The following questions have been prepared based on the evaluation criteria included in the peer review report of Tykhe Art and Design Journal to contribute to the enhancement of the scientific quality of the articles submitted to the journal and to improve their success in the double-blind peer review process.

1. Is the title of the article appropriate for the content of the study?

2. Does the abstract clearly state the subject, problem addressed, findings, and contribution to the field without exceeding the word limit?

3. Are the keywords sufficient and in compliance with international standards?

4. Are the translations of the title, abstract, and keywords appropriate?

5. Does the introduction section clearly and adequately state the subject, purpose, or problem of the study, as well as the methodology used, if applicable?

6. Are the ideas, discussions, and findings in the article presented consistently and sufficiently?

7. Does the conclusion section explicitly present the findings and contributions of the study to the field?

8. Has the relevant literature been reviewed comprehensively, including recent and significant sources? Does the article establish coherence with the existing literature?

9. Is the language of the article clear and comprehensible?

10. Are the concepts and terms related to the subject used correctly?

11. Is the article written in accordance with grammar rules and the journal’s writing guidelines?

12. Is the study original? Does it offer new insights, evaluations, discussions, or perspectives on the topic?

13. Are the cited sources properly referenced both in the text and in the reference section, in compliance with academic ethics and the journal’s citation guidelines? Does the article adhere to the journal’s ethical standards overall?

14. Are all the sources cited in the text included in the reference section?

15. If the article includes tables, figures, or images, are they used appropriately and formatted according to the journal’s writing guidelines?