Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite
Year 2019, , 78 - 80, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070

Abstract

References

  • Bougie, R., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 377–393.
  • Canbolat, Z.N & Pınarbaşı, F. (2018). Mobil Uygulamalara Yönelik Olumsuz Kullanıcı Değerlendirmelerinin İncelenmesi: İçerik Analizi ve Metin Madenciliği Yöntemleriyle Bir Uygulama. V. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, 102.
  • Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2014). Consumer brand relationships: A research landscape. Springer.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. . (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7. bs). Pearson.
  • Hegner, S. M., Fetscherin, M., & van Delzen, M. (2017). Determinants and outcomes of brand hate. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(1), 13–25.
  • Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. The Journal of Marketing, 71–82.
  • Kucuk, S. U. (2016). Brand Hate: Navigating Consumer Negativity in the Digital World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Lee, M. S., Motion, J., & Conroy, D. (2009). Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 169–180.
  • Pınarbaşı, F., & Canbolat, Z. N. (2018). EVALUATION OF AUGMENTED REALITY MOBILE APPLICATIONS IN TURKEY MARKET: A DATA MINING APPROACH TO CONSUMER REVIEWS. CHANGING ORGANIZATIONS, 187.
  • Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Dalli, D. (2012). Emotions that drive consumers away from brands: Measuring negative emotions toward brands and their behavioral effects. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 55–67.

CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?

Year 2019, , 78 - 80, 30.07.2019
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070

Abstract

Purpose- Consumer negativity
is one of crucial concepts for understanding and evaluating consumers in
today’s world, since emotions play key role for consumer decision making. The
study aims to examine consumer negativity with related concepts (brand hate and
brand switch) in Turkey context.

Methodology- A survey with 135
participants is used for data collection stage and study employs logistic
regression and Mann Whitney Tests for methodology according to non-parametric
structure of data.

Findings- Results imply that
all antecedent variables (negative past experience, symbolic incongruity and
ideological incongruity) have positive relationship with brand hate, while only
negative past experience and symbolic incongruity have positive relationship
with brand switch. Mann Whitney tests also conclude that negative e-wom has
significant differences regarding to brand hate and brand switch variables.







Conclusion- Study included
descriptive statistics regarding to Turkish consumer negativity for managerial
implication. The study confirms antecedents of brand hate regarding to previous
studies, while it implies ideological incongruity as most important antecedent.
Brand switch concept is only affected by negative past experience and symbolic
incongruity, this shows that ideological incongruity does not affect brand
switch intention. Ideological incongruity is found important for concept with
attitude nature (brand hate) while opposite conclusion is valid for concept
with intention nature (brand switch).

References

  • Bougie, R., Pieters, R., & Zeelenberg, M. (2003). Angry customers don’t come back, they get back: The experience and behavioral implications of anger and dissatisfaction in services. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 377–393.
  • Canbolat, Z.N & Pınarbaşı, F. (2018). Mobil Uygulamalara Yönelik Olumsuz Kullanıcı Değerlendirmelerinin İncelenmesi: İçerik Analizi ve Metin Madenciliği Yöntemleriyle Bir Uygulama. V. Yıldız Sosyal Bilimler Kongresi, 102.
  • Fetscherin, M., & Heinrich, D. (2014). Consumer brand relationships: A research landscape. Springer.
  • Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R. . (2014). Multivariate Data Analysis (7. bs). Pearson.
  • Hegner, S. M., Fetscherin, M., & van Delzen, M. (2017). Determinants and outcomes of brand hate. Journal of Product & Brand Management, 26(1), 13–25.
  • Keaveney, S. M. (1995). Customer switching behavior in service industries: An exploratory study. The Journal of Marketing, 71–82.
  • Kucuk, S. U. (2016). Brand Hate: Navigating Consumer Negativity in the Digital World. Palgrave Macmillan, Cham.
  • Lee, M. S., Motion, J., & Conroy, D. (2009). Anti-consumption and brand avoidance. Journal of Business Research, 62(2), 169–180.
  • Pınarbaşı, F., & Canbolat, Z. N. (2018). EVALUATION OF AUGMENTED REALITY MOBILE APPLICATIONS IN TURKEY MARKET: A DATA MINING APPROACH TO CONSUMER REVIEWS. CHANGING ORGANIZATIONS, 187.
  • Romani, S., Grappi, S., & Dalli, D. (2012). Emotions that drive consumers away from brands: Measuring negative emotions toward brands and their behavioral effects. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 29(1), 55–67.
There are 10 citations in total.

Details

Primary Language English
Subjects Finance, Business Administration
Journal Section Articles
Authors

Fatih Pinarbasi This is me 0000-0001-9005-0324

Ebru Enginkaya 0000-0003-1137-3470

Publication Date July 30, 2019
Published in Issue Year 2019

Cite

APA Pinarbasi, F., & Enginkaya, E. (2019). CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?. PressAcademia Procedia, 9(1), 78-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070
AMA Pinarbasi F, Enginkaya E. CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?. PAP. July 2019;9(1):78-80. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070
Chicago Pinarbasi, Fatih, and Ebru Enginkaya. “CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?”. PressAcademia Procedia 9, no. 1 (July 2019): 78-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070.
EndNote Pinarbasi F, Enginkaya E (July 1, 2019) CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?. PressAcademia Procedia 9 1 78–80.
IEEE F. Pinarbasi and E. Enginkaya, “CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?”, PAP, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 78–80, 2019, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070.
ISNAD Pinarbasi, Fatih - Enginkaya, Ebru. “CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?”. PressAcademia Procedia 9/1 (July 2019), 78-80. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070.
JAMA Pinarbasi F, Enginkaya E. CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?. PAP. 2019;9:78–80.
MLA Pinarbasi, Fatih and Ebru Enginkaya. “CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?”. PressAcademia Procedia, vol. 9, no. 1, 2019, pp. 78-80, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2019.1070.
Vancouver Pinarbasi F, Enginkaya E. CONSUMER NEGATIVITY TOWARDS BRANDS: BRAND HATE OR BRAND SWITCH?. PAP. 2019;9(1):78-80.

PressAcademia Procedia (PAP) publishes proceedings of conferences, seminars and symposiums. PressAcademia Procedia aims to provide a source for academic researchers, practitioners and policy makers in the area of social and behavioral sciences, and engineering.

PressAcademia Procedia invites academic conferences for publishing their proceedings with a review of editorial board. Since PressAcademia Procedia is an double blind peer-reviewed open-access book, the manuscripts presented in the conferences can easily be reached by numerous researchers. Hence, PressAcademia Procedia increases the value of your conference for your participants. 

PressAcademia Procedia provides an ISBN for each Conference Proceeding Book and a DOI number for each manuscript published in this book.

PressAcademia Procedia is currently indexed by DRJI, J-Gate, International Scientific Indexing, ISRA, Root Indexing, SOBIAD, Scope, EuroPub, Journal Factor Indexing and InfoBase Indexing. 

Please contact to procedia@pressacademia.org for your conference proceedings.