THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING: THE ROLE OF SELF-EFFICACY PERCEPTION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT

Yıl 2013, Cilt: 10 Sayı: 40, 139 - 154, 13.01.2014

Seçil Bal Taştan

https://doi.org/10.14783/od.v10i40.1012000360

Cited By: 14

Öz

PSİKOLOJİK GÜÇLENDİRME ALGISI VE PSİKOLOJİK İYİ HİSSETME HALİ ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİ: ÖZ-YETERLİLİK ALGISI VE SOSYAL DESTEK ALGISININ ROLÜ

Özet: Bu çalışmanın amacı, bireylerin psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile işle ilgili iyi hissetme hali arasındaki ilişkiyi incelemektir. Bununla birlikte çalışmanın amacı, işyerinde psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ile psikolojik iyi hissetme hali arasındaki ilişkide bireylerin öz-yeterlilik inancının ara değişken rolüne ve sosyal destek algısının düzenleyici değişken rolüne ilişkin bulgular elde edebilmektir. Bu bağlamda, psikolojik güçlendirme algısı ve iyi hissetme hali arasındaki ilişkiyi ve algılanan öz-yeterlilik duygusu ve sosyal desteğin rolünü incelemeye yönelik tasarlanan yapılandırılmış saha araştırması, İstanbul ili Kadıköy ilçesine bağlı devlet ilköğretim okullarında görev yapmakta olan öğretmenler üzerinde uygulanmıştır. Araştırma modelinde ön görülen bir dizi hipotez, katılımcılardan elde edilen ampirik verilere dayanarak test edilmiştir. Araştırma sonuçları, psikolojik güçlendirme algısının dört boyutunun da psikolojik iyi hissetme hali ile pozitif ve anlamlı şekilde ilişkili olduğunu göstermiştir. Bununla birlikte, elde edilen istatistiksel bulgulara gore, bireylerin öz-yeterlilik algısının psikolojik güçlendirme ve iyi hissetme hali arasındaki ilişkide kısmi seviyede ara değişken rolüne sahip olduğu ve amir sosyal desteğinin bu ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğu görülmüştür. Bütün bu sonuçlar, çalışanlarının işyerindeki psikolojik iyi hissetme halini ve çalışma yaşamıyla ilgili olumlu duygulanımlarını güçlendirmeyi amaçlayan ve farklı sektörlerde yer alan özel ve kamu kurumlarına bakış açısı sunmaya yardımcı olmaktadır.

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGICAL EMPOWERMENT AND PSYCHOLOGICAL WELL BEING: THE ROLE OF SELF-EFFICACY PERCEPTION AND SOCIAL SUPPORT

Abstract: The objective of this study is to examine the relationship between psychological empowerment and psychological well being. Additionally, it is aimed to find evidences about the mediating role of individuals’ self-efficacy perception and the moderating role of perceived supervisor social support on the relationship between psychological empowerment and psychological well-being at work. The effect of psychological empowerment on work-related psychological well-being and the roles of self-efficacy and social support were examined through a structured research survey which has been performed among teaching staff working in public primary schools in Istanbul-Kadıköy. The hypotheses were generated and empirically tested by the data obtained from the participants. The results have demonstrated that all four dimensions of the psychological empowerment had significantly positive relationships with psychological well-being states of the individuals. Moreover, the statistical findings have revealed that self-efficacy perception had a partial mediating role and perceived social support had a significant moderating role on the relationship between psychological empowerment and well-being. Furthermore, the findings of this study have provided insights to various public and private organizations from different sectors which aim to enhance psychological well-being of the individuals and try to improve their work-related positive affections at the workplace.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Psikolojik Güçlendirme Algısı; Psikolojik İyi Hissetme Hali; Esenlik; Öz-Yeterlilik Algısı; Sosyal Destek; Öğretmenlerin Çalışma Yaşamındaki Duygusal Algılamaları; Psychological Empowerment; Psychological Well-Being; Self-Efficacy; Social Support

Kaynakça

• Sofarelli, D. & Brown, D. (1998). The need for nursing leadership in uncertain times. Journal of Nursing Management, 6, 201–207.
• Thyer, G. (2003). Dare to be different: transformational leadership may hold the key to reducing nursing shortage. Journal of Nursing Management, 11, 73–79.
• Medley, F. &Larochelle, D. (1995). Transformational leadership and job satisfaction. Nursing Management, 26, 640-659.
• Nielsen, K., Randall, R., Yarker, J. & Brenner, S.O. (2008). The effects of transformational leadership on followers’ perceived work characteristics and psychological well- being: A longitudinal study. Work &Stress, 22 (1), 16–32.
• Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Brenner, S., Randall, R. & Borg, V. (2008). The importance of transformational leadership style for the well-being of employees working with older people. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 63 (5), 465–475.
• Herrenkohl, R.C., Judson, G.T. & Heffner, J.A. (1999). Defining and measuring employee empowerment. Journal of Applied Behavioural Science, 35(3), 373-389.
• Block, P. (1993). Stewardship. Berrett-Koehler, San Francisco.
• Walton, R.E. (1985). From control to commitment in the workplace. Harvard Business Review, 63(2), 77-84.
• Senge, P. (1990). The fifth discipline: the art and practice of the learning organization. Doubleday/Currency, New York.
• Tracey, D. (1990). 10 Steps to Empowerment: A Common Sense Guide to Managing People. William Morrow, New York.
• Dee, J.R., Henkin, A.B. & Duemer, L. (2003). Structural antecedents and psychological correlates of teacher empowerment. Journal of Educational Administration, 41(3), 257-277.
• Potterfield, T. A. (1999). The business of employee empowerment: Democracy and ideology in the workplace. Westport, CT: Quorum Books.
• Conger, J. A., Kanungo, R. N. (1988). The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice. Academy of Management Review, 13, 471-482.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1995). Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation. Academy of Management Journal, 38(5), 1442-1465.
• Spreitzer, G. M. (1996) Social structural characteristics of psychological empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 39(2), 483-504.
• Spreitzer, G. M., Kizilos, M. A. & Nason, S. W. (1997). A dimensional psychological empowerment and effectiveness, satisfaction, and strain. Journal of Management, 23(5), 679-704. the
• relationship between
• Thomas, K. W., Velthouse, B. A. (1990). Cognitive elements of empowerment: An interpretive model of intrinsic motivation. Academy of Management Review, 15, 666–681.
• Bordin, C., Bartram, T. & Casimir, G. (2007). The antecedents empowerment Management Research News, 30(1), 34-46. psychological employees. among Singaporean IT
• Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: A social cognitive view. Englewood Cliffs, Prentice-Hall, New Jersey.
• Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84, 191-215.
• Spreitzer, G. M., De Janasz, S. C. & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Empowered empowerment in leadership. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20, 511-526. The role of psychological empowerment: Antecedents and
• Liden, R.C., Wayne, S.J. & Sparrowe, R.T. (2000). An examination of the mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relations between the job, interpersonal relationships and work outcomes. Journal of Applied Psychology, 85(3), 407-416.
• Avolio, B., Zhu, W., Koh, W. & Bhatia, P. (2004). Transformational commitment: empowerment role and moderating role of structural distance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25, 951–968.
• Seibert, S., Silver, S. & Randolph,W. (2004). Taking empowerment to the next level: a multiplelevel model of empowerment, performance, and satisfaction. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 332-350.
• Kirkman, B.L. & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self- management: antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Management Journal, 42(1), 56-74.
• Savery, L.K. & Luks, A.J. (2001). The relationship between empowerment, job satisfaction and reported stress levels: Organization Development Journal, 22(3), 97-104. evidence. Leadership &
• Koberg, C.S., Boss, R.W., Senjem, J.C. & Goodman, E.A. (1999). Antecedents and outcomes of empowerment. Group & Organization Management, 24(1), 71-92.
• Taştan, S.Bal.(2011). The mediating role of psychological empowerment on the relationship between participative organizational climate, self efficacy and individual performance behaviors. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Organizational Behavior, Marmara University. [31] McClain, A. (2001). Estimating the effects of empowerment on Black women's psychological well-being. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Graduate School of Social Work, Boston College.
• Tahira, J., Ruhi, K. & Jibeen, R. K. (2010) Predictors of Psychological well-being of Pakistani Immigrants in Toronto, Canada. International Journal of Intercultural Relations, 34, 452–464.
• Diener, E., Lucas, R. E. & Oishi, S. (2002). Subjective well-being: The science of happiness and life satisfaction. In C. R. Snyder & E. S. J. The handbook of positive psychology (pp. 63-73). Oxford University Press, New York.
• Diener, E., Sapyta, J.J. & Suh, E. (1998). Subjective well- being is essential to well-being. Psychological Inquiry, 9, 33-37.
• Seligman, M. E. P., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (2000). Positive Psychologist, 55, 5-14. an introduction. American
• Eldeleklioğlu, J., Yılmaz, A. & Gültekin, F. (2010). Investigation of teacher trainees’ psychological tell-Being in terms of time management. World Conference on Educational Sciences, February 04-08, İstanbul. (Full text: Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 2 (2), 342-348).
• Ryan, R. M. & Deci, E. L. (2001). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychological Association, 55(1), 68-78.
• Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. In G. J., Kafka, & A. Kozma, (2002). The construct validity of Ryff’s scales of psychological well-being (SPWB) and their relationship to measures of subjective well-being. Social Indicators Research, 57(2), 171.
• Warr, P. B. (1987). Work, unemployment, and mental health. Clarendon Press, . Oxford, England.
• Atilla Bal, E. (2008). Self-efficacy, contextual factors and well-being: The impact of work engagement. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Organizational Behavior, Marmara University.
• Warr, P. B. (1994). A conceptual framework for the study of work and mental health. Work and Stress, 8(2), 84-97.
• Russell, J.A. & Carroll, J.M. (1999). The phoenix of bipolarity: Reply to Watson and Tellegen. Psychological Bulletin, 125(5), 611-617.
• Keyes, L.M., Shmotkin, D. & Ryff, C.D. (2002). Optimizing well-being: The empirical encounter of two traditions. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 82, 1007–1022.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The “what” and “why” of goal pursuits: Human needs and the self-determination of behavior. Psychological Inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
• Fava, L. (2011). The relationship between complementary and alternative medicine use, psychological well-being. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, The California School of Professional Psychology.
• Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman, New York.
• Parker, L. (1994). Working together: Perceived self- and collective efficacy at the workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 24, 47–59.
• Jex, S.M., Bliese, P.D., Buzzell, S. & Primeau, J. (2001). The impact of selfefficacy on stressor-strain relations: coping style as an exploratory mechanism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86, 401–409.
• Nielsen, K., Yarker, J., Randall, R. & Munir, F. (2009). The mediating effects of team and self-efficacy on the relationship between transformational leadership, and job satisfaction and psychological well-being in healthcare professionals: A cross-sectional questionnaire survey. International Journal of Nursing Studies, 46, 1236–1244.
• O’Leary, A. (1992). Self-efficacy and health: behavioral and stress-physiological mediation. Cognitive Therapy and Research, 16, 229–245.
• Jex, S.M. & Dudanowski, D.M. (1992). Efficacy beliefs and work stress: an exploratory study. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 13, 262–279.
• Jex, S.M. & Bliese, P.D. (1999). Efficacy beliefs as a moderator of the impact of work-related stressors: a multilevel study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 84, 349– 361.
• Stetz, T.A., Stetz, M.C. & Bliese, P.A. (2006). The importance of self-efficacy in the moderating effects of social support on stressor-strain relationships. Work & Stress, 20, 49–59.
• Zellars, K.L., Hochwarter, W.A., Perrewe, P.L., Miles, A.K. & Kiewitz, C. (2001). Beyond self-efficacy: interactive effects of role conflict and perceived collective efficacy. Journal of Managerial Issues, 13, 483–499.
• Bandura, A. (2000). Cultivate self-efficacy for personal and organizational effectiveness. In E. A. Locke (Ed.), The Blackwell handbook of principles of organizational behavior (pp.120-136), Blackwell, Oxford, UK.
• Lawler, E. E. (1986). High involvement management: Participative strategies for improving organizational performance. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Spencer, S.M. (2006). Effects of social support and heterosexism on the psychological well-being of diverse adults. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Eberly College of Arts and Sciences, Psychology Department of Psychology Morgantown West Virginia University.
• Logan M.S. & Ganster D.C. (2007). The effects of empowerment on attitudes and performance: The role of social support and empowerment beliefs. Journal of Management Studies, 44 (8), 1523-1551.
• Dvir, T. & Shamir, B. (2003). Follower development characteristics as predicting transformational leadership: a longitudinal field study. Leadership Quarterly, 14, 327– 344.
• Pillai, R. & Williams, E. (2004). Transformational leadership, self-efficacy, group cohesiveness, commitment, and performance. Journal of Organizational Change Management, 17, 144–159.
• Menon, S.T. (1995). Employee Empowerment: Definition, Measurement and Construct Validation. McGill University, Canada.
• Deci, E. L. & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. New York. U.S.A.
• Ryan, R. M., & Frederick, C. (1997). On Energy, Personality, and Health: Subjective Vitality as a Dynamic Reflection of Well-Being. Journal of Personality, 65(3), 529–565.
• Constantine, M. G., & Sue, D.W. (2006). Factors contributing to optimal human functioning in people of color in the United States. The Counseling Psychologist, 34, 228-244.
• Lang, J.G., Muñoz, R.F., Bernal, G., & Sorensen, J.L. (1982). Quality of life and psychological well-being in a bicultural Latino community. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 4, 433-450.
• Ryff, C. D. & Singer, B. (2002). From social structure to biology: integrative science in pursuit of human health and well-being. In Handbook of positive psychology (ed. C. R.Snyder & S. J. Lopez), pp. 541–555. Oxford University Press, New York.
• Mahon, N.E., & Yarcheski, A. (2001). Social support and well-being in early adolescents: The role of mediating variables. Clinical Nursing Research, 10 (2), 163-181.
• Gençöz T., & Özlale Y. (2004). Direct and indirect effects of social support on psychological well-being. Social Behavior and Personality, 32(5), 449–458.
• Tofi, T., Flett, R., & Timutimu-Thorpe, H. (1996). Problems faced by Pacific Island students at university in New Zealand: Some effects on academic performance and psychological wellbeing. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 31(1), 51-59.
• Mathieu, J. E., & Taylor, S. R. (2006). Clarifying conditions and decision points for mediational type inferences in organizational behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1031-1056.
• House, R.J. & Howell, J.M. (1992). Personality and charismatic leadership. Leadership Quarterly, 3(2), 81-108.
• House, J.S. (1981). Work Stress and Social Support. Addison-Wesley.
• Gardenhour, C. (2008). Teachers’ perceptions of empowerment in their work environments as measured by the psychological empowerment instrument. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Faculty of the Department of Educational Leadership and Policy Analysis, East Tennessee State University.
• Bragger, J. D., Rodriguez-Srednicki, O., Kutcher, E. J., Indovino, L., & Rosner, E. (2005). Work-family, work- family culture and organizational citizenship behavior among teachers. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20, 303-324.
• Gönen, E., Hablemitoğlu, Ş., & Özmete, E. (2004). Akademisyen kadınlar. Toplumsal Dönüşüm Publishing, İstanbul.
• Antonucci, T. C. (2001). Social relations: An examination of social networks, social support and sense of control. In J. E. Birren & K. W. Schaie (Eds.), Handbook of the psychology of aging (5th Edition, pp. 427-453). Academic Press, New York.
• Felsten, G., & Wilcox, K. (1992). Influences of stress and situation-specific mastery beliefs and satisfaction with social support on well-being and academic performance. Psychological Reports, 70(1), 291–303.
• Wright, B. E. (2001). Public-sector work motivation: A review of the current literature and a revised conceptual model. Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11, 559.
• Short, P. & Johnson, P. (1994). Exploring the links among teacher empowerment, leader power, and conflict. Education, 114, 581–592.
• Short, P. M. (1994). Defining teacher empowerment. Education, 114(4), 488–492.
• Ercan, S.N. (2009). Effects of work-family; family-work conflicts, self-construal, perceived managerial support and stress on employees’ self-rated performance. Unpublished Doctoral Thesis, Social Sciences Institute, Department of Organizational Behavior, Marmara University.
• Spreitzer, G. M. & Quinn, R. E. (2001). A company of leaders: Five disciplines for unleashing the power in your workplace. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco.
• Schwarzer, R. (Ed.). (1992). Self-efficacy: Thought control of action. Washington,DC: Hemisphere.
• Schwarzer, R. & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self- efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds.), Measures in health psychology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs (pp. 35-37). Windsor, United Kingdom.
• Yesilay, A., Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1997). Turkish adaptation of the general perceived self-efficacy scale. [22.04.2010] turk.htm,
• Warr, P. B. (1990). Decision latitude, job demands, and employee well-being. Work & Stress, 4, 285-294.
• Grandey, A. A. (1999). The effects of emotional labor: employee attitudes, stress and performance. Published Doctoral Dissertation, Colorado State University.
• Ünler Öz, E. (2007). Duygusal emek davranışlarının çalışanların iş sonuçlarına etkisi. Beta Publishing, İstanbul.
• Baron, R.M. & Kenny, D.A. (1986). The moderator- mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: considerations. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182. and statistical
• Sharma, S. (1996). Applied multivariate techniques. John Wiley, New York.
• Siegall, M. & Gardner, S. (2000). Contextual factors of psychological empowerment. Personnel Review, 29(6), 703-722. SEÇİL BAL TAŞTAN [e-mail]
• Seçil Bal Taştan is a Lecturer Doctor working in
• management and organization department. She has a
• doctorate degree of Organizational Behavior. Her interests
• organizational behavior, organizational psychology, and
• human resources management. She has authored a
• number of academic research studies in academic journals
• and conferences on these subjects. and organization,