Developing An Achievement Test For Primary School English Course: Validity And Reliability Study

Year 2023, Volume: 5 Issue: 2, 778 - 788, 28.12.2023

Işıl Akçay , Nezih Önal

https://doi.org/10.51535/tell.1341862

Abstract

The objective of this research was to develop a multiple-choice achievement test for the 4th-grade English lesson unit called "My Day." The test's administration took place in the autumn term of the 2022-2023 academic year and involved 621 fifth-grade students from the central district of Niğde province. Out of these students, 209 participated in the pilot phase, while the remaining 412 students were involved in the actual application of the test. The test items were meticulously analyzed using the Test Analysis Program (TAP). Based on the results of the item discrimination analysis, two items were deemed less effective and, therefore, excluded from the final version of the test. Ultimately, the test consisted of 25 carefully selected items to evaluate the student's understanding of the "My Day" unit. To assess the internal reliability of the test, the researchers calculated the KR-20 value which turned out to be 0.888. This value demonstrated that the test exhibited a satisfactory level of consistency and reliability in measuring the intended learning outcomes. Overall, the rigorous development process and statistical analysis provide confidence in the validity and accuracy of the achievement test. Several recommendations are made in order to increase the test's usefulness and efficacy. The researcher could conduct a follow-up study to evaluate the long-term impact of the achievement test on students' language learning progress. Additionally, they may explore adapting the test for use in various regions and cultures to assess its cross-cultural validity, aiming to further improve its effectiveness and applicability.

Keywords

Achievement test development, English language teaching, Validity, Reliability, Item analysis.

References

• Alderson, C., Clapham, C., & Wall, D. (2002). Language test construction and evaluation (9th ed.). Cambridge University Press.
• Andrade, H. L., & Brookhart, S. M. (2020). Classroom assessment as the co-regulation of learning. Assessment In Education: Principles, Policy & Practice, 27(4), 350-372. https://doi.org/10.1080/0969594X.2019.1571992
• Baysal, A. E., & Ocak, G. (2019). An achievement test on “studying abroad” and “my environment” units: the study of validity and reliability. International Journal of Social Science Research, 8(1), 1-19. https://dergipark.org.tr/en/pub/ijssresearch/issue/46587/402223
• Borghans, L., Golsteyn, B. H., Heckman, J. J., & Humphries, J. E. (2016). What grades and achievement tests measure? Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 113(47). https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1601135113
• Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). Sosyal bilimler için veri analizi el kitabı. Pegem Yayıncılık.
• Fraenkel, J. R., & Wallen, N. E. (2006). How to design and evaluate research in education (6th ed.). McGraw-Hill.
• Gursoy, E., Korkmaz, S. C., & Damar, E. A. (2017). English language teaching within the new educational policy of Turkey: Views of Stakeholders. International Education Studies, 10(4), 18-30. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v10n4p18
• Huitt, W. (2011). Bloom et al.'s taxonomy of the cognitive domain. Educational Psychology Interactive, 22, 1-4. http://www.edpsycinteractive.org/topics/cognition/bloom.pdf
• Ilyosovna, N. A. (2020). The importance of English language. International Journal on Orange Technologies, 2(1),22-24. https://researchparks.innovativeacademicjournals.com/index.php/IJOT/article/view/4730
• İncirci, A., & Parmaksız, R.Ş. (2016). Development of achievement test related to English class “simple past tense achievement test”. International Journal of Language Academy, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.18033/ijla.408
• Karip, E. (2012). Ölçme ve değerlendirme. Pegem A Yayıncılık.
• Kılıç, S. (2016). Cronbach's alpha reliability coefficient. Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, 6(1),47 https://doi.org/10.5455/jmood.20160307122823
• Kim, S., Raza, M., & Seidman, E. (2019). Improving 21st-century teaching skills: The key to effective 21st-century learners. Research in Comparative and International Education, 14(1), 99-117. https://doi.org/10.1177/1745499919829214
• Kornbrot, D. (2014). Point biserial correlation. Wiley StatsRef: Statistics Reference Online. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118445112.stat06227
• Krasnıqı, S., & Muhaxherı, N. (2019). Issues and benefits of the literature inclusion into English language teaching. Journal of International Social Research, 12(68). http://dx.doi.org/10.17719/jisr.2019.3823
• Meidasari, V. E. (2015). The assessment and evaluation in teaching English as a foreign language. Indonesian EFL Journal, 1(2), 224-231. https://doi.org/10.25134/ieflj.v1i2.629
• Mohamad, M. M., Sulaiman, N. L., Sern, L. C., & Salleh, K. M. (2015). Measuring the validity and reliability of research instruments. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 204, 164-171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2015.08.129
• Özüdoğru, F., & Adıgüzel, O. C. (2015). Development of a listening and speaking achievement test for primary school 2nd grade English course. Pegem Education and Training Journal, 5(4), 375-396. http://dx.doi.org/10.14527/pegegog.2015.021.
• Paker, T. (2018). İngilizce öğretiminde ölçme ve değerlendirme. E. Üstünel & Ş. Kömür (eds.), Kuramdan uygulamaya sınıf öğretmenliği seti: ilkokulda yabancı dil öğretimi, (p145-153).Eğiten Kitap.
• Saricoban, G. (2012). Foreign language education policies in Turkey. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 46, 2643-2648. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.05.539
• Sönmez, G., & Köksal, O. (2022). A critical overview of English language education policy in Turkey. Shanlax International Journal of Education, 11(1), 1-9. https://doi.org/10.34293/ education.v11i1.5721
• Tabachnick, B. G., Fidell, L. S., & Ullman, J. B. (2007). Using multivariate statistics.(Vol. 5). Pearson.
• Tekin, H. (2000). Eğitimde ölçme ve değerlendirme. Yargı Yayınları.
• Usta, M. E., & Karakuş, M. (2016). The development of the scale of pedagogical literacy. Kastamonu Education Journal, 24 (1), 133-14. https://dergipark.org.tr/tr/pub/kefdergi/issue/22606/241622