Yükseköğretim kurumlarında gerçekleştirilen mentorluk araştırmalarının içerik analiz yöntemi ile incelenmesi

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 2 Sayı: 2, 27 - 42, 30.12.2019

Merve Gözde Durmaz , Gülten Gümüştekin

Öz

Bu çalışmanın amacı yükseköğretimde mentorluk çalışmalarına ilişkin
yerli ve yabancı literatürdeki bilimsel yayınların belirlenen temalar
kapsamında içerik analizi yöntemiyle incelenmesidir. Mentorluk kavramsal olarak
deneyime ve bilgi birikimine sahip mentor ile bilgi ve deneyim yönünden
yetersiz olarak görülen genç yetişkin arasında sağlanan iletişimle genç
yetişkinin; çalışma sürecine adaptasyonun sağlanması, deneyim aktarımının
gerçekleşmesi ve bilgi birikiminin arttırılmasına yardımcı olunması süreci olarak
özetlenebilmektedir. Araştırmada içerik analizi yöntemi kullanılmıştır. İçerik
analizi, literatürde araştırılan alanla ilgili yapılmış olan akademik
çalışmaların belirli sınırlar dâhilinde derinlemesine incelenmesi yöntemiyle
gerçekleştirilen nitel bir araştırma yöntemidir. İçerik analizi çalışmaları
incelenen akademik yayınların belirlenen temalar çerçevesinde özetlenerek,
ilgili literatüre katkı sağlaması açısından oldukça önem taşımaktadır. Araştırma
kapsamında 2009-2019 yılları arasında yerli ve yabancı literatürde yayınlanmış
ve ulaşılabilen 35 makale bu amaç çerçevesinde incelenmiştir. Bununla
birlikte araştırmalarda kullanılan yöntemler, yayınların yayınlanma
tarih aralığı, örneklem dağılımı ve çalışmalar sonucunda ulaşılan
bulgular ortaya konulmaya çalışılmıştır. Bu çalışma yükseköğretim kurumlarında
gerçekleştirilen mentorluk çalışmalarının belirlenen amaçlar kapsamında
incelenmesi ve sonuçlarının yorumlanmasıyla, mentorluğun yükseköğretim kurumları
açısından önemini ortaya çıkarabilecektir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Yükseköğretim, mentorluk, mentorluk çalışmaları

Destekleyen Kurum

İZMİR DEMOKRASİ ÜNİVERSİTESİ

Teşekkür

“Bu çalışma 18-20 Nisan 2019 tarihinde İzmir Demokrasi Üniversitesi İİBF tarafından düzenlenen 4.Lisansüstü İşletme Öğrencileri Sempozyumunda sözlü olarak sunulmuş ve gerekli düzeltmeler yapılmıştır”

An investigation of mentoring research conducted in the higher education institutions by content analysis method

Öz

The
aim of this study is to investigate the scientific publications in domestic and
foreign literature related to mentoring studies in higher education with
content analysis methods within the scope of determined themes. With the
communication provided between a mentor who has conceptual experience and
knowledge and the young adult who is seen as inadequate in terms of knowledge
and experience, the young adult; adaptation to the working process, the
transfer of experience and help to increase the knowledge can be summarized as
the process. The
content analysis method was used in the research. Content
analysis is a qualitative research method that is carried out by an in-depth
examination of the academic studies conducted in the field. Content
analysis studies are very important in terms of contributing to the related
literature by summarizing the academic publications reviewed. Within
the scope of the study, 35 articles published in the national and international
literature between 2009-2019 and available to them were examined within the
framework of this purpose. In addition, the methods
used in the research, publication date of publication, sample distribution and
the findings obtained as a result of studies have been tried to be revealed.
This
study will be able to reveal the importance of mentoring in terms of higher
education institutions by examining the results of mentoring activities carried
out in higher education institutions within the scope of the determined
objectives and interpreting the results.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Higher education, mentoring, mentoring work

Kaynakça

• Allen, T.D. (2003). Mentoring others: a dispositional and motivational approach. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 62, 134–154.
• Allen, T.D., Eby, L.T. & Lentz, E. (2006) The relationship between formal mentoring program characteristics and perceived program effectiveness. Personnel Psychology, 59(1), 125–53.
• Asgari, S. & Carter, F. (2016). Peer mentors can improve academic performance: a quasi-experimental study of peer mentorship in ıntroductory courses. Teaching of Psychology, 43(2), 131-135.
• Baker, V.L. & Griffn, K.A. (2010). Beyond mentoring and advising: Toward understanding the role of faculty “developers” in student success. About Campus, 14(6), 2–8.
• Bell, A. & Treleaven, L. (2011). Looking for professor right: Mentee selection of mentors in a formal mentoring program. High Education, 61, 545–561.
• Bordes, V. & Arredondo, P. (2005). Mentoring and 1st-year Latina/o college students. Journal of Hispanic Higher Education, 4(2), 114-133.
• Boyer, K.E., Thomas, E.N., Rorrer, A.S., Cooper, D. & Vouk, M.A. (2010) Increasing technical excellence, leadership and commitment of computing students through identity-based mentoring. in 41st ACM Technical Symposium on Computer Science Education, Milwaukee, WI, 10–3 March, New York: ACM, 167-171.
• Campbell, A., Converse, P.E. & Rodgers, W.L. (1976). The quality of American life: Perceptions, evaluations and satisfaction. New York: Russell Sage.
• Campbell, C.M., Smith, M., Dugan, J.P. & Komives, S.R. (2012). Mentors and college student leadership outcomes: the ımportance of position and process. The Review of Higher Education, 35(4), 595-625.
• Chan, A.W., Yeh, C.J. & Krumboltz, J.D. (2015). Mentoring ethnic minority counseling and clinical psychology students: A multicultural, ecological, and relational model. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 1-16.
• Chester, A., Burton, L.J., Xenos, S. & Elgar, K. (2013). Peer mentoring: supporting successful transition for first year undergraduate psychology students. Australian Journal of Psychology, 65, 30–37.
• Cohen, S., Kamarck, T. & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behaviour. 24, 385–396.
• Cohen, S., Mermelstein, R., Kamarck, T. & Hoberman, H.M. (1985). Measuring the functional components of social support. In I.G. Sarason & B.R. Sarason (Eds.), Social Support: Theory, research and applications (pp.73–94), USA: Kluwer Academic Publishers.
• Collings, R., Swanson, V. & Watkins, R. (2014). The impact of peer mentoring on levels of student wellbeing, integration and retention: a controlled comparative evaluation of residential students in UK higher education. High Education, 68, 927-942.
• Colvin, J.W. & Ashman M. (2010). Roles, risks, and benefits of peer mentoring relationships in higher education. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 18(2), 121-134.
• Cornelius, V., Wood, L. & Lai, J. (2016). Implementation and evaluation of a formal academic-peer-mentoring programme in higher education. Active Learning in Higher Education, 17(3), 193-205.
• Crisp, G. & Cruz, I. (2009). Mentoring College Students: A Critical Review of the Literature Between 1990 and 2007. Research in Higher Education, 50, 525-54.
• Crisp, G. (2009). Conceptualization and initial validation of the college student mentoring scale (CSMS). Journal of College Student Development, 50(2), 177–194.
• Crombag, H.F.M. (1968). Studie motivatie en studie attitude. Groningen: Walters.
• Curtin, C., Malley, J. & Stewart, A. J. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57, 714-738.
• Çamveren, H. & Vatan F. (2019). Öğretim üyeleri için Mentorluk Yetkinliğini Değerlendirme Ölçeği’nin Türkçeye uyarlanması: Geçerlik ve güvenirlik çalışması. Kastamonu Eğitim Dergisi, 27(1), 47-54.
• DeAngelo, L., Mason, J. & Winters, D. (2016). Faculty engagement in mentoring undergraduate students: How institutional environments regulate and promote extra-role behavior. Innovative Higher Education, 41(4), 317-332.
• Dolan, E. & Johnson, D. (2009). Toward a holistic view of undergraduate research experiences: An exploratory study of impact on graduate/postdoctoral mentors. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 18(6), 487.
• Eby, L.T.D.T., Allen, T.D., Hoffman, B.J., Baranik, L.E., Sauer, J.B., Baldwin, S., ... & Evans, S.C. (2013). An interdisciplinary meta-analysis of the potential antecedents, correlates, and consequences of protégé perceptions of mentoring. Psychological bulletin, 139(2), 441.
• Ehrich, L.C., Hansford, B. & Tennent, L. (2004). Formal mentoring programs in education and other professions: A review of the literature. Educational Administration Quarterly, 40(4), 518–540.
• Eller, L.S., Lev, E.L. & Feurer, A. (2014). Key components of an effective mentoring relationship: A qualitative study. Nurse Education Today, 34(5), 815-820.
• Fleming, G.M., Simmons, J.H., Xu, M., Gesell, S.B., Brown, R.F., Cutrer, W.B., ... & Cooper, W.O. (2015). A facilitated peer mentoring program for junior faculty to promote professional development and peer networking. Academic Medicine: Journal of The Association of American Medical Colleges, 90(6), 819.
• Foster, H., Ooms, A. & Marks-Maran, D. (2015). Nursing students' expectations and experiences of mentorship. Nurse Education Today, 35, 18-24.
• Fox, A., Stevenson, L., Connelly, P., Duff, A. & Dunlop, A. (2010). Peer-mentoring undergraduate accounting students: the influence on approaches to learning and academic performance. Active Learning in Higher Education, 11(2), 145-156.
• Gannon, J.M. & Maher, A. (2012). Developing tomorrow’s talent: The case of an undergraduate mentoring programme. Education + Training, 54(6), 440–55.
• Gershenfeld, S. (2014). A review of undergraduate mentoring programs. Review of Educational Research, 84(3), 365-391.
• Golde, C.M. & Dore, T.M. (2001). At cross purposes: What the experiences of doctoral students reveal about doctoral education (www.phd-survey.org). Philadelphia, PA: A report prepared for The Pew Charitable Trusts.
• Gök, E. & Aydın, B. (2017). Yükseköğretim öğrenci mentörlük ölçeği geliştirme yolunda pilot bir çalışma. Kırıkkale Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 7(1), 107-120.
• Gümüş, E. & Gök, E. (2016). Eğitim fakültelerinde akademik mentorluk ve göreve yeni başlayan öğretim üyelerinin mentorluk ihtiyaçları. Yükseköğretm ve Bilim Dergisi, 6(2), 268-276.
• Haeger, H. & Fresquez, C. (2016). Mentoring for ınclusion: the ımpact of mentoring on undergraduate researchers in the sciences. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 15(36), 1–9.
• Hagemeier, N.E., Murawski, M.M. & Popovich, N.G. (2013). The ınfluence of faculty mentors on junior pharmacy faculty members’ career decisions. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 77(3), 1-7.
• Hall, R. & Jaugietis, Z. (2011). Developing peer mentoring through evaluation. Innovation High Education, 36, 41–52.
• Hamlin, R.G. & Sage, L. (2011) Behavioural criteria of perceived mentoring effectiveness: An empirical study of effective and ineffective mentor and mentee behaviour within formal mentoring relationships. Journal of European Industrial Training, 35(8), 752–78.
• Hammond, J.A., Bithell, C., Jones, L. Bidgood, P. (2010) A first year experience of student-directed peer-assisted learning. Active Learning in Higher Education 11(3), 201–212.
• İşcan, Ö. F. & Çakır, S. (2016). Mentorluk ve psikolojik güçlendirmenin öz yeterlilik algısına etkisi. Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, 21(1), 1-15.
• Jackevicius, C.A., Le, J., Nazer, L., Hess, K., Wang, J. & Law, A.V. (2014). A formal mentorship program for faculty development. American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education, 78(5), 1-7.
• Johnson, W.B. (2007) On being a mentor: A guide for higher education faculty. London: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
• Kılınç, U. & Alparslan A.M. (2014). Yükseköğretimde mentörlük: Mentör ve menti bakış açılarını belirlemeye yönelik bir uygulama. Yükseköğretim Dergisi, 4(2), 91-101.
• Kram, K. E. (1985). Mentoring at work. Glenview, IL: Scott Foresman.
• Kram, K. E. (1988). Mentoring at work: Developing relationships in organizational life. Glenview, IL: Scott, Foresman and Company.
• Kram, K.E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608-625.
• Lechuga, V. M. (2011). Faculty-graduate student mentoring relationships: Mentors’ perceived roles and responsibilities. Higher Education, 62(6), 757-771.
• Lejonberg, E., Elstad, E. & Christophersen, K. (2015) Mentor education: challenging mentors’ beliefs about mentoring. International Journal of Mentoring and Coaching in Education, 4(2), 142-158.
• Light, R.J. (2001). Making the most of college. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
• Lusford, L.G., Crisp, G., Dolan, E.L. & Wuetherick, B. (2017). Mentoring in higher education. The SAGE Handbook of Mentoring, 20, 316-334.
• McGovern, T.V., Corey, L.A., Cranney, J., Dixon, W.E. Jr, Holmes, J.D., Kuebli, J. E., ... Walker, S.J. (2010). Psychologically literate citizens. In D. Halpern (Ed.), Undergraduate education in psychology: Blueprint for the discipline’s future (pp. 9–27). Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
• McKinsey, E. (2016). Faculty mentoring undergraduates: the nature, development, and benefits of mentoring relationships. Teaching & Learning Inquiry, 4(1), 1-15.
• Morrow, K.V. & Styles, M.B. (1995). Building relationships with youth in program settings: A study of Big Brothers/Big Sisters. Philadelphia, PA: Public/Private Ventures.
• Noe, R. (1988). Investigation of determinants successful assigned mentoring relationships. Personnel Psychology, 41, 457-479.
• Özden, K. (2014). Üniversite öğrencilerinde psikolojik iyi oluşun psikososyal yordayıcılarının sosyal bilişsel kariyer kuramı açısından incelenmesi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, İstanbul Arel Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İstanbul.
• Palmer, R.J., Hunt, A.N., Neal, M. & Wuetherick, B. (2015). Mentoring, undergraduate research, and identity development: a conceptual review and research agenda. Mentoring & Tutoring: Partnership in Learning, 23(5), 411-426.
• Parise, M.R. & Forret, M.L. (2008) Formal mentoring programs: The relationship of program design and support of mentors’ perceptions of benefit and costs. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72(2), 225–240.
• Parks, S. D. (2000). Big questions, worthy dreams: Mentoring young adults in their search for meaning, purpose, and faith. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
• Pişkin, M.T., Ceylan, A., Aslan, D. & Çan, G. (2014). Halk sağlığı araştırma görevlı̇lerı̇nı̇n eğı̇tı̇m süreçlerini̇ “mentor” kavram ve yaklaşımı kapsamında değerlendirmeleri. Tıp Eğitimi Dünyası, 40, 19-28.
• Ragins, B.R, Cotton, J. L. & Miller, J. S. (2000) Marginal mentoring: The effects of type of mentor, quality of relationship, and program design on work and career attitudes. Academy of Management Journal 43(6), 1177–1194.
• Raymond, B.C. & Kannan V.R. (2014). A survey of faculty mentoring programs in AACSB schools of business. Journal of Management Education, 38(6), 818-842.
• Rosenberg. (1965). Rosenberg self esteem scale. In S. Wright, M. Johnston & J. Weinman (1995). Measures in health psychology: A users portfolio. UK: Nfer-Nelson.
• Sambunjak, D., Straus, S.E. & Marusic, A. (2009). A systematic review of qualitative research on the meaning and characteristics of mentoring in academic medicine. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 25(1), 72-78.
• Denard Thomas, J., Gail Lunsford, L., & Rodrigues, H.A. (2015). Early career academic staff support: Evaluating mentoring networks. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 37(3), 320-329.
• Tükeltürk, A. (2014). Üniversitelerde mentorluğun kurumsallaştırılması süreci, önemi ve kazanımları; Çanakkale Onsekiz Mart Üniversitesi üzerine bir inceleme. Organizasyon ve Yönetim Bilimleri Dergisi, 6(1), 137-155.
• Yılmaz, G. (2007). Sınıf öğretmeni adaylarının öğretmenlik uygulaması deneyimlerinin fen öğretimi öz yeterlik ve sınıf yönetimi inançlarına olan etkisi. Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Zachary, L. J. (2000). The mentor’s guide: Facilitating effective learning relationships. San Francisco: Jossey Bass Wiley.
• Zachary, L. J. (2002). The role of teacher as mentor. New Directions for Adult and Continuing Education, 2002(93), 27-38.