Reliability Analysis of the Porto Velho Pier - Rio Grande/RS ThroughLimit Equilibrium and Finite Element Method

Year 2024, Volume: 4 Issue: 2, 77 - 87, 30.12.2024

Luiza Antiqueira Da Silva Neta , Diego De Freitas Fagundes Antônio Marcos De Lima Alves

Abstract

This study analyzes the global stability of the Porto Velho pier, a structure in the port complex of the city of Rio Grande - RS, Brazil. This structure is a gravity pier with a length of 640 m which has been showing excessive displacements in a 150 m stretch. Limit Equilibrium and Finite Element tools associated with the Monte Carlo and FOSM Methods were applied. Four scenarios will be analyzed that represent the evolution of the erosion of the base of the pier structure, in which it can be concluded that as the loss of soil and rockfill of the base occurs, it presents a reduction in the safety factor and according to the FEM results in its rupture. In addition, the FEM analysis shows that the strength criterion of the pier's protective rockfill has a significant influence on the stability of the pier, since when it is considered to be linearly elastic, the structure behaves very similarly to that found by the MEL, while when the Mohr Coulomb criterion is adopted, the structure behaves in a way that is more representative of what is observed in situ.

Keywords

Porto Velho Pier in the city of Rio Grande - RS, Stability Analysis, Seawall, Reliability Analysis, Limit Equilibrium Method; Finite Element Method.

Supporting Institution

Port of Rio Grande

Thanks

The Federal University of Rio Grande and the Port of Rio Grande for sharing their technical assets to enable this research to be carried out.

References

• Abbaszadeh, M., Shahriar, K., Sharifzadeh, M., & Heydari, M. (2011). Uncertainty and reliability analysis applied to slope stability: A case study from Sungun copper mine. Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 29(5), 581–596.
• Ansari, T., Kainthola, A., Singh, K. H., Singh, T. N., & Sazid, M. (2021). Geotechnical and micro-structural characteristics of phyllite-derived soil: Implications for slope stability. Lesser Himalaya, Uttarakhand, India. Catena, 196, 104906.
• Beloni, A. V., Alves, A. M. L., & Real, M. V. (2017). Análise de confiabilidade das estacas do cais do Porto Novo de Rio Grande (Brasil) empregando metodologia bayesiana. Geotecnia, 141, 19–39.
• Cho, S. E. (2013). First-order reliability analysis of slope considering multiple failure modes. Engineering Geology, 154, 98–105.
• Cho, S. E. (2010). Probabilistic assessment of slope stability that considers the spatial variability of soil properties. Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 136(7), 975–984.
• Christian, J., Ladd, C., & Baecher, G. (1994). Reliability applied to slope stability analysis. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 120(12), 2180–2207.
• Corps of Engineers. (1997). Engineering and design introduction to probability and reliability methods for use in geotechnical engineering. Engineering Technical Letter No. 1110-2-547. Department of the Army, U.S., Washington, DC.
• Da Re, G., Germaine, J. T., & Ladd, C. C. (2001). Physical mechanisms controlling the pre-failure stress-strain behavior of frozen sand. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering.
• Ditlevsen, O. (1979). Narrow reliability bounds for structural systems. Journal of Structural Mechanics, 7(4), 453–472.
• Duncan, J. M., & Wright, S. G. (2014). Soil strength and slope stability. Wiley.
• Dyson, A. P., & Tolooiyan, A. (2019). Probabilistic investigation of RFEM topologies for slope stability analysis. Computers and Geotechnics, 114, Article 103129.
• El-Ramly, H. (2001). Probabilistic analyses of landslide hazards and risks: Bridging theory and practice [Doctorial thesis]. University of Alberta, Canada.
• Griffiths, D. V., & Lane, P. A. (1999). Slope stability analysis by finite elements. Geotechnique, 49(3), 387–403.
• Griffiths, D. V., & Fenton, G. A. (2007). Probabilistic methods in geotechnical engineering. In International Center for Mechanical Sciences (pp. 71–112). Springer.
• Haldar, S. (2019). Reliability-based design of pile foundations. In K. Ilamparuthi & G. R. Robinson (Eds.), Geotechnical design and practice (pp. 225–236). Springer.
• Hostettler, S., Jöhr, A., Montes, C., & D’Acunzi, A. (2019). Community-based landslide risk reduction: A review of a Red Cross soil bioengineering for resilience program in Honduras. Landslides, 16(9), 1779–1791.
• Jiang, S., Huang, J., Griffiths, D. V., & Deng, Z. (2022). Advances in reliability and risk analyses of slopes in spatially variable soils: A state-of-the-art review. Computers and Geotechnics, 141, Article 104498.
• Johari, A., & Mousavi, S. (2019). An analytical probabilistic analysis of slopes based on limit equilibrium methods. Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 78, 4333–4347.
• Lacasse, S., & Nadim, F. (1998). Risk and reliability in geotechnical engineering. Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Case Histories in Geotechnical Engineering, 1172–1192.
• Li, D. Q., Wang, L., Cao, Z. J., & Qi, X. H. (2019). Reliability analysis of unsaturated slope stability considering SWCC model selection and parameter uncertainties. Engineering Geology, 260, Article 105207.
• Li, L., Wang, Y., Cao, Z., & Chu, X. (2013). Risk de-aggregation and system reliability analysis of slope stability using representative slip surfaces. Computers and Geotechnics, 53, 95–105.
• Meirelles, M. C. (2008). Determination of the rockfill shear strength of the Machadinho HPP through large-scale direct shear tests [Master thesis]. Federal University of Santa Catarina.
• Metya, S., Mukhopadhyay, T., Adhikari, S., & Bhattacharya, G. (2017). System reliability analysis of soil slopes with general slip surfaces using multivariate adaptive regression splines. Computers and Geotechnics, 87, 212–228.
• Ortigão, J. A. R., & Sayão, A. S. F. J. (2004). Handbook of slope stabilization. Springer-Verlag.
• Phoon, K. K., & Kulhawy, F. H. (1999). Characterization of geotechnical variability. Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 36(4)
• Plaxis 2D. (2016). Plaxisbv. Delft, Netherlands.
• Queiroz, I. M. (2016). Comparison between deterministic and probabilistic stability analysis, featuring a consequent risk assessment. In: S. Aversa, L. Cascini, L. Picarelli, & C. Scaiva (Eds.), Landslides and engineered slopes. Experience, theory and practice. CRC Press.
• SUPRG Technical Collection. (2016). Inspection report on pathological manifestations along the Porto Velho Quay structure.
• Vanmarcke, E. H. (1977). Probabilistic modeling of soil profiles. Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, 103(11), 1227–1246.
• Yang, J., Dai, J., Yao, C., Jiang, S., Zhou, C., & Jiang, Q. (2020). Estimation of rock mass properties in excavation damage zones of rock slopes based on the Hoek-Brown criterion and acoustic testing. International Journal of Rock Mechanics and Mining Sciences, 126, Article 104192.
• Zaman, M., Booker, J. R., & Gioda, G. (2000). Modeling in geomechanics. John Wiley & Sons.
• Zeng, P., Jimenez, R., & Jurado-Piña, R. (2015). System reliability analysis of layered soil slopes using fully specified slip surfaces and genetic algorithms. Engineering Geology, 193, 106–117.