Evaluation of the Effect of Educational Bureaucracy on School Administration: A Blunting School Climate for Teachers

Year 2023, Volume: 10 (Special Issue), 96 - 134, 29.10.2023

Güler Shaıkh , İlknur Şentürk

https://doi.org/10.59409/ojer.1365959

Abstract

This study aims to determine the relationship between School Climate, Organizational Commitment and Educational Bureaucracy (coercive & enabling) to examine it according to some variables. In the study, relational survey model, which is one of the quantitative research methods, was used. The data were collected from a total of 280 teachers working in public primary and secondary schools in Gebze during the 2022-2023 academic year. Statistical analysis of the data was carried out with SPSS 26.0. ANOVA and t-tests were applied to the items to test the effect of dependent variables. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test statistics were applied and it was found that the answers given by the participants showed homogeneous distribution (p>0.05). Skewness and Kurtosis values were evaluated to obtain normal distribution values. Based on the results, it was concluded that there is a negative, low and significant relationship between School Climate, Organizational Commitment and Coercive Bureaucracy. It was seen that there is a positive, moderate and significant relationship between School Climate, Organizational Commitment and Enabling Bureaucracy. In addition, significant differences were found between the answers given to the scale items according to teachers' gender, age, institution and field.

Keywords

school climate, organizational commitment, educational bureaucracy, teachers' views

Ethical Statement

ETİK KURUL BELGESİ VARDIR. EKLİ DOSYALARDA YER ALMAKTADIR.

References

• Albalawi, A. S., Naughton, S., Elayan, M. B., & Sleimi, M. T. (2019). Perceived organizational support, alternative job opportunity, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and turnover intention: A moderated-mediated model. Organizacija, 52(4).
• Aldridge, J. M., & Fraser, B. J. (2016). Teachers’ views of their school climate and its relationship with teacher self-efficacy and job satisfaction. Learning Environments Research, 19, 291-307.
• Al-Jabari, B., & Ghazzawi, I. (2019). Organizational commitment: A review of the conceptual and empirical literature and a research agenda. International Leadership Journal, 11(1).
• Aranki, D. H., Suifan, T. S., & Sweis, R. J. (2019). The relationship between organizational culture and organizational commitment. Modern Applied Science, 13(4), 137-154.
• Avşar, D. (2019). Okul ikliminin işe yabancılaşma düzeyine etkisi. [Unpublished Master’s Thesis], Sabahattin Zaim Üniversitesi, İstanbul.
• Baugh, S. G., & Roberts, R. M. (1994). Professional and organizational commitment among engineers: Conflicting or complementing? IEEE transactions on engineering management, 41(2), 108-114.
• Bellibaş, M. Ş., Polatcan, M., & Kılınç, A. Ç. (2022). Linking instructional leadership to teacher practices: The mediating effect of shared practice and agency in learning effectiveness. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 50(5), 812-831.
• Besley, T., Burgess, R., Khan, A., & Xu, G. (2022). Bureaucracy and development. Annual Review of Economics, 14, 397-424.
• Bjork, C. (2005). Indonesian Education: Teachers, schools, and central bureaucracy (1st ed.). Routledge.
• Block, M. (2011). School climate. In Goldstein, S., Naglieri, J.A. (Eds.), Encyclopedia of child behavior and development. Springer, Boston, MA.
• Bodur, E., & Argon, T. (2019). Yenilikçi okul ve örgüt iklimine ilişkin öğretmen görüşleri. Uluslararası Liderlik Eğitimi Dergisi, 1(1), 75-88.
• Boz, A., & Saylik, A. (2021). The impact of enabling school structure on academic optimism: Mediating role of altruistic behaviors. International Journal of Educational Methodology, 7(1), 137-154.
• Bozeman, B. (2000). Bureaucracy and red tape. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.
• Bruner, J. (1996). The culture of education. Harvard University Press.
• Burak, İ. (2022). Öğretmen algılarına göre bürokratik okul yapısı ile örgütsel bağlılık arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Unpublished Master’s thesis, Pamukkale Üniversitesi, Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü.
• Chattopadhyay, P. (1993). Bureaucracy and class in Marxism. In Garston, N. (Ed.), Bureaucracy: Three paradigms. Recent Economic Thought Series, vol 34. Springer, Dordrecht.
• Chegini, Z., Janati, A., Asghari-Jafarabadi, M., & Khosravizadeh, O. (2019). Organizational commitment, job satisfaction, organizational justice and self-efficacy among nurses. Nursing Practice Today, 6(2), 86-93.
• Cheng, T. J., Haggard, S., & Kang, D. (2020). Institutions and growth in Korea and Taiwan: the bureaucracy. East Asian Development: New Perspectives (pp. 87-111). Routledge.
• Cherubini, L. (2009). Reconciling the tensions of new teachers' socialization into school culture: A review of the research. Issues in Educational Research, 19, 83-99.
• Christensen, L., Johnson, R. B., & Turner, L. A. (2014). Research methods: Design and analysis. (Trans. Ed. A. Aypay). Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
• Churcher, M., & Talbot, D. (2020). The corporatization of education: Bureaucracy, boredom, and transformative possibilities. New Formations, 100(100-101), 28-42.
• Collie, R. J., Shapka, J. D., & Perry, N. E. (2011). Predicting teacher commitment: The impact of school climate and social–emotional learning. Psychology in the Schools, 48(10), 1034-1048.
• Cornell, A., Knutsen, C. H., & Teorell, J. (2020). Bureaucracy and growth. Comparative Political Studies, 53(14), 2246-2282.
• Cox, H., & Wood, J. R. (1980). Organizational structure and professional alienation: The case of public school teachers. Peabody Journal of Education, 58(1), 1-6.
• Çeltek, F. M. (2021). Temel eğitim kademesindeki öğretmenlerin okul kültürü algıları ile iş doyumları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üniversitesi.
• Daud, K. A. M., Khidzir, N. Z., Ismail, A. R., & Abdullah, F. A. (2018). Validity and reliability of instrument to measure social media skills among small and medium entrepreneurs at Pengkalan Datu River. International Journal of Development and Sustainability, 7(3), 1026-1037.
• Deal, T. E., & Peterson, K. D. (1999). Shaping school culture: The heart of leadership. Adolescence, 34(136), 802.
• Deniz, Ü., & Erdener, M. A. (2020). Levels of school administrators exhibiting instructional supervision behaviors: Teachers’ perspectives. Research in Educational Administration and Leadership, 5(4), 1038-1081.
• Dhillon, A., & Meier, K. J. (2022). Representative bureaucracy in challenging environments: Gender representation, education, and India. International Public Management Journal, 25(1), 43-64.
• Díaz de Rada, Á. (2007). School bureaucracy, ethnography and culture, Social Anthropology/Anthropologie sociale, 15(2), 205-222.
• Drechsler, W. (2020). Good bureaucracy: Max Weber and public administration today. Max Weber Studies, 20(2), 219-224.
• Dutta, A. (2006). The bureaucracy of beauty: Design in the age of its global reproducibility. Routledge.
• Eagleton, T. (2016). Culture. Yale University Press.
• Erickson, F. (1987). Conceptions of school culture: An overview. Educational Administration Quarterly, 23(4), 11-24
• Ferreira, C. M., & Serpa, S. (2019). Rationalization and bureaucracy: Ideal-type bureaucracy by Max Weber. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 7(2), 187-195.
• Field, A. (2013). Discovering statistics using IBM SPSS statistics. Sage.
• Firestone, W. A., & Wilson, B. L. (1985). Using bureaucratic and cultural linkages to improve instruction: The principal's contribution. Educational Administration Quarterly, 21(2), 7-30.
• Fowler, J. F. J. (2013). Survey research methods. Sage Publications.
• Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education. Boston: McGraw-Hill.
• Franks, T. (1989). Bureaucracy, organization culture and development. Public Administration and Development, 9(4), 357-368.
• Frymier, J. (1987). Bureaucracy and the Neutering of Teachers. Phi Delta Kappan, 69(1), 9-14
• Gay, P. D. (2009). The values of bureaucracy. Oxford University Press.
• George, D., & Mallery, P. (2019). IBM SPSS statistics 26 step by step: A simple guide and reference. Routledge.
• Goldring, L. (2002). The power of school culture. Leadership, 32(2), 32-35
• Gruenert, S. (2005). Correlations of collaborative school cultures with student achievement. NASSP bulletin, 89(645), 43-55.
• Gualmini, E. (2008). Restructuring Weberian bureaucracy: Comparing managerial reforms in Europe and the United States. Public Administration, 86(1), 75-94.
• Gülşen, C., & Gülenay, G. B. (2014). The principal and healthy school climate. Social Behavior and Personality: An international journal, 42(1), 93-100.
• Hajjar, S. T. (2018). Statistical analysis: Internal-consistency reliability and construct validity. International Journal of Quantitative and Qualitative Research Methods, 6(1), 27-38.
• Hanson, E. M. (1975). The modern educational bureaucracy and the process of change. Educational Administration Quarterly, 11(3), 21–36. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X7501100303
• Harber, C., & Davies, L. (2005). School management and effectiveness in developing countries: The post-bureaucratic school. A&C Black.
• Hargreaves, D. H. (1995). School culture, school effectiveness and school improvement. School effectiveness and school improvement, 6(1), 23-46.
• Hashmi, M. U., & Shuja, S. (2020). The bureaucracy of Pakistan: from the perspective of Max Weber’s ‘Iron Cage’ Philosophy. Gomal University Journal of Research, 36(1), 30-39.
• Haşim, I. (2017). Ortaokullarda okul kültürünün incelenmesi. İstanbul Aydın Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9(3), 61-71.
• Headley, A. M., Wright, J. E., & Meier, K. J. (2021). Bureaucracy, democracy, and race: The limits of symbolic representation. Public Administration Review, 81(6), 1033-1043.
• Hedges, J. (2002). The importance of posting and interaction with the education bureaucracy in becoming a teacher in Ghana. International Journal of Educational Development, 22(3-4), 353-366.
• Hightower, A. M. (2001). San Diego's big boom: District bureaucracy meets culture of learning. Stanford University.
• Hightower, A. M. (2002). San Diego's big boom: District bureaucracy supports culture of learning. A research report. Document R-02-2. Center for the Study of Teaching and Policy.
• Hinton, P., McMurray, I., & Brownlow, C. (2014). SPSS explained. Routledge.
• Hoff, T., Lee, D. R., & Prout, K. (2021). Organizational commitment among physicians: A systematic literature review. Health Services Management Research, 34(2), 99-112.
• Hofstede, G. (2003). What is culture? A reply to Baskerville. Accounting, organizations and society, 28(7-8), 811-813.
• Hoy, W. K. (2003). An analysis of enabling and mindful school structures: Some theoretical, research and practical considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(1), 87-109.
• Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2000). School bureaucracies that work: Enabling, not coercive. Journal of school Leadership, 10(6), 525-541.
• Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2001). Designing better schools: The meaning and measure of enabling school structures. Educational administration quarterly, 37(3), 296-321.
• Hunter, I. (2020). Rethinking the school: Subjectivity, bureaucracy, criticism. Routledge.
• Jerald, C. D. (2006). School culture. Center for Comprehensive School Reform and Improvement.
• John, M. C. (1999, April). Leadership style, school climate, and the institutional commitment of teachers. International Forum Journal, 2(1), 25-57.
• Johnson, M. T., & Johnson, M. T. (2013). What is culture? What does it do? What should it do?. Evaluating culture: Well-being, institutions and circumstance, 97-119.
• Karaoğlan, Ö. (2019). Okulların bürokratik yapısı, örgütsel sessizlik ve örgütsel sinizm arasındaki ilişki [Unpublished Master’s Thesis]. Pamukkale University, Denizli.
• Kasikci, S., Kurtay, M., & Kondakci, Y. (2023). The role of leadership in developing a climate of technology integration in public schools. Teaching and Teacher Education, 132, 104234.
• Katz, M. B. (1971). Class, bureaucracy, and schools: The illusion of educational change in America. New York: Praeger
• Khan, N. (2019). The impact of organizational climate on teacher’s commitment. Journal of Education and Educational Development, 6(2), 327-342.
• Kissell, R. E. (2023). Coercion and consent for the US education market: community engagement policy under racialized fiscal surveillance. Journal of Education Policy, 38(5), 738-760.
• Kotnis, B. (2004). Enabling bureaucracies in education: A case study of formalization in an urban district and schools. State University of New York at Buffalo.
• Lacks, P. (2016). The relationships between school climate, teacher self-efficacy, and teacher beliefs. [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. The Institutional Repository of Liberty University, Virginia.
• Lai Eng Fei, E., & K Han, C. G. (2020). The influence of school climate, teachers’ commitment, teachers’ motivation on teachers’ work performance through teachers’ job satisfaction. International journal of advanced research in education and society, 1(3), 23-35.
• Landau, S., & Everitt, B. S. (2003). A handbook of statistical analyses using SPSS. Chapman and Hall/CRC.
• Langer, J. (2022). Bureaucracy and the imaginal realm: Max Weber, rationality and the substantive Basis of Public Administration. Perspectives on Public Management and Governance, 5(2), 122-134.
• Lee, H. Y. (2019). China's new bureaucracy? State and society in China (pp. 55-75). Routledge.
• Lee, M., & Louis, K. S. (2019). Mapping a strong school culture and linking it to sustainable school improvement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 81, 84-96.
• Lennon, P. A. (2010). The Relationship of Bureaucratic Structure to School Climate: An Exploratory Factor Analysis of Construct Validity. ProQuest LLC. 789 East Eisenhower Parkway, PO Box 1346, Ann Arbor, MI 48106.
• Levesque, R. (2007). SPSS programming and data management. A guide for SPSS and SAS Users.
• Loan, L. J. M. S. L. (2020). The influence of organizational commitment on employees’ job performance: The mediating role of job satisfaction. Management Science Letters, 10(14), 3307-3312.
• Loukas, A. (2007). What is school climate?. Leadership Compass, 5(1), 1-3.
• Luna-Arocas, R., & Lara, F. J. (2020). Talent management, affective organizational commitment and service performance in local government. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(13), 4827.
• Maassen, P., & Stensaker, B. (2019). From organised anarchy to de‐coupled bureaucracy: The transformation of university organisation. Higher Education Quarterly, 73(4), 456-468.
• MacNeil, A. J., Prater, D. L., & Busch, S. (2009). The effects of school culture and climate on student achievement. International Journal of Leadership in Education, 12(1), 73-84.
• Marta, I. A., Supartha, I., Dewi, I. G. A. M., & Wibawa, I. (2021). Job enrichment, empowerment, and organizational commitment: The mediating role of work motivation and job satisfaction. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business, 8(1), 1031-1040.
• Masemann, V. L. (2003). Culture and education. Comparative education: The dialectic of the global and the local, 2, 115-132.
• McGuigan, L. (2005). The role of enabling bureaucracy and academic optimism in academic achievement growth. The Ohio State University.
• Mcneil, L. M. (2000). Sameness, bureaucracy, and the myth of educational equity: The TAAS System of Testing in Texas public schools. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 22(4), 508–523. https://doi.org/10.1177/0739986300224008
• Mehta, J. (2013). From bureaucracy to profession: Remaking the educational sector for the twenty-first century. Harvard Educational Review, 83(3), 463-488.
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (2001). Organizational commitment. Personnel psychology and human resource management: A reader for students and practitioners, 289-342.
• Meyer, M. W. (2013). Limits to bureaucratic growth. In Limits to Bureaucratic Growth. de Gruyter.
• Miewald, R. D. (1970). Weberian bureaucracy and the military model. Public Administration Review, 129-133.
• Monteiro, P., & Adler, P. S. (2022). Bureaucracy for the 21st century: Clarifying and expanding our view of bureaucratic organization. Academy of Management Annals, 16(2), 427-475.
• Mowday, R. T. (1998). Reflections on the study and relevance of organizational commitment. Human resource management review, 8(4), 387-401.
• Myksvoll, T., Tatham, M., & Fimreite, A. L. (2022). Understanding bureaucratic support for coerced institutional change. Governance, 35(4), 1119-1138.
• Nah, D. (2021). Hegel, Weber, and bureaucracy. Critical Review, 33, 1-21. Doi.10.1080/08913811.2021.2006900.
• Obamuyi, T. M., & Olayiwola, S. O. (2019). Corruption and economic growth in India and Nigeria. Journal of Economics & Management, 35, 80-105.
• Odoh, J. N. (2020). Comparative analysis of school climate and teachers’ commitment in public and private secondary schools in Ebonyi State. National Journal of Educational Leadership, 5(1).
• Oldac, Y. I., & Kondakci, Y. (2020). Multilevel analysis of the relationship between school-level variables and student achievement. Educational Management Administration & Leadership, 48(4), 762-780.
• Özgenel, M., & Ankaralıoğlu, S. (2020). The effect of school administrators’ spiritual leadership style on school culture. Spiritual Psychology and Counseling, 5(2), 137-165.
• Page, R. (1987). Teachers' perceptions of students: A link between classrooms, school cultures, and the social order. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 77-99.
• Pashiardis, G. (2000). School climate in elementary and secondary schools: Views of Cypriot principals and teachers. International Journal of Educational Management, 14(5), 224-237.
• Peterson, K. D., & Deal, T. E. (2009). The shaping school culture fieldbook. John Wiley & Sons.
• Pudjiwati, J., Cakranegara, P. A., Pesik, I. M., Yusuf, M., & Sutaguna, I. N. T. (2021). The influence of employee competence and leadership on the organizational commitment of Perumda Pasar Juara employees. Jurnal Darma Agung, 30(2), 606-613.
• Purwanto, A. (2020). The relationship of transformational leadership, organizational justice and organizational commitment: a mediation effect of job satisfaction. Journal of Critical Reviews.
• Rafferty, T. J. (2003). School climate and teacher attitudes toward upward communication in secondary schools. American Secondary Education, 49-70.
• Rahawarin, M. A., Zacharias, T., Yusriadi, Y., & Rianti, M. (2020). Dimension of organizational citizenship behavior and its effect toward employees’ performance at capital investment and licensing service office South Buru District. Humanities & Social Sciences Reviews, 8(2), 681-689.
• Reaves, S. J., & Cozzens, J. A. (2018). Teacher perceptions of climate, motivation, and self-efficacy: is there really a connection. Journal of Education and Training Studies, 6(12), 48-67.
• Redondo, R., Sparrow, P., & Hernández-Lechuga, G. (2021). The effect of protean careers on talent retention: examining the relationship between protean career orientation, organizational commitment, job satisfaction and intention to quit for talented workers. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 32(9), 2046-2069.
• Reichers, A. E. (1985). A review and reconceptualization of organizational commitment. Academy of management review, 10(3), 465-476.
• Ridwan, M., Mulyani, S. R., & Ali, H. (2020). Improving employee performance through perceived organizational support, organizational commitment and organizational citizenship behavior. Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(12).
• Robinson, S. (2019). Decentralization, managerialism and accountability: Professional loss in an Australian education bureaucracy. Policy Actors, (pp. 2-16). Routledge.
• Rosenfeld J. (2017). Don't ask or tell: pay secrecy policies in U.S. workplaces. Social Science Research, 65, 1-16. Doi: 10.1016/j.ssresearch.2017.01.009
• Rossi, P. H., Wright, J. D., & Anderson, A. B. (Eds.). (2013). Handbook of survey research. Academic press.
• Rudasill, K. M., Snyder, K. E., Levinson, H., & L Adelson, J. (2018). Systems view of school climate: A theoretical framework for research. Educational psychology review, 30, 35-60.
• Sager, F., & Rosser, C. (2021). Weberian bureaucracy. In Oxford research encyclopedia of politics.
• Sager, Fritz & Rosser, Christian. (2009). Weber, Wilson, and Hegel: Theories of modern bureaucracy. Public Administration Review. 69. 1136 - 1147. 10.1111/j.1540-6210.2009.02071.x.
• Saputra, A., Mahardika, A., & Izharsyah, J. R. (2021). The rationality of the Max Weber Bureaucracy Model in the modernization of the public services bureaucracy of the industrial era 4.0 (Case Study of Medan City E-KTP Services). Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 4(3), 6677-6687.
• Sarhan, N., Harb, A., Shrafat, F., & Alhusban, M. (2020). The effect of organizational culture on the organizational commitment: Evidence from hotel industry. Management Science Letters, 10(1), 183-196.
• Sarı, T. (2019). Okul yöneticilerinin algı yönetimi taktikleri, örgüt iklimi ve öğretmen motivasyonu arasındaki ilişkiler [Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation]. Pamukkale Üniversitesi Eğitim Bilimleri Enstitüsü, Denizli.
• Schechter, C., Da’as, R. A., & Qadach, M. (2022). Crisis leadership: Leading schools in a global pandemic. Management in Education, Doi: 10.1177/08920206221084050
• Schein, E. H. (1991). What is culture?. Newbury Park, CA: Sage, 243-253.
• Schott, R. L. (2000). The origins of bureaucracy: An anthropological perspective. International Journal of Public Administration, 23(1), 53–78.
• Seeram, E. (2019). An overview of correlational research. Radiologic technology, 91(2), 176-179.
• Serpa, S., & Ferreira, C. M. (2019). The concept of bureaucracy in a depraved Nigerian Economy: Challenges and prospects. Int'l J. Soc. Sci. Stud., 7, 12.
• Sinden, J. E., Hoy, W. K., & Sweetland, S. R. (2004). An analysis of enabling school structure: Theoretical, empirical, and research considerations. Journal of Educational Administration, 42(4), 462-478.
• Smith, K. B., & Larimer, C. W. (2004). A mixed relationship: Bureaucracy and school performance. Public Administration Review, 64(6), 728-736.
• Smith, P. A., Escobedo, P., & Kearney, W. S. (2020). Principal influence: A catalyst for positive school climate. International Journal of Education Policy and Leadership, 16(5).
• Spencer-Oatey, H., & Franklin, P. (2012). What is culture? A compilation of quotations. GlobalPAD Core Concepts, 1, 22.
• Suzuki, K., & Hur, H. (2020). Bureaucratic structures and organizational commitment: Findings from a comparative study of 20 European countries. Public Management Review, 22(6), 877-907.
• Syakur, A., Susilo, T. A. B., Wike, W., & Ahmadi, R. (2020). Sustainability of communication, organizational culture, cooperation, trust and leadership style for lecturer commitments in higher education. Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences, 3(2), 1325-1335.
• Tajasom, A., & Ahmad, Z. A. (2011). Principals' leadership style and school climate: teachers' perspectives from Malaysia. International Journal of Leadership in Public Services, 7(4), 314-333.
• Thapa, A., Cohen, J., Guffey, S., & Higgins-D’Alessandro, A. (2013). A review of school climate research. Review of educational research, 83(3), 357-385.
• Theobald, Nick A., and Donald P. Haider-Markel. (2009). "Race, bureaucracy, and symbolic representation: Interactions between citizens and police." Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory 19(2), 409-426.
• Thompson, D. (2004). Bureaucracy and democracy. In Restoring Responsibility: Ethics in Government, Business, and Healthcare (pp. 50-70). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. doi:10.1017/CBO9780511617423.005
• Tjosvold, D., & McNeely, L. T. (1988). Innovation through communication in an educational bureaucracy. Communication Research, 15(5), 568-581.
• Toprak, M., Saylik, A., & Törün, M. K. (2022). Türkiye’deki kamu okullarında bürokrasi: Mevcut ampirik çalışmaların tematik bir analizi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, 58, 245-257.
• Tsang, K. K., Wang, G., & Bai, H. (2022). Enabling school bureaucracy, psychological empowerment, and teacher burnout: a mediation analysis. Sustainability, 14(4), 2047.
• Visser, P. S., Krosnick, J. A., & Lavrakas, P. J. (2000). Survey research. In H. T. Reis & C. M. Judd (Eds.), Handbook of research methods in social and personality psychology (pp. 223–252). Cambridge University Press.
• Warner, B. E. (2001). John Stuart Mill’s Theory of Bureaucracy within representative government: Balancing competence and participation. Public Administration Review, 61(4), 403–413. http://www.jstor.org/stable/977502
• Waruwu, H., Asbari, M., Purwanto, A., Nugroho, Y. A., Fikri, M. A. A., Fauji, A.,& Dewi, W. R. (2020). The role of transformational leadership, organizational learning and structure on innovation capacity: Evidence from Indonesia private schools. EduPsyCouns: Journal of Education, Psychology and Counseling, 2(1), 378-397.
• Weber, M. (2016). Bureaucracy. In Social Theory Re-Wired (pp. 287-292). Routledge.
• Whiten, A., Hinde, R. A., Laland, K. N., & Stringer, C. B. (2011). Culture evolves. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 366(1567), 938-948.
• Wong, W. (2013). The search for a model of public administration reform in Hong Kong: Weberian bureaucracy, new public management or something else?. Public Administration and Development, 33(4), 297-310.
• Yiğit, M., & Ağalday, B. (2022). Unutulmuş bir okul yöneticisi: Okul müdür yardımcılarının yönetim tarzları okul iklimini nasıl etkiler?. Yaşadıkça Eğitim, 36(3), 732-750.
• Yusof, N. (2012). School climate and teachers’ commitment: A case study of Malaysia. International Journal of Economics Business and Management Studies, 1(2), 65-75.
• Zahedipour, M., & Haghighi, M. (2015). Investigating the correlation between the organizational participative and bureaucratic culture white teachers job burnout. International Journal of Biology, Pharmacy and Allied Sciences, 4(8), 117-125.
• Zullig, K., Matthews, M.R. (2014). School climate. in: Michalos, A.C. (eds) Encyclopedia of Quality of Life and Well-Being Research. Springer, Dordrecht. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-0753-5_2597