The Effect of Perceived Organizational Support on Psychological Ownership

Year 2020, Volume: 15 Issue: 22, 1234 - 1254, 29.02.2020

Gül Çıkmaz , Salih Yeşil

https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.658193

Cited By: 6

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to investigate whether organizational support has an effect on psychological ownership perception. Method: A total of 326 employees working in the SME in Gaziantep were the sample of this study. Data wascollected through survey method and subsequently collected data were staticially analysed by using SPSS 21.0. Results: According to the findings, there was a negative relationship between organizational support and psychological ownership perceptions. In addition, perceived organizational support had a negative effect on psychological ownership. Discussion: In this study where the effects of organizational support perceptions on psychological ownership were examined, it was seen that negative perceptions in organizational support behaviors could affect perceptions of psychological ownership negatively.This study focuses on and investigates the organizational support and psychological ownership perception. The purpose of this study is to investigate whether organizational support has an effect on psychological ownership perception. The study involved a field research. A total of 326 employees working in the SME in Gaziantep comprised the sample of this study. Data was collected through survey method and subsequently collected data were statically analyzed by using SPSS 21.0. According to the findings, there was a negative relationship between organizational support and psychological ownership perceptions. In addition, perceived organizational support had a negative effect on psychological ownership. The results were important to reflect upon the relationship between organizational support and psychological ownership perception. In this study where the effects of organizational support perceptions on psychological ownership were examined, it was seen that negative perceptions in organizational support behaviors could affect perceptions of psychological ownership negatively. The findings were discussed from the perspectives of both theory and practice. 

Keywords

Ownership, PsychologicalOwnership, Perceived Organizational Support

Çalışanların Algıladıkları Örgütsel Desteğin Psikolojik Sahiplenme Üzerine Etkisi

Abstract

Bu çalışma örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sahiplenme konularını ele almakta ve incelemektedir. Çalışmanın amacı, örgütsel bağlamda ortaya çıkan örgütsel destek olgusunun psikolojik sahiplenme ile ilişkisi ve üzerinde etkisinin olup olmadığını belirlemektir. Araştırma bir alan çalışması içermektedir. Araştırmanın çalışma grubunu Gaziantep ilinde KOBİ niteliğinde çalışan işletmelerde görev yapan toplam 326 çalışan oluşturmaktadır. Çalışmada veriler anket soru formu yardımıyla toplanmıştır. Elde edilen verilerin istatistiki analizi için SPSS 21.0 kullanılmıştır. Çalışma sonucunda algılanan örgütsel destek ile psikolojik sahiplenme arasında negatif yönlü anlamlı bir ilişki olduğu belirlenmiştir. Ayrıca algılanan örgütsel desteğin psikolojik sahiplenme üzerinde negatif yönlü bir etkiye sahip olduğu ortaya çıkmıştır. Elde edilen sonuçlar, örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişkileri ortaya koymak açısından önem taşımaktadır. Örgütsel destek algılamalarının, psikolojik sahiplenme üzerindeki etkisinin araştırıldığı bu çalışmada, örgütsel destek davranışların da ortaya çıkan olumsuz algılamaların, psikolojik sahiplenme duygusuna yönelik algılamaları negatif yönde etkileyebileceği belirlenmiştir. Bu sonuçlar gerek teorik ve gerekse uygulama perspektiflerinden sonuç kısmında tartışılmıştır.

Keywords

Psikolojik Sahiplenme, Sahiplenme, Algılanan Örgütsel Destek

References

• Bayram, N. (2004). Sosyal Bilimlerde Spss İle Veri Analizi. Bursa: Ezgi Kitabevi.
• Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and Power in Social Life. New York: Wiley.
• Coyle-Shapiro, J. A.-M., ve Conway, N. (2005). Exchange relationships: examining psychological contracts and perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90(4), 774-781.
• Çakır, Ö. (2001). İşe bağlılık olgusu ve etkileyen faktörler. Ankara: Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Eisenberger, R., Huntington, R., Hutchison, S., ve Sowa, D. (1986). Perceived organizational support. Journal of Applied Psychology, 71, 500–507.
• Furby, L. (1991). Understanding the psychology of possession and ownership: a personal memoir and appraisal of. Journal of Social Behavior and Personality, 6(6), 457–463.
• George, J. M. (1989). Mood and absence. Journal of Applied Psychology, 317–324.
• George, J. M., ve Brief, A. (1992). Feeling good-doing good: a conceptual analysis of the mood at work-organizational spontaneity relationship. Psychological Bulletin, 112(2), 319-329.
• Giray, M. D., ve Şahin, D. (2013). Algılanan örgütsel, yönetici ve çalışma arkadaşları desteği ölçekleri: geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Türk Psikoloji Yazıları, 15(30), 1-9.
• Hellman, C. M., Fuqua , D., ve Worley, J. (2006). A reliability generalization study on the survey of perceived organizational support: the effects of mean age and number of ıtems on score reliability. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 66(4), 631-642.
• Kalaycı, Ş. (2014). SPSS uygulamalı çok değişkenli istatistik teknikleri. Ankara: Asil Yayın Evi
• Jeswani, S., ve Dave, S. (2012). A study on the impact of predictors of psychological ownership on turnover intention among faculty members. IJEMR, 2(2). - Online - ISSN 2249 – 2585 - Print - ISSN 2249 - 8672
• Kerse, G., ve Karabey, C. (2017). Algılanan örgütsel desteğin örgütsel özdeşleşmeye etkisi: örgütsel sinizmin aracı rolü. MANAS Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 6(4), 375-398.
• Mathieu, J., ve Zajac, D. (1990). A review and meta-analysisof the antecedents, correlates and consequences of organizational commitment. Psychological Bulletin, 171-194.
• McIntyre, N., Srivastava, A., ve Fuller, J. A. (2009). The relationship of locus of control and motives with psychological ownership in organizations. Journal of Managerial Issues, 21(13), 383-411.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Allen, N. (1997). Commitment in the Workplace: Theory, Research, and Application. London: Sage Publication.
• Meyer, J. P., ve Allen, N. J. (1991). A three-component conceptualization of organizational commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 1(1), 61-89.
• Ötken, A. B. (2015). Algılanan örgütsel destek ve psikolojik sahiplenme arasındaki ilişki ve bu ilişkide örgütsel adaletin rolü. Hacettepe Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 33(2), 113-140.
• Pare, G., Sicotte, C., ve Jacque, H. (2006). The effects of creating psychological ownership on physicians' acceptance of clinical information systems. Journal of the American Medical Informatics Association, 13(2), 197-205.
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., ve Dirks, K. (2001). Toward a theory of psychological ownership in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 26(2), 298-310.
• Pierce, J. L., Kostova, T., ve Dirks, K. (2003). The state of psychological ownership: ıntegrating and extending a century of research. Review of General Psychology, 7(1), 84–107.
• Rhoades, L., ve Eisenberger, R. (2002). Perceived organizational support: a review of the literature. Journal of Applied Psychology, 87(4), 698–714.
• Van Dyne, L., ve Pierce, J. L. (2004). Psychological ownership and feelings of possession: three field studies sredicting employee attitudes and organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(4), 439–459.
• White, R. W. (1959). "Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological Review, 66(5), 297-330.