Araştırma Makalesi
BibTex RIS Kaynak Göster
Yıl 2023, , 1 - 26, 02.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434

Öz

Kaynakça

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300.
  • Agyei, D. D., & Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 155-171.
  • Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1602-1608). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  • Andyani, H., Setyosari, P., Wiyono, B. B., & Djatmika, E. T. (2020). Does technological pedagogical content knowledge impact the use of ICT in pedagogy? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 126-139.
  • Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd Ed, pp. 11-32). Routledge.
  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 71-88.
  • Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Beck, J. A., & Wynn, H. C. (1998). Technology in teacher education: Progress along the continuum. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 424 212).
  • Birisci, S., & Kul, E. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93.
  • Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 697-724.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayınları.

THE PREDICTIVITY OF TEACHER EFFICACY BELIEFS ON TECHNOLOGICAL PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE: A HIERARCHIC MULTIPLE REGRESSION ANALYSIS

Yıl 2023, , 1 - 26, 02.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434

Öz

Teacher self-efficacy refers to the affective nature of teachers' decisions to participate in technology integration practices, as well as technological pedagogical content knowledge emphasizes the cognitive nature of teachers' decisions to participate in technology integration practices. Since the knowledge and beliefs held by the teacher or preservice teachers are intertwined and inextricably linked, both are considered essential components of teacher knowledge. This study examined the nature of the complex interaction between pre-service teachers' self-efficacy beliefs and their technological pedagogical content knowledge. The relational screening model, one of the quantitative research designs, was used in the research. The target population of the research was the preservice teachers studying in Central Anatolia, and the sample consisted of 205 pre-service teachers selected randomly from the target population. Technological Pedagogical Content Knowledge Self-Assessment Scale (TPACK-SAS) and The Teachers' Sense of Efficacy Scale (TSES) were used to obtain the data. Frequency, percentage, mode, median, arithmetic mean, and standard deviation were calculated, and hierarchical multiple regression was performed to analyze data. According to the results of the research, pre-service teachers' TPACK, TCK, TPK, and PCK components have average scores at the agree level, while their teacher-efficacy (efficacy in student participation, in teaching strategies, and in classroom management) beliefs have average scores at a slightly sufficient level. The predictive effects of teacher-efficacy sub-dimensions on the TPACK central component were examined as a block, and there was a positive medium relationship between efficacy beliefs in student participation and the central component TPACK. 12% of the variance in TPACK was explained by teacher efficacy (efficacy in student participation). Teacher-efficacy beliefs subdomains and derived knowledge domains (TCK, TPK, and PCK) explained 55.6% of the variance in the central component, TPACK. Similar studies can be performed in different contexts, and different variables (beliefs, attitudes) can be included in the process, and the factors affecting the intention of teachers or teacher candidates to use technology can be examined.

Kaynakça

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300.
  • Agyei, D. D., & Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 155-171.
  • Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1602-1608). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  • Andyani, H., Setyosari, P., Wiyono, B. B., & Djatmika, E. T. (2020). Does technological pedagogical content knowledge impact the use of ICT in pedagogy? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 126-139.
  • Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd Ed, pp. 11-32). Routledge.
  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 71-88.
  • Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Beck, J. A., & Wynn, H. C. (1998). Technology in teacher education: Progress along the continuum. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 424 212).
  • Birisci, S., & Kul, E. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93.
  • Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 697-724.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayınları.

ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ

Yıl 2023, , 1 - 26, 02.06.2023
https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434

Öz

Öğretmen öz yeterliği, öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyonu uygulamalarına katılma kararlarının duygusal doğasını ele alan bir yapı iken, teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi, öğretmenlerin teknoloji entegrasyonu uygulamalarına katılma kararlarının bilişsel doğasını ele alır. Öğretmen ya da öğretmen adaylarının sahip olduğu bilgi ve inançlar iç içe geçmiş ve ayrılmaz bir şekilde bağlantılı olduğundan, her ikisi de öğretmen bilgisinin temel unsurları olarak kabul edilir. Bu çerçevede öğretmen adaylarının öz yeterlik inançları ile teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgileri arasındaki karmaşık etkileşimin doğası incelenmiştir. Araştırmada nicel araştırma desenlerinden ilişkisel tarama modeli kullanılmıştır. Araştırma hedef evreni Orta Anadolu’da öğrenim görmekte olan öğretmen adaylarından, örneklemi ise hedef evren içerisinden basit seçkisiz olarak seçilen 205 öğretmen adayından oluşmaktadır. Verilerin elde edilmesinde teknolojik pedagojik alan bilgisi öz değerlendirme ve öğretmenlik mesleğine yönelik öz yeterlilik ölçekleri kullanılmıştır. Verilerin analizinde frekans, yüzde, mod, medyan, aritmetik ortalama, standart sapma ve hiyerarşik çoklu regresyon kullanılmıştır. Araştırma sonuçlarına göre öğretmen adaylarının TPAB, TAB, TPB ve PAB bileşenlerinin katılıyorum düzeyinde, öğretmen özyeterlik (öğrenci katılımında yeterlik, öğretim stratejilerinde yeterlik ve sınıf yönetiminde yeterlik) inançlarının ise biraz yeterli düzeyinde ortalama skorlara sahiptir. Öğretmen öz yeterlik alt boyutları blok olarak TPAB merkez bileşeni üzerinde yordama etkisi incelenmiş ve öğrenci katılımında yeterlik inançları ile TPAB bilgi alanı arasında pozitif orta büyüklükte bir ilişki vardır. TPAB’ın %12’sinin öğretmen öz yeterliği (öğrenci katılımda yeterlik) tarafından açıklanmıştır. Öğretmen öz yeterlik inançları (ÖKY, ÖSY ve SYY) ile türetilmiş TPAB bilgi alanları (TAB, TPB ve PAB) blok halinde TPAB değişkeninin %55,6’sı açıklanmaktadır. Benzer çalışmalar farklı bağlamlarda farklı değişkenler (inanç, tutumları) sürece dahil edilerek öğretmen ya da öğretmen adaylarının teknolojiyi kullanma niyetini etkileyen faktörler incelenebilir.

Kaynakça

  • Abbitt, J. T. (2011). Measuring technological pedagogical content knowledge in preservice teacher education: A review of current methods and instruments. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(4), 281-300.
  • Agyei, D. D., & Keengwe, J. (2014). Using technology pedagogical content knowledge development to enhance learning outcomes. Education and Information Technologies, 19(1), 155-171.
  • Albion, P. (1999). Self-efficacy beliefs as an indicator of teachers’ preparedness for teaching with technology. In J. Price, J. Willis, D. Willis, M. Jost, & S. Boger-Mehall (Eds.), Proceedings of SITE 1999-Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference (pp. 1602-1608). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education.
  • Andyani, H., Setyosari, P., Wiyono, B. B., & Djatmika, E. T. (2020). Does technological pedagogical content knowledge impact the use of ICT in pedagogy? International Journal of Emerging Technologies in Learning, 15(3), 126-139.
  • Angeli, C., Valanides, N., & Christodoulou, A. (2016). Theoretical considerations of technological pedagogical content knowledge. In M. C. Herring, M. J. Koehler, & P. Mishra (Eds.), Handbook of technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK) for educators (2nd Ed, pp. 11-32). Routledge.
  • Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 9(1), 71-88.
  • Ashton, P. (1984). Teacher efficacy: A motivational paradigm for effective teacher education. Journal of Teacher Education, 35(5), 28-32.
  • Ashton, P. T., & Webb, R. B. (1986). Making a difference: Teachers’ sense of efficacy and student achievement. New York: Longman.
  • Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavior change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191-215.
  • Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action: a social cognitive theory. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall, Inc.
  • Bandura, A. (1997). Self-Efficacy: The exercise of control. New York: W. H. Freeman and Company.
  • Beck, J. A., & Wynn, H. C. (1998). Technology in teacher education: Progress along the continuum. (ERIC Document Reproduction No. ED 424 212).
  • Birisci, S., & Kul, E. (2019). Predictors of technology integration self-efficacy beliefs of preservice teachers. Contemporary Educational Technology, 10(1), 75-93.
  • Blonder, R., & Rap, S. (2017). I like Facebook: Exploring Israeli high school chemistry teachers’ TPACK and self-efficacy beliefs. Education and Information Technologies, 22(2), 697-724.
  • Büyüköztürk, Ş., Kılıç-Çakmak, E., Akgün, Ö. E., Karadeniz, Ş., & Demirel, F. (2011). Bilimsel araştırma yöntemleri. Ankara: Pegem-A Yayınları.
Toplam 15 adet kaynakça vardır.

Ayrıntılar

Birincil Dil Türkçe
Bölüm Araştırma Makalesi
Yazarlar

Tansu Gönç 0000-0002-5654-8935

Tezcan Kartal 0000-0001-7609-3555

Talip Kırındı

Erken Görünüm Tarihi 2 Haziran 2023
Yayımlanma Tarihi 2 Haziran 2023
Yayımlandığı Sayı Yıl 2023

Kaynak Göster

APA Gönç, T., Kartal, T., & Kırındı, T. (2023). ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 25(1), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434
AMA Gönç T, Kartal T, Kırındı T. ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ. Trakya University Journal of Social Science. Haziran 2023;25(1):1-26. doi:10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434
Chicago Gönç, Tansu, Tezcan Kartal, ve Talip Kırındı. “ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ”. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25, sy. 1 (Haziran 2023): 1-26. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434.
EndNote Gönç T, Kartal T, Kırındı T (01 Haziran 2023) ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25 1 1–26.
IEEE T. Gönç, T. Kartal, ve T. Kırındı, “ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ”, Trakya University Journal of Social Science, c. 25, sy. 1, ss. 1–26, 2023, doi: 10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434.
ISNAD Gönç, Tansu vd. “ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ”. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi 25/1 (Haziran 2023), 1-26. https://doi.org/10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434.
JAMA Gönç T, Kartal T, Kırındı T. ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ. Trakya University Journal of Social Science. 2023;25:1–26.
MLA Gönç, Tansu vd. “ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ”. Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, c. 25, sy. 1, 2023, ss. 1-26, doi:10.26468/trakyasobed.1229434.
Vancouver Gönç T, Kartal T, Kırındı T. ÖĞRETMEN YETERLİK İNANÇLARININ TEKNOLOJİK PEDAGOJİK ALAN BİLGİLERİNİ YORDAMA GÜCÜ: HİYERARŞİK ÇOKLU REGRESYON ANALİZİ. Trakya University Journal of Social Science. 2023;25(1):1-26.
Resim

Trakya Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 ile lisanslanmıştır.