Spectroscopic Characterisation and Elemental Composition of Biochars Obtained from Different Agricultural Wastes

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 4, 426 - 435, 04.12.2021

Muhittin Onur Akça , Sonay Sozudogru Ok , Kıymet Deniz Abdoelbage Mohammedelnour , Mümtaz Kibar

https://doi.org/10.15832/ankutbd.623876

Cited By: 2

Öz

The use of biochar (BC) has an environmental importance in terms of climate change, soil fertility, waste management and energy generation. The purpose of this study was to reveal some of the structural characteristics of BC produced from agricultural wastes by employing spectroscopic techniques within a short time frame. The BCs were produced via slow pyrolysis at 300 °C from four feedstocks: tea waste (TW), hazelnut husk (HH), rice husk (RH) and poultry litter (PL). The pH of plant-derived BC was alkaline (pH: 7-9), and the pH of manure-derived BC was strongly alkaline (pH: 10.1). PLBC has the highest (4.67 dS m-1) electrical conductivity (EC) when compared to other BC materials. According to the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis method, organic compound contents of TWBC and HSBC were found to be higher than the other two BCs, while the other two BCs (RHBC and PLBC) were richer in mineral content. TWBC and HHBC were composed of more mineral elements when compared to RHBC and PLBC, but the latter two were still rich in minerals. The surface area of RHBC was found higher (12.9 m2 g-1) than other BC materials. According to the X-ray fluorescence (XRF) analysis method, the total element content of PLBC was found higher than the other BCs. In addition, the silicon (Si) content of RHBC was considerably higher (16.4%). In PLBC’s XRD diagram: quartz (SiO2) at 3.41 (Å); calcite (CaCO3) at 3.96, 2.94 and 1.91 (Å); sylvine (KCl) at 3.06 and 1.85 (Å); and whitlockite ([Ca, Mg]3 [PO4]2) at 2.78 and 2.17 (Å) were found. In HHBC and RHBC diagrams, partially crystallized carbon (CryC) peaks were mainly observed between 1.20 and 2.34 (Å), and cristobalite peaks (i.e., amorphous SiO2) were observed at 3.91 and 3.40 (Å).

Anahtar Kelimeler

Biochar, Plant nutrients, XRD and XRF Spectroscopy, Spectroscopic characterisation

Kaynakça

• Ahmad F, Khan AU & Yasar A (2013). Transesterification of oil extracted from different species of algae for biodiesel production. Afr. J Environ Sci Technol. 7 (6):358-64.
• Al-Wabel M I, Al-Omran A, El-Naggar A H, Nadeem M & Usman ARA (2013). Pyrolysis temperature-induced changes in characteristics and chemical composition of biochar produced from Conocarpus wastes. Bioresour. Technol. 131:374–379.
• Armynah Bidayatul et al. (2018). Analysis of Chemical and Physical Properties of Biochar from Rice Husk Biomass." Journal of Physics: Conference Series. Vol. 979. No. 1. IOP Publishing.
• Beesley L, Moreno-Jimenez E, Gomez-Eyles J L, Harris E, Robinson B & Sizmur T (2011). A review of biochars’ potential role in the remediation, revegetation, and restoration of contaminated soils. Environ Pollut 159: 474-480.
• Bintaş E, Bozkurt M, Küçükyılmaz K, Konak R, Çınar M, Akşit H, Seyrek S & Çatlı A U (2014). Efficacy of Supplemental Natural Zeolite in Broiler Chickens Subjected to Dietary Calcium Deficiency. Italian Journal of Animal Science 13:3141, 275-283.
• Bremner J M (1965). Total nitrogen. Agronomy 9:1149-78.
• Cabrera A, Cox L, Spokas K A, Celis R, Hermosín M C, Cornejo J & Koskinen W C (2011). Comparative sorption and leaching study of the herbicides fluometuron and 4- chloro-2 methylphenoxyacetic acid (MCPA) in a soil amended with biochars and other sorbents. J. Agri. Food Chem 14, 12550–12560.
• Chan K Y, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A & Joseph S (2007). Agronomic values of greenwaste biochar as a soil amendment. Aust. J. Soil Res 45, 629–634.
• Chan K Y & Xu Z (2009). Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S, editors. Biochar for Environmental Management Science and Technology. Earthscan, London; p. 67–8.
• Clemente J S, Beauchemin S, Thibault Y, MacKinnon T & Smith D (2018). Differentiating Inorganics in Biochars Produced at Commercial Scale Using Principal Component Analysis. ACS Omega 3, 6931−6944.
• Downie A, Crosky A & Munroe P (2009). Physical properties of biochar. In ‘Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology’. (Eds J Lehmann, S Joseph) pp. 13−32. (Earthscan, London, UK).
• Enders A, Hanley K, Whitman T, Joseph S, Lehmann J (2012). Characterization of biochars to evaluate recalcitrance and agronomic performance. Bioresour Technol 1,114:644.
• Evans M R, Jackson B R, Popp M & Sadaka S (2017). Chemical Properties of Biochar Materials Manufactured from Agricultural Products Common to the Southeast United States. HortTecnology 27(1).
• Fang Z & Xu C B (2014). Near-critical and supercritical water and their applications for biorefineries. Dordrecht: Springer.
• Glaser B, Parr M, Braun C & Kopolo G (2009). Biochar is carbon negative. Nat. Geosci. 2(1), 2.
• Gunarathne V, Mayakaduwa S & Vithanage M (2017). Biochar’s Influence as a Soil Amendment for Essential Plant Nutrient Uptake. In: Naeem M., Ansari., Gill S. (eds) Eseential Plant Nutrients. Springer, Cham.
• Güllü B & Kadıoğlu Y K (2017). Use of tourmaline as a potential petrogenetic indicator in the determination of host magma: CRS, XRD, and PED-XRF methods. Spectrochimica Acta Part A: Molecular and Biomolecular Spectroscopy 183, 68–74.
• Jassal R S, Johnson M S, Molodovskaya M, Black T A, Jollymore A & Sveinson K (2015). Nitrogen enrichment potential of biochar in relation to pyrolysis temperature and feedstock quality. J Environ Manage 1;152:140-4.
• Kadıoğlu Y K, Üstündağ Z, Deniz K, Yenikaya C & Erdoğan Y (2009). XRF and Raman Characterization of Antimonite. Instrumentation Science and Technology, 37, 683-696.
• Keiluweit M, Nico P S, Johnson M G & Kleber M (2010). Dynamic molecular structure of plant biomass-derived black carbon (biochar). Environmental Science & Technology 44, 1247–1253.
• Koralay T (2010). Petrographic and geochemical characteristics of upper Miocene Tekkedag volcanic (CentralAnatolia—Turkey). Chemie der Erde 70, 335–351.
• Kuo S (1996) Phosphorus. In: Sparks, D.L., Ed., Methods of Soil Analysis: Part 3, SSSA Book Series No. 5, SSSA and ASA, Madison, 869-919.
• Lehman, J., Gaunt, J., and Rondon, M. 2006. Biochar sequestration in terrestial ecosystems. A review. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 11(2), 403–427.
• Lehmann J & Joseph S (2015). Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Biochar for environmental management: science, technology and implementation. Taylor and Francis, London, pp 1–13.
• Nakka S B R (2015). Biocharculture: Biochar for environment and development. ASIN: B01FJUPYCO.
• Ogawa M, Okimori Y & Takahashi F (2006). Carbon sequestration by carbonization of biomass and forestation: Three case studies. Mitig. Adapt. Strateg. Glob. Change 11, 429–444.
• Prakongkep N, Gilkes R J & Wanpen W (2015). Forms and solubility of plant nutrient elements in tropical plant waste biochars. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science, 178 (5).
• Qadeer R, Hanif J. Saleem M & Afzal M (1994). Characterization of activated-charcoal. J. Chem. Soc. Pak 16 (4) 229-235.
• Rayment G E & Higginson F R (1992). Australian Laboratory Handbook of Soil and Water Chemical Method. Reed International Books Australia P/L, Trading as Inkata Press, Port Melbourne, 330 p.
• Scott H, Ponsonby D J & Atkinson C J (2014). Biochar: An improver of nutrient and soil water availability-what is the evidence? CAB Reviews 9, No. 01. CAB Reviews Perspectives in Agriculture Veterinary Science Nutrition and Natural Resources 9 DOI: 10.1079/PAVSNNR20149019.
• Sikder S & Joardar J C (2019). Biochar production from poultry litter as management approach and effects on plant growth. Int J Recycl Org Waste Agricult 8:47.
• Tamai K & Feng Ma J (2003). Characterization of silicon uptake by rice roots. New Phytologist 158 (3), 431-436.
• Tang J, Zhu W, Kookana R & Katayama A (2013). Characteristics of biochar and its application in remediation of contaminated soil. J Biosci Bioeng 116 (6):653-9.
• Verheijen F, Jeffery S, Bastos A C, van der Velde M & Diafas F (2010). Biochar application to soils. A critical scientific review of effects on soil properties, processes, and functions. EUR 24099 EN Office for the Official Publications of the European Communities, Luxembourg, p 149.
• Wilding L P, R E. Brown & N Holowaychuk (1967). Accessibility and Properties of Occluded Carbon in Biogenic Opal. Soil Science, 103, 56‐61.
• Zhao B & Nartey O D (2014). Characterization and evaluation of biocharss derived from agricultural waste biomass from Gansu, China *, the 2014 world congress on Advances on civil, environmental, and materials research (ACEM 14), Busan, Korea, August, 24-28, 2014.