Should I Learn Division Algorithm?: An Investigation of Elementary Students’ Solution Strategies on Division with Remainder (DWR) Problems

Year 2023, Volume: 10 (Special Issue), 273 - 292, 29.10.2023

Osman Bağdat , Ayşe Bağdat

https://doi.org/10.59409/ojer.1373059

Abstract

The division with remainder (DWR) problems offer significant potential for students to make sense of the division operation. The purpose of the study is to investigate elementary school students' solution strategies for DWR problems. In particular, this study aims to compare the problem-solving strategies in DWR problems employed by second-grade students, who are versed in multiplication, but have not been introduced to division; with those of third and fourth-grade students who are familiar with division but have yet to engage with the interpretation of remainders. This qualitative research obtained data from 144 students in second, third, and fourth-grades in a public primary school. A total of six different DWR problems were presented to the students, including types as remainder divisible, remainder not divisible and remainder as a whole. The findings indicated that the strategies used by students in solving DWR problems differed. While second-grade students prefer strategies such as repetitive addition, repetitive subtraction, grouping, verbal explanation and using models, there is a noticeable tendency to use the division algorithm by fourth-grade students. However, it was noticed that students were unable to interpret the remainder in a meaningful way, especially from the third-grade, when they began to learn the division algorithm. According to the study, rather than moving immediately to the division algorithm, teachers should spend their time helping students understand division through contextual problems and representations.

Keywords

Realistic problems, context, division algorithm, division with remainder (DWR) problems, student strategies

References

• Anghileri, J., Beishuizen, M., & van Putten, K. (2002). From informal strategies to structured procedures: Mind the gap!. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 49(2), 149–170.
• Arıkan, E. E., & Ünal, H. (2016). An examination of preservice mathematics teachers' realistic approaches with division with remainder (DWR) problems. International Journal of Social and Educational Sciences, 3(5), 1-12.
• Bağdat, A., & Ev-Çimen, E. (2023). An investigation of sixth-grade students' skills of posing problems regarding the order of operations via multiple-choice tests. Turkish Studies-Educational Sciences, 18(2), 533-551. https://dx.doi.org/10.7827/TurkishStudies.64586
• Cai, J. & Cifarelli, V. (2004). Thinking mathematically by Chinese learners: A cross-national comparative perspective. In L. Fan, N.-Y. Wong, J. Cai & S. Li (Eds.), How Chinese learn mathematics: Perspectives from insiders. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific.
• Cai, J., & Silver, E. A. (1995). Solution processes and interpretations of solutions in solving a division-with-remainder story problem: Do Chinese and US students have similar difficulties?. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 26(5), 491-497.
• Chen, L., Van Dooren, W., Chen, Q., & Verschaffel, L. (2011). An investigation on Chinese teachers' realistic problem posing and problem-solving ability and beliefs. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 9, 919-948.
• Cooper, B., & Harries, T. (2005). Making sense of realistic word problems: Portraying working class 'failure' on a division with remainder problem. International Journal of Research & Method in Education, 28(2), 147-169.
• Correa, J., Nunes, T., & Bryant, P. (1998). Young children's understanding of division: The relationship between division terms in a noncomputational task. Journal of Educational Psychology, 90, 321-329.
• Doğan-Coşkun, S. D., & Ev-Çimen, E. (2019a). Pre-service elementary teachers' problem-solving abilities for problems focusing on the partition and comparison meanings of the division operation. Eskişehir Osmangazi University Journal of Social Sciences, 20, 1-21.
• Dogan-Coşkun, S., & Ev-Çimen, E. (2019b). Pre-service elementary teachers' difficulties in solving realistic division problems. Acta Didactica Napocensia, 12(2), 183-194.
• Doruk, M., & Doruk, G. (2019). Analysis of the problems posed by the fifth-grade students related to multiplication and division. Van Yüzüncü Yıl University Journal of Education, 16(1), 1338-1369.
• Ev-Çimen, E., & Tat, T. (2018). Investigation of eight grade students' problem posing abilities for interpretation of the remainder in division problems. Journal of Research in Education and Teaching, 7(4), 1-11.
• Graeber, A., Tirosh, T., & Glover, R. (1989). Preservice teachers' misconceptions in solving verbal problems in multiplication and division. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(1), 95–102.
• Gravemeijer, K. (1994). Developing realistic mathematics education. Utrecht: Cd-ß Press.
• Guerrero, L., & Rivera, A. (2001). Does the acquisition of mathematical knowledge make students better problem solvers? An examination of third-graders' solution of division-with-remainder (DWR) problems. In Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of the North American Chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education. Snowbird, Utah.
• İncikabı, L., Ayanoglu, P., & Uysal, R. (2020). Sixth-grade students' procedural and conceptual understandings of division operation in a real-life context. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 13(1), 35-45.
• Kaasila, R., Pehkonen, E., & Hellinen, A. (2010). Finnish pre-service teachers' and upper secondary students' understanding of division and reasoning strategies used. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 73, 247-261.
• Kouba, V. L. (1989). Children's solution strategies for equivalent set multiplication and division word problems. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 20(2), 147-158.
• Li, Y., & Silver, E. A. (2000). Can younger students succeed where older students fail? An examination of third graders' solutions of a division-with-remainder (DWR) problem. The Journal of Mathematical Behaviour, 19(2), 233-246.
• Polya, G. (2004). How to solve it: A new aspect of mathematical method (Vol. 85). Princeton University Press.
• Robinson, K. M., Arbuthnott, K. D., Rose, D., McCarron, M. C., Globa, C. A., & Phonexay, S. D. (2006). Stability and change in children's division strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 93(3), 224-238.
• Rodríguez, P., Lago, M. O., Hernández, M. L., Jiménez, L., Guerrero, S., & Caballero, S. (2009). How do secondary students approach different types of division with remainder situations? Some evidence from Spain. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 24, 529-543.
• Silver, E. A. (1988). Solving story problems involving division with remainders: The importance of semantic processing and referential mapping. In: M. J. Behr, C. B. Lacampagne, & M. M. Wheeler (Eds.), Proceedings of the tenth annual meeting of the North American chapter of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education (pp. 127-133). De Kalb, IL: Northern Illinois University.
• Silver, E. A., Mukhopadhyay, S., & Gabriele, A. J. (1992). Referential mapping and the solution of division story problems involving remainders. Focus on Learning Problem in Mathematics, 14 (3), 29-39.
• Silver, E. A., Shapiro, L. J., & Deutsch, A. (1993). Sense making and the solution of division problems involving remainders: an examination of middle school students' solution processes and their interpretations of solutions. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 24(2), 117-135.
• Steffe, L. P. (1988). Children's construction of number sequences and multiplying schemes. Number Concepts and Operations in the Middle Grades, 2, 119-140.
• Squire, S., & Bryant, P. (2002). The influence of sharing on children's initial concept of division. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 81(1), 1-43.
• Van de Walle J. A. (2007). Elementary and middle school mathematics (6th ed.). Boston, MA: Pearson.
• Verschaffel, L., Greer, B. & De Corte, E. (2000) Making sense of word problems. Lisse: Swets & Zeitlinger.
• Yıldırım, A., & Şimşek, H. (2011). Qualitative research methods in social sciences. Ankara: Seçkin Publishing.