Identification of Sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) Genotypes Tolerant to Water Stres

Yıl 2018, Cilt: 24 Sayı: 3, 312 - 322, 05.09.2018

Ali Beyhan Uçak

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.456645

Cited By: 2

Öz

The present research was carried out to determine water-stress tolerance of linoleic sunflower genotypes (P64LE119, PR63F73, P64LL62) grown under different water stress conditions [no water-stress (I100); mild water-stress (I70); strong water-stress (I35)] in the years 2015 and 2016. Variance analyses revealed significant differences between the genotypes (P<0.01). As the average of two years, the greatest yield was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 4094.66 kg ha-1, the lowest yield was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 2487.81 kg ha-1. Again as the average of two years, the greatest chlorophyll content was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 49.83 spad, the lowest value was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 34.39 spad. The greatest crop water stress index was obtained from strong water stress x genotype interaction (I35xPR63F73) with 0.53, the lowest value was obtained from no water-stress x genotype interaction (I100xP64LE119) with 0.21. The P64LE119 genotype with optimum water use efficiency and prominent with crop water stress index and chlorophyll content both in no water-stress and strong water stress treatments was identified as water stress-resistant and the genotype was considered to have reliable characteristics potentially to be used in further water stress-resistance studies.  

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sunflower; Water stress; Crop water stress index; Tolerance; Chlorophyll

Kaynakça

• Afkari A (2010). The effect of water deficit on characteristics physiological-chemical of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) varieties. Advances in Environmental Biology 4(1): 24-30
• Alahdadi I, Oraki H & Khajani F P (2011). Effect of water stress on yield and yield components of sunflower genotypes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(34): 6504-6509
• Alderfasi A A & Nielsen D C (2001). Use of crop water stress index for monitoring water status and scheduling irrigation in wheat. Agriculture Water Management 47: 69-75
• Ali M D & Shui L T (2009). Potential evapotranspiration model for Muda Irrigation Project, Malaysia. Water Resources Management 23(1): 57-69
• Blake G R & Hartge K H (1986). Bulk density. In: Klute, A. (ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, Part 1. American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA, Monograph 9, pp. 363-375
• Chaves M M (1991). Effect of water deficits on carbon assimilation. Journal of Experimental Botany 42(1): 1-16
• Chimenti C, Pearson A & Hall J (2002). Osmotic adjustment and yield maintenance under drought in sunflower. Field Crops Research 75(2): 235-246
• Choudhury B J & Idso S B (1984). Simulating sunflower canopy temperatures to infer root-zone soil water potential. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology 31: 69-78
• Cornic G (2000). Drought stress inhibits photosynthesis by decreasing stomatal aperture-not by affecting ATP synthesis. Trends in Plant Science 5(5): 187-188
• Darvishzadeh R, Azizi M, Hatami-Maleki H, Bernousi I, Abdollahi Mandoulakani B, Jafari M & Sarrafi A (2010). Molecular characterization and similarity relationships among sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) inbred lines using some mapped simple sequence repeats. African Journal of Biotechnology 9(43): 7280-7288
• Demirtas M & Kirnak H (2009). Farklı sulama yöntemleri ve aralıklarının fizyolojik parametrelere etkisi. Yüzüncü Yıl Üniversitesi Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi 19: 79-83
• Der G & Everitt B S (2002). A Handbook of Statistical Analyses Using SAS. Second Edition. CRC Press LLC, 2000 N.W. Corporate Blvd., Boca Raton, Florida 3431. USA
• Flexas J & Medrano H (2002). Drought-inhibition of photosynthesis in C3 plants: Stomatal non-stomatal limitations revisited. Annals of Botany 89(2): 183-189
• Gencoglan C & Yazar A (1999). Çukurova koşullarında yetiştirilen I. ürün mısır bitkisinde infrared termometre değerlerinden yararlanılarak bitki su stresi indeksi (CWSI) ve sulama zamanının belirlenmesi. Turkish Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 23: 87-95
• Gunes A, Inal A, Adak M S, Bagci E G, Cicek N & Eraslan F (2008). Effect of drought stress implemented at pre-and post-anthesis stage on some physiological parameters as screening criteria in chickpea cultivars. Russian Journal of Plant Physiology. 55(1): 59-67
• Gungor Y, Erozel A Z & Yildirim O (2006). Sulama. Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları: 1592, Ders Kitabı: 424, Ankara
• Hajhassani-Asl N, Roshdi M, Ghafari M, Alizadeh A & Moradi-Aghdam A (2009). The effect of drought stress and defoliation on some agronomic traits, seed yield and yield components of sunflower (Alestar hjbrid). Danesh Novin Journal 5(15): 27-39
• Idso S B (1982). Non-Water-Stressed Baselines: A Key to Measuring and Interpreting Plant Water Stress. Agriculture Meteorol 27(1-2): 59-70
• Idso S B, Jackson R D, Pinter P J, Regina to R J & Hatfield J L (1981). Normalizing The Stress-Degree Day Parameter For Environmental Variability. Agricultural Meteorology 24: 45-55
• Jackson R D & Reginato R J (1981). Canopy temperature as a crop water stress indicator. Water Resources Research 17: 1133-1138
• Kaleem S, Hassan F U & Saleem A (2009). Influence of environmental variations on physiological attributes of sunflower. African Journal Biotechnol 8(15): 35313539
• Kassab O M, Abo Ellil A A & Abo El-Kheir MS (2012). Water use efficiency and productivity of two sunflower cultivars as influenced by three rates of drip irrigation water. Journal of Applied Sciences Research 8(7): 3524-3529
• Khayatnezhad M, Gholamin R, Jamaati-e-Somarin S H & Zabihie Mahmoodabad R (2011). The leaf chlorophyll content and stress resistance relationship considering in Corn cultivars (Zea mays). Advances in Environmental Biology 5(1): 118-122
• Klute A (1986). Water retention: In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis. Part 2, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd Edition, Agronomy Monograph No: 9, Soil Science Society of America, Madison, WI. pp. 635-653
• Kozlowski T T & Pallardy S G (1997). Physiology of Woody Plants, Academic Press, 642 pp, San Diego
• Moran M S, Clarke T R, Inoue Y & Vidal A (1994). Estimating crop water deficit using the relation between surface-air temperature and spectral vegetation index. Remote Sensing of Environment 49(3): 246-263
• Moroni I F, Fraysse M, Presotto A & Cantamutto M (2012). Evaluation of Argentine wild sunflower biotypes for drought stress during reproductive stage. 18th International Sunflower Conference, 27 February-1 March, Argentina, pp. 420-425
• Mozaffari K, Arshi Y & Zeinali-Khanghah H (1996). Research on the effects of water stress on some morphophysiological traits and yield components of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.). Seed and Plant Journal 12(3): 24-33
• Oraki H, Khajani F P & Aghaalikhana M (2012). Effect of water deficit stress on proline contents, solublesugars, chlorophyll and grain yield of sunflower hybrids. African Journal of Biotechnology 11(1): 164-168
• Reginato R J (1983). Field qualification of crop water stress. The American Society of Agricultural Engineers 26(3): 772-781
• Reginato R J & Howe J (1985). Irrigation scheduling using crop indicators. Journal of Irrigation and Drainage Engineering Asce 111(2): 125-133
• Robert G A, Rajasekar M & Manivannan P (2016). Triazoleinduced drought stress amelioration on growth, yield, and pigments composition of Helianthus annuus L. (sunflower). International Multidisciplinary Research Journal 5: 6-15 Sahin U,
• Kiziloglu F M, Anapali O & Okuroglu M (2007). Determining crop and pan coefficients for sugar beet and potato crops under cool season semiarid climatic conditions. Journal of Agronomy Crop Science 193(2): 146-152
• Scott H D (2000). Soil-plant-water relations. Soil physics. Agricultural and environmental applications. Iowa State University, 2121 South State Avenue, Ames, Iowa, pp. 322-355
• Skoric D (2009). Sunflower breeding for resistance to abiotic stresses. Helia 32(50): 1-16 Testi L, Goldhamer D & Iniesta F (2008). Crop water stress index is a sensitive water stress indicator in pistachio trees. Irrigation Science 26: 395-405
• Tuzuner A (1990). Toprak ve Su Analiz Laboratuvarları El Kitabı, T.C. Tarim Orman ve Köyişleri Bakanlığı Köy Hizmetleri Genel Müdürlüğü, Ankara, Türkiye
• Walker G K & Hatfield J L (1979). Test of stress-degreeday concept using multiple planting dates of red kidney beans. Agronomy Journal 71: 967-971
• Zaeifizade M & Goliov R (2009). The effect of the interaction between genotypes and drought stress on the superoxide dismutase and chlorophyll content in durum wheat landraces. Turkish Journal of Biology 33(1): 1-7
• Zlatev Z, Vassilev A, Goltsev V & Popov G (2010). Drought-induced changes in chlorophyll fluorescence of young bean plants. Agriculture Science 2(2): 75-79