Research Article
BibTex RIS Cite

THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION

Year 2016, , 297 - 305, 30.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353

Abstract

Psychological contract is non-physical agreement is in
addition to economic agreements on wages and working conditions. Employees
assure to work, and loyalty with this non-physical treaty and they expect
safety, respectful relationship, better status. The definition of trust weaved
in this research is the willingness of a party to be defenseless to the actions
of another party relied on the expectation that the other will perform a
particular action important to the trustor, irrespective of the ability to show
or control that other party (Mayer, Davis ve Schoorman, 1995; Schoorman, ve
Davis, 2007). The aim of this study is to determine the public employees
working in Eskişehir the effect on trust to organization and their
psychological contract violation. In this study, approximately 120 public
employees working in Eskisehir survey be conducted. In this study, survey
questions will emanate psychological contract violation scale made by Robinson
and Rousseau (1994), organizational trust scale is Nyhan and Marlow (1997).
According to the results found that the trust of the employees and the
administrators decreases when the employees have violated the psychological
contract. 

References

  • Atkinson, C. 2007, "Trust and the psychological contract", Employee Relations, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227-246.
  • Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life, Transaction Publishers.
  • Brinkhoff, A., Özer, Ö., & Sargut, G. 2015, “All You Need Is Trust? An Examination of Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Projects”, Production and Operations Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181-200.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Geri Bildirimin Araştırma Görevlilerinin Öz-Yeterlilikleri Üzerindeki Etkisi”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21-30.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Öğrencilerin Öz-Yeterlilikleri, Değişime Karşı Dirençleri ve Girişimcilik ile Olan İlişkisi”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1436-1447.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlalinin Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Üzerindeki Etkisi ve Bir Araştirma”, Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, vol. S1, pp. 513-522.
  • Çankır, Bilal 2010, “Yalın Düşünce Sistemini Uygulayan Kurumlarla Uygulamayan Kurumlarda Çalışanlarda Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı”, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi S.B.E., Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2005, “Understanding psychological contracts at work”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2009, “Fifty years of psychological contract research: What do we know and what are the main challenges”, International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 24, no. 71, pp. 71-131.
  • Conway, N., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. 2012, “The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure”, Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 277-299.
  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. 1980, “New Work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fullfilment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 39-52.
  • Crewson, P. E. 1997, “Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect”, Journal of public administration research and theory, vol 7, no. 4, pp. 499-518.
  • Çubukçu, K., & Tarakçioğlu, S. 2010, “Örgütsel güven ve bağlılık ilişkisinin otelcilik ve turizm meslek lisesi öğretmenleri üzerinde incelenmesi”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 4, ss. 57-78.
  • Demircan, N., & Ceylan, A. 2003, “Örgütsel güven kavramı: Nedenleri ve sonuçları”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139-150.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. 2002, “Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 87, no. 4, 611.
  • Dries, N., & De Gieter, S. 2014, “Information asymmetry in high potential programs: A potential risk for psychological contract breach”, Personnel Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 136-162.
  • Driscoll, J. W. 1978, “Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 44-56.
  • Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. 2008, “Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1079-1098.
  • Eckerd, S., Hill, J., Boyer, K. K., Donohue, K., & Ward, P. T. 2013, “The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes”, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 567-578.
  • Epitropaki, O. 2013, “A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated–mediated model”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65-86.
  • Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. 2013, “Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance”, Management Research Review, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 828-848.
  • Fukuyama, F. 1995, “Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity”, New York: Free press.
  • Fukuyama, F. 2005, “Güven: Sosyal erdemler ve refahın yaratılması [Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity]”, Trans. Ahmet Buğdaycı). İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. 2014, “Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea”, Technovation, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 605-616.
  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2008, “Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: a multilevel examination”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 93, no. 6, 1208.
  • Hiltrop, J. M. 1996, “Managing the changing psychological contract”, Employee relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 36-49.
  • Huff, L., & Kelley, L. 2005, “Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organizational trust and customer orientation: a seven-nation study”, Journal of business research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 96-102.
  • İşcan, Ö. F., & Sayın, U. 2010, “Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 4.
  • Işık, M. 2014, “Çağrı Merkezlerinde Takım Çalışması ve Örgütsel Güven İlişkisi”, Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Jacqueline, A. M., & Kessler, I. 2003, “The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A psychological contract perspective”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol 13, no. 2, pp. 213-230.
  • Jafri, M. H. 2012, “Influence of psychological contract breach on organizational citizenship behaviour and trust”, Psychological Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 29-36.
  • Kingshott, R. P., & Pecotich, A. 2007, “The impact of psychological contracts on trust and commitment in supplier-distributor relationships”, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 41, no. 9/10, pp. 1053-1072.
  • Koçel, T. 1983, “Yönetim Kavram ve Teknikleri”, Uluslararası Eğitim Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Yayın, no. 1, 72.
  • Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). 2004, “Trust and Distrust In Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches: Dilemmas and Approaches”, Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Krosgaard, M. A., Brodt, S. E., & Whitener, E. M. 2002, “Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 312-319.
  • Kurian, G. T. 2013, “Psychological contract”. The AMA Dictionary of Business and Management.
  • Lämsä, A. M., & Pučėtaitė, R. 2006, “Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective”, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 130-141.
  • Lester, T. 1994, “Managing People in Europe, Facing the HR Challenge of Leaner Companies”, The Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
  • Liang, H. R., Liang, H. L., & Sun, C. K. 2016, “Coping with Negative Work Experience and Work-related Family Issues: Spirituality as A Buffer against Emotional Exhaustion and Work-Family Conflict”, Asian Business Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42-54.
  • Liu, CM, CJ Huang, KP Huang 2013, “Psychological Contract Breach, Organizational Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Hotel Industry in Taiwan”, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 635-648.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995, “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of management review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709-734.
  • Mcallister, D. J. 1995, “Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–59.
  • Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. 1997, “Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory”, Evaluation Review, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 614-635.
  • Öksüzler, O. 2006, “Sosyal Sermaye, Güven ve Belirleyicileri: Bir Panel Analizi”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 108-129.
  • Özsağır, A. 2007, “Ekonomide Güven Faktörü”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 20.
  • Özyılmaz, A. 2010, “Vertical Trust In Organizations: A Review Of Empirical Studies Over The Last Decade/Örgütlerde Dikey Güven: Son On Yillik Dönemdeki Ampirik Çalişmalarin Gözden Geçirilmesi”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 13.
  • Polat, S., & Celep, C. 2008, “Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet, örgütsel güven, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına ilişkin algıları”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 307-331.
  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-De-Silane, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1996, “Trust in large organizations (No. w5864)”, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Robinson, S. L. 1996, “Trust and breach of the psychological contract”, Administrative science quarterly, pp. 574-599.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. 1995, “Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior”, Journal of organizational behavior, vol.16, no. 3, pp. 289-298.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994, “Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm”, Journal of organizational behavior, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 245-259.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 2(2), 121-139.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
  • Sargut, A. S., Özen, Ş. 2010, “Örgüt Kuramları”, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. 2. Baskı.
  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 2007, “An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future”, Academy of Management review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 344-354.
  • Scott, D. 1980, “The causal relationship between trust and the assessed value of management by objectives”, Journal of Management, vol. 6, pp. 157-175.
  • Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American journal of Sociology, 623-658.
  • Shleifer, A. 1997, “Government in transition”, European Economic Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 385-410.
  • Simmel, G. 1978, The philosophy of money, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000, “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 102-111.
  • Straiter, K. L. 2005, “The effects of supervisors’ trust of subordinates and their organization on job satisfaction and organizational commitment”, International Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86-101.
  • TDK, http://tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.56af584a76fd52.47278510, Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2016.
  • TEPAV, http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/blog/s/5273/Turkler+neden+birbirine+guvenmez_+
  • Trybou, J., & Gemmel, P. 2016, “Fulfilment of administrative and professional organisational obligations and nurses' customer-oriented behaviours”, Journal of nursing management, Early Wiew, pp. 1-9.
  • Vander Elst, T., De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. 2014, “Perceived control and psychological contract breach as explanations of the relationships between job insecurity, job strain and coping reactions: Towards a theoretical integration”, Stress and Health, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 100-116.
  • Wellin, M. M. 2012, “Managing the psychological contract: Using the personal deal to increase business performance”, Gower Publishing.
  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. 1998, “Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior”, Academy of management review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 513-530.
  • WVS, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  • Yılmaz, Kadir 2015, “Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Farkındalık ve Örgütsel Güven Algıları İle Okulların Örgütsel Etkililik Düzeyleri”, Afyon: Kocatepe Üniversitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Yolaç, S. 2012, “Yöneticinin Algılanan Liderlik Tarzı İle Yöneticiye Duyulan Güven Arasındaki İlişkide Lider Üye Etkileşiminin Rolü-The Role Of The Leader–Member Interaction In The Relationship Between The Perceived Leadership Style And The Trust In Manager”, Öneri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 36, pp. 63-72.
  • Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Song, L. J., Li, C., & Jia, L. 2008, “How do I trust thee? The employee-organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization”, Human Resource Management, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 111-132.
Year 2016, , 297 - 305, 30.12.2016
https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353

Abstract

References

  • Atkinson, C. 2007, "Trust and the psychological contract", Employee Relations, vol. 29, no. 3, pp. 227-246.
  • Blau, P. M. 1964. Exchange and power in social life, Transaction Publishers.
  • Brinkhoff, A., Özer, Ö., & Sargut, G. 2015, “All You Need Is Trust? An Examination of Inter-Organizational Supply Chain Projects”, Production and Operations Management, vol. 24, no. 2, pp. 181-200.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Geri Bildirimin Araştırma Görevlilerinin Öz-Yeterlilikleri Üzerindeki Etkisi”, İş ve İnsan Dergisi, vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 21-30.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Öğrencilerin Öz-Yeterlilikleri, Değişime Karşı Dirençleri ve Girişimcilik ile Olan İlişkisi”, International Journal of Social Sciences and Education Research, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 1436-1447.
  • Çankır, B. 2016, “Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlalinin Lider-Üye Etkileşimi Üzerindeki Etkisi ve Bir Araştirma”, Eurasian Business & Economics Journal, vol. S1, pp. 513-522.
  • Çankır, Bilal 2010, “Yalın Düşünce Sistemini Uygulayan Kurumlarla Uygulamayan Kurumlarda Çalışanlarda Örgütsel Vatandaşlık Davranışı”, İstanbul: Marmara Üniversitesi S.B.E., Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2005, “Understanding psychological contracts at work”, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  • Conway, N., & Briner, R. B. 2009, “Fifty years of psychological contract research: What do we know and what are the main challenges”, International review of industrial and organizational psychology, vol. 24, no. 71, pp. 71-131.
  • Conway, N., & Coyle-Shapiro, J. A. M. 2012, “The reciprocal relationship between psychological contract fulfilment and employee performance and the moderating role of perceived organizational support and tenure”, Journal of occupational and Organizational Psychology, vol. 85, no. 2, pp. 277-299.
  • Cook, J., & Wall, T. 1980, “New Work attitude measures of trust, organizational commitment and personal need non-fullfilment”, Journal of Occupational Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, pp. 39-52.
  • Crewson, P. E. 1997, “Public-service motivation: Building empirical evidence of incidence and effect”, Journal of public administration research and theory, vol 7, no. 4, pp. 499-518.
  • Çubukçu, K., & Tarakçioğlu, S. 2010, “Örgütsel güven ve bağlılık ilişkisinin otelcilik ve turizm meslek lisesi öğretmenleri üzerinde incelenmesi”, İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, vol. 4, ss. 57-78.
  • Demircan, N., & Ceylan, A. 2003, “Örgütsel güven kavramı: Nedenleri ve sonuçları”, Yönetim ve Ekonomi: Celal Bayar Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, vol. 10, no. 2, pp. 139-150.
  • Dirks, K. T., & Ferrin, D. L. 2002, “Trust in leadership: meta-analytic findings and implications for research and practice”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 87, no. 4, 611.
  • Dries, N., & De Gieter, S. 2014, “Information asymmetry in high potential programs: A potential risk for psychological contract breach”, Personnel Review, vol. 43, no. 1, pp. 136-162.
  • Driscoll, J. W. 1978, “Trust and participation in organizational decision making as predictors of satisfaction”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 21, pp. 44-56.
  • Dulac, T., Coyle-Shapiro, J. A., Henderson, D. J., & Wayne, S. J. 2008, “Not all responses to breach are the same: The interconnection of social exchange and psychological contract processes in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 51, no. 6, pp. 1079-1098.
  • Eckerd, S., Hill, J., Boyer, K. K., Donohue, K., & Ward, P. T. 2013, “The relative impact of attribute, severity, and timing of psychological contract breach on behavioral and attitudinal outcomes”, Journal of Operations Management, vol. 31, no. 7, pp. 567-578.
  • Epitropaki, O. 2013, “A multi-level investigation of psychological contract breach and organizational identification through the lens of perceived organizational membership: Testing a moderated–mediated model”, Journal of Organizational Behavior, vol. 34, no. 1, pp. 65-86.
  • Erkutlu, H., & Chafra, J. 2013, “Effects of trust and psychological contract violation on authentic leadership and organizational deviance”, Management Research Review, vol. 36, no. 9, pp. 828-848.
  • Fukuyama, F. 1995, “Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity”, New York: Free press.
  • Fukuyama, F. 2005, “Güven: Sosyal erdemler ve refahın yaratılması [Trust: The social virtues and the creation of prosperity]”, Trans. Ahmet Buğdaycı). İstanbul: İş Bankası Yayınları.
  • Hemmert, M., Bstieler, L., & Okamuro, H. 2014, “Bridging the cultural divide: Trust formation in university–industry research collaborations in the US, Japan, and South Korea”, Technovation, vol. 34, no. 10, pp. 605-616.
  • Henderson, D. J., Wayne, S. J., Shore, L. M., Bommer, W. H., & Tetrick, L. E. 2008, “Leader--member exchange, differentiation, and psychological contract fulfillment: a multilevel examination”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 93, no. 6, 1208.
  • Hiltrop, J. M. 1996, “Managing the changing psychological contract”, Employee relations, vol. 18, no. 1, pp. 36-49.
  • Huff, L., & Kelley, L. 2005, “Is collectivism a liability? The impact of culture on organizational trust and customer orientation: a seven-nation study”, Journal of business research, vol. 58, no. 1, pp. 96-102.
  • İşcan, Ö. F., & Sayın, U. 2010, “Örgütsel Adalet, İş Tatmini ve Örgütsel Güven Arasındaki İlişki”, Atatürk Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 24, no. 4.
  • Işık, M. 2014, “Çağrı Merkezlerinde Takım Çalışması ve Örgütsel Güven İlişkisi”, Erzurum: Atatürk Üniversitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Jacqueline, A. M., & Kessler, I. 2003, “The employment relationship in the UK public sector: A psychological contract perspective”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, vol 13, no. 2, pp. 213-230.
  • Jafri, M. H. 2012, “Influence of psychological contract breach on organizational citizenship behaviour and trust”, Psychological Studies, vol. 57, no. 1, pp. 29-36.
  • Kingshott, R. P., & Pecotich, A. 2007, “The impact of psychological contracts on trust and commitment in supplier-distributor relationships”, European Journal of Marketing, vol. 41, no. 9/10, pp. 1053-1072.
  • Koçel, T. 1983, “Yönetim Kavram ve Teknikleri”, Uluslararası Eğitim Müdürlüğü Yayınları, Yayın, no. 1, 72.
  • Kramer, R. M., & Cook, K. S. (Eds.). 2004, “Trust and Distrust In Organizations: Dilemmas and Approaches: Dilemmas and Approaches”, Russell Sage Foundation.
  • Krosgaard, M. A., Brodt, S. E., & Whitener, E. M. 2002, “Trust in the face of conflict: the role of managerial trustworthy behavior and organizational context”, Journal of Applied Psychology, vol. 87, no. 2, pp. 312-319.
  • Kurian, G. T. 2013, “Psychological contract”. The AMA Dictionary of Business and Management.
  • Lämsä, A. M., & Pučėtaitė, R. 2006, “Development of organizational trust among employees from a contextual perspective”, Business Ethics: A European Review, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 130-141.
  • Lester, T. 1994, “Managing People in Europe, Facing the HR Challenge of Leaner Companies”, The Economist Intelligence Unit, London.
  • Liang, H. R., Liang, H. L., & Sun, C. K. 2016, “Coping with Negative Work Experience and Work-related Family Issues: Spirituality as A Buffer against Emotional Exhaustion and Work-Family Conflict”, Asian Business Research, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 42-54.
  • Liu, CM, CJ Huang, KP Huang 2013, “Psychological Contract Breach, Organizational Trust and Organizational Citizenship Behavior of Hotel Industry in Taiwan”, Pakistan Journal of Statistics, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 635-648.
  • Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. 1995, “An integrative model of organizational trust”, Academy of management review, vol. 20, no. 3, pp. 709-734.
  • Mcallister, D. J. 1995, “Affect- and cognition-based trust as foundations for interpersonal cooperation in organizations”, Academy of Management Journal, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 24–59.
  • Nyhan, R. C., & Marlowe, H. A. 1997, “Development and psychometric properties of the organizational trust inventory”, Evaluation Review, vol. 21, no. 5, pp. 614-635.
  • Öksüzler, O. 2006, “Sosyal Sermaye, Güven ve Belirleyicileri: Bir Panel Analizi”, Akdeniz İİBF Dergisi, vol. 6, no. 12, pp. 108-129.
  • Özsağır, A. 2007, “Ekonomide Güven Faktörü”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, vol. 20, no. 20.
  • Özyılmaz, A. 2010, “Vertical Trust In Organizations: A Review Of Empirical Studies Over The Last Decade/Örgütlerde Dikey Güven: Son On Yillik Dönemdeki Ampirik Çalişmalarin Gözden Geçirilmesi”, Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, vol. 7, no. 13.
  • Polat, S., & Celep, C. 2008, “Ortaöğretim öğretmenlerinin örgütsel adalet, örgütsel güven, örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışlarına ilişkin algıları”, Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 307-331.
  • Porta, R. L., Lopez-De-Silane, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. 1996, “Trust in large organizations (No. w5864)”, National Bureau of Economic Research.
  • Robinson, S. L. 1996, “Trust and breach of the psychological contract”, Administrative science quarterly, pp. 574-599.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Morrison, E. W. 1995, “Psychological contracts and OCB: The effect of unfulfilled obligations on civic virtue behavior”, Journal of organizational behavior, vol.16, no. 3, pp. 289-298.
  • Robinson, S. L., & Rousseau, D. M. 1994, “Violating the psychological contract: Not the exception but the norm”, Journal of organizational behavior, vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 245-259.
  • Rousseau, D. M. (1989). Psychological and implied contracts in organizations. Employee responsibilities and rights journal, 2(2), 121-139.
  • Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
  • Sargut, A. S., Özen, Ş. 2010, “Örgüt Kuramları”, Ankara: İmge Kitabevi. 2. Baskı.
  • Schoorman, F. D., Mayer, R. C., & Davis, J. H. 2007, “An integrative model of organizational trust: Past, present, and future”, Academy of Management review, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 344-354.
  • Scott, D. 1980, “The causal relationship between trust and the assessed value of management by objectives”, Journal of Management, vol. 6, pp. 157-175.
  • Shapiro, S. P. (1987). The social control of impersonal trust. American journal of Sociology, 623-658.
  • Shleifer, A. 1997, “Government in transition”, European Economic Review, vol. 41, no. 3, pp. 385-410.
  • Simmel, G. 1978, The philosophy of money, London: Routledge & Kegan Paul.
  • Simons, T. L., & Peterson, R. S. 2000, “Task conflict and relationship conflict in top management teams: the pivotal role of intragroup trust”, Journal of applied psychology, vol. 85, no. 1, pp. 102-111.
  • Straiter, K. L. 2005, “The effects of supervisors’ trust of subordinates and their organization on job satisfaction and organizational commitment”, International Journal of Leadership Studies, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 86-101.
  • TDK, http://tdk.gov.tr/index.php?option=com_gts&arama=gts&guid=TDK.GTS.56af584a76fd52.47278510, Erişim Tarihi: 01.02.2016.
  • TEPAV, http://www.tepav.org.tr/tr/blog/s/5273/Turkler+neden+birbirine+guvenmez_+
  • Trybou, J., & Gemmel, P. 2016, “Fulfilment of administrative and professional organisational obligations and nurses' customer-oriented behaviours”, Journal of nursing management, Early Wiew, pp. 1-9.
  • Vander Elst, T., De Cuyper, N., Baillien, E., Niesen, W., & De Witte, H. 2014, “Perceived control and psychological contract breach as explanations of the relationships between job insecurity, job strain and coping reactions: Towards a theoretical integration”, Stress and Health, vol. 32, no. 2, pp. 100-116.
  • Wellin, M. M. 2012, “Managing the psychological contract: Using the personal deal to increase business performance”, Gower Publishing.
  • Whitener, E. M., Brodt, S. E., Korsgaard, M. A., & Werner, J. M. 1998, “Managers as initiators of trust: An exchange relationship framework for understanding managerial trustworthy behavior”, Academy of management review, vol. 23, no. 3, pp. 513-530.
  • WVS, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org
  • Yılmaz, Kadir 2015, “Öğretmenlerin Örgütsel Farkındalık ve Örgütsel Güven Algıları İle Okulların Örgütsel Etkililik Düzeyleri”, Afyon: Kocatepe Üniversitesi. Yüksek Lisans Tezi.
  • Yolaç, S. 2012, “Yöneticinin Algılanan Liderlik Tarzı İle Yöneticiye Duyulan Güven Arasındaki İlişkide Lider Üye Etkileşiminin Rolü-The Role Of The Leader–Member Interaction In The Relationship Between The Perceived Leadership Style And The Trust In Manager”, Öneri Dergisi, vol. 9, no. 36, pp. 63-72.
  • Zhang, A. Y., Tsui, A. S., Song, L. J., Li, C., & Jia, L. 2008, “How do I trust thee? The employee-organization relationship, supervisory support, and middle manager trust in the organization”, Human Resource Management, vol. 47, no. 1, pp. 111-132.
There are 71 citations in total.

Details

Journal Section Articles
Authors

Bilal Cankir

Publication Date December 30, 2016
Published in Issue Year 2016

Cite

APA Cankir, B. (2016). THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION. Research Journal of Business and Management, 3(4), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353
AMA Cankir B. THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION. RJBM. December 2016;3(4):297-305. doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353
Chicago Cankir, Bilal. “THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3, no. 4 (December 2016): 297-305. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353.
EndNote Cankir B (December 1, 2016) THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION. Research Journal of Business and Management 3 4 297–305.
IEEE B. Cankir, “THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION”, RJBM, vol. 3, no. 4, pp. 297–305, 2016, doi: 10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353.
ISNAD Cankir, Bilal. “THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION”. Research Journal of Business and Management 3/4 (December 2016), 297-305. https://doi.org/10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353.
JAMA Cankir B. THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION. RJBM. 2016;3:297–305.
MLA Cankir, Bilal. “THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION”. Research Journal of Business and Management, vol. 3, no. 4, 2016, pp. 297-05, doi:10.17261/Pressacademia.2016.353.
Vancouver Cankir B. THE EFFECT ON TRUST TO ORGANIZATION AND PSYCHOLOGICAL CONTRACT VIOLATION. RJBM. 2016;3(4):297-305.

Research Journal of Business and Management (RJBM) is a scientific, academic, double blind peer-reviewed, quarterly and open-access online journal. The journal publishes four issues a year. The issuing months are March, June, September and December. The publication languages of the Journal are English and Turkish. RJBM aims to provide a research source for all practitioners, policy makers, professionals and researchers working in all related areas of business, management and organizations. The editor in chief of RJBM invites all manuscripts that cover theoretical and/or applied researches on topics related to the interest areas of the Journal. RJBM publishes academic research studies only. RJBM charges no submission or publication fee.

Ethics Policy - RJBM applies the standards of Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE). RJBM is committed to the academic community ensuring ethics and quality of manuscripts in publications. Plagiarism is strictly forbidden and the manuscripts found to be plagiarized will not be accepted or if published will be removed from the publication. Authors must certify that their manuscripts are their original work. Plagiarism, duplicate, data fabrication and redundant publications are forbidden. The manuscripts are subject to plagiarism check by iThenticate or similar. All manuscript submissions must provide a similarity report (up to 15% excluding quotes, bibliography, abstract, method).

Open Access - All research articles published in PressAcademia Journals are fully open access; immediately freely available to read, download and share. Articles are published under the terms of a Creative Commons license which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. Open access is a property of individual works, not necessarily journals or publishers. Community standards, rather than copyright law, will continue to provide the mechanism for enforcement of proper attribution and responsible use of the published work, as they do now.