Do Political Tactics Pay off in Business Life?

Yıl 2023, Cilt: 37 Sayı: 4, 246 - 258, 15.10.2023

Senay Yürür , Filiz Ercan , Hakan Baltacı

Öz

The main purpose of this study is to examine whether employees who resort to political tactics in organizations are able to create a better perception of performance and commitment in the eyes of their supervisors or leaders and to what extent the supervisors’ self-efficacy affects this relationship. To this end, research data were collected through an online survey from a total of 221 participants. During data collection, managers were asked to evaluate their subordinates’ behaviors (in terms of political tactics), performance, and commitment, as well as their own levels of self-efficacy. As a result, it was found that the performance of subordinates attempting to ingratiate themselves with their superiors was not positively evaluated by their supervisors. Furthermore, supervisors with high self-efficacy tended to evaluate these types of subordinates even more negatively. In other words, the differential impact of employees’ political tactics on supervisors’ evaluations and the variations in supervisors’ perceptions of these tactics based on their levels of self-efficacy are seen as valuable contributions to the literature on political tactics.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Employee performance, employee commitment, political tactics, upward influence tactics

Politik Taktikler İş Yaşamında Karşılığını Buluyor Mu?

Öz

Çalışmanın temel amacı, örgütlerde politik taktiklere başvuran çalışanların, amirlerinin/ yöneticilerinin gözünde daha iyi bir performans ve bağlılık algısı yaratıp yaratmadığını ve amirlerin öz yeterliliklerinin bu ilişkiyi ne ölçüde etkilediğini incelemektir. Bu niyetle araştırma verileri çev- rimiçi anket yardımıyla toplam 221 katılımcıdan toplanmıştır. Veriler toplanırken yöneticilerden astlarının davranışlarını (politik taktikler açısından), performanslarını ve bağlılıklarını, ayrıca kendi- lerinin öz yeterlik düzeylerini değerlendirmeleri istenmiştir. Verilerin analizi için SPSS 25 programı kullanılmıştır. Sonuç olarak amirlerinin gözüne girmeye çalışan astların performanslarının amirleri tarafından olumlu değerlendirilmediği, öz yeterliliği yüksek olan amirlerin ise bu tür astları daha da olumsuz değerlendirdikleri görülmüştür. Başka bir ifade ile yöneticilerin, çalışanların kullan- dığı politik taktiklerinden, beklenenin ötesinde olumsuz etkilenmeleri ile yöneticilerin bu taktik- leri nasıl algıladıklarının öz yeterlilik düzeylerine göre farklılaşması politik taktikler yazınına değerli katkılar olarak görülmektedir.

Anahtar Kelimeler

Çalışan performansı, çalışan bağlılığı, politik taktikler, üste yönelik etkileme taktikleri

Kaynakça

• Afthanorhan, A., Awang, Z., Abd Majid, N., Foziah, H., Ismail, I., Al Halbusi, H., & Tehseen, S. (2021). Gain more insight from common latent fac- tor in structural equation modeling. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1, 1793, 012030.
• Arıkan, S. (2011). İşyerinde kullanılan politik taktiklere yönelik olası bireysel önceller üzerine bir araştırma. Türk Psikoloji Dergisi, 26(68), 52–71.
• Ayhan, A. G. Ö., & Gürbüz, S. (2014). Algılanan örgütsel politikanın örgütsel vatandaşlık davranışı ile ilişkisinde adaletin rolü. ISGUC The Journal of Industrial Relations and Human Resources, 16(3), 76–93.
• Aypay, A. (2010). Genel öz yeterlik ölçeği’nin (GÖYÖ) Türkçe’ye uyarlama çalışması. İnönü Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 11(2), 113–132.
• Başar, U., & Basım, N. (2016). A cross‐sectional survey on consequences of nurses’ burnout: Moderating role of organizational politics. Journal of Advanced Nursing, 72(8), 1838–1850. [CrossRef]
• Başar, U., & Varoğlu, A. K. (2016). Örgütsel politika algısının ihmalkârlık üzerindeki etkisinde işten ayrılma niyetinin aracı rolü. Yönetim ve Ekonomi Dergisi, 23(3), 751–765.
• Bernardin, H. J., & Villanova, P. (2005). Research streams in rater self-effi- cacy. Group and Organization Management, 30(1), 61–88. [CrossRef]
• Betoret, F. D. (2006). Stressors, self‐efficacy, coping resources, and burn- out among secondary school teachers in Spain. Educational Psy- chology, 26(4), 519–539. [CrossRef]
• Bingöl, D., Gürbüz, S., & Habiboğlu, O. S. (2015). Kimler terfi eder: İyi aktör- ler, iyi askerler, çok çalışanlar, yüksek bağlılık gösterenler ya da üstüne benzeyenler mi? 23. Ulusal Yönetim ve Organizasyon Kongresi Bildiriler Kitabı, Mayıs 14–16 (ss. 428–435). Bodrum, Muğla.
• Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.
• Bolino, M. C., Varela, J. A., Bande, B., & Turnley, W. H. (2006). The impact of impression‐management tactics on supervisor ratings of organizational citizenship behavior. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 281–297. [CrossRef]
• Brouer, R. L., Wallace, A. S., & Harvey, P. (2011). When good resources go bad: The applicability of conservation of resource theory to psycho- logically entitled employees. In The role of individual differences in occupational stress and well being (pp. 109–150). Emerald Group Publishing Limited. [CrossRef]
• Brutus, S., Fletcher, C., & Baldry, C. (2009). The influence of independent self-construal on rater self-efficacy in performance appraisal. Inter- national Journal of Human Resource Management, 20(9), 1999–2011. [CrossRef]
• Bunner, J., Prem, R., & Korunka, C. (2019). How do safety engineers improve their job performance? The roles of influence tactics, expert power, and management support. Employee Relations: The International Journal, 42(2), 381–397.
• Byrne, Z. S. J. (2005). Fairness reduces the negative effects of organiza- tional politics on turnover intentions, citizenship behavior and job performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 20(2), 175–200. [CrossRef]
• Chaturvedi, S., & Srivastava, A. K. (2014). An overview of upward influence tactics. Global Journal of Finance and Management, 6(3), 265–274.
• Clarke, N., Alshenaifi, N., & Garavan, T. (2022). The effects of subordinates’ use of upward influence tactics on their supervisors’ job perfor- mance evaluations in Saudi Arabia: The significance of loyalty. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 33(2), 239–268. [CrossRef]
• Çizel, B., Selçuk, O., & Atabay, E. (2020). Ortak yöntem yanlılığı üzerine sistematik bir yazın taraması. Anatolia: Turizm Araştırmaları Dergisi, 31(1), 7–18. [CrossRef]
• Çöl, G. (2008). Algılanan güçlendirmenin işgören performansı üzerine etkileri. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, 9, 35–46.
• Dhar, R. L. (2009). Living with organizational politics: An exploration of employee’s behavior. International Journal of Management & Innova- tion, 1(1), 37–56.
• Dulebohn, J. H., Murray, B., & Ferris, G. R. (2004). The vicious and virtuous cycles of influence tactic use and performance evaluation outcomes. Organizational Analysis, 12(1), 53–74. [CrossRef]
• Ercan, F. (2019). Algılanan örgütsel politika ve örgütsel adalet ilişkisi (Tez No: 587928). [Yayımlanmamış Yüksek Lisans Tezi, Ege Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü].
• Falbe, C. M., & Yukl, G. (1992). Consequences for managers of using single influence tactics and combinations of tactics. Academy of Manage- ment Journal, 35(3), 638–652. [CrossRef]
• Ferris, G. R., Cook, G. H., & Dulebohn, J. H. (2000). Organizational politics: The nature of the relationship between politics perceptions and political behavior. In Research in the Sociology of Organizations (pp. 89– 130). [CrossRef]
• Foa, E. B., & Foa, U. G. (2012). Resource theory of social exchange. In K. Törnblom & A. Kazemi (Eds.). Handbook of social resource theory (pp. 15–32). Springer. [CrossRef]
• Foa, U. G., & Foa, E. B. (1980). Resource theory: Interpersonal behavior as exchange. In K. J. Gergen, M. S. Greenberg & R. H. Willis (Eds.). Social exchange: Advances in theory and research. Plenum Press.
• Folger, R. G., & Cropanzano, R. (1998). Organizational justice and human resource management (vol. 7). Sage.
• Gliem, J. A., & Gliem, R. R. (2003). Calculating, interpreting, and reporting Cronbach’s alpha reliability coefficient for Likert-type scales. Mid- west research-to-practice Conference in Adult, Continuing, and community education.
• Gouldner, A. W. (1961). The norm of reciprocity. American Sociological Review, 25, 161–179.
• Grimm, P. (2010). Social desirability bias. In J. Sheth & N. Malhotra (Eds.). Wiley international encyclopedia of marketing. John Wiley & Sons.
• Guo, Y., Kang, H., Shao, B., & Halvorsen, B. (2019). Organizational politics as a blindfold: Employee work engagement is negatively related to supervisor-rated work outcomes when organizational politics is high. Personnel Review, 48(3), 784–798. [CrossRef]
• Gürbüz, S. (2019). AMOS ile yapısal eşitlik modellemesi. Seçkin Yayıncılık.
• Harrell‐Cook, G., Ferris, G. R., & Dulebohn, J. H. (1999). Political behaviors as moderators of the perceptions of organizational politics—Work outcomes relationships. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 20(7), 1093–1105. [CrossRef]
• Harris, K. J., Kacmar, K. M., Zivnuska, S., & Shaw, J. D. (2007). The impact of political skill on impression management effectiveness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(1), 278–285. [CrossRef]
• Hayes, A. F., Montoya, A. K., & Rockwood, N. J. (2017). The analysis of mech- anisms and their contingencies: PROCESS versus structural equa- tion modeling. Australasian Marketing Journal, 25(1), 76–81. [CrossRef]
• Higgins, C. A., Judge, T. A., & Ferris, G. R. (2003). Influence tactics and work outcomes: A meta‐analysis. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 24(1), 89–106. [CrossRef]
• Hinkin, T. R., & Schriesheim, C. A. (1990). Relationships between subordi- nate perceptions of supervisor influence tactics and attributed bases of supervisory power. Human Relations, 43(3), 221–237. [CrossRef]
• Hobfoll, S. E. (1989). Conservation of resources: A new attempt at con- ceptualizing stress. American Psychologist, 44(3), 513–524. [CrossRef]
• Hofstede, G. (1980). Culture and organizations. International Studies of Management and Organization, 10(4), 15–41. [CrossRef]
• Hofstetter, C. R., Sallis, J. F., & Hovell, M. F. (1990). Some health dimensions of self-efficacy: Analysis of theoretical specificity. Social Science and Medicine, Part C, 31(9), 1051–1056. [CrossRef]
• İslamoğlu, G., & Börü, D. (2007). Politik davranış boyutları: Bir ölçek geliştirme çalışması. Akdeniz Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimleri Fakültesi Dergisi, 7(14), 135–153.
• Kacmar, K. M., & Baron, R. A. (1999). Organizational politics: The state of the field, links to related processes, and an agenda for future research. In G. R. Ferris (Ed.). Research in human resources management (vol. 17, pp. 1–39). Elsevier Science/JAI Press.
• Kaya, N., Aydin, S., & Ayhan, O. (2016). The effects of organizational politics on perceived organizational justice and intention to leave. American Journal of Industrial and Business Management, 6(3), 249–258. [CrossRef]
• Kipnis, D., & Schmidt, S. M. (1988). Upward-influence styles: Relationship with performance evaluations, salary, and stress. Administrative Sci- ence Quarterly, 33(4), 528–542. [CrossRef]
• Kipnis, D., Schmidt, S. M., & Wilkinson, I. (1980). Intraorganizational influ- ence tactics: Explorations in getting one’s way. Journal of Applied Psychology, 65(4), 440–452. [CrossRef]
• Kirkman, B. L., & Rosen, B. (1999). Beyond self-management: Antecedents and consequences of team empowerment. Academy of Manage- ment Journal, 42(1), 58–74. [CrossRef]
• Krumpal, I. (2013). Determinants of social desirability bias in sensitive surveys: A literature review. Quality and Quantity, 47(4), 2025–2047. [CrossRef]
• Kumar, P., & Ghadially, R. (1989). Organizational politics and its effects on members of organizations. Human Relations, 42(4), 305–314. [CrossRef]
• Lamude, K. G. (1994). Supervisor’s influence tactics for handling manag- er’s resistance. Psychological Reports, 75(1), 371–374. [CrossRef]
• Landells, E. M., & Albrecht, S. L. (2017). The positives and negatives of organizational politics: A qualitative study. Journal of Business and Psychology, 32(1), 41–58. [CrossRef]
• Lange, M., & Kayser, I. (2022). The role of self-efficacy, work-related auton- omy and work-family conflict on employee’s stress level during home-based remote work in Germany. International Journal of Envi- ronmental Research and Public Health, 19(9), 4955. [CrossRef]
• Lee, S., Han, S., Cheong, M., Kim, S. L., & Yun, S. (2017). How do I get my way? A meta-analytic review of research on influence tactics. Leader- ship Quarterly, 28(1), 210–228. [CrossRef]
• Lind, E. A., & Tyler, T. R. (1988). The social psychology of procedural justice. Springer Science & Business Media.
• Madison, D. L., Allen, R. W., Porter, L. W., Renwick, P. A., & Mayes, B. T. (1980). Organizational politics: An exploration of managers’ perceptions. Human Relations, 33(2), 79–100. [CrossRef]
• Mayes, B. T., & Allen, R. W. (1977). Toward a definition of organizational politics. Academy of Management Review, 2(4), 672–678. [CrossRef]
• McFarland, L. A., Ryan, A. M., & Kriska, S. D. (2002) Field study investigation of applicant use of influence tactics in a selection interview. Journal of Psychology, 136(4), 383–398. [CrossRef]
• Meera, K. P., & Jumana, M. K. (2015). Self-efficacy and academic perfor- mance in English. Research in Pedagogy, 5(2), 25–30. [CrossRef]
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1984). Testing the side bet Theroy of organiza- tional commitment: Some methodological considerations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 69(3), 372–378. [CrossRef]
• Meyer, J. P., & Allen, N. J. (1997). Commitment in the workplace: Theory, research, and application. Sage.
• Miller, B. K., Rutherford, M. A., & Kolodinsky, R. W. (2008). Perceptions of organizational politics: A meta-analysis of outcomes. Journal of Business and Psychology, 22(3), 209–222. [CrossRef]
• Mitchell, M. S., & Ambrose, M. L. (2007). Abusive supervision and work- place deviance and the moderating effects of negative reciprocity beliefs. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92(4), 1159–1168. [CrossRef]
• Orpen, C. (1996). The effects of ingratiation and self-promotion tactics on employee career success. Social Behavior and Personality: An Inter- national Journal, 24(3), 213–214. [CrossRef]
• Pelit, E., Boylu, Y., & Güçer, E. (2007). Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi akademisyenlerinin örgütsel bağlılık düzeyleri üzer- ine bir araştırma. Gazi Üniversitesi Ticaret ve Turizm Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 1, 86–114.
• Pfeffer, J. (1992). Managing with power: Politics and influence in organiza- tions. Harvard Business Press.
• Pfeffer, J., Salancik, G. R., & Leblebici, H. (1976). The effect of uncertainty on the use of social influence in organizational decision making. Administrative Science Quarterly, 21(2), 227–245. [CrossRef]
• Pugh, S. D., Groth, M., & Hennig-Thurau, T. (2011). Willing and able to fake emotions: A closer examination of the link between emotional dis- sonance and employee well-being. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96(2), 377–390. [CrossRef]
• Rao, A., Schmidt, S. M., & Murray, L. H. (1995). Upward impression manage- ment: Goals, influence strategies, and consequences. Human Rela- tions, 48(2), 147–167. [CrossRef]
• Rosenblatt, Z., Rogers, K. S., & Nord, W. R. (1993). Toward a political frame- work for flexible management of decline. Organization Science, 4(1), 76–91. [CrossRef]
• Royle, M. T., Hall, A. T., Hochwarter, W. A., Perrewé, P. L., & Ferris, G. R. (2005). The interactıve effects of accountabılıty and job self-Effıcacy on organızatıonal cıtızenshıp behavıor and polıtıcal behavıor. Organizational Analysis, 13(1), 15517470.
• Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1995). Generalized self-efficacy scale. In J. Weinman, S. Wright, & M. Johnston (Eds), Measures in health psy- chology: A user’s portfolio. Causal and control beliefs, (vol. 35, p. 37), United Kingdom.
• Sigler, T. H., & Pearson, C. M. (2000). Creating an empowering culture: Examining the relationship between organizational culture and per- ceptions of empowerment. Journal of Quality Management, 5(1), 27–52. [CrossRef]
• Syabarrudin, A., Eliyana, A., & Naimah, J. (2020). Does employees’ self- efficacy drive their organizational commitment? Systematic Reviews in Pharmacy, 11(4), 135–141.
• Thacker, R. A., & Wayne, S. J. (1995). An examination of the relationship between upward influence tactics and assessments of promotability. Journal of Management, 21(4), 739–756. [CrossRef]
• Ulus, A. B., & Kanbur, A. (2020). Güç mesafesi ve örgütsel adaletin politik davranışlar üzerindeki etkisi. İşletme Araştırmaları Dergisi, 12(4), 3451–3466. Van Knippenberg, B., & Steensma, H. (2003). Future interaction expecta- tion and the use of soft and hard influence tactics. Applied Psychol- ogy, 52(1), 55–67. [CrossRef]
• Vecchione, M., & Caprara, G. V. (2009). Personality determinants of politi- cal participation: The contribution of traits and self-efficacy beliefs. Personality and Individual Differences, C, 46(4), 487–492.
• Vigoda, E. (2000). Organizational politics, job attitudes, and work out- comes: Exploration and implications for the public sector. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 57(3), 326–347. [CrossRef]
• Vigoda, E. (2001). Reactions to organizational politics: A cross-cultural examination in Israel and Britain. Human Relations, 54(11), 1483–1518. [CrossRef]
• Vigoda, E. (2002). Stress-related aftermaths to workplace politics: The relationships among politics, job distress, and aggressive behavior in organizations. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 23, 1–18.
• Wang, Y., & Yang, B. (2017). Power, interactional justice, and hard influence tactics: Evidence from China and USA. Social Behavior and Personal- ity: An International Journal, C, 45(1), 51–68.
• Wayne, S. J., & Ferris, G. R. (1990). Influence tactics, affect, and exchange qual- ity in supervisor-subordinate interactions: A laboratory experiment and field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(5), 487–499. [CrossRef]
• Wong, C. Y., Boon-Itt, S., & Wong, C. W. Y. (2011). The contingency effects of environmental uncertainty on the relationship between supply chain integration and operational performance. Journal of Opera- tions Management, 29(6), 604–615. [CrossRef]
• Wood, R. E., & Marshall, V. (2008). Accuracy and effectiveness in appraisal outcomes: The influence of self‐efficacy, personal factors and organi- sational variables. Human Resource Management Journal, 18(3), 295–313. [CrossRef]
• Yeşilay, A., Schwarzer, R., & Jerusalem, M. (1996). Genelleştirilmiş özyetki beklentisi ölçeği. http://userpage. fu-berlin.de/~health/turk.htm.
• Yukl, G., & Falbe, C. M. (1990). Influence tactics in upward, downward, and lateral influence attempts. Journal of Applied Psychology, 75(2), 132–140. [CrossRef]
• Yukl, G., & Tracey, J. B. (1992). Consequences of influence tactics used with subordinates, peers, and the boss. Journal of Applied Psychology, 77(4), 525–535. [CrossRef]
• Yüksel, M., & Bolat, T. (2016). Örgütsel politika, Hofstede’in örgüt kültürü boyutları, iş tutumları ve iş çıktıları ilişkisi. Eskişehir Osmangazi Üni- versitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Dergisi, 11(3), 173–204. [CrossRef]
• Yürür, S. (2019). Sosyal mübadele kuramı. S. Yürür (Ed.), Örgütsel davranış kuramları. Beta Yayınevi. 245–280.
• Zivnuska, S., Kacmar, K. M., Witt, L. A., Carlson, D. S., & Bratton, V. K. (2004). Interactive effects of impression management and organizational politics on job performance. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 25(5), 627–640. [CrossRef]