A RESEARCH ON SOLID AND LIQUID CONSUMPTION

Yıl 2024, Cilt: 17 Sayı: 1, 77 - 110, 31.01.2024

Fatma İşler , Hülya Bakırtaş

Öz

In this study, the recent changes in consumption are examined in the context of the sharing economy and how the related concepts are handled in the literature. Solid consumption, which reflects a long-term and property-based consumption style, is handled in the materialist consumption logic, while liquid consumption, which reflects a more temporary and access-based consumption style, is characterized by concepts such as flexibility and adaptability. In this direction, descriptive research was carried out, and 11 academic publications with “solid consumption” and “liquid consumption” in their titles or keywords formed the basis of the study. As a result of the study, it was seen that most of the published studies on solid and liquid consumption were designed as a literature review, and the focus of the studies was the dimensions of solid and liquid consumption in the digitalized world, liquid modernity in the context of sharing economy, and understandings of related concepts in different sectors. There are limited studies on the subject. This situation increases the need for conceptual and empirical studies.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Liquid Consumption, Solid Consumption, Sharing Economy

Katı Ve Akışkan Tüketim Üzerine Bir Araştırma

Öz

Bu çalışmada, son zamanlarda tüketimde meydana gelen değişimler, paylaşım ekonomisi bağlamında irdelenerek, ilgili kavramların literatürde nasıl ele alındığı incelenmektedir. Uzun süreli ve mülkiyete dayalı bir tüketim şeklini yansıtan katı tüketim, materyalist tüketim mantığında ele alınırken, daha geçici ve erişime dayalı bir tüketim şeklini yansıtan akışkan tüketim ise, esneklik ve uyumluluk gibi kavramlarla karakterize edilmektedir. Bu doğrultuda betimsel bir araştırma gerçekleştirilmiş, başlığında veya anahtar kelimelerinde “katı tüketim” ve “akışkan tüketim” geçen 11 akademik çalışma, araştırmanın temelini oluşturmuştur. Yapılan çalışma sonucunda, katı ve akışkan tüketime ilişkin yayınlanmış çalışmaların çoğunun literatür incelemesi şeklinde tasarlandığı, odaklandığı konuların ise dijitalleşen dünyada katı ve akışkan tüketime ilişkin boyutlar, paylaşım ekonomisi bağlamında akışkan modernite, farklı sektörlerde ilgili kavramlara ilişkin anlayışlar şeklinde olduğu görülmüştür. Konuya ilişkin sınırlı çalışma vardır. Bu durum, kavramsal ve ampirik çalışmalara olan ihtiyacı arttırmaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Akışkan Tüketim, Katı Tüketim, Paylaşım Ekonomisi, Liquid Consumption, Solid Consumption, Sharing Economy

Kaynakça

• Akan, Y. ve Tepeler, M. İ. (2022). Sürdürülebilirlik ve güven ekseninde paylaşım ekonomisi. Sosyoekonomi, 30(53), 447-464.
• Akdağ, U. Ö. A., & İş, Ö. Ü. E. Öğretmenlerin sosyal medya kullanım deneyimlerinin incelenmesi. Akademik Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 11(143), 209-219.
• Algesheimer, R.A., Dholakia, U.M. ve Herrmann, A. (2005). The social influence of brand community: Evidence from European car clubs. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 19-34.
• Allayarova, N., Kadirov, D., Krisjanous, J., & Johnstone, M. L. (2023). Liquid consumption and Islam: The Continual Drift Adjustment (CDA) framework. Journal of Islamic Marketing, https://doi.org/10.1108/JIMA-05-2022-0138.
• Alonso-Almeida, M., Perramon, J. ve Bagur-Femenias, L. (2020). Shedding light on sharing economy and new materialist consumption: An empirical approach. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 52(3), 1-9.
• Apte, U. M. ve Davis, M. M. (2019). Sharing economy services: Business model generation. California Management Review, 61(2), 104-131.
• Arnould, E. J. ve Thompson, C. J. (2005). Consumer culture theory (CCT): Twenty years of research. Journal of Consumer Research, 31(4), 868-882.
• Aspara, J. ve Wittkowski, K. (2019). Sharing-dominant logic? Quantifying the association between consumer intelligence and choice of social access modes. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(2), 201-222.
• Atanasova, A., Eckhardt, G. M., & Husemann, K. C. (2023). Liquid consumer security. Journal of Consumer Research, https://doi.org/10.1093/jcr/ucad047.
• Bardhi, F. ve Eckhardt, G. M. (2012). Access-based consumption: The case of car sharing. Journal of Consumer Research, 39(4), 881-898.
• Bardhi, F. ve Eckhardt, G. M. (2017). Liquid consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 582-597.
• Bauman, Z. (2000). Liquid Modernity, Cambridge, UK: Polity Press.
• Bauman, Z. (2016). Liquid modernity revisited. In Die Zwischengesellschaft (pp. 11-22). Nomos Verlagsgesellschaft mbH & Co. KG.
• Belk, R. (2007). Why not share rather than own?. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 611(1), 126-140.
• Belk, R. (2014). You are what you can access: Sharing and collaborative consumption online. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1595-1600.
• Beretta, E., Miniero, G. ve Ricotta, F. (2021). Consumers’ journey between liquid and solid consumption. Sustainability, 13(24), 2-20.
• Berry, L. ve Maricle, K. E. (1973). Consumption without ownership: Marketing opportunity for today and tomorrow. MSU Business Topics, 21(1), 33-41.
• Binkley, S. (2008), Liquid consumption – Anti-consumerism and the fetishezed de-fetishization of commodities, Sam Binkley, Jo Littler içinde, Cultural Studies and Anti-Consumerism (81-105) London: Routledge.
• Böckmann, M., (2013), The shared economy: It is time to start caring about sharing; value creating factors in the shared economy. (Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi), University of Twente, Faculty of Management and Governance, Holland.
• Catulli, M., Lindley, J. K., Reed, N. B., Green, A., Hyseni, H. ve Kiri, S. (2013). What is mine is not yours: Further insight on what access-based consumption says about consumers. In Consumer Culture Theory. Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
• Chasin, F., von Hoffen, M., Hoffmeister, B. ve Becker, J. (2018). Reasons for failures of sharing economy businesses. MIS Quarterly Executive, 17(3), 185-199.
• Choi, Y. (2020). Sharing economy for sustainable commerce. International Journal of E-Business Research (IJEBR), 16(3), 60-73.
• Cohen, M. ve Sundararajan, A. (2015). Self-regulation and innovation in the peer-to-peer sharing economy. U. Chi. L. Rev. Dialogue, 82(2), 116-133.
• Edbring, E. G., Lehner, M. ve Mont, O. (2016). Exploring consumer attitudes to alternative models of consumption: Motivations and barriers. Journal of Cleaner Production, 123(4), 5-15.
• Erdoğan, İ. (2012). Eğitimde değişim yönetimi. Ankara: Pegem Akademi.
• Fournier, S. ve Lee, L. (2009). Getting brand communities right. Harvard Business Review, 87(4), 105-111.
• Ger, G. ve Belk, R. W. (1996). I'd like to buy the world a coke: Consumptionscapes of the less affluent world. Journal of Consumer Policy, 19(3), 271-304.
• Gül, İ., Dinçer, M. ve Çetin, G. (2018). Paylaşım ekonomisi ve turizme etkileri üzerine bir değerlendirme. Güncel Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 2(1), 7-16.
• Gleim, M. ve Lawson, S. J. (2014). Spanning the gap: An examination of the factors leading to the green gap. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 20(5), 503-514.
• Harmankaya, M. Ö. (2022). Uluslararası öğrenciler için akademik türkçe sosyal bilimler kitabının okunabilirliği. Bayterek Uluslararası Akademik Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(2), 250-264.
• Hartmann, P. ve Apaolaza-Ibáñez, V. (2012). Consumer attitude and purchase intention toward green energy brands: The roles of psychological benefits and environmental concern. Journal of Business Research, 65(9), 1254-1263.
• Hatipler, M. ve Köksalan N. (2021). Dijital dünyada yeni nesil ekonomik bir model: Paylaşım ekonomisini anlamak. El Ruha 8. Uluslararası Sosyal Bilimler Konferansı’nda sunulan bildiri, Erişim adresi: https://www.academia.edu/45164376/Dijital_Dünyada_Yeni_Nesil_Ekonomik_Bir_Model_Paylaşım_Ekonomisini_Anlamak_A_New_Generatıon_Economıc_Model_In_Dıgıtal_World_Understandıng_The_Sharıng_Economy_
• Heinrichs, H. (2013). Sharing economy: A potential new pathway to sustainability. GAIA-Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society, 22(4), 228-231.
• Hokkinen, M. (2023) From loss to involuntary liquidity: Refugees’ relationships to possessions, Consumption Markets & Culture, doi: 10.1080/10253866.2023.2224734.
• Isen, A. M. ve Means, B. (1983). The influence of positive affect on decision-making strategy. Social Cognition, 2(1), 1-14.
• Kalaycı Oflaz, N. (2019). Paylaşım ekonomisi ve Türkiye üzerine bir değerlendirme. International Social Sciences Studies Journal. 5(32). 1692-1705.
• Kervenoael, R. D., Bajde, D. ve Schwob, A. (2018). Liquid retail: Cultural perspectives on marketplace transformation. Consumption Markets & Culture, 21(5), 417-422.
• Kırcova, İ., Pınarbaşı, F. ve Köse, Ş. G. (2019, Mayıs). Liquid consumption on social media: A research on the motivations to continue using Instagram stories. 48. Yıllık EMAC Konferansı’nda sunulmuş bildiri, Hamburg University, Hamburg.
• Kisfürjesi, N., ve Hofmeister-Tóth, Á. (2023, Ocak). A phenomenological study of liquid consumption. International Marketing Trends Conference, Paris.
• Kişi, N., (2018). Paylaşım ekonomisinin ulaşım sektörüne yansımaları: Uber örneği. Uluslararası Yönetim ve Sosyal Araştırmalar Dergisi, 5(10), 57-68.
• Koçak, Y. ve Ulema, Ş. (2020). Paylaşım ekonomisinde yasal sorunlar ve çözüm önerileri: Airbnb örneği. Journal of Tourism and Gastronomy Studies, 8(4), 3021-3038.
• Kozinets, R. V. (2019). Consuming technocultures: An extended JCR curation. Journal of Consumer Research, 46(3), 620-627.
• Lamberton, C. ve Goldsmith, K. (2020). Ownership: A perennial prize or a fading goal? A curation, framework, and agenda for future research. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(2), 301-309.
• Lee, R. L. (2011). Modernity, solidity and agency: Liquidity reconsidered. Sociology, 45(4), 650-664.
• Lee, R. L. (2014). Travel, liquidity and order in Malaysian modernity. Asian Journal of Social Science, 41(6), 580-599.
• Lee, R. L. (2022). Time, space, and power in digital modernity: From liquid to solid control. Time & Society, 31(1), 69-87.
• Lee, Z. W., Chan, T. K., Balaji, M. S. ve Chong, A. Y. L. (2018). Why people participate in the sharing economy: An empirical investigation of Uber. Internet Research, 28(3), 829-850.
• Leung, E., Cito, M. C., Paolacci, G. ve Puntoni, S. (2022). Preference for material products in identity‐based consumption. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 32(4), 672-679.
• Lyaskovskaya, E. ve Khudyakova, T. (2021). Sharing economy: For or against sustainable development. Sustainability, 13(19), 2-20.
• Matzler, K., Veider, V. ve Kathan, W. (2015). Adapting To The Sharing Economy. Cambridge, MA, USA: MIT.
• Mccormick, K. ve Leire, C. (2019). Sharing Cities: Exploring the Emerging Landscape of the Sharing Economy in Cities. Sweden: Lund University.
• Minami, A. L., Ramos, C. ve Bortoluzzo, A. B. (2021). Sharing economy versus collaborative consumption: What drives consumers in the new forms of exchange?. Journal of Business Research, 128(2), 124-137.
• Minina, A., & Holmqvist, J. (2021). Liquid, solid and in-between: Service relationships in global mobility. Consumption Markets & Culture, 24(6), 575-595.
• Morewedge, C. K., Monga, A., Palmatier, R. W., Shu, S. B. ve Small, D. A. (2021). Evolution of consumption: A psychological ownership framework. Journal of Marketing, 85(1), 196-218.
• Muniz, A.M. ve O’Guinn, T.C. (2001). Brand community. Journal of Consumer Research, 27(4),412-432.
• Oe, H. ve Yamaoka, Y. (2022). Liquid consumption of smartphones as devices for enhancing personal experiences: What do consumers expect from their smartphones and what makes them make purchasing decisions?. Journal of Management Information and Decision Sciences, 25(6), 1-15.
• Olkun, S. (1996). Örgütsel değişimin yönetimi örgüt kültürü ve liderlik faktörü. Kuram ve Uygulamada Eğitim Yönetimi, 8(8), 565-574.
• Özbölük, T. (2018). Sahipliğin sıkıcılığından erişimin özgürlüğüne kaçış: Akışkan tüketime ilişkin kavramsal bir çerçeve. Journal of Economy Culture and Society, 3(59), 257-276.
• Öztürk, T. A. (2015). Postmodernizmin zaman algısı: Müzikte nostalji modası. Medeniyet Sanat Dergisi, 1(1), 31-41.
• Peng, L., Wang, J., Huang, Y. ve Wang, X. (2022). Self-construal, moral disengagement, and unethical behavior in peer-to-peer accommodation: the moderating role of perceived consumption liquidity. Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 1(30), 1-20.
• Piscicelli, L., Cooper, T. ve Fisher, T. (2015). The role of values in collaborative consumption: Insights from a product-service system for lending and borrowing in the UK. Journal of Cleaner Production, 4(97), 21-29.
• Ritzer, G. ve Rey, P. J. (2016). From ‘solid’ producers and consumers to ‘liquid’ prosumers. New York: Routledge.
• Rosenberg, L. M., Weijo, H. A., & Kerkelä, I. (2023). Consumer desires and the fluctuating balance between liquid and solid consumption: The case of Finnish clothing libraries. Journal of Consumer Research, https://doi.org/ 10.1093/jcr/ucad021. Shaheen, S. A., Chan, N. D. ve Gaynor, T. (2016). Casual carpooling in the San Francisco Bay Area: Understanding user characteristics, behaviors, and motivations. Transport Policy, 51(2), 165-173.
• Saravade, S., Felix, R. ve Fırat, A. F. (2021). From solidity to liquidity: Macro-level consumption patterns in the sharing economy. Journal of Macromarketing, 41(2), 284-296.
• Šepel’ová, L., Calhoun, J. R. ve Straffhauser-Linzatti, M. (2022). Sustainability drives of the sharing economy. In Developments in Information & Knowledge Management for Business Applications, 71(2), 139-154.
• Seval, K. ve Ünlüönen, K. (2017). Paylaşım ekonomisi kapsamında turizm sisteminin değerlendirilmesi. Gazi Üniversitesi Turizm Fakültesi Dergisi, 10(1), 1-21.
• Slater, D. (1997). Consumer Culture and Modernity. Routledge, New York, USA.
• Stack, K. M., (2020). The “sharing” economy. 09 Aralık 2022 tarihinde http://pressfolios-production.s3.amazonaws.com/uploads/story/story_pdf/329695/3296951556381178.pdf
• Statista., (2022). Sharing Economy Index 2022. 17 Ocak 2023 tarihinde https://www.statista.com/statistics/1259263/most-sharing-friendly-cities-worldwide/
• Statista., (2023). Value of the sharing economy worldwide in 2021 with a forecast for 2027. 19 Ocak 2023 tarihinde https://www.statista.com/statistics/830986/value-of-the-global-sharing-economy/. Steadman, C., Banister, E., & Medway, D. (2023). Consumers’ interplays between solidity and liquidity in life: Insights from tattoo consumption. Journal of Business Research, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2023.113968.
• Sutherland, W. ve Jarrahi, M. H. (2018). The sharing economy and digital platforms: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Information Management, 43(2), 328-341.
• Thebault-Spieker, J., Terveen, L. ve Hecht, B. (2017). Toward a geographic understanding of the sharing economy: Systemic biases in UberX and TaskRabbit. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 24(3), 1-40.
• Tussyadiah, I. P. ve Pesonen, J. (2016). Impacts of peer-to-peer accommodation use on travel patterns. Journal of Travel Research, 55(8), 1022-1040.
• Uğurluer, S., (2019), Tüketı̇m kültürüne etkı̇lerı̇ bakımından deneyı̇msel pazarlama: Alışverı̇ş merkezlerı̇nde özel gün uygulamaları üzerı̇ne bı̇r ı̇nceleme. (Yayınlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi), Ege Üniversitesi, Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü, İzmir.
• Varol, M. Ç. ve Varol, E. (2020). Postmodern tüketime postmodern bir yanıt: Paylaşım ekonomisi. Asya Studies, 4(12), 128-141.
• Yanıklar, C. (2018). Postmodern tüketim, tüketim kültürü ve toplumsal kimliğin inşası. Kocaeli Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(35), 231-252.
• Yaprak, B., & Coşan, B. (2023). Niş pazar bölümü olarak engellilerin GSM operatörü seçim kriterleri üzerine nitel bir araştırma. İnsan ve Toplum Bilimleri Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(1), 257-279.