GEÇMİŞTEN GÜNÜMÜZE SOSYAL KAYTARMA: BİBLİYOMETRİK BİR ANALİZ

Yıl 2022, Cilt: 5 Sayı: 2, 223 - 243, 30.12.2022

Ecem Ayaz Manğuş , Ebru Tolay

https://doi.org/10.54472/jobig.1222091

Öz

Geçmişi 1880’li yıllara kadar uzanan ve 1980’li yıllardan itibaren yoğun şekilde araştırılmaya başlanan sosyal kaytarma, takım temelli bir olgudur. Çalışmada, 40 yıldan beri incelenen bu olgu hakkındaki bilimsel makalelerin bibliyometrik analizini gerçekleştirmek ve sosyal kaytarma literatürünün geçmişten günümüze genel bir görünümünü ortaya koymak amaçlanmaktadır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, Web of Science (WoS) veri tabanında yer alan ve “social loafing (sosyal kaytarma)” terimini içeren 234 makale incelenmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda, örneklemi oluşturan makalelerin 42 yıllık bir zaman diliminde yayınlandığı ve gerek makale sayısında gerekse atıf sayısında yıllara göre genel bir artış eğilimi olduğu saptanmıştır. Karau ve Williams’ın (1993) çalışması, alandaki en etkili (en fazla atıf alan) makaledir (1051 atıf). Yeni makaleler arasında en etkili olanı ise Xu, Huang ve Robinson’a (2017) aittir. Alandaki en etkili dergi Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2567 atıf); kurum, Toledo Üniversitesi (1134 atıf); ülke ise Amerika Birleşik Devletleri’dir (6081 atıf). Sosyal kaytarma ile en sık birlikte kullanılan anahtar kelimeler motivasyon, grup dinamikleri, hazıra konma, sanal takımlar, grup çalışması ve performanstır. COVID-19 salgınının, makalelerde ele alınan konuları etkilediği; buna göre 2020 yılından önce incelenen konular ile sonrasında ele alınan konularda bir farklılaşma olduğu tespit edilmiştir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

sosyal kaytarma, bibliyometrik analiz, vosviewer, covid19

SOCIAL LOAFING FROM PAST TO PRESENT: A BIBLIOMETRIC ANALYSIS

Öz

Social loafing is a team-based phenomenon that dates back to the 1880s and has been intensively researched since the 1980s. This study is aimed to perform a bibliometric analysis of scientific articles about this phenomenon, which has been studied for 40 years, and to present a general view of the social loafing literature from the past to the present. For this purpose, 234 articles in the Web of Science (WoS) database containing the term “social loafing” were examined. As a result of the research, it was determined that the articles constituting the sample were published in 42 years, and there was a general increasing trend in both the number of articles and the number of citations over the years. The work of Karau and Williams (1993) is the most influential (highest cited) article in the field (1051 citations). Among the new essays, the most effective is by Xu, Huang, and Robinson (2017). The most prominent journal in the field is the Journal of Personality and Social Psychology (2567 citations), the institution is the University of Toledo (1134 citations), and the country is the United States (6081 citations). The keywords most frequently used with social loafing are motivation, group dynamics, free-riding, virtual teams, group work, and performance. Furthermore, it has been determined that the COVID-19 pandemic affects the issues covered in the articles. Accordingly, there is a differentiation between the points examined before 2020 and those discussed after.

Anahtar Kelimeler

social loafing, bibliometric analysis, vosviewer, covid19

Kaynakça

• Aggarwal, P. ve Connie L. O. (2008). Social Loafing on Group Projects: Structural Antecedents and Effect on Student Satisfaction. Journal of Marketing Education, 30 (3), 255-264.
• Alsaedi, T., Sherief, N., Phalp, K. ve Ali, R. (2022). Online Social Transparency in Enterprise Information Systems: A Risk Assessment Method. Information Technology and Management, 23, 95-124. Alyahya, M. A., Elshaer, I. A. ve Sobaih, A. E. E. (2022). The Impact of Job Insecurity and Distributive Injustice Post Covid-19 on Social Loafing Behavior among Hotel Workers: Mediating Role of Turnover Intention. Int. J. Environmental Research and Public Health, 19, 411-425.
• Akgündüz, Y. ve Eryılmaz, G. (2018). Does Turnover Intention Mediate the Effects of Job Insecurity and Co-Worker Support on Social Loafing?. International Journal of Hospitality Management, 68, 41-49.
• Anderson, C. A., Lindsay J. J. ve Bushman B. J. (1999). Research in the Psychological Laboratory: Truth or Triviality?. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 8 (1). 3-9.
• Aranson, E., Timothy D., W. ve Robin, M. A. (2012). Sosyal Psikoloji. İstanbul (Çev: Okhan Gündüz) Kaknüs Yayınları, İstanbul.
• Bilgin, N. (2016). Sosyal Psikoloji Sözlüğü: Kavramlar, Yaklaşımlar. Bağlam Yayıncılık, İstanbul.
• Byun, G., Karau, S. J., Dai, Y. ve Lee, S. (2018). A Three-Level Examination of the Cascading Effects of Ethical Leadership on Employee Outcomes: A Moderated Mediation Analysis. Journal of Business Research, 88, 44-53.
• Dai, Y.D., Hou, Y. H., Wang C. H., Zhuang W., L. ve Liu, Y. C. (2020). TMX, Social Loafing, Perceived Accountability and OCB. The Service Industries Journal, 40 (5-6), 394-414.
• Doğan, B. Gül, T., Doğan S. ve Aykan E. (2021). Liderlik Tarzlarının Bibliyometrik Analizi. Erciyes Akademi, 35 (1), 161-189.
• Earley, C. P. (1989). Social Loafing and Collectivism: A Comparison of the United States and the People’s Republic of China. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34 (4): 565-581.
• Güney, İ. ve Somuncu M. (2020). Turizm Coğrafyasında Yeni Eğilimler: Bibliyometrik Göstergeler Üzerinden Bir Ağ Analizi. Ege Coğrafya Dergisi, 29 (2), 297-319.
• Harding, L. M. (2018). Students of a Feather “Flocked” Together: A Group Assignment Method for Reducing Free-Riding and Improving Group and Individual Learning Outcomes. Journal of Marketing Education, 40 (2), 117-127.
• Harkins, S. G., Latanè B. ve Williams K. (1980). Social Loafing: Allocating Effort or Taking It Easy?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 16 (5), 457-465.
• Harkins, S. G. ve Petty, R. E. (1982). Effects of Task Difficulty and Task Uniqueness on Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 43 (6), 1214-1229.
• Himmetoğlu, B., Ayduğ D. ve Bayrak C. (2022). Relationships Among Teachers’ Perceptions on Coworker Social Loafing, Organizational Justice and Task Visibility. International Journal of Educational Management, 36 (3), 247-260.
• Hoon, H. ve Tan M. L. T. (2008). Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Social Loafing: The Role of Personality, Motives, and Contextual Factors. The Journal of Psychology, 142 (1), 89-108.
• Ilgın, B. (2013). Toplumsal Bir Hastalık: Sosyal Kaytarma. Uşak Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 6 (3), 238-270.
• Kağıtçıbaşı, Ç. ve Cemalcılar Z. (2021). Dünden Bugüne İnsan ve İnsanlar: Sosyal Psikolojiye Giriş. Evrim Yayınevi, İstanbul.
• Karau, S. J. ve Williams, K. D. (1993). Social Loafing: A Meta-Analytic Review and Theoretical Integration. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 65 (4), 681-706.
• Kidwell, R. Jr, E. ve Bennett N, (1993). Employee Propensity to Withhold Effort: A Conceptual Model to Intersect Three Avenues of Research. Academy of Management Review, 18 (3), 429-456.
• Lam, Chris ve Campbell K. S. (2021). Follow the Leader? The Impact of Leader Rapport Management on Social Loafing. Business and Professional Communication Quarterly, 84 (3), 181-204.
• Latane, B., Williams K. ve Harkins S. (1979). Many Hands Make Light the Work: The Causes and Consequences of Social Loafing. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 37, 822-832.
• Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Jaworski R. A., ve Bennett N. (2004). Social Loafing: a Field Investigation. Journal of Management, 30 (2), 285-304.
• Luo, Z., Marnburg E., Øgaard T. ve Okumuş F. (2021). Exploring Antecedents of Social Loafing in Students’ Group Work: A Mixed-Methods Approach. Journal of Hospitality Leisure, Sport and Tourism Education, 28: 100314.
• McShane, S. ve Glinow M. A. V. (2016). Örgütsel Davranış, (Çev. Günsel A. ve Bozkurt S.). Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Mihelič, K. K., ve Culiberg, B. (2019). Reaping the Fruits of Another’s Labor: The Role of Moral Meaningfulness, Mindfulness, and Motivation in Social Loafing. Journal of Business Ethics, 160 (3), 713-727.
• Moorhead, G. ve Griffin R. W. (2010). Organizational Behavior: Managing People and Organizations. Cengage Learning, China South-Western.
• Myers, D. G. (2015). Sosyal Psikoloji (Çev: Akfırat S.). Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Özbunar, Ş. ve Özler N. D. E. (2021). Sosyal Kaytarma, Örgütsel Davranışta Seçme Konular-I, 61-86., Özler, N. D. E. (Der.), Ekin Yayınevi, Bursa.
• Öztürk, O. ve Gürler G. (2021). Bir Literatür İncelemesi Aracı Olarak Bibliyometrik Analiz. Nobel Bilimsel Eserler, Ankara.
• Peñarroja, V., Orengo V. ve Zornoza A. (2017). Reducing Perceived Social Loafing In Virtual Teams: The Effect of Team Feedback with Guided Reflexivity. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 47 (8), 424-435.
• Robbins, S. P. ve Judge T. (2011). Örgütsel Davranış, (Çev. İnci Erdem). Nobel Yayıncılık, Ankara.
• Shepperd, J. A. (1993). Productivity Loss in Performance Groups: A Motivation Analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 113 (1), 67-81.
• Shih, H. A. ve Susanto E. (2017). Perceived Identifiability, Shared Responsibility and Innovative Work Behavior. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28 (22), 3109-3127.
• Simms, A. ve Nichols T. (2014). Social Loafing: A Review of the Literature. Journal of Management Policy and Practice, 15 (1), 58-67.
• Van, E., Jan N. ve Waltman, L. (2017). VOSviewer Manual, Manual for Vosviewer 1.6.6. Universiteit Leiden. 1-49.
• Wagner III., J. A. (1995). Studies of Individualism-Collectivism-Effects on Cooperation in Groups. Academy of Management Journal, 38 (1), 152-173.
• Wang, J. ve Zhou Y. P. (2018). Impact of Queue Configuration on Service Time: Evidence from a Supermarket. Management Science, 64 (7), 3055-3075.
• Williams, K., Harkins S. G. ve Latane B. (1981). Identifiability as a Deterrent to Social Loafing: Two Cheering Experiments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 40: 303-311.
• Williams, K. D. ve Karau S. J. (1991). Social Loafing and Social Compensation: The Effects of Expectations of Coworker Performance. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 61 (4), 570.
• Xu, E, Huang X. ve Robinson S. L. (2017). When Self-View is at Stake: Responses to Ostracism through the Lens of Self-Verification Theory. Journal of Management, 43 (7), 2281-2302.
• Yildiz, B. ve Elibol E. (2021). Turnover Intention Linking Compulsory Citizenship Behaviours to Social Loafing in Nurses: A Mediation Analysis. Journal of Nursing Management, 29 (4), 653-663.