Aydın ilinde bulunan sulama kooperatiflerinin su yönetim performanslarının değerlendirilmesi

Year 2023, Volume: 60 Issue: 3 - Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University Volume: 60 Issue: 3, 385 - 398, 13.10.2023

Abdurrahman Aydın Selin Akçay

https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1318409

Abstract

Amaç: Aydın ilinde bulunan 23 adet yeraltı sulama kooperatifinin sulama yönetim etkinlikleri 2006-2017 yılları için çeşitli performans göstergeleriyle incelenerek, İşletme-Bakım-Yönetim organizasyonunun geliştirilmesine yönelik bazı önerilerde bulunulması hedeflenmiştir.
Materyal ve Yöntem: Sulama kooperatiflerinin performanslarının değerlendirilmesinde; FAO ve IPTRID tarafından geliştirilmiş olan karşılaştırmalı değerlendirme rehberindeki göstergeler kullanılmıştır.
Araştırma Bulguları: Bu araştırma sonucunda; sırasıyla sulama oranı %7-94, yatırımın geri dönüşüm oranı %53-146, su ücreti toplama etkinliği %70-91, bakım masrafının gelire oranı %4-104, birim alana düşen toplam işletme-bakım-yönetim masrafı 102.2-1 103.7 $/ ha, birim alanda çalıştırılan personel sayısı 26.5-316.9 ha/personel, su dağıtımında çalıştırılan her bir kişi başına toplam masraf ise 2 013-11 996 $/kişi değerleri arasında değiştiği saptanmıştır.
Sonuç: Bölgede sulu tarım açısından büyük öneme sahip olan sulama kooperatiflerinde tespit edilen problemlerin çözümüne yönelik olarak işletme-bakım-yönetim ve denetim mekanizmalarında özen gösterilmesi, katılımcı sulama yönetimi anlayışının benimsenmesi, kredi ve destek sistemlerinin revize edilmesi, bazı hizmetlerin hibe yoluyla verilmesi, düşük faizli sulama kredileriyle temel sulama hizmetlerinin desteklenmesi ve mevcut uygulamaya konan desteklerin de sürdürülmesi gerekmektedir.

Keywords

Sistem Performansı, Sulama kooperatifi, sulama yönetimi, performans göstergesi

Supporting Institution

Scientific Projects Coordination Unit (Project No: ZRF-16016) of Aydın Adnan Menderes University

Project Number

ZRF-16016

Thanks

This study was conducted as a MSc thesis by Abdurrahman Aydın and supported financially by the Scientific Projects Coordination Unit (Project No: ZRF-16016) of Aydın Adnan Menderes University.

Evaluation of water use management performances for irrigation cooperatives in Aydın province

Abstract

Objective: The objective of this study was to assess the performance indicators for 2006-2017 years. Hence for a better Management-Operation-Maintenance organization, irrigation management efficiencies of 23 groundwater irrigation cooperatives located in Aydın was used. .
Materials and Methods: The indicators chosen from comparative performance evaluation set by FAO and IPTRID were used in this study for the evaluation of the efficiency of irrigation cooperatives.
Results: Main findings of this study indicated that the values of the indicators varied as follows; irrigation ratio 7-94%, cost recovery ratio 53-146%, irrigation water fee collection efficiency 70-91%, maintenance costs to total revenue ratio 4-104%, total MOM costs per unit area 102.2-1103.7/ha, number of staff employed per irrigation area 26.5-316.9 ha/person, total costs per staff employed in irrigation area varied between 2013-11996 $/ person.
Conclusion: In order to bring solutions to the main problems of irrigation cooperatives which creates benefits to the irrigated agriculture in the region; operation management and maintenance organizations should be better fulfilled, participatory management should be encouraged, support and credit systems should be re-arranged. Also, supporting irrigation services by irrigation credits with lower interest rates or providing costless would be a solution.

Keywords

Irrigation cooperative, irrigation management, performance indicators, system performance

Project Number

ZRF-16016

References

• Akıllı, H., 2011. Participatory Irrigation Management, From Public Irrigation Management to Local and Private Irrigation Management: The Case of Antalya Irrigation Associations. Akdeniz University Graduate School of Social Sciences, (Unpublished) PhD Thesis, Antalya, 229 pp.
• Akyüz, Y. & E. Atış, 2022. Determination of the environmental attitudes of producers within the framework of adaptation to climate change: the case of Küçük Menderes Basin. Journal of Agriculture Faculty of Ege University, 59 (3): 557-566. https://doi.org/10.20289/zfdergi.1063327
• Anonymous, 2013. Aydın agricultural master plan. T.C. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Aydın Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry. (Web page: http://aydin.tarim.gov.tr/Belgeler/Belgeler/AYDIN%20TARIM%20MASTER%20PLANI.docxAydın) (Accessed: January 2017).
• Anonymous, 2018. Aydın agricultural master plan. T.C. Ministry of Agriculture and Forestry, Aydın Directorate of Provincial Agriculture and Forestry. (Web page: https://aydin.tarimorman.gov.tr/Belgeler/Ayd%C4%B1n%20Tar%C4%B1m%20Master%20Plan%C4%B1/MASTER%20PLAN%20%20%2816.01.2019%29-converted.pdf) (Accessed: December 2018).
• Bekişoğlu, M., 1994. “Irrigation development and operation and maintenance problems in Türkiye, 579-586”. Proceedings of the Conference on Development of Soil and Water Resources (1994, Ankara). General Directorate of State Hydraulic Works, 1450 pp.
• Beyribey, M., F.K. Sönmez, B. Çakmak & M. Oğuz, 1997. Determination of monthly water supply ratio in state irrigation schemes. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 3 (2): 33-37. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000309
• Bouwer, H., 2003. Integrated water management for the 21st century: problems and solutions. Food, Agriculture and Environment, 1 (1): 118-127. https://doi.org/10.1234/4.2003.326
• Cengiz, M. & Y. Uçar, 2018. Evaluation of irrigation management in Isparta province irrigation cooperatives. Isparta University of Applied Sciences The Journal of Agriculture Faculty, 1st International Agricultural Structures and Irrigation Symposium, Special Issue: 501-511.
• Çiftçi, N., Y. Demir Yurteri & N. Çivicioğlu, 2012. “Konya ili sulama kooperatiflerinin sulamadaki etkinliği işletmecilik sorunları ve Kadınhanı Kolukısa Kasabası Sulama Kooperatifi örneği, 403-410”, 2. Ulusal Sulama ve Tarımsal Yapılar Sempozyumu (24-25 Mayıs 2012, İzmir) Bildirileri, 629 s.
• Cin, S. & B. Çakmak, 2017. Assessment of irrigation performance in Başören irrigation cooperative area of Beypazarı, Ankara. Journal of Agricultural Faculty of Gaziosmanpaşa University, 34 (2): 10-19. https://doi.org/10.13002/jafag4211
• Demir, H.N. & R. Topak, 2015. Water management in Konya-Sarayönü district Gözlü irrigation cooperative. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences 2 (1): 19-26. DMİ, 2019. Turkish State Meteorological Service, Aydın Directorate of Provincial Meteorological Station database, Aydın.
• Dorsan, F., S. Anaç & S. Akçay, S., 2004. Performance evaluation of transferred irrigation schemes of Lower Gediz Basin. Journal of Applied Sciences, 4 (2): 231-234.
• DSİ, 2016. Soil and water resources. State Hydraulic Works, Ankara (Web page: http://www.dsi.gov.tr/topraksu.htm) (Accessed: 13.03.2019).
• DSİ, 2018. Activity report, State Hydraulic Works, Ankara, (Web page: http://www.dsi.gov.tr/docs/stratejik-plan/dsi-2018-faaliyet-raporu.pdf?sfvrsn=2#page=52), (Accessed: April 2019).
• Eliçabuk, C., 2016. Performance Evaluation in Konya-GevrekliI Irrigation. Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, (Unpublished) MSc Thesis, Konya, 52 pp.
• Fişekçioğlu, F., 2018. A Research on Irrigation Performance and Water Use Behaviors of Farmers for Kozağaç Irrigation Cooperative in Akşehir. Selçuk University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, (Unpublished) MSc Thesis, Konya, 37 pp.
• Gençoğlu, M. & H. Değirmenci, 2019. Assessment of irrigation performance: a case study of Kırıkhan irrigation association. KSU Journal of Agriculture and Nature 22 (3): 436-443. https://doi.org/10.18016/ksutarimdoga.vi.495353
• Kasalak, A.F., S. Aksu, G. Demir, C. Şentürk & B.G. Dinçbilek, 2012. “Türkiye’de katılımcı sulama yönetimi devir çalışmaları, 395-402”, 2. Ulusal Sulama ve Tarımsal Yapılar Sempozyumu (24-25 Mayıs 2012, İzmir) Bildirileri, 629 ss.
• Koç, C., E. Yılmaz & N. Dağdelen, 2009. A study on determination of optimum personnel number in irrigation associations. Journal of Adnan Menderes University Agricultural Faculty, 6 (1): 21-28.
• Lencha, B.K., 2008. Water Use Efficiency of Smallholder Irrigation in the Ethiopian Central Rift Valley, The Case of Haleku Melka Tesso Irrigation Project. International Land and Water Management at Wageningen University, (Unpublished) MSc Thesis, Netherlands.
• Malano H. & M. Burton, 2001. Guidelines for Benchmarking Performance in the Irrigation and Drainage Sector. International Programme for Technology and Research in Irrigation and Drainage Knowledge Synthesis Report No. 5, FAO, Rome, 44 pp.
• Nalbantoğlu, G. & B. Çakmak, 2007. Benchmarking of irrigation performance in Akıncı irrigation district. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, 13 (3): 213-223. https://doi.org/10.1501/Tarimbil_0000000551
• Özkan, E., H. Hurma, B. Aydın, E. Aktaş, G. Özdemir & Ö. Azabağaoğlu, 2012. Some performance indicators of main irrigation cooperatives in terms of rural development in East Thrace Region. Balkan Journal of Social Sciences, 1 (1): 113-116.
• Özlu, H., 2004. “Irrigation reform in Türkiye, 1-12”. International Capacity Building Program on Participatory Irrigation Management (December 5-14, 2004, IARTC Menemen, İzmir, Türkiye).
• Rao, P.S., 1993. Review of Selected Literature on Indicators of Irrigation Performance. International Irrigation Management Institute, Colombo, Sri Lanka, 75 pp.
• Rodriguez-Díaz, J.A., E. Camacho Poyato & R. López Luque, 2004. Applying benchmarking and data envelopment analysis (DEA) techniques to irrigation districts in Spain. Irrigation and Drainage, 53: 135-143. https://doi.org/10.1002/ird.128
• Sayın, B., 2011. “Participatory irrigation management” from Public Irrigation Management to Local and Private Irrigation Management: The Case of Antalya Irrigation Associations. Akdeniz University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, (Unpublished) PhD Thesis, Antalya, 165 pp.
• Sönmezyıldız, E. & B. Çakmak, 2013. Assessment of irrigation performance in land consolidation area of Eskişehir Beyazaltın village. Mediterranean Agricultural Sciences, 26 (1): 33-40.
• Süheri, S. & R. Topak, 2005. The comparison of irrigation organizations in point of water management in Konya plain. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, 19 (37): 79-86.
• Taşpınar, C., 2018. Assessment of Agricultural Water Use in Soğulca Sarıkaya Irrigation Cooperative Area of Haymana, Ankara. Ankara University Graduate School of Natural and Applied Science, (Unpublished) MSc Thesis, Ankara, 38 pp.
• Tekiner, M. & B. Çakmak, 2011. “Kapalı borulu sulama şebekelerinde karşılaştırmalı değerlendirme ile sistem performansının belirlenmesi, 27-30”. Uluslararası Katılımlı I. Ali Numan Kıraç Tarım Kongresi ve Fuarı (27-30 Nisan, 2011, Eskişehir) Bildirileri, 138 s.
• Vermillion, D.L., 2000. Guide to Monitoring and evaluation of irrigation management transfer. International Network on Participatory Irrigation Management (INPIM), USA.
• Yercan, M., E. Atış & H.E. Salalı, 2009. Assessing irrigation performance in the Gediz River Basin of Türkiye: water user associations versus cooperatives. Irrigation Science 27: 263-270. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00271-008-0142-z.