Sınıf Yönetimi Olgusunun Pedagoji, Otorite Tipleri ve Söylevsel Güç İlişkileri Bağlamında Yeniden Değerlendirilmesi

Year 2018, Volume: 2 Issue: 2, 59 - 85, 31.10.2018

Yılmaz Soysal , Somayyeh Radmard

https://doi.org/10.32960/uead.451358

Cited By: 4

Abstract

Bu çalışma, sınıf yönetimi olgusuna yeni ya da alternatif bir
perspektif sunmayı amaçlamıştır. Sınıf yönetimi sınıfın maddi bağlamının düzenlenmesi ve öğretimsel faaliyetlerin düzenlenmesi gibi iki ana etmen tarafından açıklanabilmekte ve tahmin
edilebilmektedir. Bu derlemede öncelikle, sınıfı kuşatan maddi ya da
fiziksel çevrenin önceden ayarlanması ile ilgili sınıf yönetimi argümanının yetersizliği müzakereye açılmıştır. Sonrasında, öğretimsel süreçlere öğrenenlerin dahil
edilmesi ya da edilmemesinin sınıf yönetimi olgusuna yansımaları ile ilgili alternatif
bir perspektif öne çıkarılmıştır. Sınıf yönetimi, bu çalışma bağlamında, öğretimsel süreçlerden kopuk bir biçimde değil, pedagojik
faaliyetlerin yöneylemine bağlı ve bitişik bir biçimde ele alınmıştır.  Öğretimi karakterize eden, öğretimsel/pedagojik yaklaşım türü, otorite tipleri ve değişen söylevsel güç ilişkileri sınıf yönetimi bağlamında derinlemesine açıklanmış ve örneklendirilmiştir. Bu bağlamda, öğretmen-merkezli ve öğrenen-merkezli sınıf içi uygulamaların türü, epistemik ve sosyal otorite olarak çeşitlenen ve öğretmen tarafından oluşturulan otorite tipleri
ve öğretmenin belli başlı pedagojik-söylevsel hamlelerinin azlığı ya da çokluğu ile oluşan sınıf içi güç ilişkileri tanımlanıp ve incelenmiştir. Öğretmenler ve öğretmen eğitimcileri adına çeşitli önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

Keywords

Sınıf yönetimi, fiziksel çevre, öğretimsel perspektifler, otorite tipleri

References

• Åkerlind, G. S. (2003). Growing and developing as a university teacher-variation in meaning. Studies in Higher Education, 28, 375-390. Åkerlind, G. S. (2004) A new dimension to understanding university teaching. Teaching in Higher Education, 9, 363-376.
• Åkerlind, G. S. (2007). Constraints on academics’ potential for developing as a teacher. Studies in Higher Education, 32(1), 21-37.
• Åkerlind, G. S. (2008). A phenomenographic approach to developing academics’ understanding of the nature of teaching and learning. Teaching in Higher Education, 13(6), 633-644.
• Alexander, R.J. (2001). Culture and pedagogy: International comparisons in primary education. Oxford: Blackwell.
• Alexander, R.J. (2006). Towards dialogic teaching: Rethinking classroom talk. New York, NY: Dialogos.
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1934). Discourse in the novel. The dialogic imagination: four essays. Trans. Michael Holquist and Caryl Emerson. Austin: University of Texas.
• Bakhtin, M. M. (1986). Speech genres & other late essays (Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist, Ed. and Vern W. McGee, trans). Austin: University of Texas Press.
• Ball, D. L., & Cohen, D. K. (1999). Developing practice, developing practitioners: Toward a practice-based theory of professional education. In L. Darling-Hammond & G. Sykes (Eds.), Teaching as the learning profession: handbook of policy and practice (1st ed. ed., pp. 3-32). San Francisco, Calif.: Jossey Bass Publishers.
• Baer, J., & Kaufman, J. C. (2005). Bridging generality and specificity: The Amusement Park Theoretical (APT) model of creativity. Roeper Review, 27, 158–163.
• Baker, J. A., Clark, T. P., Maier, K. S., & Viger, S. (2008). The differential influence of instructional context on the academic engagement of students with behavior problems. Teaching and Teacher Education, 24, 1876-1883.
• Başar, H. (1999). Sınıf Yönetimi. Ankara: Milli Eğitim Bakanlığı Yayınları No: 3390. Celep, C. (2002). Sınıf Yönetimi ve Disiplini. Ankara: Anı Yayıncılık.
• Baumanin, J.F. (1992). Organizing and Managing a whole Language Classroom. Reading Research and Instruction, 31(3), 1-14.
• Becker, W. C., & Gersten, R. (1982) A follow-up of follow through: Meta-analysis of the later effects of the Direct Instruction Model. American Educational Research Journal, 19, 75- 93.
• Becker, H. J., and M. M. Riel (2000). Teacher Professional Engagement and Constructivist Compatible Computer Use. Irvine, CA: University of California, Irvine and University of Minnesota, Center for Research on Information Technology and Organizations.
• Berry, M. (1981). Systemic linguistics and discourse analysis: A multi-layered approach to exchange structure. In Studies in discourse analysis, ed. M. Coulthard and M. Montgomery, 120–45. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.
• Berland, L. K., & Hammer, D. (2012). Framing for scientific argumentation. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 49(1), 68-94.
• Bloom, L.A., Perlmutter, J & Burrell, L., (1999). Applying Constructivism to Inclusive Classrooms. Intervention in School and Clinic (ISC), 34(3), 132-136.
• Bolhuis, S., and M. J. M. Voeten (2004). Teachers’ Conceptions of Student Learning and Own Learning. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 10, 77-98.
• Bradshaw, C. P., Bottiani, J., Osher, D., & Sugai, G. (2014). Integrating positive behavioral interventions and supports (PBIS) and social emotional learning. In M. D. Weist, N. A. Lever, C. P. Bradshaw, & J. Owens (Eds.), Handbook of school mental.
• Brown, D. and Clement, J. (1991). Classroom teaching experiments in mechanics. In R. Duit, F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: theoretical and empirical studies. Kiel, Germany: IPN
• Brookhart, S. M. & Freeman, D. J., (1992). Characteristics of entering student teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 1, 37-60.
• Brophy, J. (2006). History of research on classroom management. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 17- 43). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Brophy, J. (1999). Perspectives of classroom management: Yesterday, today and tomorrow. In H. Freiberg (Ed.), Beyond behaviorism: changing the classroom management paradigm, 43–56. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Calderhead, J. (1981). Stimulated recall: A method for research on teaching. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 51, 211–217.
• Candela, A. (2005). Students’, participation as co-authoring of school institutional practices. Culture and Psychology, 11, 321–37.
• Charles, C. M. (1996). Building classroom discipline (5. Baskı) White Plains, NY: Longman Publishers.
• Cheng, Y.C., & Tam, W.M. (2007). School effectiveness and improvement in Asia: Three waves, nine trends and challenges. In T. Townsend, B. Avalos, B. Caldwell, Y.C. Cheng, B. Fleisch, L. Moos, et al. (Eds.), International handbook on school effectiveness and improvement (pp. 245–268). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Cheng, Y.C., & Mok, M.M.C. (2007). School-based management and paradigm shifts in education: An empirical study. International Journal of Educational Management, 21(6), 517–542.
• Cheng,Y.C. (2005). Globalization and educational reforms in Hong Kong: Paradigm shift. In J. Zaida, K. Freeman, M. Geo-JaJa, S. Majhanovich, V. Rust, & R. Zajda (Eds.), The international handbook on globalization and education policy research (pp. 165–187). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Springer.
• Cheng, Y.C., Mok, M.M.C., & Chow, K.W. (2003). Organization and management of education in the Asia-Pacific Region: Development, reform, and growth. In J. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), The handbook on educational research in the Asia-Pacific Region (Section 6, pp. 915–930). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Cheng, Y. C. & Townsend, T. (2000). Educational change and development in the AsiaPacific region: Trends and issues. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp. 317-344). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Clandinin, D. J. & Connelly, F. M. (Eds.) (1995). Teachers’ professional knowledge landscapes. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Cochran-Smith, M., and K. Zeichner. (2005). Studying teacher education: The report of the AERA panel on research and teacher education. Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2001). The outcomes question in teacher education. Teaching & Teacher Education, 17(5), 527-546.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2003). Learning and unlearning: The education of teacher educators. Teaching and Teacher Education, 19, 5-28.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2004). Taking stock in 2004: Teacher education in dangerous times. Journal of Teacher Education, 55(1), 3-7.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2005). Teacher educators as researchers: Multiple perspectives. Teaching and Teacher Education, 21(2), 219-225.
• Cochran-Smith, M. (2006). Policy, practice, and politics in teacher education. Thousand Oaks, CA: Corwin Press.
• Cornelius-White, J. (2007). Learner-Centered Teacher-Students Relationships Are Effective: A Meta-Analysis. Review of Educational Research, 77, 113-143.
• Corbett, D., & Wilson, B. (2002). What urban students say about good teaching. Educational Leadership, 60, 18–22.
• Cornelius-White, J. H. D., & Harbaugh, A. P. (2009). Learner-centered insrrucrion: Building relationships for student success. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
• Good, T. L., & Brophy, J. E. (2003). Looking in classrooms (9th ed.). Boston: Allyn and Bacon Bartlett, A. 1994. Implications of whole language for classroom management. Action in Tacher Education, 16, 65-74.
• Crone, D. A., Hawken, L. S., & Horner, R. H., (2010). Responding to problem behavior in schools: The Behavior Education Program (2nd Ed.) New York: Guilford.
• Crone, D. H., & Horner, R. H. (2003). Building positive behavior support systems in schools: Functional behavioral assessment. New York: Guilford.
• Dabbagh, N., & Bannan-Ritland, B. (2005). Online learning: Concepts, strategies, and applications. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
• DeVries, R., & B. Zan. (1994). Moral classroom, moral children: Creating a constructivist atmosphere in early education. New York: Teachers College Press.
• Dollard, N., & Christensen, L., (1996). Constructive classroom management. Focus on Exceptional Children, 29 (2), 1–24.
• Doyle, W. (1986). Classroom organization and management. In M. Wittrock (Ed.), Handbook of Research on Teaching (3rd ed., pp. 392–431). New York: Macmillan.
• Downey, D., & Pribesh, S. (2004). When race matters: Teachers’ evaluations of students’ classroom behavior. Sociology of Education, 77(4), 267-282.
• Duke, D. (Ed.). (1979). Classroom management: The 78th yearbook of the National Society for the Study of Education, Part II. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
• Edmund T. Emmer & Laura M. Stough (2001). Classroom Management: A Critical Part of Educational Psychology, With Implications for Teacher Education, Educational Psychologist, 36 (2), 103-112.
• Emmer, E., & Sabornie, E. J. (2014). Handbook of classroom management. Routledge.Evertson, C., & Harris, A. (1992). What we know about managing classrooms. Educational Leadership, 74-78.
• Fraser, C., Kennedy, A., Reid, L., & Mckinney, S. (2007). Teachers’ continuing Professional development: Contested concepts, understandings and models. Professional Development in Education, 33, 153-169.
• Freiberg JH, Lamb SM (2009). Dimensions of person-centered classroom management, Theory Into Practice, 48, 99–105.
• Freiberg, H. J., & Lapointe, J. M. (2006). Research-based programs for preventing and solving discipline problems. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 735–786). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
• Freiberg, H. J., & Huang, S. (1994). Study 2.4: Longitudinal study of the life-cycle of improving schools: Final report. Philadelphia: National Center on Education in the Inner Cities, Temple University.
• Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999a). Beyond behaviorism: Changing the classroom management paradigm. Boston: Allyn & Bacon.
• Freiberg, H. J. (Ed.). (1999b). School climate: Measuring, improving, and sustaining healthy learning environments. London: Falmer.
• Glasser, W. (1998). Choice theory: A new psychology of personal freedom. New York, NY: Harper.
• Glasser, W. (1969). Schools without failure. New York: Harper & Row. Glasscr, W. (1986). Conlrol Iheory in Ilıe classroom. New York: Harper & Row.
• Gopinathan, S. & Ho, W. K. (2000). Educational change and development in Singapore. In Townsend, T. & Cheng, Y.C. (2000) (eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific Region: Challenges for the future (pp. 163-184) Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets and Zeilinger Publishers.
• Guskey, T. R. (1988). Teacher efficacy, self-concept, and attitudes toward the implementation of instructional innovation. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4, 63–69.
• Gündüz, H. B. (2004), Eğitim Okul ve Sınıf Yönetimi. Sınıf Yönetimi Ankara: Asil Yayıncılık.
• Hoban, G. (2002). Teacher learning for educational change. Buckingham, UK: Open University Press.
• Jackson, P. (1968). Life in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Jeremy S & Alex H (2001) The Differential Effects of Teacher Approval and Disapproval in Junior and Infant Classrooms, Educational Psychology in Practice, 17(2), 157-167.
• Jones, V. (1996). Classroom management. In J. Sikula (Ed.), Handbook of research on teacher education (2nd ed., pp. 503–521). New York: Simon & Schuster.
• Jussim, L., & Harber, K. D. (2005). Teacher expectations and self-fulfilling prophecies: Knows and unknown, resolved and unresolved controversies. Personality and Social Psychology Review. 9(2), 131-155.
• Kim, Y. H. (2000). Recent changes and developments in Korean school education. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp. 83-106). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Kounin, J. S. (1970). Discipline and group management in classrooms. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
• Kunter, M., & Baumert, J. (2006). Linking TIMSS to research on learning and instruction: a re-analysis of the German TIMSS and TIMSS video data. In S. J. Howie, & T. Plomp (Eds.), Learning mathematics and science: Lessons learned from TIMSS (pp. 335e351). Leiden: Routledge Falmer.
• Kunter, M., Baumert, J. R., & Koller, O. (2007). Effective Classroom Management and the Development of Subject-Related Interest. Learning and Instruction, 17, 494-509.
• Landrum, T.M., & Kauffmann, J. (2006). Behavioural approaches to classroom management. In C.M. Evertson & C.S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 47–72). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Langdon, C. A. (1996) The third Phi Delta Kappa poll of teachers’ attitudes toward the public schools, Phi Delta Kappan, 78, 3, 244–250.
• Leach, J. T., & Scott, P. H. (2002). Designing and evaluating science teaching sequences: an approach drawing upon the concept of learning demand and a social constructivist perspective on learning. Studies in Science Education, 38, 115–142.
• Lemke, J. L. (1990). Talking science: language, learning and values. Norwoord, NJ: Ablex.
• Lefstein, A. (2008). Changing classroom practice through the English National Literacy Strategy: A micro-interactional perspective. American Educational Research Journal 45, 701–37.
• Lemke, J.L. (1990). Talking science: Language, learning and values. Norwood, NJ: Ablex.Lewis, R. (1999). Teachers coping with the stress of classroom discipline, Social Psychology of Education, 3, 155–171.
• Lin, A.M.Y. (2007). What’s the use of ‘triadic dialogue’? Activity theory, conversation analysis and analysis of pedagogical practices. Pedagogies, 2,77–94.
• Lyle, S. (2008). Dialogic teaching: Discussing theoretical contexts and reviewing evidence from classroom practice. Language and Education: An International Journal, 22, 222–40.
• MacBeath, J. (2007). Improving school effectiveness: Retrospective and Prospective. In T. Townsend (Ed.), International Handbook of School Effectiveness and Improvement (pp. 57-74). Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer.
• McDermott, L.& Somers, M. (1991). Building a research base for curriculum development: an example from mechanics. In F. Goldberg and H. Niedderer (Eds.), Research in physics learning: theoretical and empirical studies. Kiel, Germany: IPN.
• Mameli, C., & Molinari, L. (2013). Interactive micro-processes in classroom discourse: turning points and emergent meanings, Research Papers in Education, 28(2), 196-211.
• Martin, S. (2004). Finding a balance: impact of classroom management conceptions on developing teacher practice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 20, 405-422. Marzano, R.J., Marzano, J.S., & Pickering, D.J. (2003). Classroom management that works: Research based strategies for every teacher. Alexandria, VA: ASCD.
• Mclntyre, T., & Battle, J. (1998). The traits of “good teachers” as identified by African- American and white students with emotional and/or behavioral disorders. Behavioral Disorders, 23, 134-142.
• Meirink, J. A., P. C. Meijer, N. Verloop, and T. C. M. Bergen (2009). Understanding Teacher Learning in Secondary Education: The Relations of Teacher Activities to Changed Beliefs about Teaching and Learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 25, 89-100.
• Mohandas, R., Meng, H. W., & Keeves, J. P. (2003). Evaluation and accountability in Asian and Pacific countries. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 107-122). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Mortimer, E., & Scott, P. (2003). Meaning making in secondary science classrooms. Maidenhead, England: Open University Press.
• Mortimer, E. F., Scott, P., & El-Hani, C. (2012). The Heterogeneity of Discourse in Science Classrooms: The Conceptual Profile Approach. In Fraser, B. J., Tobin, K. G., & McRobbie, C. J. (2012). International handbook of science education (Part one). Springer Dordrecht Heidelberg: London, New York. (pp. 231-246).
• Murphy, P. K., Delli, L. A. M., & Edwards, M. N. (2004). The good teacher and good teaching: Comparing beliefs of second-grade students, preservice teachers, and inservice teachers. Journal of Experimental Education, 72, 69-92.
• Myhill, D. (2006). Talk, talk, talk: Teaching and learning in whole class discourse. Research Papers in Education, 21,19–41.
• Nelson, J. R., Johnson, A., & Marchand-Martel la, N. (1996). Effects of direct instruction, cooperative learning, and independent learning practices on the classroom behavior of students with behav- ioral disorders: A comparative analysis. Journal of Emotional and Behavioral Disorders, 4, 53-63.
• Nilsson, P., & Vikström, A. (2015). Making PCK explicit-capturing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) in the science classroom. International Journal of Science Education, 37(17), 2836–2857.
• Ornstein A.C. & Lasley, T. J. (2000). Strategies for effective teaching. Boston: McGraw Hill.Pefianco, E. C., Curtis, D., & Keeves, J. P. (2003). Learning across the adult lifespan. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia- Pacific region (pp. 305-320). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers' Beliefs and Educational Research: Cleaning Up a Messy Construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307-332.
• Peterson, C. C. (2003). Lifespan human development. In J. P. Keeves & R. Watanabe (Eds.), International handbook of educational research in the Asia-Pacific region (pp. 379- 394). The Netherlands: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Rajput, J. S. (2001). Reforms in school education in India. Plenary speech presented at the International Forum on Educational reforms in the Asia-Pacific Region “Globalization, Localization, and Individualization for the Future”, HKSAR, China
• Richardson, V. (1996). The Role of Attitudes and Beliefs in Learning to Teach. In Handbook of Research in Teacher Education, edited by J. Sikula, 102-119. New York, NY: Macmillan.
• Robinson, S. L., & Griesemer, S. M. R. (2006) Helping individual students with problem behavior. In C. M. Evertson & C. S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 787-802). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Rogers, C. and Freiberg, H.J. (1994) Freedom to learn. 3rd ed. New York: Macmillan Publishing.
• Romi, S., Lewis, R., & Katz, Y. (2009). Student responsibility and classroom discipline in Australia, China and Israel. Compare, 39, 439–452.
• Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (2000). Teacher expectations for the disadvantaged. In P., K.Smith, and A.D. Pellegrini (Eds.), Psychology of Education: major themes (pp. 286- 291). Routledgefalmer: London.
• Schon, D. (1983). The reflective practioner: How professionals think in action. New York: Basic Books.
• Schon, D. A. (1987). Educating the reflective practitioner: Toward a new design for teaching and learning in the professions. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Scott, P.H. (1997). Teaching and learning science concepts in the classroom: talking a path from spontaneous to scientific knowledge. In: Linguagem, cultura e cognicao reflexoes para o ensino de ciencias, Belo Horizonte, Brazil: Faculdade de Educacao da UFMG. Scott, P.H. (1998). Teacher talk and meaning making in science classrooms: A Vygotskian analysis and review. Studies in Science Education, 32, 45-80.
• Shechtman, Z., & Leichtentritt, J. (2004). Affective Teaching: A Method to Enhance Classroom Management. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27, 323-333.
• Sanford, J.P., Emmer, E. T. (1988). Understanding Classroom Management: Anobservationguide. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
• Soysal, Y., & S. Radmard, S. (2018). Social negotiations of meanings and changes in the beliefs of prospective teachers: A vygotskian perspective, Educational Studies, 44(1), 57-80.
• Soysal, Y., & S. Radmard, S. (2017a). Sosyal Oluşturmacı Öğretimin Öğretmen Adaylarının Öğrenme ve Öğretmeye Yönelik İnançlarına ve Sınıf içi Uygulamalarına Etkisinin İncelenmesi. İlköğretim Online, 16(4), 1505-1531.
• Soysal, Y., & S. Radmard, S. (2017b). An exploration of Turkish teachers’ attributions to barriers faced within learner-centred teaching, Educational Studies, 43(2),186-209.
• Soysal, Y., & Tanık, H. (2017). Akademisyenlerin Öğretimsel Bariyerlere Yönelik Atıflarının Pedagojik-Epistemolojik İnanç Sistemleri Bağlamında İncelenmesi. Yükseköğretim ve Bilim Dergisi. 7(2), 333-352.
• Stough, L. (2006). The place of classroom management and standards in teacher education. In C.M. Evertson & C.S. Weinstein (Eds.), Handbook of classroom management: Research, practice, and contemporary issues (pp. 909–924). Mahwah: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Tang, X., & Wu X. (2000). Educational change and development in the People’s Republic of China: Challenges for the future. In T. Townsend & Y. C. Cheng (Eds.), Educational change and development in the Asia-Pacific region: Challenges for the future (pp. 133- 162). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Thomas, J. A. (1998). On becoming a good teacher: Reflective practice with regard to children’s voices. Journal of Teacher Education, 49, 372-380.
• Viennot, L. and Rainson, S. (1999). Design and evaluation of a research based teaching sequence: the superposition of electric fields. International Journal of Science Education, 21(1), 1-16.
• Wall, C. R. G. (2016). From Student to Teacher: Changes in Preservice Teacher Educational Beliefs Throughout the Learning-to-Teach Journey. Teacher Development 20(3), 364-379. Weissberg, R.P., Kumpfer, K.L., & Seligman, M.E.P. (2003). Prevention that works for children and youth: An introduction. American Psychologist, 58(6/7), 425-432.