Derleme
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster

A Systematic and Comparative Review of International Test Standards and Guidelines

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 39, 804 - 830, 01.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.889770

Öz

The purpose of this study is to examine the standards and guidelines recommended by institutions and organizations interested in psychological testing and measurement worldwide and to introduce the relevant literature to those concerned. Within the scope of this purpose, the content of updated test standards recommended by the American Educational Research Association, the American Psychological Association and the National Council on Educational Measurement, which are the pioneers of institutions that develop standards for psychological testing, were examined. Besides, test adaptation guidelines developed by the International Testing Commission were included, which provide comprehensive guidelines on test adaptation and usage of intercultural testing. The Test Analysis Model proposed by the European Federation of Psychologists’ Associations was also presented generally, and the standards specifically regarding psychological tests and measurement processes used in employment processes established by the International Standards Organization were examined. General evaluations regarding the listed guidelines and standards were made, and the contents of the guidelines and standards were introduced to the all researchers interested in psychological measurement.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1966). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1974). Standards for educational & psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Anastasi, A., and Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Brennan, R. L. (2006). Educational measurement. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Çüm, S. ve Koç, N. (2013). Türkiye’de psikoloji ve eğitim bilimleri dergilerinde yayımlanan ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama Dergisi, 12(24), 115-135.
  • EFPA Board of Assessment (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests, Version 4.2.6. http://www.efpa.eu/professional-development/assessment
  • Evers, A., Sijtsma, K., Lucassen, W., and Meijer, R. R. (2011). The Dutch review process for evaluating the quality of psychological tests: History, procedure and results. International Journal of Testing, 10, 295-317.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Theory, methods, and practices in testing for the 21st century. Psicothema, 16, 696-701.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2006, March). Testing practices in the 21st century. Key Note Address, University of Oviedo, Spain.
  • Hovardaoğlu, S. ve Sezgin, N. (1998). Eğitimde psikolojide ölçme standartları. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Birliği Yayınları.
  • International Test Commission (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0102_1
  • International Test Commission (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4
  • International Test Commission (2012). International guidelines on quality control in scoring, test analysis, and reporting of test scores. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_quality_control.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2014). International guidelines on the security of tests, examinations, and other assessments. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_security.pdf
  • International Test Commission (2015). International guidelines for practitioner use of test revisions, obsolete tests, and test disposal. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_disposal.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for the large-scale assessment of linguistically and culturally diverse populations. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_diverse_populations.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2020). New guidelines on technology-based assessments, in collaboration with the Association of Test Publishers (ATP). https://www.intestcom.org/page/28
  • ISO (2011). Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings (Part 1 and 2). Technical committee: Human Resource Management.
  • ISO (2020). Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings. Technical committee: Human Resource Management.
  • Mor Dirlik, E. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme konulu doktora tezlerinin test ve ölçek geliştirme standartlarına uygunluğunun incelenmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 62-78.
  • Mor Dirlik, E. ve Koç, N. (2017). The analysis of the psychological tests using in educational institutions according to the testing standards. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(4), 453-468.
  • Muñiz, J., and Bartram, D. (2007). Improving international tests and testing. European Psychologist, 12, 206-219.
  • Schultz, D. P., and Schultz, S. E. (2011). A history of modern psychology (10th Ed.). Belmont, US: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  • Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.

Uluslararası Test Standartlarının ve Yönergelerinin Sistematik ve Karşılaştırmalı İncelenmesi

Yıl 2021, Cilt: 18 Sayı: 39, 804 - 830, 01.07.2021
https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.889770

Öz

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, dünya genelinde psikolojik testler ve ölçmeyle ilgilenen kurum ve kuruluşlar tarafından psikolojik testlere ve ölçme süreçlerine ilişkin önerilen standartları ve yönergeleri incelemek ve bu konuyla ilgili kaynakları psikometri bilim alanında çalışan test geliştiricilere, uyarlayıcılara ve testlerle ilgilenen araştırmacılara tanıtmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, psikolojik testlere ilişkin standartlar geliştiren kurumların öncüleri olan Amerikan Eğitim Araştırmaları Birliği, Amerikan Psikologlar Birliği ve Eğitimde Ölçme Ulusal Konseyi tarafından önerilen ve güncelleme çalışmaları yapılan test standartları ayrıntılı olarak incelenmiştir. Bunlara ek olarak, test uyarlama ve kültürlerarası test kullanımına ilişkin kapsamlı yönergeler sunan Uluslararası Test Komisyonu tarafından geliştirilmiş test uyarlama yönergelerine çalışma kapsamında yer verilmiştir. Avrupa Psikologlar Birliği tarafından geliştirilen ve kullanıma sunulan Test İnceleme Modeli’nin de tanıtıldığı çalışmada son olarak, Uluslararası Standartlar Organizasyonu tarafından özellikle iş yaşamında kullanılan psikolojik testlere ve ölçme süreçlerine ilişkin oluşturulan standartlar incelenmiştir. İncelenen standartlara ve yönergelere ilişkin genel değerlendirmeler yapılmış, psikolojik ölçme araçları ile ilgilenen tüm araştırmacılara bu standartların ve yönergelerin kapsamları detaylı biçimde tanıtılmıştır.

Kaynakça

  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1966). Standards for educational and psychological tests and manuals. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Psychological Association, American Educational Research Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1974). Standards for educational & psychological tests. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1985). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (1999). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association.
  • American Educational Research Association, American Psychological Association, & National Council on Measurement in Education (2014). Standards for educational and psychological testing. Washington, DC: American Educational Research Association.
  • Anastasi, A. (1988). Psychological testing. (6th ed.). New York: Macmillan.
  • Anastasi, A., and Urbina, S. (1997). Psychological testing (7th ed.). New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
  • Brennan, R. L. (2006). Educational measurement. Westport, CT: ACE/Praeger.
  • Cronbach, L. J. (1990). Essentials of psychological testing (5th ed.). New York: Harper Collins.
  • Çüm, S. ve Koç, N. (2013). Türkiye’de psikoloji ve eğitim bilimleri dergilerinde yayımlanan ölçek geliştirme ve uyarlama çalışmalarının incelenmesi. Eğitim Bilimleri ve Uygulama Dergisi, 12(24), 115-135.
  • EFPA Board of Assessment (2013). EFPA Review Model for the Description and Evaluation of Psychological and Educational Tests, Version 4.2.6. http://www.efpa.eu/professional-development/assessment
  • Evers, A., Sijtsma, K., Lucassen, W., and Meijer, R. R. (2011). The Dutch review process for evaluating the quality of psychological tests: History, procedure and results. International Journal of Testing, 10, 295-317.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2004). Theory, methods, and practices in testing for the 21st century. Psicothema, 16, 696-701.
  • Hambleton, R. K. (2006, March). Testing practices in the 21st century. Key Note Address, University of Oviedo, Spain.
  • Hovardaoğlu, S. ve Sezgin, N. (1998). Eğitimde psikolojide ölçme standartları. Ankara: Türk Psikologlar Birliği Yayınları.
  • International Test Commission (2001). International guidelines for test use. International Journal of Testing, 1(2), 93-114. https://doi.org/10.1207/S15327574IJT0102_1
  • International Test Commission (2006). International guidelines on computer-based and internet-delivered testing. International Journal of Testing, 6(2), 143-171. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15327574ijt0602_4
  • International Test Commission (2012). International guidelines on quality control in scoring, test analysis, and reporting of test scores. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_quality_control.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2014). International guidelines on the security of tests, examinations, and other assessments. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_security.pdf
  • International Test Commission (2015). International guidelines for practitioner use of test revisions, obsolete tests, and test disposal. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_disposal.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2017). The ITC guidelines for translating and adapting tests (2nd ed.). https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_test_adaptation_2ed.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2018). ITC guidelines for the large-scale assessment of linguistically and culturally diverse populations. https://www.intestcom.org/files/guideline_diverse_populations.pdf
  • International Test Commission. (2020). New guidelines on technology-based assessments, in collaboration with the Association of Test Publishers (ATP). https://www.intestcom.org/page/28
  • ISO (2011). Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings (Part 1 and 2). Technical committee: Human Resource Management.
  • ISO (2020). Procedures and methods to assess people in work and organizational settings. Technical committee: Human Resource Management.
  • Mor Dirlik, E. (2014). Ölçek geliştirme konulu doktora tezlerinin test ve ölçek geliştirme standartlarına uygunluğunun incelenmesi. Eğitimde ve Psikolojide Ölçme ve Değerlendirme Dergisi, 5(2), 62-78.
  • Mor Dirlik, E. ve Koç, N. (2017). The analysis of the psychological tests using in educational institutions according to the testing standards. Journal of Measurement and Evaluation in Education and Psychology, 8(4), 453-468.
  • Muñiz, J., and Bartram, D. (2007). Improving international tests and testing. European Psychologist, 12, 206-219.
  • Schultz, D. P., and Schultz, S. E. (2011). A history of modern psychology (10th Ed.). Belmont, US: Wadsworth, Cengage Learning.
  • Urbina, S. (2004). Essentials of psychological testing. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Toplam 30 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Konular Alan Eğitimleri
Bölüm Makaleler
Yazarlar

Ezgi Mor Dirlik 0000-0003-0250-327X

Özge Altıntaş 0000-0001-5779-855X

Seval Kartal 0000-0002-3018-6972

Yayımlanma Tarihi 1 Temmuz 2021
Kabul Tarihi 15 Nisan 2021
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2021 Cilt: 18 Sayı: 39

Kaynak Göster

APA Mor Dirlik, E., Altıntaş, Ö., & Kartal, S. (2021). Uluslararası Test Standartlarının ve Yönergelerinin Sistematik ve Karşılaştırmalı İncelenmesi. OPUS International Journal of Society Researches, 18(39), 804-830. https://doi.org/10.26466/opus.889770