Sosyal Sermaye ve Türk-Alman Akademik Bağlantıları

Yıl 2019, Cilt: 27 Sayı: 39, 205 - 222, 31.01.2019

Yeşim Kuştepeli , Sedef Akgüngör , Yaprak Gülcan

https://doi.org/10.17233/sosyoekonomi.2019.01.12

Cited By: 1

Öz

Bu çalışma, i) Türkiye koordinatör ve Almanya’nın ortak olduğu, ii) Almanya’nın koordinatör ve Türkiye’nin ortak olduğu, iii) hem Türkiye hem de Almanya’nın ortak olduğu Avrupa Çerçeve Programı (FP5, FP6, FP7) BIT projelerinde ulusötesi akademik ağların sosyal sermaye yönünü araştırmaktadır. Sosyal Ağ Analizi sonuçları, Türkiye ve Almanya’nın işbirliği yaptığı Avrupa’daki FP BIT projelerinde, Türkiye’de sosyal sermayenin arttığını göstermektedir. Ulusüstü ağ bağlantıları, bilgi transferi, yenilik ağları ve sosyal sermaye oluşumu için temel ve fırsatlar sağlamıştır. İleride araştırmalar, Türkiye’deki ve Almanya’daki kurumların toplumsal sermaye yaratımını ayrı ayrı analiz etmeyi planlamaktadır.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Sosyal Sermaye, Akademik Bağlantılar, Sosyal Ağlar, Avrupa Birliği Çerçeve Programları, BİT Sektörü

Social Capital and Turkish-German Academic Linkages

Öz

This study investigates linking social capital aspect and transnationality of academia through networks via European Framework Programme (FP5, FP6, FP7) ICT projects in which i) Turkey is coordinator and Germany is partner, ii) Germany is coordinator and Turkey is partner, iii) both Turkey and Germany are partners. Social Network Analysis results depict that in European FP ICT projects where Turkey and Germany collaborated, social capital in Turkey increased. Transnational network linkages provided basis and opportunities for knowledge transfer, innovation networks, and formation of social capital. Further research will analyze social capital creation of the institutions in Turkey and Germany individually.

Anahtar Kelimeler

European Framework Programmes, Social Capital, Academic Linkages, Social Networks, ICT Sector

Kaynakça

• Avnimelech, G. and Teubal, M. (2008) “From Direct Support of Business Sector R&D/Innovation To Targeting Venture Capital/Private Equity: A Catching-Up Innovation And Technology Policy Life Cycle Perspective”, Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 17(1-2):153-172.
• Annen, K, (2003), “Social capital, inclusive networks, and economic performance”, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization 50(4): 449-463.
• Bilecen, B., Çatır G. and Orhon, A. (2015), “Turkish-German Transnational social Space: Stitching Across borders”, Population, Space and Place 21(3): 244-256.
• Coe, N. M. and Bunnell, T. G. (2003), “Spatializing’knowledge communities: towards a conceptualization of transnational innovation networks”, Global Networks 4: 437-456.
• Cooke, P. (1996), “The New Wave of Regional Innovation Networks: Analysis, Characteristics and Strategy” Small Business Economics 8:159-171.
• Dahal, G. R. and Adhikari, K. P. (2008), “Bridging, Linking, and Bonding Social Capital in Collective Action”, Working Paper, CGIAR Systemwide Program on Collective Action and Property Rights (CAPRi) Working Paper No: 79, May.
• Dhanaraj, C. and Parkhe, A. (2006) “Orchestrating innovation networks”, Academy of Management Review, 31(3): 659-669.
• Frenken, K. (2000), “A complexity approach to innovation networks”, Research Policy 29:257-272.
• Fukuyama, F. (1995), “Social capital and the global economy”, Foreign Affairs 74(5):89-103.
• Glaeser, E. L., Laibson, D. and Sacerdote, B. (2002), “An economic approach to social capital”, The Economic Journal 112(483): 437-458.
• Gülcan, Y. and Aldemir, C. (2017), “Analysis of historical roots and context of Turkish–German academic and scientific-innovative networks”, in International Innovation Networks and Knowledge Migration:The German–Turkish nexus (ed. A. Pyka, Y. Kustepeli, D. Hartmann), New York, USA, pp.303-17.
• Güler, H, and Kara, O. (2011), “Enhancing Knowledge Spillovers Through International R&D Networking: The Case of Turkey’s Participation in the 6th EU Framework Programme”, DRUID 2011, Innovation, Strategy, and Structure -Organizations, Institutions, Systems and Regions, Denmark.
• Heller-Schuh, B., Barber, M., Henriques, L., Paier, M., Pontikakis, D., Scherngell, T., Veltri, G. A., Weber, M. (2011), “Analysis of Networks in European Framework Programmes (1984-2006)”, EUR 24759 EN Joint Research Centre Institute for Prospective Technological Studies.
• Henry, L., Mohan, G. and Yanacopulos, H. (2004), “Networks as transnational agents of development”, Third World Quarterly 25(5): 839-855.
• Icduygu, A. (2012), “50 Years After the Labour Recruitment Agreement with Germany: The Consequences of Emigration for Turkey”, Perceptions 17(2): 11-36.
• Jacobs, J. (1965), The Death and Life of Great American Cities, London: Penguin Books.
• Jöns, H. (2007), “Transnational mobility and the spaces of knowledge production: a comparison of global patterns, motivations and collaborations in different academic fields”, Social Geography 2: 97-114.
• Knack, S. and Keefer, P. (1997), “Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation”, The Quarterly journal of economics, 112(4): 1251-1288.
• Kustepeli, Y., Balkır, C., Akgungor, S., Gulcan , Y., Beyzatlar, M. A. and Gunduz, S. (2013), “Turkish–German economic relations via foreign direct investment and patents”, Journal of Entrepreneurship and Innovation Management 1(2): 23–50.
• Lin, N. (1999), “Building a network theory of social capital”, Connections, 22(1): 28-51.
• Mones, R. A., Bautista, R. A. and Rola, M. R. (2015), “Promoting lifelong learning: what marketers can learn from social capital theory” In Third International Conference on Asian Studies (ed. T Endo), Niigata, Japan, 20-21 June 2015, pp. 124-130. Niigata: International Center for Research and Development.
• Poortinga, W. (2012), “Community resilience and health: The role of bonding, bridging, and linking aspects of social capital”, Health and Place 18(2): 286–295.
• Projects and Results (2017) http://cordis.europa.eu/projects/home_en.html, 25.08.2017.
• Putnam, R. D, (1993), “The prosperous community”, The American prospect 4(13): 35-42.
• Pyka, A., Kustepeli, Y., Balkır, C and D. Hartmann (2017), “Introduction”, in International Innovation Networks and Knowledge Migration:The German–Turkish nexus (ed. A. Pyka, Y. Kustepeli, D. Hartmann), New York, USA, pp.1-12.
• Pyka A, Scharnhorst A. Innovation Networks: New Approaches in Modelling and Analyzing.Berlin:Springer-Verlag; 2009,
• Pyka, A. and Buchmann, T. (2011) Innovation networks. In J. Krafft and M. Dietrich (eds), Handbook on the Theory of the Firm, 466–483. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
• Routledge, B. R. and Von Amsberg, J. (2003), “Social capital and growth”, Journal of Monetary Economics 50(1): 167-193.
• Sabatini, F. (2009), “Social capital as social networks: A new framework for measurement and an empirical analysis of its determinants and consequences”, The Journal of Socio-Economics 38(3): 429-442.
• TGIN, "Knowledge Transfer in Turkish-German Innovation Networks in the Context of European Integration", IntenC Programme Project funded by TUBİTAK, August 2011-August 2014.
• Tödtling, F. (1999) “Innovation Networks, Collective Learning, and Industrial Policy in Regions of Europe”, European Planning Studies, 7 (6): 693-97.
• Wang, C. T. L. and Hosoki, R. I. (2016), “From Global to Local Transnational Linkages, Global Influences, and Taiwan’s Environmental NGOs”, Sociological Perspectives 59(3): 561–58
• Woolcock, M. (1998), “Social capital and economic development: Toward a theoretical synthesis and policy framework”, Theory and Society 27(2): 151-208.
• Zander, I. (1999), “How do you mean ‘global’? An empirical investigation of innovation networks in the multinational corporation”, Research Policy 28:195–213.