Comparison of Principals’ Discourses, Behaviors, and Practices towards the Students in terms of Values Education: Turkey and The US Sample

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 7 Sayı: 15, 555 - 567, 21.10.2023

Bilgen Kıral

https://doi.org/10.31458/iejes.1311914

Öz

The research was carried out to reveal the discourses, behaviors, and practices of principals working in middle schools in Turkey and Ohio, the US, evaluate them in terms of values education, and compare the two countries. The study is a case study design, one of the qualitative research designs. The research was carried out in two phases, the first phase was in Turkey in 2018-2019 and the second phase was in the US between 2020 and 2022. Totally 24 teachers participated in both countries (12 Turkey and 12 US). As a result of the research, it was found that there are some similarities and differences between the two countries; some suggestions are given according to the research findings. Chromebooks and free lunch can be provided to students by the Turkish Ministry of National Education, and principals in Turkey can communicate more with students by spending their lunches and breaks.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Principal, student, value, discourse, behavior

Etik Beyan

Ethical approval and written permission for this study were obtained from the Social and Human Sciences Scientific Research and Publication Ethics Committee of Aydın Adnan Menderes University with the decision dated 19/09/2020 and numbered 48692.

Destekleyen Kurum

TUBİTAK

Proje Numarası

TÜBİTAK 2219-1059B191900090

Teşekkür

This study is derived from a project supported by The Scientific and Technological Research Council of Türkiye (TÜBİTAK 2219-1059B191900090).

Kaynakça

• Açıkalın, A., Şişman, M. & Turan, S. (2007). Bir insan olarak okul müdürü [Principal as a human being]. Ankara: Pegem A.
• Aydın, M. (2010). Okulda değerler eğitimi [Values education at school]. Eğitime Bakış, 6(18), 16-19.
• Barker, A. (2011). Improve your communication skills. London: Kogan.
• Berkowitz, M. W. & Bier, M. (2005). What works in character education. www.character.org. Retrieved date: 10.11.2018
• Bursalıoğlu, Z. (2010). Okul yönetiminde yeni yapı ve davranış [New structure and behavior in the school administration]. Ankara: PegemA.
• Creswell, J. W. (2007). Qualitative inquiry & research design. Thousand Oaks, Califormia: Sage
• Davidson, L. & Stokes, L. C. (2001). Educators perceptions of character education. https://eric.ed.gov/?id=ED461923. Retrieved date: 11.04.22
• Demmon, T., Rice, J. & Warble, D. (1996). Moral and character development in public education. http://Eric.ed.gov/?İd = ED409251. Retrieved date: 11.04.22
• Doring, A., Schwartz, S., Cieciuch, J., Groenen, P., Glatzel, V., Harasimczuk, J., Janowicz, N., Nyagolova, M., … & Bilsky, W. (2015). Cross-cultural evidence of value structures and priorities in childhood. British Journal of Psychology, 675-699.
• Duer, M., Parisi, A., & Valintis, M. (2002). Character education effectiveness (Unpublished project). Saint Xavier University.
• Ekşi, H. & Okudan, A. (2011). Eğitim yöneticilerinin bakış açısı ile değerler eğitimi [Values education from the perspective of education administrators]. Türk Fen Eğitimi Dergisi, 8(2), 178-190.
• Fidan, M. (2013). Öğretmen algılarına göre ilköğretim kurumlarında yöneticilerin iletişim becerileri ve örgütsel değerler arasındaki ilişki [The relationship between primary education institutions administrators' communications skills and organisational values: The perceptions of teachers] (Unpublished master thesis). Atatürk University.
• Fidan, M. & Küçükali, R. (2014). İlköğretim kurumlarında yöneticilerin iletişim becerileri ve örgütsel değerler [Communication skills and organizational values of administrators in primary education institutions]. Eğitim Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 4(1), 317-334.
• Finegan, J. (2000). The impact of person and organizational values on organizational commitment. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 73, 149-169.
• Glesne, C. (2012). Nitel araştırmaya giriş [Introduction to qualitative research]. A. Ersoy & P. Yalçınoğlu (Trs.). Ankara: Anı Pub.
• Gümüş, E. (2012). Türkiye ve Amerika Birleşik Devletleri ilköğretim kurumları müdürlerinin hizmet öncesi ve hizmet ici eğitim faaliyetlerinin karşılaştırılmasına yönelik nitel bir araştırma [A qualitative study on the comparison of pre-service and in-service training activities of primary school principals in Turkey and the U. S. A.: Province of Erzurum and state of Michigan case] (Unpublished master thesis). Atatürk University.
• Gürgen, H. (1997). Örgütlerde iletisimin kalitesi [Quality of communication in organizations]. İstanbul: Der Pub. Halstead, J. M. (1996). Values and values education in schools. J. M. Halstead & M. Taylor. (Edts). Values in Education and Education in Values. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
• Halstead, J. M. & Taylor, M. (1996). Values in education and education in values. Bristol, PA: Falmer.
• Halstead, J. M. & Taylor, M. (2000). Learning and teaching about values. Cambridge Journal of Education, 30(2), 169-202.
• Illich, I. D. (2012). Okulsuz toplum [Deschooling society]. M. Ozay (Trns.). İstanbul: Şule Pub.
• Kıral, E. (2018). Kayıp giden bir değer: Saygı [A lost value: Respect]. Çağdaş Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 5(1), 4-10.
• Lee, W. & Manzon, M. (2014). Comparing values. M. Bray, B. Adamson, & M. Mason (Edts.). Comparative Education Research. Hong Kong: Springer.
• Lickona, T. (1991). Education for character. NY: Bantam.
• Lyons, S., Higgins, C. & Duxbury, L. (2010). Work values. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31, 969-1002.
• Merriam, S. M. (2009). Qualitative research. John Wiley & Sons Inc.
• Meydan, H. (2012). İlköğretim okullarında degerler ve karakter egitimi [Values and character education in primary schools] (Unpublished doctoral dissertation). Sakarya University.
• Ministry of National Education's 2019-2023 Strategic Plan. (2018). http://www.meb.gov.tr/stratejik_plan/. Retrieved date: 01.10.2021
• Mullins, L. (2005). Management and organizational behavior. England: Prentice Hall.
• National Education Council. (2021). https://ttkb.meb.gov.tr/www/gecmisten-gunumuze-mill-egitim-sralari/icerik/328. Retrieved date: 01.02.2022.
• Paker, T. (2017). Durum çalısması. F. N. Seggie & Y. Bayyurt (Trns.). Nitel arastırma yontem, teknik, analiz ve yaklasımları [Qualitative research: methods, techniques, analyses and approaches]. Ankara: Anı Pub.
• Patton, M. Q. (2014). Qualitative research and evaluation methods. M. Butun & S. B. Demir (Trns.). Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Pradhan, N. & Cropra, N. (2008). Communication skills for educational managers. India: Enclave.
• Riehl, C. (1998). We gather together. Educational Administration Quarterly, 34(1), 91-125.
• Robbins, S. (2003). Essentials of organizational behavior. United Kingdom: Prentice Hall.
• Schwartz, S. H. (1992). Universals in the content and structure of values. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 25, 1-65.
• Schwartz, S. H., & Bilsky, W. (1987). Toward a theory of the universal psychological structure of human values. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 53, 550-562.
• Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online Readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1-20.
• The Basic Law of National Education. (2019). Law number: 1739, official gazette date and number: 24/6/1973 & 14574
• Tutar, H. (2003). Orgutsel iletişim [Organizational communication]. Ankara: Seckin.
• US Department of Justice. (2020). https://www.ojjdp.gov/ojstatbb/crime/qa05101.asp. Retrieved date: 22.01.2022
• Veugelers, W. & Vedder, P. (2003). Values in teaching. Teachers and Teaching, 9(4), 377-389.
• Vurgun, L. & Öztop, S. (2011). Yönetim ve örgüt kültüründe degerlerin önemi [The importance of values in management and organizational culture]. Suleyman Demirel University Journal, 16(3), 217-230.
• Yenen, E. & Ulucan, P. (2021). Comparing preschool curricula of Turkey and Ohio in the context of value education. International Journal of Contemporary Educational Research, 8(3), 23-38.
• Yıldırım, A. & Şimşek, H. (2005). Sosyal bilimlerde nitel arastırma yöntemleri [Qualitative research methods in the social sciences]. Ankara: Seçkin.
• Zainal, Z. (2007). Case study as a research method. Journal Kemanusiaan, 9, 1-6.