A Study on the Situations Determining the Classroom Decisions of Preservice Teachers and the Criteria for Evaluating Their Decision

Year 2023, , 130 - 151, 30.06.2023

Emel Bayrak Özmutlu

https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1232731

Cited By: 1

Abstract

This study aims to investigate the situations that determine the classroom decisions of preservice teachers and the criteria they use to evaluate their decisions during the teaching practice process. The study utilized a basic qualitative research model and employed the typical case sampling method to select the study group, consisting of ten pre-service teachers in their final year of primary education program. Data collection involved the use of reflective evaluation forms and unstructured interview forms. The pre-service teachers completed reflective evaluation forms after each implementation process for a ten-week period, and unstructured interviews based on the reflective evaluation forms were conducted with the participants in pairs every week. The analysis revealed that the situations of the candidates' classroom decisions can be analyzed under five themes: self-efficacy, students, environment, classroom management, and teaching. Furthermore, the criteria used by the candidates to evaluate their decisions can be analyzed under five themes: content knowledge, classroom management skills, student recognition, teaching-learning process, and monitoring and evaluation of learning. The findings suggest that teacher education programs should provide support to candidates to make effective decisions under the situations that are decisive on classroom decisions. Additionally, it is important to emphasize that candidates evaluate the decisions they make in the classroom on the basis of criteria that cover all components of the teaching-learning process.

Keywords

decision making, teacher education curricula, Preservice teacher, Teacher education curricula, Teaching practice

References

• Aikenhead, G. S. (1984). Teacher decision making: The case of Prairie High. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 21(2), 167-186. https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.3660210208.
• Akgün, F. (2013). Preservice teachers’ web pedagogical content knowledge and relationship between teachers’ perceptions of self-efficacy. Trakya University Journal of Education, 3(1), 48-58.
• Ayra, M., & Kösterelioğlu, İ. (2015). Öğretmenlerin yaşam boyu öğrenme eğilimlerinin mesleki öz yeterlik algıları ile ilişkisi. Education Sciences, 10(1), 17-28.
• Bayrak-Özmutlu, E. (2022). The relationship between theory and practice: An examination based on pre-service teachers' beliefs. Journal of Qualitative Research in Education, (30), 223-249. https://doi.org/10.14689/enad.30.10.
• Bayrak-Özmutlu, E., & Bıkmaz, F. (2022). Teachers’ belıefs and possible sources. In F. Bıkmaz, & F. Mızıkacı (Eds.), Curriculum, teachers and technology in the Turkish and ınternational contexts (pp. 276-316). Cambridge Publishing.
• Beyer, L. E., & Zeichner, K. (1987/2018). Teacher education in cultural context: Beyond reproduction. In T. Popewitz (Ed.), Critical studies in teacher education (pp. 298-334). Routledge.
• Blackley, C., Redmond, P., & Peel, K. (2021). Teacher decision-making in the classroom: The influence of cognitive load and teacher affect. Journal of Education for Teaching, 47(4), 548-561. https://doi.org/10.1080/02607476.2021.1902748
• Borko, H., & Shavelson, R. J. (1990). Teacher decision making. In J. F. Beau., & I. Lorna (Eds.), Dimensions of thinking and cognitive instruction (pp. 311-346). North Central Regional Educational Laboratory.
• Borko, H., & Livingston, C. (1989). Cognition and improvisation: Differences in mathematics instruction by expert and novice teachers. American educational research journal, 26(4), 473-498.
• Calderhead, J. (1983, April). Research into teachers’and student teachers’ cognitions: Exploring thenature of classroom practice. Paper presented at the meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Montreal.
• Clough, M. P., Berg, C. A., & Olson, J. K. (2009). Promoting effective science teacher education and science teaching: A framework for teacher decision-making. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 7(4), 821-847.
• Coleman, P. (2022). Validity and reliability within qualitative research for the caring sciences. International Journal of Caring Sciences, 14(3), 2041-2045.
• Creswell, J. W., & Miller, D. L. (2000). Determining validity in qualitative inquiry. Theory into Practice, 39(3), 124-130. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip3903_2.
• Çiftçi, S., & Taskaya, S. M. (2010). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öz yeterlik ve iletişim becerileri arasındaki ilişki. Education Sciences, 5(3), 921-928.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Oakes, J. (2021). Preparing teachers for deeper learning. Harvard Education Press. Darling-Hammond, L., & Hammerness, K. (2002). Toward a pedagogy of cases in teacher education. Teaching Education, 13(2), 125-135. https://doi.org/10.1080/1047621022000007549.
• Darling-Hammond, L., & Snyder, J. (2000). Authentic assessment of teaching in context. Teaching and Teacher Education, 16(5-6), 523-545. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0742-051X(00)00015-9.
• Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teaching, re‐imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273-289. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540600902875340
• Evans, J. S. B. T., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Dual-process theories of higher cognition: Advancing the debate. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 8(3), 223–241. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745691612460685
• Helleve, I., Eide, L., & Ulvik, M. (2021). Case-based teacher education preparing for diagnostic judgement. European Journal of Teacher Education, Latest Article, 1-17. https://doi.org/10.1080/02619768.2021.1900112
• Fogarty, J. I., Wang, M. C., & Creek, R. (1983). A descriptive study of experienced and novice teachers’ interactive instructional thoughts and actions. The Journal of Educational Research, 77(1), 22-32. https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.1983.10885491
• Fullan, M.G. (1996). Turning systemic thinking on its head. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(6), 420–423.
• Griffith, R., & Groulx, J. (2014). Profile for teacher decision making: A closer look at beliefs and practice. Journal of Research in Education, 24(2), 103-115.
• Gündoğan, A., & Koçak, A. (2017). Öğretmen adaylarının okul iklimi algıları ile akademik öz-yeterlik inançları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesi. Sakarya University Journal of Education, 7(3), 639-657.
• Hoy, A. W. (2013). A reflection on the place of emotion in teaching and teacher education. In M. Newberry, A. Gallant. & P. Riley (Eds.), Emotion and school: Understanding how the hidden curriculum ınfluences relationships, leadership, teaching, and learning (Advances in Research on Teaching, Vol. 18) (pp. 255-270). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. https://doi.org/10.1108/S1479-3687(2013)0000018017
• Ilgaz, G., Bülbül, T., & Çuhadar, C. (2013). Öğretmen adaylarının eğitim inançları ile öz-yeterlik algıları arasındaki ilişkinin incelenmesİ. Abant İzzet Baysal Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 13(1), 51-66.
• Kagan, D. M. (1992). Implication of research on teacher belief. Educational Psychologist, 27(1), 65-90. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326985ep2701_6
• Kansanen, P., & Meri, M. (1999). The didactic relation in the teaching-studying-learning process. Didaktik/Fachdidaktik as Science of the Teaching Profession, 2(1), 107-116.
• Kinach, B. M., (2002). Understanding and learning-to-explain by representing mathematics: Epistemological dilemmas facing teacher educators in the Secondary mathematics “methods” course. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 5, 153-186.
• Kleven, T. A. (1991). Interactive Teacher Decision‐making still a basic skill? Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 35(4), 287-294.
• Klimczak, A. K., Bali, S. J., & Wedman, J. F. (1995). Teacher decision making regarding content structure: A study of novice and experienced teachers. The University of Missouri-Columbia.
• Korthagen, F. A. (2011). Making teacher education relevant for practice: The pedagogy of realistic teacher education. Orbis Scholae, 5(2), 31-50.
• Leinhardt, G., & Greeno, J. G. (1986). The cognitive skill of teaching. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(2), 75- 95. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.78.2.75
• Lloyd, C. A. (2019). Exploring the real-world decision-making of novice and experienced teachers. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(2), 166-182. https://doi.org/10.1080/0309877X.2017.1357070
• Loughran, J. (2019). Pedagogical Reasoning: The foundation of the professional knowledge of teaching. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and practice, 25(5), 523-535. https://doi.org/10.1080/13540602.2019.1633294
• Marshall, C., & Rossman, G. B. (2014). Designing qualitative research. Sage publications.
• Merriam, S. B. (2009). Nitel Araştırma: Desen ve Uygulama İçin Bir Rehber. (S. Turan, çev.) Ankara: Nobel Yayıncılık.
• Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. SAGE Publications, Inc.
• Olson, J.K., Bruxvoort, C.N., Madsen, A.J., & Clough, M.P. (2004, March). The effect of problem-based learning video case content on preservice elementary teachers’ conceptions of teaching. Paper presented at the National Association of Research in Science Teaching International Conference, Canada.
• Oshima, J., & Shaffer, D. W. (2021). Learning analytics for a new epistemological perspective of learning. Information and Technology in Education and Learning, 1(1), 1-11.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Nitel araştırma ve değerlendirme yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Perfecto, M. R. G. (2012). Contextual Factors in Teacher Decision Making: Extending the Woods Model. Asia-Pacific Education Researcher (De La Salle University Manila), 21(3), 474-483.
• Peterson, P. L., & Comeaux, M. A. (1987). Teachers' schemata for classroom events: The mental scaffolding of teachers' thinking during classroom instruction. Teaching and Teacher Education, 3(4), 319-331. https://doi.org/10.1016/0742-051X(87)90024-2
• Rich, P. J., & Hannafin, M. J. (2008). Decisions and reasons: Examining preservice teacher decision-making through video self-analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 20(1), 62-94. https://doi.org/10.1080/19415257.2013.866974
• Saracaloğlu, A. S., Karademir, Ç. A., Dursun, F., Altın, M., & Üstündağ, N. (2017). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öz-düzenleyici öğrenme becerilerinin, akademik öz-yeterlik, akademik kontrol odağı ve akademik başarıları ile ilişkisi. Turkish Studies, 12(33), 379-402.
• Shavelson, R. J. (1973). The basic teaching skill: Decision making. Stanford Center for Research and Development in Teaching.
• Sheppard, M., & Levy, S. A. (2019). Emotions and teacher decision-making: An analysis of social studies teachers’ perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 77(1), 193-203. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2018.09.010
• Siuty, M. B., Leko, M. M., & Knackstedt, K. M. (2018). Unraveling the role of curriculum in teacher decision making. Teacher Education and Special Education, 41(1), 39-57. https://doi.org/10.1177/0888406416683230
• Stanovich, K. E., West, R. F., & Toplak, M. E. (2011). The complexity of developmental predictions from dual process models. Developmental Review, 31(2), 103–118. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dr.2011.07.003
• Syring, M., Kleinknecht, M., Bohl, T., Kuntze, S., Rehm, M., & Schneider, J. (2015). How problem-based or direct instructional case-based learning environments influence secondary school pre-service teachers’ cognitive load, motivation and emotions: A quasi-experimental intervention study in teacher education. Journal of Education and Human Development, 4(4), 115-129. http://dx.doi.org/10.15640/jehd.v4n4a14
• Thakur, S. & Chetty, P. (2020). How to establish the validity and reliability of qualitative research? https://www.projectguru.in/how-to-establish-the-validity-and-reliability-of-qualitative-research/ adresinden erişildi.
• Trevisan, O., Phillips, M., & De Rossi, M. (2021). Unpacking teacher decision-making: Connecting complex elements. Italian Journal of Educational Research, (27), 13-26. https://doi.org/10.7346/sird-022021-p13
• Ulusoy, F. (2016). Developing prospective mathematics teachers’ knowledge for teaching quadrilaterals through a video case-based learning environment. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Middle East Technical University.
• Watson, S. (2019, February). Revisiting teacher decision making in the mathematics classroom: A multidisciplinary approach. Paper presented at the meeting of Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education, Utrecht.
• Watson, S., Kimber, E., Major, L., & Marschall, G. (2018). A phenomenological study of a novice mathematics teacher’s instructional decision making. Unpublished working paper, Cambridge. Retrieved from http://bit.ly/2x1C7yL
• Westerman, D. A. (1991). Expert and novice teacher decision making. Journal of Teacher Education, 42(4), 292-305. https://doi.org/10.1177/002248719104200407
• Worthington, M. (2013). Differences between phenomenological research and a basic qualitative research. https://eclass.uoa.gr/modules/document/file.php/PPP436/DifferencesBetweenPhenomenologicalResearchAndBasicQualitativeResearchDesign.pdf adresinden erişildi.
• Wang, Y. (2021). What is the role of emotions in educational leaders’ decision making? Proposing an organizing framework. Educational Administration Quarterly, 57(3), 372-402. https://doi.org/10.1177/0013161X20938856
• Veenman, S. (1984). Perceived problems of beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 54(2), 143-178. https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543054002143
• Young, C. M. (2020). Classroom emotions and teacher decision-making processes: A qualitative study. (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Mount Saint Vincent University.
• Zeichner, K. (2010). Rethinking the connections between campus courses and field experiences in college-and university-based teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 61(1-2), 89-99. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487109347671