IS INVERSE RELATIONSHIP A PHENOMENON?

Year 2016, Volume: 30 Issue: 1, 13 - 16, 12.12.2016

Coşkun Şerefoğlu

Abstract

Inverse productivity basically disproves the land productivity which is presumably based on the size of the farm. The main aim of this paper is to analyse the empirical studies which have been made on this issue in detail so far and develop some policy implications. The empirical results show that an inverse relationship in developing countries might become more of an issue because of the predominant sector in Agriculture.  Some suggestions can be made in order to handle problems that small farms encounter. The first and most important is the high value added product. The government should encourage small farmers to grow high value added products by controlling market supply and demand. Second, public policies should be sufficient to attract private investors in transportation, retail chain stores, processing and storage. The technology level of bigger farms should be costless and easily transferred to smaller farms. Last but not least, small farms are one of the most fragile issues concerning family farms and food security.

Keywords

Inverse productivity, bigger farms, small farms, productivity, agriculture

References

• Barrett, C.B (1996). On price risk and the inverse farm size-productivity relationship. Journal of Development Economics, Vol 51 (1996) 193-215
• Barthan, P (1973). Size, Productivity, and Returns to Scale: An Analysis of Farm-Level Data in Indian Agriculture, Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 81, No. 6 (Nov. - Dec., 1973), pp. 1370-1386
• Bharadwaj, K., 1974, Production Conditions In Indian Agriculture (Cambridge University Press).
• Barbier P (1984): “Inverse Relationship between Farm Size and Productivity – A Product of
• Science or Imagination?” Economic and Political Weekly, Vol. XIX No. 52 & 53, December.
• Carter, M.R (1984). Identification Of The Inverse Relationship Between Farm Size And Productivity: An Empirical Analysis Of Peasant Agricultural Production, Oxf. Econ. Pap. (1984) 36 (1): 131-145
• Deolalikar, A.B (1981). The Inverse Relationship between Productivity and Farm Size: A Test Using Regional Data from India. American Journal of Agricultural Economics, (May, 1981), pp. 275-279
• Ellis, F (1988). Peasant Economics, Farm Haouseholds and Agrarian Development, Farm size and factor productivity, Cambridge University Press. U.K., p.p 191-209
• Fan, S and Chan-Kang, C (2005). Agricultural Economics, Volume 32, Issue Supplement s1, pages 135–146, January 2005
• Feder, G (1985). The relation between farm size and farm productivity. Journal of Development Economics 18 (1985) 297-313. North-Holland
• Hazell, P.B.R (2005). Is there a future for small farms?, Agricultural Economics, vol. 32, issue s1, pages 93-101
• Heltberg, R (1998). Rural Market Imperfections and the Farm Size-Productivity Relationship: Evidence from Pakistan, World Development Vol. 26, No. 10, pp. 1807-1826
• Lamb, R (2003). Inverse productivity: land quality, labor markets, and measurement error. Journal of Development Economics, 71(2003), 71-95
• Mahesh, R (2000). Farm Size - Productivity Relationship: Some Evidence from Kerala. KIED Working Paper 2, Kerala Institute For Environment And Development
• Mazumder, D (1965). Size of Farm and Productivity: A Problem of Indian Peasant Agriculture. Economica, New Series, Vol. 32, No. 126 (May, 1965), pp. 161-173
• Tadesse, B and Krishmamoorthy, S (1997). Technical efficiency in paddy farms of Tamil Nadu: an analysis based on farm size and ecological zone, Agricultural Economics 16 (1997) pp. 185-192
• Thapa, S (2007). The relationship between farm size and productivity: empirical evidence from the Nepalese mid-hills. MPRA Paper No. 7638, posted 12. March 2008 00:16 UTC
• Sen, A,K (1962). An aspect of Indian Agriculture. Economic Weekly. February, 1962, pp.243-6