8: Design of Structures for Earthquake Resistance, European Committee
for Standardization, 1998.
- [11] C.S.I. SAP2000 Advanced v10.0.7 (Structural Analysis Program), Computers and
Structures Inc., 2007.