BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS OF PUBLICATIONS IN SOCIAL INNOVATION BY VISUAL MAPPING METHOD

Year 2020, Volume: 11 Issue: Ek, 90 - 101, 20.12.2020

Murat Gülmez , Suzan Oğuz , Deniz Yalçıntaş

https://doi.org/10.21076/vizyoner.727490

Cited By: 5

Abstract

Today, innovation that results from technological improvements and developments directly affects societies and social life. This interaction led to the emergence of the concept of social innovation. Social innovation is the process of developing and implementing effective solutions to social and environmental problems in order to support social progress. The aim of the study is to investigate the researches about the concept of social innovation, which has come to the fore in recent years, by using bibliometric analysis method. For this purpose, the Web of Science database is scanned using the concept of social innovation between 2010-2019 and a total of 579 publications are reached. Publications are visualized by VOSviewer mapping method. In the end of the analysis of these studies, it is seen that the most frequently used keyword is “social innovation”, the most published and most co-authored author is Antonius Schröder, and the most cited author is Frances R. Westley. In addition, it is among the findings that Spain is the most broadcasting country (90 broadcasts) and England is the country with the most citation (915 citations).

Keywords

Social Innovation, Bibliometric Analysis, Visual Mapping

SOSYAL İNOVASYON ALANINDAKİ YAYINLARIN GÖRSEL HARİTALAMA YÖNTEMİYLE BİBLİYOMETRİK ANALİZİ

Abstract

Günümüzde teknolojik yenilik ve gelişmeler sonucu ortaya çıkan inovasyon, toplumları ve sosyal yaşamı doğrudan etkilemektedir. Bu etkileşim, sosyal inovasyon kavramının ortaya çıkmasına sebep olmuştur. Sosyal inovasyon, sosyal ilerlemeyi desteklemek amacıyla sosyal ve çevresel sorunlara etkili çözümler geliştirme ve uygulama sürecidir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, son yıllarda öne çıkan sosyal inovasyon kavramı ile ilgili yapılmış araştırmaları bibliyometrik analiz yöntemi ile incelemektir. Bu amaç doğrultusunda Web of Science veritabanında sosyal inovasyon kavramı kullanılarak 2010-2019 yılları arası baz alınarak tarama yapılmış ve toplamda 579 yayına ulaşılmıştır. Yayınlar, VOSviewer haritalama yöntemi ile görselleştirilmiştir. Analiz sonrası incelenen çalışmalarda en sık kullanılan anahtar kelimenin “sosyal inovasyon” olduğu, en fazla yayın yapan ve en fazla ortak yazarlığı olan yazarın Antonius Schröder olduğu ve en fazla atıf alan yazarın Frances R. Westley olduğu görülmektedir. Ayrıca en fazla yayın yapan ülkenin İspanya (90 yayın), en fazla atıf alan ülkenin ise İngiltere (915 atıf) olduğu bulgular arasındadır.

Keywords

Sosyal İnovasyon, Bibliyometrik Analiz, Görsel Haritalama

References

• Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. M., Pel, B., Weaver, P., Dumitru, A., Haxeltine, A. ve O'Riordan, T. (2019). Transformative social innovation and (dis)empowerment. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 145, 195-206.
• BEPA (Bureau of European Policy Advisors). (2010). Empowering people, driving change. In: Social Innovation in the European Union, European Commission.
• Bulut, C., Eren, H. ve Halac, D. S. (2013). Social innovation and psychometric analysis. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 82, 122-130.
• Cloutier, J. (2003). Qu'est-ce que l'innovation sociale?, Cahiers du CRISES (ss. 46). Montréal: Centre de recherche sur les innovaitons sociales (CRISES).
• Cruz, H., Rubén Martínez, M. ve Blanco, I. (2017). Crisis, urban segregation and social innovation in Catalonia. Partecipazione E Conflitto, 10(1), 221-245.
• Durán-Sánchez, A., Peris-Ortiz, M., Álvarez-García, J. ve del Río, M. D. L. C. (2018). Entrepreneurship and social ınnovation for sustainability. Bibliometric analysis. Strategies and Best Practices in Social Innovation içinde (11-29). Springer, Cham.
• Gaitán-Angulo, M., Díaz, J. C., Viloria, A., Lis-Gutiérrez, J. P. ve Rodríguez-Garnica, P. A. (2018, June). Bibliometric analysis of social innovation and complexity (Databases Scopus and Dialnet 2007–2017). International Conference on Data Mining and Big Data içinde(23-30). Springer, Cham.
• Grimm, R., Fox, C., Baines, S. ve Albertson, K. (2013). Social innovation, an answer to contemporary societal challenges? Locating the concept in theory and practice. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 26(4), 436-455.
• Kohler, T. ve Chesbrough, H. (2019). From collaborative community to competitive market: The quest to build a crowdsourcing platform for social innovation. R&D Management, 49(3), 356-368.
• Lazzarotti, F., Samir Dalfovo, M. ve Emil Hoffmann, V. (2011). A bibliometric study of innovation based on Schumpeter. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 6(4), 121-135.
• Ludvig, A., Rogelja, T., Asamer-Handler, M., Weiss, G., Wilding, M. ve Zivojinovic, I. (2020). Governance of social innovation in forestry. Sustainability, 12(3), 1065, 1-16.
• Moulaert, F., MacCallum, D., Mehmood, A. ve Hamdouch, A., (2013). The international handbook on social innovation: Collective action, social learning and transdisciplinary research, Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham.
• Mulgan, G. (2006). The process of social innovation. Innovations: Technology, Governance, Globalization, 1(2), 145-162.
• Mulgan, G., Tucker, S., Ali, R. ve Sanders, B. (2007). Social innovation: what it is, why it matters and how it can be accelerated, Skoll centre for social entrepreneurship, Working paper, 1-50.
• Mumford, M. D. (2002). Social innovation: Ten cases from benjamin franklin, Creativity Research Journal, 14(2), 253-266,
• Murray, R., Caulier-Grice, J. ve Mulgan, G. (2010). The open book of social ınnovation. London: The Young Foundation & NESTA, Erişim adresi: https://youngfoundation.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/10/The-Open-Book-of-Social-Innovationg.pdf, (7 Şubat 2020).
• Özdemir, F., ve Ar, İ. M. (2015). Sosyal yenilik üzerine bir alan araştırması. Girişimcilik ve İnovasyon Yönetimi Dergisi, 4(1), 17-43.
• Pacheco, A. S. V., Santos, M. J. ve Silva, K. V. D. (2018). Social innovation: what do we know and do not know about it. International Journal of Innovation and Learning, 24(3), 301-326.
• Phills, J. A., Deiglmeier, K. ve Miller. D. T. (2008). Rediscovering social innovation. Stanford Social Innovation Review, 6(4), 34–43.
• Pol, E. ve Ville, S. (2009). Social innovation: Buzz word or enduring term? J. Socio-econ. 38, 878–885.
• Prahalad, C. K. ve Ramaswamy, V. (2004). Co-creation experiences: The next practice in value creation. Journal of Interactive Marketing, 18(3), 5-14.
• Sharra, R. ve Nyssens, M. (2010). Social innovation: An interdisciplinary and critical review of the concept. Université Catholique de Louvain Belgium, 1-15.
• Sinclair, S. ve Baglioni, S. (2014). Social innovation and social policy–promises and risks. Social Policy and Society, 13(3), 469-476.
• Topsakal, Y. ve Yüzbaşioğlu, N. (2017). Sosyal inovasyon kavramsal model önerisi. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 13(3), 565-576.
• Van der Have, R. P. ve Rubalcaba, L. (2016). Social innovation research: An emerging area of innovation studies?. Research Policy, 45(9), 1923-1935.
• Weerakoon, C., McMurray, A., Rametse, N. ve Douglas, H. (2016). A preliminary bibliographic analysis of the social innovation literature. SIERC 2016: Collaborating for Impact içinde(345-360). New Zealand Social Innovation and Entrepreneurship Research Centre.
• Yeşilkaya, M. ve Yıldız, T. (2018). Özgeci davranış ekseninde sosyal inovasyon eğiliminin incelenmesine yönelik bir araştırma. Girişimcilik İnovasyon ve Pazarlama Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(4), 81-97.
• Zapf, W. (1994). Über soziale Innovationen. W. Zapf (Ed.). Modernisierung, wohlfahrtsentwicklung und transformation: Soziologische aufsätze 1987 bis 1994 içinde (23-40). Berlin: Edition Sigma.