Identification of Hordeum spontaneum Genotypes Resistant to Net Blotch Disease

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 25 Sayı: 1, 115 - 122, 13.03.2019

Arzu Çelik Oğuz , Aziz Karakaya , Rukiye Murat Duran Kürşad Özbek

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.539014

Cited By: 2

Öz

Wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) is a progenitor of cultivated barley and naturally grows in Turkey. H. spontaneum genotypes possess superior characteristics for biotic and abiotic stress tolerance factors. In this study, 3 virulent Pyrenophora teres f. maculata and 3 virulent P. teres f. teres isolates were tested under greenhouse conditions in order to find net blotch resistant H. spontaneum genotypes. A total of 104 H. spontaneum genotypes were used. Twenty-six H. spontaneum genotypes which corresponded to 25% of the genotypes (genotypes numbered 8, 13, 14, 16, 22, 24, 27, 31, 37, 44, 47, 54, 58, 62, 65, 66, 69, 74, 78, 81, 89, 94, 99, 102, 104 and 107) exhibited reactions classified in the resistant group to 3 virulent P. teres f. maculata isolates. Eight H. spontaneum genotypes which corresponded to 7.6% of the genotypes (genotypes numbered 24, 27, 29, 33, 44, 54, 89 and 94) exhibited reactions classified in the resistant group to 3 virulent P. teres f. teres isolates. Six H. spontaneum genotypes which corresponded to 5.7% of the genotypes (genotypes numbered 24, 27, 44, 54, 89 and 94) exhibited reactions in the resistant group to both 6 virulent P. teres f. teres and P. teres f. maculata isolates. In addition, a considerable number of genotypes exhibited resistant group reactions to one or two isolates of both forms of the pathogen. These genotypes could be used for developing net blotch resistant barley cultivars. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Barley, Disease resistance, Hordeum spontaneum, Net Blotch, Pyrenophora teres

Kaynakça

• Afanasenko OS, Makarova IG & Zubkovich AA (2000). Inheritance of resistance to different Pyrenophora teres Dreschs. strains in barley accession CI 5791. In: Logue S. (ed.). Proceedings of 8th International Barley Genetics Symposium, Adelaide, 2000: 73-75.
• Aktaş H (1995). Reaction of Turkish and German barley varieties and lines to the virulent strain T4 of Pyrenophora teres. Rachis, 14: 9-13.
• Alleweldt G (1987). The contribution of grapevine breeding to integrated pest control. In: Cavalloro R. (ed.). Integrated Pest Control in Viticulture, pp. 369-377. A.A. Balkema, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
• Ceccarelli S & Grando S (2000). Barley landraces from the Fertile Crescent. A lesson for plant breeders. InGenes in the field, On –farm conservation of crop diversity. (Brush, S. B. ed.)., pp. 51-76. Int. Plant Gen. Res. Institute, International Developmet Research Center, Lewis Publishers, Boca Raton, London, New York, Washington, D.C.
• Çelik E & Karakaya A. (2017). Yabani arpa (Hordeum spontaneum) ve hastalıklara dayanıklılık. Mustafa Kemal Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, 22: 65-86.
• Çelik Oğuz A (2015). Determination of the pathotypes of Pyrenophora teres in Turkey and assessment of the reactions of some barley landraces and wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) populations to net blotch. Ph. D. Thesis. Ankara University, Turkey, Graduate School of Natural and Applied Sciences (In Turkish).
• Çelik Oğuz A, Karakaya A, Duran RM & Özbek K. (2017). Net blotch resistant Hordeum spontaneum genotypes identified. 2017. International Workshop Plant Health: Challenges and Solutions Poster Abstracts 23-28 April, 2017 Antalya, Turkey
• Douiyssi A, Rasmusson DC & Roelfs AP (1998). Responses of barley cultivars and lines to isolates of Pyrenophora teres. Plant Disease, 82: 316-321.
• Ellis RP, Forster BP, Robinson D, Handley LL, Gordon DC, Russell JR & Powell W (2000). Wild barley: a source of genes for crop improvement in the 21st century?. J. Exp. Bot., 51(342): 9-17.
• Fetch, Jr, TG, Steffenson BJ & Nevo E (2003). Diversity and sources of multiple disease resistance in Hordeum spontaneum. Plant Disease, 87:1439-1448.
• Jakob SS, Rödder D, Engler JO, Shaaf S, Özkan H, Blattner FR & Kilian B (2014). Evolutionary history of wild barley (Hordeum vulgare subsp. spontaneum) analyzed using multilocus sequence data and paleodistribution modeling. Genome Biol. Evol. 6:685–702.
• Jana S & Bailey KL (1995). Responses of wild and cultivated barley from West Asia to net blotch and spot blotch. Crop Science, 35: 242-246.
• Karakaya A & Akyol A (2006). Determination of the seedling reactions of some Turkish barley cultivars to the net blotch. Plant Pathol. J., 5: 113-114.
• Karakaya A, Mert Z, Çelik Oğuz A, Azamparsa M. R, Çelik E, Akan K & Çetin L (2014). Current status of scald and net blotch diseases of barley in Turkey. IWBLD – 1st International Workshop on Barley Leaf Diseases, Salsomaggiore Terme, Italy, June 3-6, 2014.
• Karakaya A, Mert Z, Çelik Oğuz A, Ertaş MN & Karagöz A (2016). Determination of the diseases occurring on naturally growing wild barley (Hordeum spontaneum) field populations. Works of the Fac. of Agric. and Food Sci., University of Sarajevo 61, 66/1: 291-295.
• Kopahnke D (1998). Evalution of barley for resistance to Drechslera teres (Sacc.) Shoem. Beiträge zur Züchtungsforschung-Bundesansalt für Züchtungsforschung an Kulturpflanzen 4:1-3.
• Kün E (1996). Tahıllar-1 (Serin İklim Tahılları). Ankara Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Yayınları, Yayın No:1451. Ankara.
• Liu Z, Ellwood SR, Oliver RP & Friesen TL (2011). Pyrenophora teres: profile of an increasingly damaging barley pathogen. Mol. Plant Pathol., 12: 1-19.
• Mathre DE (ed.) (1982). Compendium of Barley Diseases. APS Press. Minnesota,78 pp.
• Nevo E (1992). Origin, evolution, population genetics and resources for breeding of wild barley, Hordeum spontaneum, in the Fertile Crescent. In: Shewry, P. R. (ed.). Barley: genetics, biochemistry, molecular biology and biotechnology, pp. 19-43. C.A.B. International. UK.
• Nevo E (2012). Evolution of wild barley and barley improvement. In: Advance in Barley Sciences. C. Li, G. Zhang, X. Liu and J. Eglinton (eds.). Proceedings of 11thInt. Barley Genetics Symposium. Zhejiang University Press- Springer, pp. 1-16.
• Nevo E, Beiles A, Zohary D (1986). Genetic resources of wild barley in the Near East: structure, evolution and application in breeding. Biological Journal of the Linnean Society, 24: 355–380.
• Sato K & Takeda K (1997). Net blotch resistance in wild species of Hordeum. Euphytica, 95:179-185.
• Shipton WA, Khan TN & Boyd WJR (1973). Net blotch of barley. Rev. Plant Pathol., 52: 269-290.
• Taşkoparan H & Karakaya A (2009). Assessment of the seedling reactions of some barley cultivars to Drechslera teres f. maculata. Selçuk Tarım ve Gıda Bilimleri Dergisi, 23(50): 60-62.
• Tekauz A (1985). A numerical scale to classify reactions of barley to Pyrenophora teres. Can. J. Plant Pathol.,7:181-183.
• Usta P, Karakaya A, Çelik Oğuz A, Mert Z, Akan K & Çetin L (2014). Determination of the seedling reactions of twenty barley cultivars to six isolates of Drechslera teres f. maculata. Anadolu Tarım Bilimleri Dergisi, 29: 20-25.
• Vavilov NI (1951). The origin, variation, immunity and breeding of cultivated plants, (translated from the Russian by K. S. Chester). Chronica Botanica; New York: Stechert-Hafner.
• Yazıcı B, Karakaya A, Çelik Oğuz A & Mert Z (2015). Determination of the seedling reactions of some barley cultivars to Drechslera teres f. teres. Bitki Koruma Bülteni, 55: 239-245.
• Yitbarek S, Berhane L, Fikadu A, Van Leur JAG, Grando S & Ceccarelli S (1998). Variation in Ethiopian barley landrace populations for resistance to barley leaf scald and net blotch, Plant Breed., 117: 419-423.
• Zadoks JC, Chang TT & Konzak CF (1974). A decimal code for the growth stages of cereals, Weed Res., 14: 415- 421.