Soğuk Savaş Sonrası Dünyada BM Tarafından Yetkilendirilmiş İnsani Müdahaleler Üzerine Neo-Realist Bir Örnek Olay İncelemesi

Yıl 2017, Cilt: 19 Sayı: 2, 615 - 632, 08.09.2017

Şahin Eray Kırdım

Öz

Uluslararası ilişkilerdeki neo-realist teorinin önerdiği
üzere, uluslararası politik sistem anarşik bir görünüm arz eder. Diğer bir
değişle, egemen eşitler arasında üst bir otorite olmadığı için, devletler genel
olarak kendi kendine yetme motivasyonu ile hareket ederek, kendi çıkarlarını
maksimize etmeye çalışırlar. 21. yüzyılda insan haklarına verilen önemin
artmasıyla beraber, uluslararası sistemde Westfalyan anlayış yerini, devletlerin
insan hakları ihlalleri söz konusu olduğunda birbirlerinin içişlerine müdahale
ettiği bir anlayışa bırakmıştır. Bu müdahalenin en uç uygulaması ise insani
müdahaledir. Ancak, Soğuk Savaş sonrası insani müdahale uygulamaları
incelendiğinde, devletlerin savaşa girmeleri için yalnızca özgecil
motivasyonların tek başına yeterli olmadığı, bununla beraber kendi çıkarlarını
önceleyebildikleri, dolayısıyla neo-realist teorinin hala geçerliliğini
koruduğu görülür.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neo-realist teori, İnsani müdahale, İnsan hakları

A Neo-Realist Case Study of U.N.-Authorized Humanitarian Interventions in The Post-Cold War World

Öz

As the
Neo-realist theory in international relations suggests, international political
system presents an anarchic environment. In other words, since there is no
formally recognized supreme authority among equally sovereign units, states
generally act in “self-help” to maximize their national interests. However, due
to ever-increasing importance of human rights issues in the 21^st
century, the Westphalian understanding of state sovereignty in international
affairs has gradually eroded and turned into a new one in which states
intervene in each other’s domestic jurisdictions especially regarding human
rights issues. The extremist practice of this intervention is humanitarian
interventions. However, when the practice of humanitarian intervention after
the Cold War is examined, it is seen that not only altruistic motives were
effective for states, but they also aimed at maximizing their self-interest and
that the main concept of the neo-realist theory is still valid. 

Anahtar Kelimeler

Neo-realist theory, Humanitarian intervention, Human rights

Kaynakça

• 2005 World Summit Outcome, G.A. Res. 60/1, U.N. Doc. A/RES/60/1 (Oct. 24. 2005).
• ABIEW, F. K. (1999). The Evolution of the Doctrine and Practice of Humanitarian Intervention, Kluwer Law International, The Netherland.
• AREND, Anthony Clark. (1993). “The United Nations and the New World Order”, Georgetown Law Journal, Vol. 81, Issue 3 pp. 491-534.
• ASH, T. G. (1993). In Europe's Name: Germany and the Divided Continent, Random House, New York.
• Ban, Ki-moon. (2011). Statement by the Secretary-General on Libya, http://www.un.org/sg/statements/?nid=5145.
• BAUM, Matthew A. (2004). “How Public Opinion Constrains the Use of Force: The Case of Operation Restore Hope”, Presidential Studies Quarterly, Vol. 34, Issue 2, pp. 187-226.
• BENJAMIN, Barry M. (1992). “Unilateral Humanitarian Intervention: Legalizing the Use of Force to Prevent Human Rights Atrocities”, Fordham International Law Journal 16(1), pp. 120-158.
• BLAKLEY, Mike. (1999). “Haiti”, The Costs of Conflict: Prevention and Cure in the Global Arena, (Ed.) Michael E. Brown and Richard N. Rosecrance, Rowman & Littlefield, USA, pp. 91-108.
• CLARK, Jeffrey. (1993). “Debacle in Somalia”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 72, Issue 1, pp. 109-123.
• DATTA, Sujit. (2014). “Humanitarian Military Intervention in Kosovo and Libya: An Assessment on Relevant Theories of International Relations”, European Scientific Journal, Special Edition, May 2014, pp. 381-388.
• DES FORGES, A. (1999). Leave None to Tell the Story Genocide in Rwanda, Human Rights Watch, USA.
• DIPRIZIO, R.C. (2002). Armed Humanitarians: U.S. Interventions from Northern Iraq To Kosovo, Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore.
• DONNELLY, J. (2000). Realism and International Relations, University Press, Cambridge.
• DUFFIELD, John S. (1994). “NATO's Functions after the Cold War”, Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 109, Issue 5, pp. 763-787.
• EVANS, Gareth. (2011). “Interview: The R2P Balance Sheet after Libya”, The Responsibility to Protect: Challenges & Opportunities in Light of the Libyan Intervention, e-International Relations, http://www.e-ir.info/wp-content/uploads/R2P.pdf, pp. 34-42.
• FALK, Richard. (1995). “The Haiti Intervention: A Dangerous World Order Precedent for the United Nations”, Harvard International Law Journal, Vol. 26, Issue 2, 341-358.
• FINEMAN, Mark. (1993). “The Oil Factor in Somalia”, http://articles.latimes.com/1993-01-18/news/mn-1337_1_oil-reserves (01.09.2016).
• G.A. Res 46/7, U.N. Doc. A/RES/46/7 (1991).
• GARWOOD-GOWERS, Andrew. (2013). “The Responsibility to Protect and The Arab Spring: Libya as The Exception, Syria as The Norm?”, University of New South Wales Law Journal, Vol. 36, Issue 2, pp. 594-618.
• GEGOUT, Catherine. (2005). “Causes and Consequences of the EU's Military Intervention in the Democratic Republic of Congo: A Realist Explanation”, European Foreign Affairs Review, Vol. 10, pp. 427-443.
• GIBBS, David N. (2002). “The Case of Somalia”, Global Society in Transition: An International Politics Reader, (Ed.) Saniel N. Nelson and Laura Neack, Kluwer Law International, The Netherland, pp. 371-385.
• GORDON, Ruth E. (1996). “Humanitarian Intervention by the United Nations: Iraq, Somalia, and Haiti”, 31 Texas International Law Journal, Vol. 31, Issue 1, pp. 43-56.
• GOW, James. (1997). “Partnership and Periphery, Empirical and Incremental: European Strategic Rationales”, The Role of European Ground and Air Forces After the Cold War, (Ed.) Gert De Nooy, Kluwer Law International, The Netherland, pp. 9-28.
• HAVEL, Vaclav. (1999). “Kosovo and the End of the Nation-State”, New York Review of Books, June 10, 1999 Issue, pp.4-6.
• HOLZGREFE, J. L. (2003). “Humanitarian Intervention Debate”, Humanitarian Intervention: Ethical, Legal and Political Dilemmas, (Ed.) J.L. Holzgrefe and Robert O. Keohane, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 15-52.
• JAKOBSEN, Peter V. (1996). “National Interest, Humanitarianism or CNN: What Triggers UN Peace Enforcement After the Cold War?”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, Issue 2, pp. 205215.
• KAUFMAN, J. P. (2002). NATO and the Former Yugoslavia: Crisis, Conflict, and the Atlantic Alliance, Rowman & Littlefield, USA. KAZIANIS, Harry. (2011). “Intervention in Libya: Example of “R2P” or Classic Realism?”, e-International Relations, available at: http://www.e-ir.info/2011/06/06/intervention-in-libya-example-of-%E2%80%9Cr2p%E2%80%9D-or-classic-realism/.
• The Kosovo Report: Conflict International Response, Lessons Learned. 2000. The Independent International Commission on Kosovo.
• KRIEG, A. (2013). Motivations for Humanitarian Intervention: Theoretical and Empirical Considerations, Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht.
• LACHICA, Alan A. (2011). “Humanitarian Intervention in East Timor: An Analysis of Australia’s Leadership Role”, Peace and Conflict Review, Vol. 5, Issue 2, 1-11.
• LECCE, Major D.J. (1998). “International Law Regarding Prodemocratic Intervention: A Study of the Dominican Republic and Haiti”, Naval Law Review, Vol. 45, pp. 247-262.
• Letter dated 20 June 1994 From the Permanent Representative of France to the United Nations Addressed to the Secretary-General, U.N. SCOR, 48th Sess., U.N. Doc. S/1994/734 (1994).
• MALANCZUK, P. (1993). Humanitarian Intervention and the Legitimacy of the Use of Force, Het Spinhuis, Amsterdam.
• MCQUEEN, C. (2006). Humanitarian Intervention and Safety Zones: Iraq, Bosnia and Rwanda, Palgrave Macmillan.
• MORGENTHAU, Hans J. (1967). “To Intervene or Not to Intervene”, Foreign Affairs, Vol. 45, Issue 3, pp. 425-436.
• MURPHY, S. D. (1996), Humanitarian Intervention: The United Nations in an Evolving World Order, University of Pennsylvania Press, Pennsylvania.
• NAFZIGER, James A.R. (1991). “Self-Determination and Humanitarian Intervention in a Community of Power”, Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 9-39.
• NANDA, Ved P. (1992). “Tragedies in Northern Iraq, Liberia, Yugoslavia, and Haiti - Revisiting the Validity of Humanitarian Intervention under International Law”, 20 Denver Journal of International Law and Policy, Vol. 20, pp. 305-334.
• International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty, The Responsibility to Protect (Dec. 2001a), retrieved from http://responsibilitytoprotect.org/ICISS%20Report.pdf, accessed on 08.12.2015.
• PEREZ, Ruth E. P. (2015). “Beyond Good Intentions. The Role of Self-Interest in Humanitarian Interventions. Looking back to the Australian Intervention in East Timor”, México y la Cuenca del Pacífico, Vol. 4, Issue 10, pp. 21-46.
• The American Presidency Project. (September 15, 1994). President Clinton, Address to the Nation on Haiti, retrieved from http://www.presidency.ucsb.edu/ws/?pid=49093, accessed on 05.08.2016).
• PRUNIER, G. (1995). The Rwanda Crisis: History of a Genocide, Columbia University Press, New York.
• Public Papers of the Presidents of the United States: William J. Clinton 219 (January 1 to July 31, 1994).
• Report of the Secretary-General on the Situation in Rwanda (1994). U.N. SCOR, 49th Sess., U.N. Doc. S/1994/640. S.C. Res. 1264, U.N. Doc. S/RES/2164 (Sep. 15, 1999).
• S.C. Res. 1484, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1484 (May 30, 2003).
• S.C. Res. 1970, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1970 (Feb. 26, 2011).
• S.C. Res. 1973, U.N. Doc. S/RES/1973 (March 17, 2011).
• S.C. Res. 770, U.N. Doc. S/RES/770 (Aug. 13, 1992).
• S.C. Res. 781, U.N. Doc. S/RES/781 (Oct. 9, 1992).
• S.C. Res. 794, U.N. Doc. S/RES/794 (Dec. 3, 1992).
• S.C. Res. 816, U.N. Doc. S/RES/816 (Mar. 31, 1993).
• S.C. Res. 841, U.N. SCOR, 48th Sess., 3238th mtg., at 3, U.N. Doc. SIRES/841 (1993).
• S.C. Res. 873, U.N. SCOR, 48th Sess., 3291st mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/873 (1993).
• S.C. Res. 875, U.N. SCOR, 48th Sess., 3293d mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/875 (1993).
• S.C. Res. 929, U.N. Doc. S/RES/929 (Jun. 22, 1994)
• S.C. Res. 940, U.N. SCOR, 49th Sess., 3413th mtg., U.N. Doc. S/RES/940 (Jul. 31, 1994).
• SEYBOLT, T. B. (2008). Humanitarian Military Intervention: The Conditions for Success and Failure, Oxford University Press, New York. SILOVE D. (1999). “Health and Human Rights of the East Timorese”, Lancet. Vol. 353, Issue 9169), p. 2067.
• STEIN, Mark. (2004). “Unauthorized Humanitarian Intervention”, Social Philosophy and Policy, Vol. 21, Issue 1, pp. 14–38.
• TESON, Fernando R. (1996). “Collective Humanitarian Intervention”, Michigan Journal of International Law, Vol. 17, pp. 323-370.
• TESON, Fernando, R. (1997, 2nd edition). Humanitarian Intervention: An Inquiry into Law and Morality, Transnational, New York.
• Thakur, Ramesh. (2011). “Libya and the Responsibility to Protect: Between Opportunistic Humanitarianism and Value-Free Pragmatism”, Security Challenges, Vol. 7, Issue 4, pp. 13-25
• UN Doc S/PV.6498, UN Security Council Meeting, 2011.
• VERWEY, W.D. (1985) “Humanitarian Intervention Under International Law”, Netherlands International Law Review, Vol. 32, Issue 3), pp. 357–418.
• VINCENT, R. J. (186). Human Rights and International Relations, The University Press, Cambridge.
• WALTZ, Kenneth. (1979). Theory of International Politics, Addison-Wesley Pub. Co., Reading.
• WALTZ, Kenneth. (2001). Man, the State, and War: A Theoretical Analysis, Columbia Press, New York.
• WALTZ, Kenneth. (2004). “Neorealism: Confusions and Criticisms”, Journal of Politics & Society, Vol. 15, pp. 2-6.
• WALZER, M. (1977, 4th ed.). Just and Unjust Wars: A Moral Argument with Historical Illustration, Basic Books, New York.
• WHEELER, N. (2002). Saving Strangers: Humanitarian Intervention in International Society, Oxford University Press, New York.
• WHEELER, N., DUNNE, T. (2001). “East Timor and the New Humanitarian Interventionism”, International Affairs, Vol. 77, Issue 4, pp. 805-827.
• WHEELER, Nicholas and BELLAMY, Alex (2008). “Humanitarian Intervention in World Politics”, The Globalization of World Politics, (Ed.) John Baylis, Steve Smith and Patricia Owens, Oxford University Press, Newyork, 510-527.
• YOSHIDA, Yuki. (2013). “A Theoretical Assessment of Humanitarian Intervention and R2P”, available at: http://www.e-ir.info/2013/01/16/from-kosovo-to-libya-theoretical-assessment-of-humanitarian-intervention-and-the-responsibility-to-protect/.