Reporting of Sexual Population of Heterocypris incongruens (Ramdohr, 1808) from a Man-Made Pond (Kahramanmaraş, Turkey) and Comparison of Hemipenes of the Genus Heterocypris Claus, 1892

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 15 Sayı: 2, 139 - 150, 14.06.2019

Mehmet Yavuzatmaca , Okan Külköylüoğlu

https://doi.org/10.22392/actaquatr.577460

Cited By: 4

Öz

The current numbers
of the genus Heterocypris includes
about 68 species. When 37 species have males, males of 26 species are not known
and data is not available for five species. Among the species of the genus, Heterocypris incongruens has a
cosmopolitan distribution but the males of the species have only been reported
in Palearctic and Nearctic regions. During an extensive field sampling, total
of 6 males and 59 females were collected from Haydolar pond (a man-made pond)
in Pazarcık, Kahramanmaraş (Turkey) on 11 June and 08 September of 2010. During
this study, we focused on the description of the hemipenis and compared it with
others in the genus. Sexual ratio is about 1:10 in favor of females. Zenker’s
organ has 28 whorls. The lenght of the hemipenis (Lh =0.23 mm) was about 19% (ca
1/5) of the length of the carapace (L: 1.21 mm) in our samples. Distal and
proximal shields of the hemipenis show variability within the indivudals of the
male H. incongruens but these shields
are similar among some other species (e.g., H.
punctata and H. putei). Such similarities in hemipenes may support the fact
that the species of the genus may have a monophyletic group. Accordingly, our
study suggest that using hemipenis as a taxonomic character should be done with
great attention because the shape of hemipenis can be changed by means of
several factors.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Heterocypris, hemipenis, Kahramanmaraş, monophyletic, Palearctic

Heterocypris incongruens (Ramdohr, 1808)’in seksüel popülasyonunun insan yapımı bir gölette (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye) rapor edilmesi ve Heterocypris Claus, 1892 cinsinin hemipenislerinin karşılaştırılması

Öz

 Heterocypris
cinsine
ait 68 türün 37 tanesinin erkeği bilinirken 26 türün ise erkeği bilinmemektedir
ve beş türün erkeğinin olup olmadığı hakkında ise bilgi bulunmamaktadır. Heterocypris incongruens, cinsin türleri
arasında kozmopolit bir dağılıma sahiptir, ancak türün erkekleri sadece
Palearktik ve Nearktik bölgelerde rapor edilmiştir. 11 Haziran ve 8 Eylül 2010
tarihlerinde Pazarcık (Kahramanmaraş, Türkiye)’taki Haydolar göletinde yapılan
kapsamlı bir arazi çalışma sırasında toplam 6 erkek ve 59 dişi birey
toplanmıştır. Çalışma sırasında, hemipenis’in
tanımına odaklandık ve bunu cins içerisindeki diğer hemipenisler ile
karşılaştırdık. Seksüel oranı yaklaşık 1:10 değeriyle dişiler lehine olduğu
tespit edilmiştir. Zenker organında 28 tane sarmal vardır. Örneklerimizdeki
hemipenis’in uzunluğu (Lh = 0.23 mm), karapaks (L: 1.21 mm) uzunluğunun
yaklaşık %19'u (yaklaşık 1/5) kadardır. Hemipenis’in
distal ve proksimal kısımları, erkek H.
incongruens bireyleri içinde değişkenlik gösterirken bu kısımlar diğer bazı
türler arasında benzerlik göstermektedir (örn., H. punctata ve H. putei).
Hemipenisler deki bu benzerlikler,
cinsin türlerinin monofiletik bir grup olabileceği gerçeğine bir destek
olabilir.
Buna göre, çalışmamız hemipenisin taksonomik bir karakter olarak
kullanılmasının büyük bir dikkat gerektirdiğini çünkü hemipenisin şeklinin
farklı faktörlerle değişebileceğini önermektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Heterocypris, hemipenis, Kahramanmaraş, monofiletik, Palearktik

Kaynakça

• Altınsaçlı, S. (1988). The Ostracoda fauna of the Bergama region and its seasonal changes. İstanbul University, Msc Thesis.
• Battish, S. K. (1981). Freshwater Ostracoda of the subfamily Cyprinotinae from Punjab, India, with the description of eight new species. Journal of Natural History, 15, 645-669. DOI: 10.1080/00222938100770461
• Bellavere, C., Benassi, G., McKenzie, K. G., & Rossi V. (1999). Non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) from temporary ponds in the Isole Pelagie (Sicily, Italy). Yerbilimleri, 35, 29-38.
• Brady, G. S. (1906). On the Entomostiacan fauna of the New Zealand Lakes. Proceedings of the General Meeting for Scientific Business of the Zoological Society of London, p. 692-701.
• Brehm, V. (1923). Bericht über die von Dr. H. Weigold in China gesammelten Kopepoden und Ostrakoden. Hydrobiology, 11(3-4), 329-345. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19230110307
• Broodbakker, N. W. (1982). The genus Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) in the West Indies, Part I. Taxonomic Characters. Bijdragen tot de Dierkunde, 52(2), 207-227.
• Butlin, R., Schön, I., & Martens, K. (1998). Asexual reproduction in non-marine ostracods. Heredity, 81, 473-480.
• Cohen, A. C., & Morin, J. G. (1990). Patterns of reproduction in ostracodes: A review. Journal of Crustacean Biology, 10(2), 184-211. DOI: 10.2307/1548480
• Daday, E. Von. (1900). Ostracoda Hungariae. Kiadja a Magyar Tudomanyos Akademia, Budapest, 320 pp.
• De Deckker, P. (1979). Ostracods from the Mound springs area between Strangways and Curdimurka, South Australia. Transactions of the Royal Society of South Australia, 103(6), 155-168.
• De Deckker, P. (1981). Ostracoda from Australian inland waters: Notes on taxonomy and ecology. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 93(1), 43-85.
• Furtos, N. C. (1933). The Ostracoda of Ohio. Bulletin of the Ohio Biological Survey, 29, 411-524.
• Furtos, N. C. (1936). Freshwater Ostracoda from Florida and North Carolina. American Midland Naturalist, 17(2), 491-522. DOI: 10.2307/2419975
• Fryer, G. (1997). The horse-trough ostracod Heterocypris incongruens. The Naturalist, 122, 121-135. Gauthier, H., & Brehm, V. (1928). Ostracodes et Cladocéres de I’Algérie et de la Tunisie. (3. note). Bulletin de la Société d’Histoire Naturelle de I’Afrique du Nord, 19, 114-121.
• Gauthier, H. (1938). Ostracodes continentaux récoltés par M. Monod Au Sahara occidental et en Mauritanie. Bulletin de la Société des Sciences Naturelles du Maroc, 18, 39-61.
• Hartmann, G. (1959). Beitrag zur kenntnis des Nicaragua sees unter besonderen berucksichtigung seiner Ostracoden (mit Beschreibung von 5 neuen Arten). Zoologischer Anzeiger, 162, 269-294.
• Horne, D. J. (1998). Non-marine ostracod database of Europe. University of Greenwitch, Chatham. In: Butlin, R., Schön, I. & Martens, K. (eds.). Asexual reproduction in non-marine ostracods. Heredity, 81, 473-480.
• Horne, D. J., & Martens, K. (1999). Geographical parthenogenesis in European non-marine ostracods: post-glacial invasion or Holocene stability?. Hydrobiologia, 391, 1-7. DOI: 10.1023/A:100350821
• Gülen, D. (1985). The species and distribution of the group of Podocopa (Ostracoda-Crustacea) in freshwaters of western Anatolia. İstanbul Üniversitesi Fen Fakültesi Mecmuası Seri B, 50, 65-80.
• Gülen, D., Altınsaçlı, S., Kubanç, C., & Kılıç, M. (1994). The Ostracoda (Crustacea) fauna of Turkey. Unpublished project report TBAG-989, p. 1-45, TÜBİTAK, Ankara.
• Gülen, D., Özuluğ, O., & Bilgin, F. H. (1996). Kabaklı kaynağı (Diyarbakır) ostracod (Crustacea) faunası. XIII Ulusal Biyoloji Kongresi, İstanbul.
• Karanovic, I. (1999). On Pseudocypridopsis n. gen., with a redescription of Pseudocypridopsis clathrata (Klie,1936) and a first description of the male (Ostracoda, Cypridopsinae). Bulletin Zoölogisch Museum Universiteit van Amsterdam, 17(1), 1-6.
• Karanovic, I. (2012). Recent freshwater ostracods of the World, Springer-Verlag Berlin Heidelberg, p. 608.
• Klie, W. (1930). Ostracoden aus dem paraguayischen teile des Gran-Chao. Sonder-Avdruck aus dem Archiv für hydrobiology, 22, 221-258.
• Klie, W. (1933). Suß- und brackwasser-Ostracoden von Bonaire, Curaçao und Aruba. Zoologisches Jahrbüch, Abteilung für Systematik, Ökologie und Geographie der Tiere, 64, 369-390.
• Klie, W. (1937). Süßwasser organismen aus dem Elbursgebirge (Persien). 2. Teil: Ostracoda. Zoologischer Anzeiger, 119, 207-211.
• Klie, W. (1938). Ostracoda, muschelkrebse.-die tierwelt Deutschlands und der angrenzenden meeresteile nach ihren merkmalen und nach ihrer lebensweise, 34 teil: krebstiere oder Crustacea, 1-230. Gustav Fischer Verlag, Jena.
• Külköylüoğlu, O. (2013). Diversity, distribution and ecology of non-marine Ostracoda (Crustacea) in Turkey: Application of pseudorichness and cosmoecious species concepts. Recent Research Development in Ecology, 4, 1-18.
• Külköylüoğlu, O., Altınsaçlı, S., & Kubanç, C. (1993). The Ostracoda (Crustacea) fauna of Küçükçekmece Lake (İstanbul) and seasonal distributions. Turkish Journal of Zoology, 17, 19-27.
• Külköylüoğlu, O., & Vinyard, G. L. (2000). Distribution and ecology of freshwater Ostracoda (Crustacea) collected from springs of Nevada, Utah, and Oregon: A preliminary study. Western North American Naturalist, 60, 291-303.
• Löffler, H. (1961). Beiträge zur kenntnis der Iranischen Binnengewässer 2: regional-limnologische Studie mit besonderer Berücksichtigung der Crustaceenfauna. Internationale Revue der Gesamten Hydrobiologie und Hydrographie, 46, 309-406. DOI: 10.1002/iroh.19610460304
• Margalef, R. (1953). Los crustáceos de las aguas continentales ibéricas. Instituto Forestal de Investigaciones y experiencias, 1-243 (Ostrácodos (Ostracoda): 137-167).
• Margalef, R. (1961). La vida en los charcos de agua dulce de Nueva Esparta (Venezuela). Memoria de la Sociedad de Ciencias Naturales La Salle, 21(59), 75-110.
• Martens, K., & Meisch, C. (1985). Description of the male of Potamocypris villosa (Jurine, 1820) (Crustacea, Ostracoda). Hydrobiologia, 127, 9-15. DOI: 10.1007/BF00004658
• Martens, K., Savatenalinton, S., Schön, I., Meisch, C., & Horne, D. J. (2013). World checklist of freshwater Ostracoda species. World Wide Web electronic publication. Retrieved from http://fada.biodiversity.be/group/show/18.
• Masi, L. (1906). Faune de la Roumanie: Ostracodes récoltés par Mr. Jaquet. Bulletinul Societatii de Sciinte, 14(6), 647-665.
• Matzke-Karasz, R., Neil, J. V., Smith, R. J., Symonová, R., Morkovsky, L., Archer, M., Hand, S. J., Cloetens, P., & Tafforeau, P. (2014). Subcellular preservation in giant ostracod sperm from an early Miocene cave deposit in Australia. Proceedings of The Royal Society B, 281, 20140394. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2014.0394
• McGregor, D. L., & Kesling, R. V. (1969). Copulatory adaptations in ostracods part I. Hemipenes of Candona. Contributions from Museum of Paleontology, University of Michigan, 22, 169-191.
• Meisch, C. (2000). Freshwater Ostracoda of western and central Europe, Heidelberg: Spektrum Akademischer Verlag, Süßwasserfauna von Mitteleuropa, 8, I-xii, pp. 522.
• Moniez, R. (1891). Faune des lacs salés d’Algérie: Ostracodes. Mémoires de la Société Zoologique de France, 4, 246-257.
• Moniez, R. (1893). Description dune nouvelle espece de Cypris vivant dans les eaux thermales du Hammam-Meskhoutine. Bulletin De La Société Zoologique De Frange. Dix-Huitième, 140-142.
• Müller, G. W. (1898). Die Ostracoden. In: Völtzkow, A. (ed.): Wissenschaftliche ergebnisse der reisen in Madagaskar und Ostafrika in der Jahren 1889–1895. Senckenbergische Naturforschende Gesellschaft, Abhandlungen, 21(2), 255-296.
• Neale, J. W. (1981). On Heterocypris luzonensis Neale sp. nov. Stereo-Atlas Ostracod Shells, 8, 79-86. Ohm, P., & Remmert, H. (1955). Etudes sur les rockpools des Pyrénéés-Orientales. Vie et Milieu, 6(2), 194-209.
• Okubo, I. (1985). On the recent Aurila species from Japan. In: Hanai, T., Ikeya, N., & Ishizaki, K. (Eds.), Evolutionary biology of Ostracoda, its fundamentals and applications, 135-144 (Elsevier, New York).
• Okubo, H. (2004). Nihon Tansui san kaimijinko rui nit suite. 1-72. (Kabushikigaisha Sanmon Insatsusho, Okayama) (in Japanase).
• Ozawa, H. (2013). The history of sexual dimorphism in Ostracoda (Arthropoda, Crustacea) since the Palaeozoic, 30 p. (an open access chapter). DOI: 10.5772/55329
• Özuluğ, O., & Kılıç, M. (2002). Contributions to Ostracoda (Crustacea) fauna of Anatolia (1). İstanbul Üniversitesi Su Ürünleri Dergisi, 14, 71-79.
• Paulo, L. F., & Moutinho, M. (1983). Systématique et distribution des ostracodes au Portugal, publicaçoes do instituto de zoologica. Faculdade de Ciencias do Porto, 173, 1-32.
• Petkowski, T., Scharf, B., & Keyser, D. (2000). New and little known Ostracods of the genus Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) from the Balkan Peninsula. Limnologica, 30, 45-57. DOI: 10.1016/S0075-9511(00)80042-0
• Rossi, V., Gandolfi, A., Baraldi, F., Bellavere, C., & Menozzi, P. (2007). Phylogenetic relationships of coexisting Heterocypris (Crustacea, Ostracoda) lineages with different reproductive modes from Lampedusa Island (Italy). Molecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 44, 1273-1283. DOI: 10.1016/j.ympev.2007.04.013
• Sars, G. O. (1924a). The freshwater Entomostraca of the Cape province (Union of South Africa). Part 2. Ostracoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 20(3), 105-194.
• Sars, G. O. (1924b). Contributions to a knowledge of the fauna of South-West Africa. 1. Crustacea Entomostraca, Ostracoda. Annals of the South African Museum, 20(3), 195-211.
• Skogsberg, T. (1917). A new freshwater ostracod. In: Results of Dr. E. Mjobergs Swedish scientific expeditions to Australia 1910–1913. Kongligar Svenska VetenskapsAkademiens Handlingar, N. F., Stockholm, 52(15), 9-22.
• Turner, C. H. (1893). Additional notes on the Cladocera and Ostracoda of Cincinnati, Ohio. Bulletin of the Scientific Laboratories of Denison University, 8, 3-18.
• Vàvra, W. (1891). Monographie der Ostracoden Böhmens. Archiv der Naturwissenshaftlichen Landesdurchforschung von Böhmen, 8(3), 1-116.
• Vávra, V. (1895). Süsswasser-Ostracoden Zanzibar’s. Hamb. Wiss. Anst, 12, 2-23.
• Yılmaz, O. (2016). Determination of the relationship of ostracod’s (Crustacea) reproductive modes and ecological factors in Muş and Mardin (Turkey). Abant İzzet Baysal University, Msc. Thesis, Bolu, Turkey.