Practical and Estimated Efficiencies of Solar Photovoltaic Power Plants

Yıl 2025, Cilt: 8 Sayı: 1, 225 - 233, 15.01.2025

Turhan Koyuncu , Fuat Lüle

https://doi.org/10.34248/bsengineering.1571843

Öz

Practical and estimated efficiencies of three (A, B and C) solar photovoltaic power plants (SPVPs) has been determined in this paper. Each of this SPVPs mainly has steel frame constructions for panel placing, polycrystalline silicon type solar PV (photovoltaic) panels, combinations of MPPT (maximum power point tracker) + inverter boxes, collecting busbar, transformer boxes, distributor busbar, kWh meter (output counter), underground cable line and mechanical components for external grid connection, control building, lighting and camera monitoring system. Selected SPVPs were installed in location of Adıyaman City, Türkiye (Latitude: 37.45°, Longitude: 38.17° and Altitude: 672 m), in 2017. Installed power capacity per SPVP is 1.025 MW. The results of the work showed us that the first year average electric energy production is 1691642 kWh and average practical and estimated efficiencies are 15.00% and 14.783%, respectively.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Solar PV plant, Practical efficiency, Estimated efficiency

Etik Beyan

Ethics committee approval was not required for this study because of there was no study on animals or humans.

Kaynakça

• Aliman O, Daut I, Isa M, Adzman MR. 2007. Simplification of sun tracking mode to gain high concentration solar energy. Amer J Appl Sci, 4(3): 171-175. https://doi.org/10.3844/ajassp.2007.171.175
• Anonymous. 2019. T.C. Çevre, Şehircilik ve İklim Değişikliği Bakanlığı, Meteo. Gen. Müd., URL: https://www.mgm.gov.tr/kurumici/radyasyon_iller.aspx?il=adiyaman (accessed date: May 15, 2024).
• Costa SCC, Diniz ASAC, Kazmerski LL. 2016. Dust and soiling issues and impacts relating to solar energy systems: Literature review update for 2012–2015. Renew Sustain Ener Rev, 63: 33-61.
• Darwish ZA, Kazem HA, Sopian K, Al-Goul MA, Alawadhi H. 2015. Effect of dust pollutant type on photovoltaic performance. Renew Sustain Ener Rev, 41: 735-744.
• Goura R. 2015. Analyzing the on-field performance of a 1-Megawatt-Grid-Tied PV system in south India. Int J Sustain Ener, 34(1): 1-9.
• Ketjoy N, Konyu M. 2014. Study of dust effect on photovoltaic module for photovoltaic power plant. Ener Proced, 52: 431-437.
• Koyuncu T. 2017. Practical efficiency of photovoltaic panel used for solar vehicles. 2nd Int Conf on Green Energy Tech (ICGET 2017), July 18-20, Rome, Italy, pp: 48.
• Kumar BS, Sudhakar K. 2015. Performance evaluation of 10 MW Grid connected solar photovoltaic power plant in India. Ener Rep, 1: 184-192.
• Kumar ES, Sarkar B, Behera DK. 2013. Soiling and dust impact on the efficiency and the maximum power point in the photovoltaic modules. Int J Eng Res Technol, 2(2): 1-8.
• Maghami MR, Hizam H, Gomes C, Radzi MA, Rezadad MI, Hajighorbani S. 2016. Power loss due to soiling on solar panel: A review. Renew Sustain Ener Rev, 59: 1307-1316.
• Menoufi K, Farghal HF, Farghali AA, Khedr MH. 2017. Dust accumulation on photovoltaic panels: A case study at the east bank of the Nile (Beni-Suef, Egypt). Ener Proced, 128: 24-31.
• Shukla AK, Sudhakar K, Baredar P. 2016. Simulation and performance analysis of 110 kWp grid-connected photovoltaic system for residential building in India: A comparative analysis of various PV technology. Ener Rep, 2: 82-88.